-
Scaling overhead of embedding optimization problems in quantum annealing
Authors:
Mario S. Könz,
Wolfgang Lechner,
Helmut G. Katzgraber,
Matthias Troyer
Abstract:
In order to treat all-to-all connected quadratic binary optimization problems (QUBO) with hardware quantum annealers, an embedding of the original problem is required due to the sparsity of the hardware's topology. Embedding fully-connected graphs - typically found in industrial applications - incurs a quadratic space overhead and thus a significant overhead in the time to solution. Here we invest…
▽ More
In order to treat all-to-all connected quadratic binary optimization problems (QUBO) with hardware quantum annealers, an embedding of the original problem is required due to the sparsity of the hardware's topology. Embedding fully-connected graphs - typically found in industrial applications - incurs a quadratic space overhead and thus a significant overhead in the time to solution. Here we investigate this embedding penalty of established planar embedding schemes such as minor embedding on a square lattice, minor embedding on a Chimera graph, and the Lechner-Hauke-Zoller scheme using simulated quantum annealing on classical hardware. Large-scale quantum Monte Carlo simulation suggest a polynomial time-to-solution overhead. Our results demonstrate that standard analog quantum annealing hardware is at a disadvantage in comparison to classical digital annealers, as well as gate-model quantum annealers and could also serve as benchmark for improvements of the standard quantum annealing protocol.
△ Less
Submitted 3 November, 2021; v1 submitted 29 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
Uncertain fate of fair sampling in quantum annealing
Authors:
Mario S. Könz,
Guglielmo Mazzola,
Andrew J. Ochoa,
Helmut G. Katzgraber,
Matthias Troyer
Abstract:
Recently, it was demonstrated both theoretically and experimentally on the D-Wave quantum annealer that transverse-field quantum annealing does not find all ground states with equal probability. In particular, it was proposed that more complex driver Hamiltonians beyond transverse fields might mitigate this shortcoming. Here, we investigate the mechanisms of (un)fair sampling in quantum annealing.…
▽ More
Recently, it was demonstrated both theoretically and experimentally on the D-Wave quantum annealer that transverse-field quantum annealing does not find all ground states with equal probability. In particular, it was proposed that more complex driver Hamiltonians beyond transverse fields might mitigate this shortcoming. Here, we investigate the mechanisms of (un)fair sampling in quantum annealing. While higher-order terms can improve the sampling for selected small problems, we present multiple counterexamples where driver Hamiltonians that go beyond transverse fields do not remove the sampling bias. Using perturbation theory we explain why this is the case. In addition, we present large-scale quantum Monte Carlo simulations for spin glasses with known degeneracy in two space dimensions and demonstrate that the fair-sampling performance of quadratic driver terms is comparable to standard transverse-field drivers. Our results suggest that quantum annealing machines are not well suited for sampling applications, unless post-processing techniques to improve the sampling are applied.
△ Less
Submitted 21 September, 2019; v1 submitted 15 June, 2018;
originally announced June 2018.
-
Optimizing Schedules for Quantum Annealing
Authors:
Daniel Herr,
Ethan Brown,
Bettina Heim,
Mario Könz,
Guglielmo Mazzola,
Matthias Troyer
Abstract:
Classical and quantum annealing are two heuristic optimization methods that search for an optimal solution by slowly decreasing thermal or quantum fluctuations. Optimizing annealing schedules is important both for performance and fair comparisons between classical annealing, quantum annealing, and other algorithms. Here we present a heuristic approach for the optimization of annealing schedules fo…
▽ More
Classical and quantum annealing are two heuristic optimization methods that search for an optimal solution by slowly decreasing thermal or quantum fluctuations. Optimizing annealing schedules is important both for performance and fair comparisons between classical annealing, quantum annealing, and other algorithms. Here we present a heuristic approach for the optimization of annealing schedules for quantum annealing and apply it to 3D Ising spin glass problems. We find that if both classical and quantum annealing schedules are similarly optimized, classical annealing outperforms quantum annealing for these problems when considering the residual energy obtained in slow annealing. However, when performing many repetitions of fast annealing, simulated quantum annealing is seen to outperform classical annealing for our benchmark problems.
△ Less
Submitted 1 May, 2017;
originally announced May 2017.
-
Updated Core Libraries of the ALPS Project
Authors:
A. Gaenko,
A. E. Antipov,
G. Carcassi,
T. Chen,
X. Chen,
Q. Dong,
L. Gamper,
J. Gukelberger,
R. Igarashi,
S. Iskakov,
M. Könz,
J. P. F. LeBlanc,
R. Levy,
P. N. Ma,
J. E. Paki,
H. Shinaoka,
S. Todo,
M. Troyer,
E. Gull
Abstract:
The open source ALPS (Algorithms and Libraries for Physics Simulations) project provides a collection of physics libraries and applications, with a focus on simulations of lattice models and strongly correlated systems. The libraries provide a convenient set of well-documented and reusable components for develo** condensed matter physics simulation code, and the applications strive to make commo…
▽ More
The open source ALPS (Algorithms and Libraries for Physics Simulations) project provides a collection of physics libraries and applications, with a focus on simulations of lattice models and strongly correlated systems. The libraries provide a convenient set of well-documented and reusable components for develo** condensed matter physics simulation code, and the applications strive to make commonly used and proven computational algorithms available to a non-expert community. In this paper we present an updated and refactored version of the core ALPS libraries geared at the computational physics software development community, rewritten with focus on documentation, ease of installation, and software maintainability.
△ Less
Submitted 15 December, 2016; v1 submitted 13 September, 2016;
originally announced September 2016.