Ergodicity breaking in wealth dynamics: The case of reallocating geometric Brownian motion
Authors:
Viktor Stojkoski,
Marko Karbevski
Abstract:
A growing body of empirical evidence suggests that the dynamics of wealth within a population tends to be non-ergodic, even after rescaling the individual wealth with the population average. Despite these discoveries, the way in which non-ergodicity manifests itself in models of economic interactions remains an open issue. Here, we shed valuable insight on these properties by studying the non-ergo…
▽ More
A growing body of empirical evidence suggests that the dynamics of wealth within a population tends to be non-ergodic, even after rescaling the individual wealth with the population average. Despite these discoveries, the way in which non-ergodicity manifests itself in models of economic interactions remains an open issue. Here, we shed valuable insight on these properties by studying the non-ergodicity of the population average wealth in a simple model for wealth dynamics in a growing and reallocating economy called Reallocating geometric Brownian motion (RGBM). When the effective wealth reallocation in the economy is from the poor to the rich, the model allows for the existence of negative wealth within the population. We show that then, in RGBM ergodicity breaks as the difference between the time-average and the ensemble growth rate of the average wealth in the population. In particular, the ensemble average wealth grows exponentially whereas the time-average growth rate is non-existent. Moreover, we find that the system is characterized with a critical self-averaging time period. Before this time period, the ensemble average is a fair approximation for the population average wealth. Afterwards, the non-ergodicity forces the population average to oscillate between positive and negative values since then the magnitude of this observable is determined by the most extreme wealth values in the population. This implies that the dynamics of the population average is an unstable phenomenon in a non-ergodic economy. We use this result to argue that one should be cautious when interpreting economic well-being measures that are based on the population average wealth in non-ergodic economies.
△ Less
Submitted 16 January, 2022; v1 submitted 24 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
Evolution of cooperation in networked heterogeneous fluctuating environments
Authors:
Viktor Stojkoski,
Marko Karbevski,
Zoran Utkovski,
Lasko Basnarkov,
Ljupco Kocarev
Abstract:
Fluctuating environments are situations where the spatio-temporal stochasticity plays a significant role in the evolutionary dynamics. The study of the evolution of cooperation in these environments typically assumes a homogeneous, well mixed population, whose constituents are endowed with identical capabilities. In this paper, we generalize these results by develo** a systematic study for the c…
▽ More
Fluctuating environments are situations where the spatio-temporal stochasticity plays a significant role in the evolutionary dynamics. The study of the evolution of cooperation in these environments typically assumes a homogeneous, well mixed population, whose constituents are endowed with identical capabilities. In this paper, we generalize these results by develo** a systematic study for the cooperation dynamics in fluctuating environments under the consideration of structured, heterogeneous populations with individual entities subjected to general behavioral rules. Considering complex network topologies, and a behavioral rule based on generalized reciprocity, we perform a detailed analysis of the effect of the underlying interaction structure on the evolutionary stability of cooperation. We find that, in the presence of environmental fluctuations, the cooperation dynamics can lead to the creation of multiple network components, each with distinct evolutionary properties. This is paralleled to the freezing state in the Random Energy Model. We utilize this result to examine the applicability of our generalized reciprocity behavioral rule in a variety of settings. We thereby show that the introduced rule leads to steady state cooperative behavior that is always greater than or equal to the one predicted by the evolutionary stability analysis of unconditional cooperation. As a consequence, the implementation of our results may go beyond explaining the evolution of cooperation. In particular, they can be directly applied in domains that deal with the development of artificial systems able to adequately mimic reality, such as reinforcement learning.
△ Less
Submitted 9 March, 2021; v1 submitted 19 December, 2019;
originally announced December 2019.
