-
Regularizing Solutions to the MEG Inverse Problem Using Space-Time Separable Covariance Functions
Authors:
Arno Solin,
Pasi Jylänki,
Jaakko Kauramäki,
Tom Heskes,
Marcel A. J. van Gerven,
Simo Särkkä
Abstract:
In magnetoencephalography (MEG) the conventional approach to source reconstruction is to solve the underdetermined inverse problem independently over time and space. Here we present how the conventional approach can be extended by regularizing the solution in space and time by a Gaussian process (Gaussian random field) model. Assuming a separable covariance function in space and time, the computat…
▽ More
In magnetoencephalography (MEG) the conventional approach to source reconstruction is to solve the underdetermined inverse problem independently over time and space. Here we present how the conventional approach can be extended by regularizing the solution in space and time by a Gaussian process (Gaussian random field) model. Assuming a separable covariance function in space and time, the computational complexity of the proposed model becomes (without any further assumptions or restrictions) $\mathcal{O}(t^3 + n^3 + m^2n)$, where $t$ is the number of time steps, $m$ is the number of sources, and $n$ is the number of sensors. We apply the method to both simulated and empirical data, and demonstrate the efficiency and generality of our Bayesian source reconstruction approach which subsumes various classical approaches in the literature.
△ Less
Submitted 17 April, 2016;
originally announced April 2016.
-
Expectation propagation as a way of life: A framework for Bayesian inference on partitioned data
Authors:
Aki Vehtari,
Andrew Gelman,
Tuomas Sivula,
Pasi Jylänki,
Dustin Tran,
Swupnil Sahai,
Paul Blomstedt,
John P. Cunningham,
David Schiminovich,
Christian Robert
Abstract:
A common divide-and-conquer approach for Bayesian computation with big data is to partition the data, perform local inference for each piece separately, and combine the results to obtain a global posterior approximation. While being conceptually and computationally appealing, this method involves the problematic need to also split the prior for the local inferences; these weakened priors may not p…
▽ More
A common divide-and-conquer approach for Bayesian computation with big data is to partition the data, perform local inference for each piece separately, and combine the results to obtain a global posterior approximation. While being conceptually and computationally appealing, this method involves the problematic need to also split the prior for the local inferences; these weakened priors may not provide enough regularization for each separate computation, thus eliminating one of the key advantages of Bayesian methods. To resolve this dilemma while still retaining the generalizability of the underlying local inference method, we apply the idea of expectation propagation (EP) as a framework for distributed Bayesian inference. The central idea is to iteratively update approximations to the local likelihoods given the state of the other approximations and the prior. The present paper has two roles: we review the steps that are needed to keep EP algorithms numerically stable, and we suggest a general approach, inspired by EP, for approaching data partitioning problems in a way that achieves the computational benefits of parallelism while allowing each local update to make use of relevant information from the other sites. In addition, we demonstrate how the method can be applied in a hierarchical context to make use of partitioning of both data and parameters. The paper describes a general algorithmic framework, rather than a specific algorithm, and presents an example implementation for it.
△ Less
Submitted 30 November, 2019; v1 submitted 15 December, 2014;
originally announced December 2014.
-
Approximate Inference for Nonstationary Heteroscedastic Gaussian process Regression
Authors:
Ville Tolvanen,
Pasi Jylänki,
Aki Vehtari
Abstract:
This paper presents a novel approach for approximate integration over the uncertainty of noise and signal variances in Gaussian process (GP) regression. Our efficient and straightforward approach can also be applied to integration over input dependent noise variance (heteroscedasticity) and input dependent signal variance (nonstationarity) by setting independent GP priors for the noise and signal…
▽ More
This paper presents a novel approach for approximate integration over the uncertainty of noise and signal variances in Gaussian process (GP) regression. Our efficient and straightforward approach can also be applied to integration over input dependent noise variance (heteroscedasticity) and input dependent signal variance (nonstationarity) by setting independent GP priors for the noise and signal variances. We use expectation propagation (EP) for inference and compare results to Markov chain Monte Carlo in two simulated data sets and three empirical examples. The results show that EP produces comparable results with less computational burden.
△ Less
Submitted 22 April, 2014;
originally announced April 2014.
-
Expectation Propagation for Neural Networks with Sparsity-promoting Priors
Authors:
Pasi Jylänki,
Aapo Nummenmaa,
Aki Vehtari
Abstract:
We propose a novel approach for nonlinear regression using a two-layer neural network (NN) model structure with sparsity-favoring hierarchical priors on the network weights. We present an expectation propagation (EP) approach for approximate integration over the posterior distribution of the weights, the hierarchical scale parameters of the priors, and the residual scale. Using a factorized poster…
▽ More
We propose a novel approach for nonlinear regression using a two-layer neural network (NN) model structure with sparsity-favoring hierarchical priors on the network weights. We present an expectation propagation (EP) approach for approximate integration over the posterior distribution of the weights, the hierarchical scale parameters of the priors, and the residual scale. Using a factorized posterior approximation we derive a computationally efficient algorithm, whose complexity scales similarly to an ensemble of independent sparse linear models. The approach enables flexible definition of weight priors with different sparseness properties such as independent Laplace priors with a common scale parameter or Gaussian automatic relevance determination (ARD) priors with different relevance parameters for all inputs. The approach can be extended beyond standard activation functions and NN model structures to form flexible nonlinear predictors from multiple sparse linear models. The effects of the hierarchical priors and the predictive performance of the algorithm are assessed using both simulated and real-world data. Comparisons are made to two alternative models with ARD priors: a Gaussian process with a NN covariance function and marginal maximum a posteriori estimates of the relevance parameters, and a NN with Markov chain Monte Carlo integration over all the unknown model parameters.
△ Less
Submitted 27 March, 2013;
originally announced March 2013.
-
Nested Expectation Propagation for Gaussian Process Classification with a Multinomial Probit Likelihood
Authors:
Jaakko Riihimäki,
Pasi Jylänki,
Aki Vehtari
Abstract:
We consider probabilistic multinomial probit classification using Gaussian process (GP) priors. The challenges with the multiclass GP classification are the integration over the non-Gaussian posterior distribution, and the increase of the number of unknown latent variables as the number of target classes grows. Expectation propagation (EP) has proven to be a very accurate method for approximate in…
▽ More
We consider probabilistic multinomial probit classification using Gaussian process (GP) priors. The challenges with the multiclass GP classification are the integration over the non-Gaussian posterior distribution, and the increase of the number of unknown latent variables as the number of target classes grows. Expectation propagation (EP) has proven to be a very accurate method for approximate inference but the existing EP approaches for the multinomial probit GP classification rely on numerical quadratures or independence assumptions between the latent values from different classes to facilitate the computations. In this paper, we propose a novel nested EP approach which does not require numerical quadratures, and approximates accurately all between-class posterior dependencies of the latent values, but still scales linearly in the number of classes. The predictive accuracy of the nested EP approach is compared to Laplace, variational Bayes, and Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approximations with various benchmark data sets. In the experiments nested EP was the most consistent method with respect to MCMC sampling, but the differences between the compared methods were small if only the classification accuracy is concerned.
△ Less
Submitted 16 July, 2012;
originally announced July 2012.
-
Bayesian Modeling with Gaussian Processes using the GPstuff Toolbox
Authors:
Jarno Vanhatalo,
Jaakko Riihimäki,
Jouni Hartikainen,
Pasi Jylänki,
Ville Tolvanen,
Aki Vehtari
Abstract:
Gaussian processes (GP) are powerful tools for probabilistic modeling purposes. They can be used to define prior distributions over latent functions in hierarchical Bayesian models. The prior over functions is defined implicitly by the mean and covariance function, which determine the smoothness and variability of the function. The inference can then be conducted directly in the function space by…
▽ More
Gaussian processes (GP) are powerful tools for probabilistic modeling purposes. They can be used to define prior distributions over latent functions in hierarchical Bayesian models. The prior over functions is defined implicitly by the mean and covariance function, which determine the smoothness and variability of the function. The inference can then be conducted directly in the function space by evaluating or approximating the posterior process. Despite their attractive theoretical properties GPs provide practical challenges in their implementation. GPstuff is a versatile collection of computational tools for GP models compatible with Linux and Windows MATLAB and Octave. It includes, among others, various inference methods, sparse approximations and tools for model assessment. In this work, we review these tools and demonstrate the use of GPstuff in several models.
△ Less
Submitted 15 July, 2015; v1 submitted 25 June, 2012;
originally announced June 2012.
-
Gaussian Process Regression with a Student-t Likelihood
Authors:
Pasi Jylänki,
Jarno Vanhatalo,
Aki Vehtari
Abstract:
This paper considers the robust and efficient implementation of Gaussian process regression with a Student-t observation model. The challenge with the Student-t model is the analytically intractable inference which is why several approximative methods have been proposed. The expectation propagation (EP) has been found to be a very accurate method in many empirical studies but the convergence of th…
▽ More
This paper considers the robust and efficient implementation of Gaussian process regression with a Student-t observation model. The challenge with the Student-t model is the analytically intractable inference which is why several approximative methods have been proposed. The expectation propagation (EP) has been found to be a very accurate method in many empirical studies but the convergence of the EP is known to be problematic with models containing non-log-concave site functions such as the Student-t distribution. In this paper we illustrate the situations where the standard EP fails to converge and review different modifications and alternative algorithms for improving the convergence. We demonstrate that convergence problems may occur during the type-II maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimation of the hyperparameters and show that the standard EP may not converge in the MAP values in some difficult cases. We present a robust implementation which relies primarily on parallel EP updates and utilizes a moment-matching-based double-loop algorithm with adaptively selected step size in difficult cases. The predictive performance of the EP is compared to the Laplace, variational Bayes, and Markov chain Monte Carlo approximations.
△ Less
Submitted 22 June, 2011;
originally announced June 2011.
