Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Jouybari, M A

Supersonic turbulent flows over sinusoidal rough walls

Authors: Mostafa Aghaei Jouybari, Junlin Yuan, Zhaorui Li, Giles J. Brereton, Farhad A. Jaberi

Abstract: Direct numerical simulations were performed to characterize fully developed supersonic turbulent channel flows over isothermal rough walls. The effect of roughness was incorporated using a level-set/volume-of-fluid immersed boundary method. Turbulence statistics of five channel flows are compared, including one reference case with both walls smooth and four cases with smooth top walls and bottom w… ▽ More Direct numerical simulations were performed to characterize fully developed supersonic turbulent channel flows over isothermal rough walls. The effect of roughness was incorporated using a level-set/volume-of-fluid immersed boundary method. Turbulence statistics of five channel flows are compared, including one reference case with both walls smooth and four cases with smooth top walls and bottom walls with two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) sinusoidal roughnesses. Results reveal a strong dependence of the turbulence on the roughness topography and the associated shock patterns. Specifically, the 2D geometries generate strong oblique shock waves that propagate across the channel and are reflected back to the rough-wall side. These strong shocks are absent in the smooth-wall channel and are significantly weaker in cases with 3D roughness geometries, replaced by weak shocklets. At the im**ement locations of the shocks on the top wall in the 2D roughness cases, localized augmentations of turbulence shear production are observed. Such regions of augmented production also exist for the 3D cases, at a much weaker level. The oblique shock waves are thought to be responsible for a more significant entropy generation for cases with 2D surfaces than those with 3D ones, leading to a higher irreversible heat generation and consequently higher temperature values in 2D roughness cases. In the present supersonic channels, the effects of roughness extend beyond the near-wall layer due to the shocks. This suggests that outer layer similarity may not fully apply to a rough-wall supersonic turbulent flow. △ Less

Submitted 7 November, 2022; v1 submitted 4 December, 2020; originally announced December 2020.

Data-driven prediction of the equivalent sand-grain height in rough-wall turbulent flows

Authors: Mostafa Aghaei Jouybari, Junlin Yuan, Giles J. Brereton, Michael S. Murillo

Abstract: This paper investigates a long-standing question about the effect of surface roughness on turbulent flow: what is the equivalent roughness sand-grain height for a given roughness topography? Deep Neural Network (DNN) and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) machine learning approaches are used to develop a high-fidelity prediction approach of the Nikuradse equivalent sand-grain height $k_s$ for turbu… ▽ More This paper investigates a long-standing question about the effect of surface roughness on turbulent flow: what is the equivalent roughness sand-grain height for a given roughness topography? Deep Neural Network (DNN) and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) machine learning approaches are used to develop a high-fidelity prediction approach of the Nikuradse equivalent sand-grain height $k_s$ for turbulent flows over a wide variety of different rough surfaces. To this end, 45 surface geometries were generated and the flow over them simulated at $\hbox{Re}_τ=1000$ using direct numerical simulations. These surface geometries differed significantly in moments of surface height fluctuations, effective slope, average inclination, porosity and degree of randomness. Thirty of these surfaces were considered fully-rough and they were supplemented with experimental data for fully-rough flows over 15 more surfaces available from previous studies. The DNN and GPR methods predicted $k_s$ with an average error of less than 10% and a maximum error of less than 30%, which appears to be significantly more accurate than existing prediction formulas. They also identified the surface porosity and the effective slope of roughness in the spanwise direction as important factors in drag prediction. △ Less

Submitted 27 November, 2020; v1 submitted 4 February, 2020; originally announced February 2020.