Modelling the response of a turbulent jet flame to acoustic forcing in a linearized framework using an active flame approach
Authors:
Thomas Ludwig Kaiser,
Gregoire Varillon,
Wolfgang Polifke,
Feichi Zhang,
Thorsten Zirwes,
Henning Bockhorn,
Kilian Oberleithner
Abstract:
This study performs a linear analysis of a turbulent reacting methane-air jet flame, with the goal of predicting the response of the reacting flow to upstream acoustic actuation. Accounting for heat release fluctuations is a vital component when investigating thermoacoustic instabilities and flame noise in a linearized framework. Unlike previous studies this work develops and applies an active fla…
▽ More
This study performs a linear analysis of a turbulent reacting methane-air jet flame, with the goal of predicting the response of the reacting flow to upstream acoustic actuation. Accounting for heat release fluctuations is a vital component when investigating thermoacoustic instabilities and flame noise in a linearized framework. Unlike previous studies this work develops and applies an active flame approach, meaning the heat release oscillations of the flame resulting from the acoustic fluctuations are taken into account. To yield an active flame approach in the linear framework, a combustion model needs to be linearized. It is demonstrated that linearizing Large Eddy Simulation (LES) and Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS) combustion models leads to closure problems, making their application in the linearized framework troublesome. Reynolds-averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) combustion models, however, prove to circumvent this problem, which makes them suitable candidates for this purpose. The RANS combustion models are linearized around the temporal mean flow of the turbulent jet flame, which is obtained by LES. An a priori analysis shows that a linearized RANS-Eddy Break Up (EBU) model is the best suited among all investigated combustion models for the investigated set-up and reproduces with high accuracy the fluctuations in reaction rate obtained in the LES. Furthermore, the linearized governing equations of the flow including the linearized EBU model for the reaction rate are solved for incoming acoustic perturbations. The response modes show that the reaction rate oscillations are caused by Kelvin-Helmholtz vortex rings, which perturb the jet flame. The results are in good agreement with the LES simulations in terms of the mode shapes of both reaction rate and velocity fluctuations.
△ Less
Submitted 1 December, 2022; v1 submitted 24 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
Mean flow data assimilation based on physics-informed neural networks
Authors:
Jakob G. R. von Saldern,
Johann Moritz Reumschüssel,
Thomas L. Kaiser,
Moritz Sieber,
Kilian Oberleithner
Abstract:
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) can be used to solve partial differential equations (PDEs) and identify hidden variables by incorporating the governing equations into neural network training. In this study, we apply PINNs to the assimilation of turbulent mean flow data and investigate the method's ability to identify inaccessible variables and closure terms from sparse data. Using high-fi…
▽ More
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) can be used to solve partial differential equations (PDEs) and identify hidden variables by incorporating the governing equations into neural network training. In this study, we apply PINNs to the assimilation of turbulent mean flow data and investigate the method's ability to identify inaccessible variables and closure terms from sparse data. Using high-fidelity large-eddy simulation (LES) data and particle image velocimetry (PIV) measured mean fields, we show that PINNs are suitable for simultaneously identifying multiple missing quantities in turbulent flows and providing continuous and differentiable mean fields consistent with the provided PDEs. In this way, consistent and complete mean states can be provided, which are essential for linearized mean field methods. The presented method does not require a grid or discretization scheme, is easy to implement, and can be used for a wide range of applications, making it a very promising tool for mean field-based methods in fluid mechanics.
△ Less
Submitted 8 December, 2022; v1 submitted 5 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
