Showing 51–79 of 79 results for author: Kastner, R

Antimatter in the Direct-Action Theory of Fields

Authors: R. E. Kastner

Abstract: One of Feynman's greatest contributions to physics was the interpretation of negative energies as antimatter in quantum field theory. A key component of this interpretation is the Feynman propagator, which seeks to describe the behavior of antimatter at the virtual particle level. Ironically, it turns out that one can dispense with the Feynman propagator in a direct-action theory of fields, while… ▽ More One of Feynman's greatest contributions to physics was the interpretation of negative energies as antimatter in quantum field theory. A key component of this interpretation is the Feynman propagator, which seeks to describe the behavior of antimatter at the virtual particle level. Ironically, it turns out that one can dispense with the Feynman propagator in a direct-action theory of fields, while still retaining the interpretation of negative energy solutions as antiparticles. △ Less

Submitted 20 September, 2015; originally announced September 2015.

Comments: Forthcoming in a special issue of Quanta Magazine honoring Richard P. Feynman; ed. Eliahu Cohen

Journal ref: Quanta (2016) 5, pp. 12-8

Haag's Theorem as a Reason to Reconsider Direct-Action Theories

Authors: R. E. Kastner

Abstract: It is argued that the severe consequences of Haag's inconsistency theorem for relativistic quantum field theories can be successfully evaded in the direct-action approach. Some recent favorable comments of John Wheeler, often mistakenly presumed to have abandoned his own (and Feynman's) direct-action theory, together with the remarkable immunity of direct-action quantum electrodynamics to Haag's t… ▽ More It is argued that the severe consequences of Haag's inconsistency theorem for relativistic quantum field theories can be successfully evaded in the direct-action approach. Some recent favorable comments of John Wheeler, often mistakenly presumed to have abandoned his own (and Feynman's) direct-action theory, together with the remarkable immunity of direct-action quantum electrodynamics to Haag's theorem, suggest that it may well be a good time to rehabilitate direct action theories. It is also noted that, as extra dividends, direct-action QED is immune to the self-energy problem of standard gauge field QED, and can also provide a solution to the problem of gauge arbitrariness. △ Less

Submitted 9 March, 2015; v1 submitted 12 February, 2015; originally announced February 2015.

Comments: A few typos corrected and a confusing sentence removed. Final version to appear in IJQF (ijqf.org)

Comment on "Quantum Darwinism, Decoherence, and the Randomness of Quantum Jumps," arXiv:1412.5206

Authors: R. E. Kastner

Abstract: This brief note in response to Wojciech Zurek's article "Quantum Darwinism, classical reality, and the randomness of quantum jumps" (Physics Today, October 2014, page 44) points out extant rebuttals in the literature to some of the author's key claims. This brief note in response to Wojciech Zurek's article "Quantum Darwinism, classical reality, and the randomness of quantum jumps" (Physics Today, October 2014, page 44) points out extant rebuttals in the literature to some of the author's key claims. △ Less

Submitted 11 March, 2015; v1 submitted 18 December, 2014; originally announced December 2014.

Comments: Accepted for publication as a Letter in Physics Today. Edited version (see v2 for submitted/accepted version). Tentatively scheduled for May issue, pending invited reply from Prof. Zurek

The Emergence of Spacetime: Transactions and Causal Sets

Authors: R. E. Kastner

Abstract: This paper discusses how the transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics can provide for a natural account of the emergence of spacetime events from a quantum substratum. In this account, spacetime is not a substantive manifold that becomes occupied with events; rather, spacetime itself exists only in virtue of specific actualized events. This implies that spacetime is discrete rather than c… ▽ More This paper discusses how the transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics can provide for a natural account of the emergence of spacetime events from a quantum substratum. In this account, spacetime is not a substantive manifold that becomes occupied with events; rather, spacetime itself exists only in virtue of specific actualized events. This implies that spacetime is discrete rather than continuous, and that properties attributed to spacetime based on the notion of a continuum are idealizations that do not apply to the real physical world. It is further noted that the transactional picture of the emergence of spacetime can provide the quantum dynamics that underlie the causal set approach as proposed by Sorkin and others. △ Less

Submitted 7 November, 2014; originally announced November 2014.

Comments: Contribution to an edited volume by Ignazio Licata. Comments welcome

Enabling FPGAs for the Masses

Authors: Janarbek Matai, Dustin Richmond, Dajung Lee, Ryan Kastner

Abstract: Implementing an application on a FPGA remains a difficult, non-intuitive task that often requires hardware design expertise in a hardware description language (HDL). High-level synthesis (HLS) raises the design abstraction from HDL to languages such as C/C++/Scala/Java. Despite this, in order to get a good quality of result (QoR), a designer must carefully craft the HLS code. In other words, HLS d… ▽ More Implementing an application on a FPGA remains a difficult, non-intuitive task that often requires hardware design expertise in a hardware description language (HDL). High-level synthesis (HLS) raises the design abstraction from HDL to languages such as C/C++/Scala/Java. Despite this, in order to get a good quality of result (QoR), a designer must carefully craft the HLS code. In other words, HLS designers must implement the application using an abstract language in a manner that generates an efficient micro-architecture; we call this process writing restructured code. This reduces the benefits of implementing the application at a higher level of abstraction and limits the impact of HLS by requiring explicit knowledge of the underlying hardware architecture. Developers must know how to write code that reflects low level implementation details of the application at hand as it is interpreted by HLS tools. As a result, FPGA design still largely remains job of either hardware engineers or expert HLS designers. In this work, we aim to take a step towards making HLS tools useful for a broader set of programmers. To do this, we study methodologies of restructuring software code for HLS tools; we provide examples of designing different kernels in state-of-the art HLS tools; and we present a list of challenges for develo** a hardware programming model for software programmers. △ Less

Submitted 20 August, 2014; originally announced August 2014.

Comments: Presented at First International Workshop on FPGAs for Software Programmers (FSP 2014) (arXiv:1408.4423)

Report number: FSP/2014/03

'Einselection' of Pointer Observables: The New H-Theorem?

Authors: Ruth E. Kastner

Abstract: In attempting to derive irreversible macroscopic thermodynamics from reversible microscopic dynamics, Boltzmann inadvertently smuggled in a premise that assumed the very irreversibility he was trying to prove: 'molecular chaos.' The program of 'Einselection' (environmentally induced superselection) within Everettian approaches faces a similar 'Loschmidt's Paradox': the universe, according to the E… ▽ More In attempting to derive irreversible macroscopic thermodynamics from reversible microscopic dynamics, Boltzmann inadvertently smuggled in a premise that assumed the very irreversibility he was trying to prove: 'molecular chaos.' The program of 'Einselection' (environmentally induced superselection) within Everettian approaches faces a similar 'Loschmidt's Paradox': the universe, according to the Everettian picture, is a closed system obeying only unitary dynamics, and it therefore contains no distinguishable environmental subsystems with the necessary phase randomness to effect einselection of a pointer observable. The theoretically unjustified assumption of distinguishable environmental subsystems is the hidden premise that makes the derivation of einselection circular. In effect, it presupposes the 'emergent' structures from the beginning. Thus the problem of basis ambiguity remains unsolved in Everettian interpretations. △ Less

Submitted 12 July, 2014; v1 submitted 16 June, 2014; originally announced June 2014.

Comments: To appear in in Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics; a few typos corrected

Journal ref: Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 48, 56-8 (2014)

Maudlin's Challenge Refuted: A Reply to Lewis

Authors: R. E. Kastner

Abstract: Lewis has recently argued that Maudlin's contingent absorber experiment remains a significant problem for the Transactional Interpretation (TI). He argues that the only straightforward way to resolve the challenge is by describing the absorbers as offer waves, and asserts that this is a previously unnoticed aspect of the challenge for TI. This argument is refuted in two basic ways: (i) it is noted… ▽ More Lewis has recently argued that Maudlin's contingent absorber experiment remains a significant problem for the Transactional Interpretation (TI). He argues that the only straightforward way to resolve the challenge is by describing the absorbers as offer waves, and asserts that this is a previously unnoticed aspect of the challenge for TI. This argument is refuted in two basic ways: (i) it is noted that the Maudlin experiment cannot be meaningfully recast with absorbers described by quantum states; instead the author replaces it with an ordinary which-way experiment; and (ii) the extant rebuttals to the Maudlin challenge in its original form are not in fact subject to the alleged flaws that Lewis ascribes to them. This paper further seeks to clarify the issues raised in Lewis' presentation concerning the distinction between quantum systems and macroscopic objects in TI. It is noted that the latest, possibilist version of TI (PTI) has no ambiguity concerning macroscopic absorbers. In particular, macroscopic objects are not subject to indeterminate trajectories, since they are continually undergoing collapse. It is concluded that the Maudlin challenge poses no significant problem for the transactional interpretation. △ Less

Submitted 11 March, 2014; originally announced March 2014.

Comments: To appear in Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics

The Nature of the Controversy over Time-Symmetric Quantum Counterfactuals

Authors: Ruth E. Kastner

Abstract: It is proposed that the recent controversy over "time-symmetric quantum counterfactuals" (TSQCs), based on the Aharonov-Bergmann-Lebowitz Rule for measurements of pre- and post-selected systems, can be clarified by taking TSQCs to be counterfactuals with a specific type of compound antecedent. In that case, inconsistency proofs such as that of Sharp and Shanks (1993) are not applicable, and the ma… ▽ More It is proposed that the recent controversy over "time-symmetric quantum counterfactuals" (TSQCs), based on the Aharonov-Bergmann-Lebowitz Rule for measurements of pre- and post-selected systems, can be clarified by taking TSQCs to be counterfactuals with a specific type of compound antecedent. In that case, inconsistency proofs such as that of Sharp and Shanks (1993) are not applicable, and the main issue becomes not whether such statements are true, but whether they are nontrivial. The latter question is addressed and answered in the negative. Thus it is concluded that TSQCs, understood as counterfactuals with a compound antecedent, are true but only trivially so, and provide no new contingent information about specific quantum systems (except in special cases already identified in the literature). △ Less

Submitted 22 January, 2014; originally announced January 2014.

Comments: 2003 paper relevant to recent claims concerning pre- and post-selected systems that appear to be based on a generally invalid counterfactual usage of the ABL Rule. The rule does not in general apply to measurements not actually made on a given system between pre- and post-selection. Thus the rule cannot be used to support claims such as a given system having mutually exclusive properties A and B

Journal ref: Philosophy of Science 70 (1):145-163 (2003)

On Real and Virtual Photons in the Davies Theory of Time-Symmetric Quantum Electrodynamics

Authors: R. E. Kastner

Abstract: This paper explores the distinction between virtual and real photons in the context of the Davies quantum relativistic extension of the Wheeler-Feynman classical electromagnetic theory. An alternative way of understanding this distinction is proposed, based on the transactional model. This paper explores the distinction between virtual and real photons in the context of the Davies quantum relativistic extension of the Wheeler-Feynman classical electromagnetic theory. An alternative way of understanding this distinction is proposed, based on the transactional model. △ Less

Submitted 27 October, 2016; v1 submitted 14 December, 2013; originally announced December 2013.

Comments: Originally published in Electronic Journal of Theoretical Physics 11, #30 (2014). This updated version has a few clarifications and omits discussion of a possible empirical test, which is overly speculative at this point

Measurement: still a problem in standard quantum theory

Authors: R. E. Kastner

Abstract: It is argued that recent claims by A. Hobson that standard quantum theory has no measurement problem cannot be sustained. Moreover, it is pointed out that taking the reduced density operator of a component system as an epistemic (ignorance-based) mixture has long been known to be untenable based on direct proof. It is argued that recent claims by A. Hobson that standard quantum theory has no measurement problem cannot be sustained. Moreover, it is pointed out that taking the reduced density operator of a component system as an epistemic (ignorance-based) mixture has long been known to be untenable based on direct proof. △ Less

Submitted 21 August, 2013; v1 submitted 20 August, 2013; originally announced August 2013.

On Delayed Choice and Contingent Absorber Experiments

Authors: R. E. Kastner

Abstract: It is pointed out that a slight variation on the Wheeler Delayed Choice Experiment presents the same challenge to orthodox quantum mechanics as Maudlin-type contingent absorber experiments present to the Transactional Interpretation (TI). Therefore, the latter cannot be used as a basis for refutation of TI. It is pointed out that a slight variation on the Wheeler Delayed Choice Experiment presents the same challenge to orthodox quantum mechanics as Maudlin-type contingent absorber experiments present to the Transactional Interpretation (TI). Therefore, the latter cannot be used as a basis for refutation of TI. △ Less

Submitted 15 May, 2012; originally announced May 2012.

Journal ref: ISRN Mathematical Physics, vol. 2012, Article ID 617291, 9 pages, 2012

The Possibilist Transactional Interpretation and Relativity

Authors: Ruth E. Kastner

Abstract: A recent ontological variant of Cramer's Transactional Interpretation, called "Possibilist Transactional Interpretation" or PTI, is extended to the relativistic domain. The present interpretation clarifies the concept of 'absorption,' which plays a crucial role in TI (and in PTI). In particular, in the relativistic domain, coupling amplitudes between fields are interpreted as amplitudes for the ge… ▽ More A recent ontological variant of Cramer's Transactional Interpretation, called "Possibilist Transactional Interpretation" or PTI, is extended to the relativistic domain. The present interpretation clarifies the concept of 'absorption,' which plays a crucial role in TI (and in PTI). In particular, in the relativistic domain, coupling amplitudes between fields are interpreted as amplitudes for the generation of confirmation waves (CW) by a potential absorber in response to offer waves (OW), whereas in the nonrelativistic context CW are taken as generated with certainty. It is pointed out that solving the measurement problem requires venturing into the relativistic domain in which emissions and absorptions take place; nonrelativistic quantum mechanics only applies to quanta considered as 'already in existence' (i.e., 'free quanta'), and therefore cannot fully account for the phenomenon of measurement, in which quanta are tied to sources and sinks. △ Less

Submitted 22 June, 2012; v1 submitted 23 April, 2012; originally announced April 2012.

Comments: Final version with some minor corrections as published in Foundations of Physics. This paper has significant overlap with Chapter 6 of my book on the Transactional Interpretation, forthcoming from Cambridge University Press: http://www.cambridge.org/us/knowledge/isbn/item6860644/?site_locale=en_US (Additional preview material is available at rekastner.wordpress.com) Comments welcome

Journal ref: Foundations of Physics: Volume 42, Issue 8 (2012), Page 1094-1113

de Broglie waves as the "Bridge of Becoming" between quantum theory and relativity

Authors: R. E. Kastner

Abstract: It is hypothesized that de Broglie's 'matter waves' provide a dynamical basis for Minkowski spacetime in an antisubstantivalist or relational account. The relativity of simultaneity is seen as an effect of the de Broglie oscillation together with a basic relativity postulate, while the dispersion relation from finite rest mass gives rise to the differentiation of spatial and temporal axes. Thus sp… ▽ More It is hypothesized that de Broglie's 'matter waves' provide a dynamical basis for Minkowski spacetime in an antisubstantivalist or relational account. The relativity of simultaneity is seen as an effect of the de Broglie oscillation together with a basic relativity postulate, while the dispersion relation from finite rest mass gives rise to the differentiation of spatial and temporal axes. Thus spacetime is seen as not fundamental, but rather as emergent from the quantum level. A result by Solov'ev which demonstrates that time is not an applicable concept at the quantum level is adduced in support of this claim. Finally, it is noted that de Broglie waves can be seen as the "bridge of becoming" discussed by Elitzur and Dolev (2005). △ Less

Submitted 14 July, 2011; v1 submitted 8 July, 2011; originally announced July 2011.

Comments: Forthcoming in Foundations of Science; reference added to recent work of Dolce

Quantum Nonlocality: Not Eliminated by the Heisenberg Picture

Authors: R. E. Kastner

Abstract: It is argued that the Heisenberg picture of standard quantum mechanics does not save Einstein locality as claimed in Deutsch and Hayden (2000). In particular, the EPR-type correlations that DH obtain by comparing two qubits in a local manner are shown to exist before that comparison. In view of this result, the local comparison argument would appear to ineffective in supporting their locality clai… ▽ More It is argued that the Heisenberg picture of standard quantum mechanics does not save Einstein locality as claimed in Deutsch and Hayden (2000). In particular, the EPR-type correlations that DH obtain by comparing two qubits in a local manner are shown to exist before that comparison. In view of this result, the local comparison argument would appear to ineffective in supporting their locality claim. △ Less

Submitted 6 January, 2011; v1 submitted 12 November, 2010; originally announced November 2010.

Comments: Final version; to appear in Foundations of Physics

The Hardy Experiment in the Transactional Interpretation

Authors: R. E. Kastner

Abstract: The Hardy experiment is analyzed from the standpoint of the Transactional Interpretation (TI) in its possibilist variant, PTI. It is argued that PTI provides a natural and illuminating account of the associated phenomena, resolving the apparent paradox which arises from the mistaken notion that components of the state vector labeled by spacetime regions imply the actual presence of a corpuscle in… ▽ More The Hardy experiment is analyzed from the standpoint of the Transactional Interpretation (TI) in its possibilist variant, PTI. It is argued that PTI provides a natural and illuminating account of the associated phenomena, resolving the apparent paradox which arises from the mistaken notion that components of the state vector labeled by spacetime regions imply the actual presence of a corpuscle in that region. △ Less

Submitted 10 September, 2010; v1 submitted 24 June, 2010; originally announced June 2010.

Comments: Revised for clarity; references added

Comment on "Comment on 'On Visibility in the Afshar Two-Slit Experiment' "

Authors: R. E. Kastner

Abstract: Tabish Qureshi (2010) has recently objected to an aspect of my discussion of a thought experiment by Srikanth (2001). I believe his objection is based on a misunderstanding about my presentation, but I accept responsibility for not being more clear. Here I attempt to clear up any confusion and to point out that one can indeed obtain interference in this experiment based on taking care to correct… ▽ More Tabish Qureshi (2010) has recently objected to an aspect of my discussion of a thought experiment by Srikanth (2001). I believe his objection is based on a misunderstanding about my presentation, but I accept responsibility for not being more clear. Here I attempt to clear up any confusion and to point out that one can indeed obtain interference in this experiment based on taking care to correctly characterize the detection process. I also emphasize that Qureshi and I are in full agreement concerning the assertion that when interference is present, there is no genuine 'which slit' information, and that in this case, the measurement necessary to preserve interference precludes determination of an actual slit of origin for the photon. △ Less

Submitted 22 February, 2010; originally announced February 2010.

Comments: I attempt to clear up a misunderstanding concerning my "On Visibility in the Afshar Two-Slit Experiment"

Better than "flashes": Transactions

Authors: R. E. Kastner

Abstract: I discuss Gisin's result showing that sets of quantum-correlated spacelike events cannot be described by a covariant probability distribution over hidden variables, and his conclusion that Tumulka's "rGRWf" (relativistic GRW "flash ontology" model) is an appropriate model to resolve the apparent conflict between quantum theory and relativity. The contrasts and similarities between the Transactiona… ▽ More I discuss Gisin's result showing that sets of quantum-correlated spacelike events cannot be described by a covariant probability distribution over hidden variables, and his conclusion that Tumulka's "rGRWf" (relativistic GRW "flash ontology" model) is an appropriate model to resolve the apparent conflict between quantum theory and relativity. The contrasts and similarities between the Transactional Interpretation's (TI) handling of a specific measurement result and that of GRW approaches are clarified. I argue that TI resolves the apparent conflict between quantum theory and relativity described by Gisin in a harmonious manner, without the necessity of modifying the theory. △ Less

Submitted 8 February, 2011; v1 submitted 12 February, 2010; originally announced February 2010.

Comments: In response to apparent confusion by some readers, this revision clarifies the fact that confirmation waves (CW) are generated for all components of the offer wave absorbed, resulting in a set of incipient transactions corresponding to different outcomes in a particular basis. This provides a physical explanation for von Neumann's "Process 1."

Why Everettians Should Appreciate the Transactional Interpretation

Authors: R. E. Kastner, John G. Cramer

Abstract: The attractive feature of the Everett approach is its admirable spirit of approaching the quantum puzzle with a Zen-like "beginner's mind" in order to try to envision what the pure formalism might be saying about quantum reality, even if that journey leads to a strange place. It is argued that the transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics (TI), appropriately interpreted, shares the same… ▽ More The attractive feature of the Everett approach is its admirable spirit of approaching the quantum puzzle with a Zen-like "beginner's mind" in order to try to envision what the pure formalism might be saying about quantum reality, even if that journey leads to a strange place. It is argued that the transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics (TI), appropriately interpreted, shares the same motivation and achieves much more, with far fewer conceptual perplexities, by taking into account heretofore overlooked features of the quantum formalism itself (i.e. advanced states). In particular, TI does not need to talk about brain states, consciousness, or observers (rational or otherwise). In its possibilist variant ("PTI"), it shares the realist virtues of treating state vector branches as genuine dynamical entities, without having to explain how or why all of their associated outcomes actually happen (they don't), how to account for a plenitude of counterpart observers in some coherent notion of trans-temporal identity of the bifurcating observers (observers don't bifurcate in TI), nor how the certainty of all outcomes could be consistent with any coherent theory of probability, let alone the Born probability (the Born probability emerges naturally in TI). In short, TI is precisely the one-world interpretation Kent is looking for in his (2010). △ Less

Submitted 4 March, 2010; v1 submitted 17 January, 2010; originally announced January 2010.

Comments: Discussion expanded and revised; Prof. John Cramer added as co-author

The Quantum Liar Experiment in Cramer's Transactional Interpretation

Authors: R. E. Kastner

Abstract: Cramer's Transactional Interpretation (TI) is applied to the "Quantum Liar Experiment" (QLE). It is shown how some apparently paradoxical features can be explained naturally, albeit nonlocally (since TI is an explicitly nonlocal interpretation, at least from the vantage point of ordinary spacetime). At the same time, it is proposed that in order to preserve the elegance and economy of the interpre… ▽ More Cramer's Transactional Interpretation (TI) is applied to the "Quantum Liar Experiment" (QLE). It is shown how some apparently paradoxical features can be explained naturally, albeit nonlocally (since TI is an explicitly nonlocal interpretation, at least from the vantage point of ordinary spacetime). At the same time, it is proposed that in order to preserve the elegance and economy of the interpretation, it may be necessary to consider offer and confirmation waves as propagating in a "higher space" of possibilities. △ Less

Submitted 28 December, 2010; v1 submitted 8 June, 2009; originally announced June 2009.

Comments: Minor editing error corrected

Journal ref: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics (Volume 41, Issue 2, May 2010, 86-92 )

On Visibility in the Afshar Two-Slit Experiment

Authors: R. E. Kastner

Abstract: A modified version of Young's experiment by Shahriar Afshar indirectly reveals the presence of a fully articulated interference pattern prior to the post-selection of a particle in a "which-slit" basis. While this experiment does not constitute a violation of Bohr's Complementarity Principle as claimed by Afshar, both he and many of his critics incorrectly assume that a commonly used relationshi… ▽ More A modified version of Young's experiment by Shahriar Afshar indirectly reveals the presence of a fully articulated interference pattern prior to the post-selection of a particle in a "which-slit" basis. While this experiment does not constitute a violation of Bohr's Complementarity Principle as claimed by Afshar, both he and many of his critics incorrectly assume that a commonly used relationship between visibility parameter V and "which-way" parameter K has crucial relevance to his experiment. It is argued here that this relationship does not apply to this experimental situation and that it is wrong to make any use of it in support of claims for or against the bearing of this experiment on Complementarity. △ Less

Submitted 27 July, 2009; v1 submitted 30 January, 2008; originally announced January 2008.

Comments: Final version; to appear in Foundations of Physics

Why the Afshar Experiment Does Not Refute Complementarity

Authors: R. E. Kastner

Abstract: A modified version of Young's experiment by Shahriar Afshar demonstrates that, prior to what appears to be a ``which-way'' measurement, an interference pattern exists. Afshar has claimed that this result constitutes a violation of the Principle of Complementarity. This paper discusses the implications of this experiment and considers how Cramer's Transactional Interpretation easily accomodates t… ▽ More A modified version of Young's experiment by Shahriar Afshar demonstrates that, prior to what appears to be a ``which-way'' measurement, an interference pattern exists. Afshar has claimed that this result constitutes a violation of the Principle of Complementarity. This paper discusses the implications of this experiment and considers how Cramer's Transactional Interpretation easily accomodates the result. It is also shown that the Afshar experiment is analogous in key respects to a spin one-half particle prepared as ``spin up along $\bf x$'', subjected to a nondestructive confirmation of that preparation, and post-selected in a specific state of spin along $\bf z$. The terminology ``which-way'' or ``which-slit'' is critiqued; it is argued that this usage by both Afshar and his critics is misleading and has contributed to confusion surrounding the interpretation of the experiment. Nevertheless, it is concluded that Bohr would have had no more problem accounting for the Afshar result than he would in accounting for the aforementioned pre- and post-selection spin experiment, in which the particle's preparation state is confirmed by a nondestructive measurement prior to post-selection. In addition, some new inferences about the interpretation of delayed choice experiments are drawn from the analysis. △ Less

Submitted 8 September, 2005; v1 submitted 2 February, 2005; originally announced February 2005.

Comments: Final version: typos corrected; to appear in Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics

Cramer's Transactional Interpretation and Causal Loop Problems

Authors: Ruth E. Kastner

Abstract: Tim Maudlin's argument for the inconsistency of Cramer's Transactional Interpretation (TI) of quantum theory has been considered in some detail by Joseph Berkovitz, who has provided a possible solution to this challenge at the cost of a significant empirical lacuna on the part of TI. The present paper proposes an alternative solution in which Maudlin's charge of inconsistency is evaded but at no… ▽ More Tim Maudlin's argument for the inconsistency of Cramer's Transactional Interpretation (TI) of quantum theory has been considered in some detail by Joseph Berkovitz, who has provided a possible solution to this challenge at the cost of a significant empirical lacuna on the part of TI. The present paper proposes an alternative solution in which Maudlin's charge of inconsistency is evaded but at no cost of empirical content on the part of TI. However, Maudlin's argument is taken as ruling out Cramer's heuristic ``pseudotime'' explanation of the realization of one transaction out of many. △ Less

Submitted 17 August, 2004; originally announced August 2004.

Comments: To appear in Synthese

Weak Values and Consistent Histories in Quantum Theory

Authors: R. E. Kastner

Abstract: A relation is obtained between weak values of quantum observables and the consistency criterion for histories of quantum events. It is shown that ``strange'' weak values for projection operators (such as values less than zero) always correspond to inconsistent families of histories. It is argued that using the ABL rule to obtain probabilities for counterfactual measurements corresponding to thos… ▽ More A relation is obtained between weak values of quantum observables and the consistency criterion for histories of quantum events. It is shown that ``strange'' weak values for projection operators (such as values less than zero) always correspond to inconsistent families of histories. It is argued that using the ABL rule to obtain probabilities for counterfactual measurements corresponding to those strange weak values gives inconsistent results. This problem is shown to be remedied by using the conditional weight, or pseudo-probability, obtained from the multiple-time application of Luders' Rule. It is argued that an assumption of reverse causality (a form of time symmetry) implies that weak values obtain, in a restricted sense, at the time of the weak measurement as well as at the time of post-selection. Finally, it is argued that weak values are more appropriately characterised as multiple-time amplitudes than expectation values, and as such can have little to say about counterfactual questions. △ Less

Submitted 24 February, 2003; v1 submitted 31 July, 2002; originally announced July 2002.

Comments: Final version, to appear in Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics

Shutters, Boxes, But No Paradoxes: Time Symmetry Puzzles in Quantum Theory

Authors: R. E. Kastner

Abstract: The ``N-Box Experiment'' is a much-discussed thought experiment in quantum mechanics. It is claimed by some authors that a single particle prepared in a superposition of N+1 box locations and which is subject to a final ``post-selection'' measurement corresponding to a different superposition can be said to have occupied ``with certainty'' N boxes during the intervening time. However, others hav… ▽ More The ``N-Box Experiment'' is a much-discussed thought experiment in quantum mechanics. It is claimed by some authors that a single particle prepared in a superposition of N+1 box locations and which is subject to a final ``post-selection'' measurement corresponding to a different superposition can be said to have occupied ``with certainty'' N boxes during the intervening time. However, others have argued that under closer inspection, this surprising claim fails to hold. Aharonov and Vaidman have continued their advocacy of the claim in question by proposing a variation on the N-box experiment, in which the boxes are replaced by shutters and the pre- and post-selected particle is entangled with a photon. These authors argue that the resulting ``N-shutter experiment'' strengthens their original claim regarding the N-box experiment. It is argued in this paper that the apparently surprising features of this variation are no more robust than those of the N-box experiment and that it is not accurate to say that the particle is ``with certainty'' in all N shutters at any given time. △ Less

Submitted 18 May, 2004; v1 submitted 11 July, 2002; originally announced July 2002.

Comments: Presentation improved; to appear in International Studies in Philosophy of Science

Journal ref: International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 18:1, 89-94. (2010)

Comment on Mohrhoff's "What quantum mechanics is trying to tell us"

Authors: R. E. Kastner

Abstract: Mohrhoff proposes using the Aharonov-Bergmann-Lebowitz (ABL) rule for time-symmetric ``objective'' (meaning non-epistemic) probabilities corresponding to the possible outcomes of not-actually-performed measurements between specified pre- and post-selection measurement outcomes. It is emphasized that the ABL rule was formulated on the assumption that such intervening measurements are actually mad… ▽ More Mohrhoff proposes using the Aharonov-Bergmann-Lebowitz (ABL) rule for time-symmetric ``objective'' (meaning non-epistemic) probabilities corresponding to the possible outcomes of not-actually-performed measurements between specified pre- and post-selection measurement outcomes. It is emphasized that the ABL rule was formulated on the assumption that such intervening measurements are actually made and that it does not necessarily apply to counterfactual situations. The exact nature of the application of the ABL rule considered by Mohrhoff is made explicit and is shown to fall short of his stated counterfactual claim. △ Less

Submitted 23 May, 2001; v1 submitted 21 March, 2000; originally announced March 2000.

Comments: To appear in American Journal of Physics. This substantially revised version critically analyses the counterfactual usage of the ABL rule as advocated by Mohrhoff, with reference to similar ongoing claims by Vaidman

TSQT `Elements of Possibility'?

Authors: R. E. Kastner

Abstract: I defend my arguments in quant-ph/9806002, which have recently been criticized by L. Vaidman (quant-ph/9811092). I emphasize that the correct usage of the ABL rule applies not to a genuine counterfactual statement but rather to a conjunction of material conditionals. I argue that the only kind of valid counterfactual statement one can make using the ABL rule is a ``might'' counterfactual, which… ▽ More I defend my arguments in quant-ph/9806002, which have recently been criticized by L. Vaidman (quant-ph/9811092). I emphasize that the correct usage of the ABL rule applies not to a genuine counterfactual statement but rather to a conjunction of material conditionals. I argue that the only kind of valid counterfactual statement one can make using the ABL rule is a ``might'' counterfactual, which is not adequate for the attribution of `elements of reality' to a quantum system. △ Less

Submitted 12 December, 1998; originally announced December 1998.

Comments: 4 pages, latex

Journal ref: Stud.Hist.Philos.Mod.Phys. 30 (1999) 399-402

The Three-Box "Paradox" and Other Reasons to Reject the Counterfactual Usage of the ABL Rule

Authors: R. E. Kastner

Abstract: An apparent paradox proposed by Aharonov and Vaidman in which a single particle can be found with certainty in two (or more) boxes is analyzed by way of a simple thought experiment. It is found that the apparent paradox arises from an invalid counterfactual usage of the Aharonov-Bergmann-Lebowitz (ABL) rule, and effectively attributes conflicting properties not to the same particle but to differ… ▽ More An apparent paradox proposed by Aharonov and Vaidman in which a single particle can be found with certainty in two (or more) boxes is analyzed by way of a simple thought experiment. It is found that the apparent paradox arises from an invalid counterfactual usage of the Aharonov-Bergmann-Lebowitz (ABL) rule, and effectively attributes conflicting properties not to the same particle but to different particles. A connection is made between the present analysis and the consistent histories formulation of Griffiths. Finally, a critique is given of some recent counterarguments by Vaidman against the rejection of the counterfactual usage of the ABL rule. △ Less

Submitted 10 February, 1999; v1 submitted 14 July, 1998; originally announced July 1998.

Comments: 20 pages, Latex, 2 figures (in three files). To appear in Foundations of Physics. Title changed, further arguments and appendix added

Journal ref: Found.Phys. 29 (1999) 851-863

Closing a Loophole in the Case Against the Counterfactual Usage of the ABL Rule

Authors: R. E. Kastner

Abstract: A currently discussed interpretation of quantum theory, Time-Symmetrized Quantum Theory, makes certain claims about the properties of systems between pre- and post- selection measurements. These claims are based on a counterfactual usage of the Aharonov-Bergmann-Lebowitz (ABL) rule for calculating the probabilities of measurement outcomes between such measurements. It has been argued by several… ▽ More A currently discussed interpretation of quantum theory, Time-Symmetrized Quantum Theory, makes certain claims about the properties of systems between pre- and post- selection measurements. These claims are based on a counterfactual usage of the Aharonov-Bergmann-Lebowitz (ABL) rule for calculating the probabilities of measurement outcomes between such measurements. It has been argued by several authors that the counterfactual usage of the ABL rule is, in general, incorrect. This paper examines what might appear to be a loophole in those arguments and shows that this apparent loophole cannot be used to support a counterfactual interpretation of the ABL rule. It is noted that the invalidity of the counterfactual usage of the ABL rule implies that the characterization of those outcomes receiving probability 1 in a counterfactual application of the rule as `elements of reality' is, in general, unfounded. △ Less

Submitted 7 July, 1998; v1 submitted 5 July, 1998; originally announced July 1998.

Comments: 12 pages, Latex, 4 figures, minor wording changes

Time-Symmetrized Quantum Theory, Counterfactuals, and `Advanced Action'

Authors: R. E. Kastner

Abstract: Recent authors have raised objections to the counterfactual interpretation of the Aharonov-Bergmann-Lebowitz (ABL) rule of time symmetrized quantum theory (TSQT). I distinguish between two different readings of the ABL rule, counterfactual and non-counterfactual, and confirm that TSQT advocate L. Vaidman is employing the counterfactual reading to which these authors object. Vaidman has responded… ▽ More Recent authors have raised objections to the counterfactual interpretation of the Aharonov-Bergmann-Lebowitz (ABL) rule of time symmetrized quantum theory (TSQT). I distinguish between two different readings of the ABL rule, counterfactual and non-counterfactual, and confirm that TSQT advocate L. Vaidman is employing the counterfactual reading to which these authors object. Vaidman has responded to the objections by proposing a new kind of time-symmetrized counterfactual, which he has defined in two different ways. It is argued that neither definition succeeds in overcoming the objections, except in a special case previously noted by Cohen and Hiley. In addition, a connection is made between TSQT and Price's concept of `advanced action', which further supports the special case discussed. △ Less

Submitted 21 September, 1998; v1 submitted 1 June, 1998; originally announced June 1998.

Comments: Minor editorial changes and correction to figure 4. To appear in "Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics"

Report number: UMCP-CHPS-1001

Journal ref: Stud.Hist.Philos.Mod.Phys. 30 (1999) 237-259