-
SIREN: An Open Source Neutrino Injection Toolkit
Authors:
Austin Schneider,
Nicholas W. Kamp,
Alex Y. Wen
Abstract:
Modeling of rare neutrino processes often relies on either simple approximations or expensive detector simulations. The former is often not sufficient for interactions with complex morphologies, while the latter is too time-intensive for phenomenological studies. We present SIREN (Sampling and Injection for Rare EveNts), a new tool for neutrino phenomenology and experimental searches alike that en…
▽ More
Modeling of rare neutrino processes often relies on either simple approximations or expensive detector simulations. The former is often not sufficient for interactions with complex morphologies, while the latter is too time-intensive for phenomenological studies. We present SIREN (Sampling and Injection for Rare EveNts), a new tool for neutrino phenomenology and experimental searches alike that enables accurate interaction and detector geometry modeling without the overhead of detailed detector response simulations. SIREN handles the injection of rare process final states and the associated weighting calculations with the speed needed for phenomenological investigations and the detail necessary for dedicated experimental searches. The extensible design of SIREN allows it to support a wide range of experimental designs and Beyond-Standard-Model neutrino interactions. Users need only specify the physical process, detector geometry, and initial neutrino flux under consideration before they can accurately simulate a model in their detector of choice. We demonstrate the capability of SIREN through two examples: (1) Standard Model $ν_μ$ deep inelastic scattering in IceCube, DUNE, and ATLAS; and (2) heavy neutral lepton interactions in MiniBooNE, MINER$ν$A, CCM. A variety of detector geometry descriptions, interaction cross sections, and neutrino fluxes are also provided for users to get started with immediately.
△ Less
Submitted 3 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Implications of MicroBooNE's low sensitivity to electron antineutrino interactions in the search for the MiniBooNE excess
Authors:
Nicholas W. Kamp,
Matheus Hostert,
Carlos A. Argüelles,
Janet M. Conrad,
Michael H. Shaevitz
Abstract:
The MicroBooNE experiment searched for an excess of electron-neutrinos in the Booster Neutrino Beam (BNB), providing direct constraints on $ν_e$-interpretations of the MiniBooNE low-energy excess (LEE). In this article, we show that if the MiniBooNE LEE is caused instead by an excess of $\overlineν_e$, then liquid argon detectors, such as MicroBooNE, SBND and ICARUS, would have poor sensitivity to…
▽ More
The MicroBooNE experiment searched for an excess of electron-neutrinos in the Booster Neutrino Beam (BNB), providing direct constraints on $ν_e$-interpretations of the MiniBooNE low-energy excess (LEE). In this article, we show that if the MiniBooNE LEE is caused instead by an excess of $\overlineν_e$, then liquid argon detectors, such as MicroBooNE, SBND and ICARUS, would have poor sensitivity to it. This is due to a strong suppression of $\overlineν_e -{}^{40}$Ar cross sections in the low-energy region of the excess. The MicroBooNE results are consistent at the $2σ$~C.L with a scenario in which the MiniBooNE excess is sourced entirely by $\overlineν_e$ interactions. The opportune location of ANNIE, a Gd-loaded water Cherenkov detector, allows for a direct search for a $\overlineν_e$ flux excess in the BNB using inverse-beta-decay events.
△ Less
Submitted 27 April, 2023; v1 submitted 29 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
New Clues About Light Sterile Neutrinos: Preference for Models with Dam** Effects in Global Fits
Authors:
J. M. Hardin,
I. Martinez-Soler,
A. Diaz,
M. **,
N. W. Kamp,
C. A. Argüelles,
J. M. Conrad,
M. H. Shaevitz
Abstract:
This article reports global fits of short-baseline neutrino data to oscillation models involving light sterile neutrinos. In the commonly-used 3+1 plane wave model, there is a well-known 4.9$σ$ tension between data sets sensitive to appearance versus disappearance of neutrinos. We find that models that damp the oscillation prediction for the reactor data sets, especially at low energy, substantial…
▽ More
This article reports global fits of short-baseline neutrino data to oscillation models involving light sterile neutrinos. In the commonly-used 3+1 plane wave model, there is a well-known 4.9$σ$ tension between data sets sensitive to appearance versus disappearance of neutrinos. We find that models that damp the oscillation prediction for the reactor data sets, especially at low energy, substantially improve the fits and reduce the tension. We consider two such scenarios. The first scenario introduces the quantum mechanical wavepacket effect that accounts for the source size in reactor experiments into the 3+1 model. We find that inclusion of the wavepacket effect greatly improves the overall fit compared to a 3$ν$ model by $Δχ^2/$DOF$=61.1/4$ ($7.1σ$ improvement) with best-fit $Δm^2=1.4$ eV$^2$ and wavepacket length of 67fm. The internal tension is reduced to 3.4$σ$. If reactor-data only is fit, then the wavepacket preferred length is 91 fm ($>20$ fm at 99\% CL). The second model introduces oscillations involving sterile flavor and allows the decay of the heaviest, mostly sterile mass state, $ν_4$. This model introduces a dam** term similar to the wavepacket effect, but across all experiments. Compared to a three-neutrino fit, this has a $Δχ^2/$DOF$=60.6/4$ ($7σ$ improvement) with preferred $Δm^2=1.4$ eV$^2$ and decay $Γ= 0.35$ eV$^2$. The internal tension is reduced to 3.7$σ$.
For many years, the reactor event rates have been observed to have structure that deviates from prediction. Community discussion has focused on an excess compared to prediction observed at 5 MeV; however, other deviations are apparent. This structure has $L$ dependence that is well-fit by the damped models. Before assuming this points to new physics, we urge closer examination of systematic effects that could lead to this $L$ dependence.
△ Less
Submitted 11 August, 2023; v1 submitted 4 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
Dark Sector Studies with Neutrino Beams
Authors:
Brian Batell,
Joshua Berger,
Vedran Brdar,
Alan D. Bross,
Janet M. Conrad,
Patrick deNiverville,
Valentina De Romeri,
Bhaskar Dutta,
Saeid Foroughi-Abari,
Matheus Hostert,
Joshua Isaacson,
Ahmed Ismail,
Sudip Jana,
Wooyoung Jang,
Nicholas W. Kamp,
Kevin J. Kelly,
Doo** Kim,
Felix Kling,
Mathieu Lamoureux,
David McKeen,
Jong-Chul Park,
Gianluca Petrillo,
Adam Ritz,
Seodong Shin,
Tyler B. Smith
, et al. (7 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
An array of powerful neutrino-beam experiments will study the fundamental properties of neutrinos with unprecedented precision in the coming years. Along with their primary neutrino-physics motivations, there has been growing recognition that these experiments can carry out a rich program of searches for new, light, weakly-coupled particles that are part of a dark sector. In this white paper, we r…
▽ More
An array of powerful neutrino-beam experiments will study the fundamental properties of neutrinos with unprecedented precision in the coming years. Along with their primary neutrino-physics motivations, there has been growing recognition that these experiments can carry out a rich program of searches for new, light, weakly-coupled particles that are part of a dark sector. In this white paper, we review the diverse theoretical motivations for dark sectors and the capabilities of neutrino beam experiments to probe a wide range of models and signatures. We also examine the potential obstacles that could limit these prospects and identify concrete steps needed to realize an impactful dark sector search program in this and coming decades.
△ Less
Submitted 5 September, 2022; v1 submitted 14 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
Dipole-Coupled Neutrissimo Explanations of the MiniBooNE Excess Including Constraints from MINERvA Data
Authors:
Nicholas W. Kamp,
Matheus Hostert,
Austin Schneider,
Stefano Vergani,
Carlos A. Argüelles,
Janet M. Conrad,
Michael H. Shaevitz,
Melissa A. Uchida
Abstract:
We revisit models of heavy neutral leptons (neutrissimos) with transition magnetic moments as explanations of the $4.8σ$ excess of electron-like events at MiniBooNE. We perform a detailed Monte Carlo-based analysis to re-examine the preferred regions in the model parameter space to explain MiniBooNE, considering also potential contributions from oscillations due to an eV-scale sterile neutrino. We…
▽ More
We revisit models of heavy neutral leptons (neutrissimos) with transition magnetic moments as explanations of the $4.8σ$ excess of electron-like events at MiniBooNE. We perform a detailed Monte Carlo-based analysis to re-examine the preferred regions in the model parameter space to explain MiniBooNE, considering also potential contributions from oscillations due to an eV-scale sterile neutrino. We then derive robust constraints on the model using neutrino-electron elastic scattering data from MINERvA. We find that MINERvA rules out a large region of parameter space, but allowed solutions exist at the $2σ$ confidence level. A dedicated MINERvA analysis would likely be able to probe the entire region of preference of MiniBooNE in this model.
△ Less
Submitted 2 March, 2023; v1 submitted 14 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
White Paper on Light Sterile Neutrino Searches and Related Phenomenology
Authors:
M. A. Acero,
C. A. Argüelles,
M. Hostert,
D. Kalra,
G. Karagiorgi,
K. J. Kelly,
B. Littlejohn,
P. Machado,
W. Pettus,
M. Toups,
M. Ross-Lonergan,
A. Sousa,
P. T. Surukuchi,
Y. Y. Y. Wong,
W. Abdallah,
A. M. Abdullahi,
R. Akutsu,
L. Alvarez-Ruso,
D. S. M. Alves,
A. Aurisano,
A. B. Balantekin,
J. M. Berryman,
T. Bertólez-Martínez,
J. Brunner,
M. Blennow
, et al. (147 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This white paper provides a comprehensive review of our present understanding of experimental neutrino anomalies that remain unresolved, charting the progress achieved over the last decade at the experimental and phenomenological level, and sets the stage for future programmatic prospects in addressing those anomalies. It is purposed to serve as a guiding and motivational "encyclopedic" reference,…
▽ More
This white paper provides a comprehensive review of our present understanding of experimental neutrino anomalies that remain unresolved, charting the progress achieved over the last decade at the experimental and phenomenological level, and sets the stage for future programmatic prospects in addressing those anomalies. It is purposed to serve as a guiding and motivational "encyclopedic" reference, with emphasis on needs and options for future exploration that may lead to the ultimate resolution of the anomalies. We see the main experimental, analysis, and theory-driven thrusts that will be essential to achieving this goal being: 1) Cover all anomaly sectors -- given the unresolved nature of all four canonical anomalies, it is imperative to support all pillars of a diverse experimental portfolio, source, reactor, decay-at-rest, decay-in-flight, and other methods/sources, to provide complementary probes of and increased precision for new physics explanations; 2) Pursue diverse signatures -- it is imperative that experiments make design and analysis choices that maximize sensitivity to as broad an array of these potential new physics signatures as possible; 3) Deepen theoretical engagement -- priority in the theory community should be placed on development of standard and beyond standard models relevant to all four short-baseline anomalies and the development of tools for efficient tests of these models with existing and future experimental datasets; 4) Openly share data -- Fluid communication between the experimental and theory communities will be required, which implies that both experimental data releases and theoretical calculations should be publicly available; and 5) Apply robust analysis techniques -- Appropriate statistical treatment is crucial to assess the compatibility of data sets within the context of any given model.
△ Less
Submitted 17 May, 2023; v1 submitted 14 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
MiniBooNE and MicroBooNE Combined Fit to a 3+1 Sterile Neutrino Scenario
Authors:
A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo,
B. C. Brown,
J. M. Conrad,
R. Dharmapalan,
A. Diaz,
Z. Djurcic,
D. A. Finley,
R. Ford,
G. T. Garvey,
S. Gollapinni,
A. Hourlier,
E. -C. Huang,
N. W. Kamp,
G. Karagiorgi,
T. Katori,
T. Kobilarcik,
K. Lin,
W. C. Louis,
C. Mariani,
W. Marsh,
G. B. Mills,
J. Mirabal-Martinez,
C. D. Moore,
R. H. Nelson,
J. Nowak
, et al. (14 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This letter presents the results from the MiniBooNE experiment within a full "3+1" scenario where one sterile neutrino is introduced to the three-active-neutrino picture. In addition to electron-neutrino appearance at short-baselines, this scenario also allows for disappearance of the muon-neutrino and electron-neutrino fluxes in the Booster Neutrino Beam, which is shared by the MicroBooNE experim…
▽ More
This letter presents the results from the MiniBooNE experiment within a full "3+1" scenario where one sterile neutrino is introduced to the three-active-neutrino picture. In addition to electron-neutrino appearance at short-baselines, this scenario also allows for disappearance of the muon-neutrino and electron-neutrino fluxes in the Booster Neutrino Beam, which is shared by the MicroBooNE experiment. We present the 3+1 fit to the MiniBooNE electron-(anti)neutrino and muon-(anti)neutrino data alone, and in combination with MicroBooNE electron-neutrino data. The best-fit parameters of the combined fit with the exclusive CCQE analysis (inclusive analysis) are $Δm^2 = 0.29 eV^2 (0.33 eV^2)$, $|U_{e4}|^2 = 0.016 (0.500)$, $|U_{μ4}|^2 = 0.500 (0.500)$, and $\sin^2(2θ_{μe})=0.0316 (1.0)$. Comparing the no-oscillation scenario to the 3+1 model, the data prefer the 3+1 model with a $Δχ^2/\text{dof} = 24.7 / 3 (17.3 / 3)$, a $4.3σ(3.4σ)$ preference assuming the asymptotic approximation given by Wilks' theorem.
△ Less
Submitted 9 September, 2022; v1 submitted 5 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
-
MiniBooNE Data Releases
Authors:
A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo,
B. C. Brown,
J. M. Conrad,
R. Dharmapalan,
A. Diaz,
Z. Djurcic,
D. A. Finley,
R. Ford,
G. T. Garvey,
S. Gollapinni,
A. Hourlier,
E. -C. Huang,
N. W. Kamp,
G. Karagiorgi,
T. Katori,
T. Kobilarcik,
K. Lin,
W. C. Louis,
C. Mariani,
W. Marsh,
G. B. Mills,
J. Mirabal-Martinez,
C. D. Moore,
R. H. Nelson,
J. Nowak
, et al. (16 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The MiniBooNE experiment has provided data releases for most publications. Occasionally it is necessary to move data release pages. This document provides a single point of reference that will be updated by the collaboration to point to the present location of the MiniBooNE data releases.
The MiniBooNE experiment has provided data releases for most publications. Occasionally it is necessary to move data release pages. This document provides a single point of reference that will be updated by the collaboration to point to the present location of the MiniBooNE data releases.
△ Less
Submitted 25 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
Convolutional Neural Networks for Shower Energy Prediction in Liquid Argon Time Projection Chambers
Authors:
Kiara Carloni,
Nicholas W. Kamp,
Austin Schneider,
Janet M. Conrad
Abstract:
When electrons with energies of $O(100)$ MeV pass through a liquid argon time projection chamber (LArTPC), they deposit energy in the form of electromagnetic showers. Methods to reconstruct the energy of these showers in LArTPCs often rely on the combination of a clustering algorithm and a linear calibration between the shower energy and charge contained in the cluster. This reconstruction process…
▽ More
When electrons with energies of $O(100)$ MeV pass through a liquid argon time projection chamber (LArTPC), they deposit energy in the form of electromagnetic showers. Methods to reconstruct the energy of these showers in LArTPCs often rely on the combination of a clustering algorithm and a linear calibration between the shower energy and charge contained in the cluster. This reconstruction process could be improved through the use of a convolutional neural network (CNN). Here we discuss the performance of various CNN-based models on simulated LArTPC images, and then compare the best performing models to a typical linear calibration algorithm. We show that the CNN method is able to address inefficiencies caused by unresponsive wires in LArTPCs and reconstruct a larger fraction of imperfect events to within 5% accuracy compared with the linear algorithm.
△ Less
Submitted 25 January, 2022; v1 submitted 20 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
Explaining the MiniBooNE Excess Through a Mixed Model of Oscillation and Decay
Authors:
Stefano Vergani,
Nicholas W. Kamp,
Alejandro Diaz,
Carlos A. Argüelles,
Janet M. Conrad,
Michael H. Shaevitz,
Melissa A. Uchida
Abstract:
The electron-like excess observed by the MiniBooNE experiment is explained with a model comprising a new low mass state ($\mathcal{O}(1)$ eV) participating in neutrino oscillations and a new high mass state ($\mathcal{O}(100)$ MeV) that decays to $ν+γ$. Short-baseline oscillation data sets are used to predict the oscillation parameters. Fitting the MiniBooNE energy and scattering angle data, there…
▽ More
The electron-like excess observed by the MiniBooNE experiment is explained with a model comprising a new low mass state ($\mathcal{O}(1)$ eV) participating in neutrino oscillations and a new high mass state ($\mathcal{O}(100)$ MeV) that decays to $ν+γ$. Short-baseline oscillation data sets are used to predict the oscillation parameters. Fitting the MiniBooNE energy and scattering angle data, there is a narrow joint allowed region for the decay contribution at 95% CL. The result is a substantial improvement over the single sterile neutrino oscillation model, with $Δχ^2/dof$ = 19.3/2 for a decay coupling of $2.8 \times 10^{-7}$ GeV$^{-1}$, high mass state of 376 MeV, oscillation mixing angle of $7\times 10^{-4}$ and mass splitting of $1.3$ eV$^2$. This model predicts that no clear oscillation signature will be observed in the FNAL short baseline program due to the low signal-level.
△ Less
Submitted 27 September, 2021; v1 submitted 13 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Updated MiniBooNE Neutrino Oscillation Results with Increased Data and New Background Studies
Authors:
MiniBooNE Collaboration,
A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo,
B. C. Brown,
J. M. Conrad,
R. Dharmapalan,
A. Diaz,
Z. Djurcic,
D. A. Finley,
R. Ford,
G. T. Garvey,
S. Gollapinni,
A. Hourlier,
E. C. Huang,
N. W. Kamp,
G. Karagiorgi,
T. Katori,
T. Kobilarcik,
K. Lin,
W. C. Louis,
C. Mariani,
W. Marsh,
G. B. Mills,
J. Mirabal-Martinez,
C. D. Moore,
R. H. Nelson
, et al. (17 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The MiniBooNE experiment at Fermilab reports a total excess of $638.0 \pm 132.8$ electron-like events ($4.8 σ$) from a data sample corresponding to $18.75 \times 10^{20}$ protons-on-target in neutrino mode, which is a 46\% increase in the data sample with respect to previously published results, and $11.27 \times 10^{20}$ protons-on-target in antineutrino mode. The additional statistics allow seve…
▽ More
The MiniBooNE experiment at Fermilab reports a total excess of $638.0 \pm 132.8$ electron-like events ($4.8 σ$) from a data sample corresponding to $18.75 \times 10^{20}$ protons-on-target in neutrino mode, which is a 46\% increase in the data sample with respect to previously published results, and $11.27 \times 10^{20}$ protons-on-target in antineutrino mode. The additional statistics allow several studies to address questions on the source of the excess. First, we provide two-dimensional plots in visible energy and cosine of the angle of the outgoing lepton, which can provide valuable input to models for the event excess. Second, we test whether the excess may arise from photons that enter the detector from external events or photons exiting the detector from $π^0$ decays in two model independent ways. Beam timing information shows that almost all of the excess is in time with neutrinos that interact in the detector. The radius distribution shows that the excess is distributed throughout the volume, while tighter cuts on the fiducal volume increase the significance of the excess. We conclude that models of the event excess based on entering and exiting photons are disfavored.
△ Less
Submitted 8 March, 2021; v1 submitted 30 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
