Swin UNETR segmentation with automated geometry filtering for biomechanical modeling of knee joint cartilage
Authors:
Reza Kakavand,
Peyman Tahghighi,
Reza Ahmadi,
W. Brent Edwards,
Amin Komeili
Abstract:
Simulation studies, such as finite element (FE) modeling, offer insights into knee joint biomechanics, which may not be achieved through experimental methods without direct involvement of patients. While generic FE models have been used to predict tissue biomechanics, they overlook variations in population-specific geometry, loading, and material properties. In contrast, subject-specific models ac…
▽ More
Simulation studies, such as finite element (FE) modeling, offer insights into knee joint biomechanics, which may not be achieved through experimental methods without direct involvement of patients. While generic FE models have been used to predict tissue biomechanics, they overlook variations in population-specific geometry, loading, and material properties. In contrast, subject-specific models account for these factors, delivering enhanced predictive precision but requiring significant effort and time for development. This study aimed to facilitate subject-specific knee joint FE modeling by integrating an automated cartilage segmentation algorithm using a 3D Swin UNETR. This algorithm provided initial segmentation of knee cartilage, followed by automated geometry filtering to refine surface roughness and continuity. In addition to the standard metrics of image segmentation performance, such as Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance, the method's effectiveness was also assessed in FE simulation. Nine pairs of knee cartilage FE models, using manual and automated segmentation methods, were developed to compare the predicted stress and strain responses during gait. The automated segmentation achieved high Dice similarity coefficients of 89.4% for femoral and 85.1% for tibial cartilage, with a Hausdorff distance of 2.3 mm between the automated and manual segmentation. Mechanical results including maximum principal stress and strain, fluid pressure, fibril strain, and contact area showed no significant differences between the manual and automated FE models. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed automated segmentation method in creating accurate knee joint FE models.
△ Less
Submitted 8 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
Integration of Swin UNETR and statistical shape modeling for a semi-automated segmentation of the knee and biomechanical modeling of articular cartilage
Authors:
Reza Kakavand,
Mehrdad Palizi,
Peyman Tahghighi,
Reza Ahmadi,
Neha Gianchandani,
Samer Adeeb,
Roberto Souza,
W. Brent Edwards,
Amin Komeili
Abstract:
Simulation studies like finite element (FE) modeling provide insight into knee joint mechanics without patient experimentation. Generic FE models represent biomechanical behavior of the tissue by overlooking variations in geometry, loading, and material properties of a population. On the other hand, subject-specific models include these specifics, resulting in enhanced predictive precision. Howeve…
▽ More
Simulation studies like finite element (FE) modeling provide insight into knee joint mechanics without patient experimentation. Generic FE models represent biomechanical behavior of the tissue by overlooking variations in geometry, loading, and material properties of a population. On the other hand, subject-specific models include these specifics, resulting in enhanced predictive precision. However, creating such models is laborious and time-intensive. The present study aimed to enhance subject-specific knee joint FE modeling by incorporating a semi-automated segmentation algorithm. This segmentation was a 3D Swin UNETR for an initial segmentation of the femur and tibia, followed by a statistical shape model (SSM) adjustment to improve surface roughness and continuity. Five hundred and seven magnetic resonance images (MRIs) from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) database were used to build and validate the segmentation model. A semi-automated FE model was developed using this semi-automated segmentation. On the other hand, a manual FE model was developed through manual segmentation (i.e., the gold standard approach). Both FE models were subjected to gait loading. The predicted mechanical response of manual and semi-automated FE models were compared. In the result, our semi-automated segmentation achieved Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) over 98% for both femur and tibia. The mechanical results (max principal stress, max principal strain, fluid pressure, fibril strain, and contact area) showed no significant differences between the manual and semi-automated FE models, indicating the effectiveness of the proposed semi-automated segmentation in creating accurate knee joint FE models. ( https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/k5hdc9cz7w/1 ).
△ Less
Submitted 18 September, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
