-
Coarse-Graining and Self-Dissimilarity of Complex Networks
Authors:
Shalev Itzkovitz,
Reuven Levitt,
Nadav Kashtan,
Ron Milo,
Michael Itzkovitz,
Uri Alon
Abstract:
Can complex engineered and biological networks be coarse-grained into smaller and more understandable versions in which each node represents an entire pattern in the original network? To address this, we define coarse-graining units (CGU) as connectivity patterns which can serve as the nodes of a coarse-grained network, and present algorithms to detect them. We use this approach to systematicall…
▽ More
Can complex engineered and biological networks be coarse-grained into smaller and more understandable versions in which each node represents an entire pattern in the original network? To address this, we define coarse-graining units (CGU) as connectivity patterns which can serve as the nodes of a coarse-grained network, and present algorithms to detect them. We use this approach to systematically reverse-engineer electronic circuits, forming understandable high-level maps from incomprehensible transistor wiring: first, a coarse-grained version in which each node is a gate made of several transistors is established. Then, the coarse-grained network is itself coarse-grained, resulting in a high-level blueprint in which each node is a circuit-module made of multiple gates. We apply our approach also to a mammalian protein-signaling network, to find a simplified coarse-grained network with three main signaling channels that correspond to cross-interacting MAP-kinase cascades. We find that both biological and electronic networks are 'self-dissimilar', with different network motifs found at each level. The present approach can be used to simplify a wide variety of directed and nondirected, natural and designed networks.
△ Less
Submitted 18 October, 2004; v1 submitted 14 May, 2004;
originally announced May 2004.
-
Topological Generalizations of network motifs
Authors:
N. Kashtan,
S. Itzkovitz,
R. Milo,
U. Alon
Abstract:
Biological and technological networks contain patterns, termed network motifs, which occur far more often than in randomized networks. Network motifs were suggested to be elementary building blocks that carry out key functions in the network. It is of interest to understand how network motifs combine to form larger structures. To address this, we present a systematic approach to define 'motif ge…
▽ More
Biological and technological networks contain patterns, termed network motifs, which occur far more often than in randomized networks. Network motifs were suggested to be elementary building blocks that carry out key functions in the network. It is of interest to understand how network motifs combine to form larger structures. To address this, we present a systematic approach to define 'motif generalizations': families of motifs of different sizes that share a common architectural theme. To define motif generalizations, we first define 'roles' in a subgraph according to structural equivalence. For example, the feedforward loop triad, a motif in transcription, neuronal and some electronic networks, has three roles, an input node, an output node and an internal node. The roles are used to define possible generalizations of the motif. The feedforward loop can have three simple generalizations, based on replicating each of the three roles and their connections. We present algorithms for efficiently detecting motif generalizations. We find that the transcription networks of bacteria and yeast display only one of the three generalizations, the multi-output feedforward generalization. In contrast, the neuronal network of \emph{C. elegans} mainly displays the multi-input generalization. Forward-logic electronic circuits display a multi-input, multi-output hybrid. Thus, networks which share a common motif can have very different generalizations of that motif. Using mathematical modelling, we describe the information processing functions of the different motif generalizations in transcription, neuronal and electronic networks.
△ Less
Submitted 16 May, 2004; v1 submitted 15 December, 2003;
originally announced December 2003.
-
On the uniform generation of random graphs with prescribed degree sequences
Authors:
R. Milo,
N. Kashtan,
S. Itzkovitz,
M. E. J. Newman,
U. Alon
Abstract:
Random graphs with prescribed degree sequences have been widely used as a model of complex networks. Comparing an observed network to an ensemble of such graphs allows one to detect deviations from randomness in network properties. Here we briefly review two existing methods for the generation of random graphs with arbitrary degree sequences, which we call the ``switching'' and ``matching'' meth…
▽ More
Random graphs with prescribed degree sequences have been widely used as a model of complex networks. Comparing an observed network to an ensemble of such graphs allows one to detect deviations from randomness in network properties. Here we briefly review two existing methods for the generation of random graphs with arbitrary degree sequences, which we call the ``switching'' and ``matching'' methods, and present a new method based on the ``go with the winners'' Monte Carlo method. The matching method may suffer from nonuniform sampling, while the switching method has no general theoretical bound on its mixing time. The ``go with the winners'' method has neither of these drawbacks, but is slow. It can however be used to evaluate the reliability of the other two methods and, by doing this, we demonstrate that the deviations of the switching and matching algorithms under realistic conditions are small compared to the ``go with the winners'' algorithm. Because of its combination of speed and accuracy we recommend the use of the switching method for most calculations.
△ Less
Submitted 30 May, 2004; v1 submitted 1 December, 2003;
originally announced December 2003.
-
Subgraphs in random networks
Authors:
S. Itzkovitz,
R. Milo,
N. Kashtan,
G. Ziv,
U. Alon
Abstract:
Understanding the subgraph distribution in random networks is important for modelling complex systems. In classic Erdos networks, which exhibit a Poissonian degree distribution, the number of appearances of a subgraph G with n nodes and g edges scales with network size as \mean{G} ~ N^{n-g}. However, many natural networks have a non-Poissonian degree distribution. Here we present approximate equ…
▽ More
Understanding the subgraph distribution in random networks is important for modelling complex systems. In classic Erdos networks, which exhibit a Poissonian degree distribution, the number of appearances of a subgraph G with n nodes and g edges scales with network size as \mean{G} ~ N^{n-g}. However, many natural networks have a non-Poissonian degree distribution. Here we present approximate equations for the average number of subgraphs in an ensemble of random sparse directed networks, characterized by an arbitrary degree sequence. We find new scaling rules for the commonly occurring case of directed scale-free networks, in which the outgoing degree distribution scales as P(k) ~ k^{-γ}. Considering the power exponent of the degree distribution, γ, as a control parameter, we show that random networks exhibit transitions between three regimes. In each regime the subgraph number of appearances follows a different scaling law, \mean{G} ~ N^α, where α=n-g+s-1 for γ<2, α=n-g+s+1-γfor 2<γ<γ_c, and α=n-g for γ>γ_c, s is the maximal outdegree in the subgraph, and γ_c=s+1. We find that certain subgraphs appear much more frequently than in Erdos networks. These results are in very good agreement with numerical simulations. This has implications for detecting network motifs, subgraphs that occur in natural networks significantly more than in their randomized counterparts.
△ Less
Submitted 26 August, 2003; v1 submitted 19 February, 2003;
originally announced February 2003.
