Attenuation Coefficient Estimation for PET/MRI With Bayesian Deep Learning pseudo-CT and Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Activity and Attenuation
Authors:
Andrew P. Leynes,
Sangtae P. Ahn,
Kristen A. Wangerin,
Sandeep S. Kaushik,
Florian Wiesinger,
Thomas A. Hope,
Peder E. Z. Larson
Abstract:
A major remaining challenge for magnetic resonance-based attenuation correction methods (MRAC) is their susceptibility to sources of MRI artifacts (e.g. implants, motion) and uncertainties due to the limitations of MRI contrast (e.g. accurate bone delineation and density, and separation of air/bone). We propose using a Bayesian deep convolutional neural network that, in addition to generating an i…
▽ More
A major remaining challenge for magnetic resonance-based attenuation correction methods (MRAC) is their susceptibility to sources of MRI artifacts (e.g. implants, motion) and uncertainties due to the limitations of MRI contrast (e.g. accurate bone delineation and density, and separation of air/bone). We propose using a Bayesian deep convolutional neural network that, in addition to generating an initial pseudo-CT from MR data, also produces uncertainty estimates of the pseudo-CT to quantify the limitations of the MR data. These outputs are combined with MLAA reconstruction that uses the PET emission data to improve the attenuation maps. With the proposed approach (UpCT-MLAA), we demonstrate accurate estimation of PET uptake in pelvic lesions and show recovery of metal implants. In patients without implants, UpCT-MLAA had acceptable but slightly higher RMSE than Zero-echo-time and Dixon Deep pseudo-CT when compared to CTAC. In patients with metal implants, MLAA recovered the metal implant; however, anatomy outside the implant region was obscured by noise and crosstalk artifacts. Attenuation coefficients from the pseudo-CT from Dixon MRI were accurate in normal anatomy; however, the metal implant region was estimated to have attenuation coefficients of air. UpCT-MLAA estimated attenuation coefficients of metal implants alongside accurate anatomic depiction outside of implant regions.
△ Less
Submitted 13 October, 2021; v1 submitted 10 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
