-
Second Analysis Ecosystem Workshop Report
Authors:
Mohamed Aly,
Jackson Burzynski,
Bryan Cardwell,
Daniel C. Craik,
Tal van Daalen,
Tomas Dado,
Ayanabha Das,
Antonio Delgado Peris,
Caterina Doglioni,
Peter Elmer,
Engin Eren,
Martin B. Eriksen,
Jonas Eschle,
Giulio Eulisse,
Conor Fitzpatrick,
José Flix Molina,
Alessandra Forti,
Ben Galewsky,
Sean Gasiorowski,
Aman Goel,
Loukas Gouskos,
Enrico Guiraud,
Kanhaiya Gupta,
Stephan Hageboeck,
Allison Reinsvold Hall
, et al. (44 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The second workshop on the HEP Analysis Ecosystem took place 23-25 May 2022 at IJCLab in Orsay, to look at progress and continuing challenges in scaling up HEP analysis to meet the needs of HL-LHC and DUNE, as well as the very pressing needs of LHC Run 3 analysis.
The workshop was themed around six particular topics, which were felt to capture key questions, opportunities and challenges. Each to…
▽ More
The second workshop on the HEP Analysis Ecosystem took place 23-25 May 2022 at IJCLab in Orsay, to look at progress and continuing challenges in scaling up HEP analysis to meet the needs of HL-LHC and DUNE, as well as the very pressing needs of LHC Run 3 analysis.
The workshop was themed around six particular topics, which were felt to capture key questions, opportunities and challenges. Each topic arranged a plenary session introduction, often with speakers summarising the state-of-the art and the next steps for analysis. This was then followed by parallel sessions, which were much more discussion focused, and where attendees could grapple with the challenges and propose solutions that could be tried. Where there was significant overlap between topics, a joint discussion between them was arranged.
In the weeks following the workshop the session conveners wrote this document, which is a summary of the main discussions, the key points raised and the conclusions and outcomes. The document was circulated amongst the participants for comments before being finalised here.
△ Less
Submitted 9 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
-
HL-LHC Computing Review: Common Tools and Community Software
Authors:
HEP Software Foundation,
:,
Thea Aarrestad,
Simone Amoroso,
Markus Julian Atkinson,
Joshua Bendavid,
Tommaso Boccali,
Andrea Bocci,
Andy Buckley,
Matteo Cacciari,
Paolo Calafiura,
Philippe Canal,
Federico Carminati,
Taylor Childers,
Vitaliano Ciulli,
Gloria Corti,
Davide Costanzo,
Justin Gage Dezoort,
Caterina Doglioni,
Javier Mauricio Duarte,
Agnieszka Dziurda,
Peter Elmer,
Markus Elsing,
V. Daniel Elvira,
Giulio Eulisse
, et al. (85 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Common and community software packages, such as ROOT, Geant4 and event generators have been a key part of the LHC's success so far and continued development and optimisation will be critical in the future. The challenges are driven by an ambitious physics programme, notably the LHC accelerator upgrade to high-luminosity, HL-LHC, and the corresponding detector upgrades of ATLAS and CMS. In this doc…
▽ More
Common and community software packages, such as ROOT, Geant4 and event generators have been a key part of the LHC's success so far and continued development and optimisation will be critical in the future. The challenges are driven by an ambitious physics programme, notably the LHC accelerator upgrade to high-luminosity, HL-LHC, and the corresponding detector upgrades of ATLAS and CMS. In this document we address the issues for software that is used in multiple experiments (usually even more widely than ATLAS and CMS) and maintained by teams of developers who are either not linked to a particular experiment or who contribute to common software within the context of their experiment activity. We also give space to general considerations for future software and projects that tackle upcoming challenges, no matter who writes it, which is an area where community convergence on best practice is extremely useful.
△ Less
Submitted 31 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
HEP Software Foundation Community White Paper Working Group -- Conditions Data
Authors:
Paul Laycock,
Marko Bracko,
Marco Clemencic,
Dave Dykstra,
Andrea Formica,
Giacomo Govi,
Michel Jouvin,
David Lange,
Lynn Wood
Abstract:
To produce the best physics results, high energy physics experiments require access to calibration and other non-event data during event data processing. These conditions data are typically stored in databases that provide versioning functionality, allowing physicists to make improvements while simultaneously guaranteeing the reproducibility of their results. With the increased complexity of moder…
▽ More
To produce the best physics results, high energy physics experiments require access to calibration and other non-event data during event data processing. These conditions data are typically stored in databases that provide versioning functionality, allowing physicists to make improvements while simultaneously guaranteeing the reproducibility of their results. With the increased complexity of modern experiments, and the evolution of computing models that demand large scale access to conditions data, the solutions for managing this access have evolved over time. In this white paper we give an overview of the conditions data access problem, present convergence on a common solution and present some considerations for the future.
△ Less
Submitted 16 January, 2019;
originally announced January 2019.
-
HEP Software Foundation Community White Paper Working Group - Data Processing Frameworks
Authors:
Paolo Calafiura,
Marco Clemencic,
Hadrien Grasland,
Chris Green,
Benedikt Hegner,
Chris Jones,
Michel Jouvin,
Kyle Knoepfel,
Thomas Kuhr,
Jim Kowalkowski,
Charles Leggett,
Adam Lyon,
David Malon,
Marc Paterno,
Simon Patton,
Elizabeth Sexton-Kennedy,
Graeme A Stewart,
Vakho Tsulaia
Abstract:
Data processing frameworks are an essential part of HEP experiments' software stacks. Frameworks provide a means by which code developers can undertake the essential tasks of physics data processing, accessing relevant inputs and storing their outputs, in a coherent way without needing to know the details of other domains. Frameworks provide essential core services for developers and help deliver…
▽ More
Data processing frameworks are an essential part of HEP experiments' software stacks. Frameworks provide a means by which code developers can undertake the essential tasks of physics data processing, accessing relevant inputs and storing their outputs, in a coherent way without needing to know the details of other domains. Frameworks provide essential core services for developers and help deliver a configurable working application to the experiments' production systems. Modern HEP processing frameworks are in the process of adapting to a new computing landscape dominated by parallel processing and heterogeneity, which pose many questions regarding enhanced functionality and scaling that must be faced without compromising the maintainability of the code. In this paper we identify a program of work that can help further clarify the key concepts of frameworks for HEP and then spawn R&D activities that can focus the community's efforts in the most efficient manner to address the challenges of the upcoming experimental program.
△ Less
Submitted 2 May, 2019; v1 submitted 19 December, 2018;
originally announced December 2018.
-
HEP Software Foundation Community White Paper Working Group -- Data Organization, Management and Access (DOMA)
Authors:
Dario Berzano,
Riccardo Maria Bianchi,
Ian Bird,
Brian Bockelman,
Simone Campana,
Kaushik De,
Dirk Duellmann,
Peter Elmer,
Robert Gardner,
Vincent Garonne,
Claudio Grandi,
Oliver Gutsche,
Andrew Hanushevsky,
Burt Holzman,
Bodhitha Jayatilaka,
Ivo Jimenez,
Michel Jouvin,
Oliver Keeble,
Alexei Klimentov,
Valentin Kuznetsov,
Eric Lancon,
Mario Lassnig,
Miron Livny,
Carlos Maltzahn,
Shawn McKee
, et al. (13 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Without significant changes to data organization, management, and access (DOMA), HEP experiments will find scientific output limited by how fast data can be accessed and digested by computational resources. In this white paper we discuss challenges in DOMA that HEP experiments, such as the HL-LHC, will face as well as potential ways to address them. A research and development timeline to assess th…
▽ More
Without significant changes to data organization, management, and access (DOMA), HEP experiments will find scientific output limited by how fast data can be accessed and digested by computational resources. In this white paper we discuss challenges in DOMA that HEP experiments, such as the HL-LHC, will face as well as potential ways to address them. A research and development timeline to assess these changes is also proposed.
△ Less
Submitted 30 November, 2018;
originally announced December 2018.
-
HEP Software Foundation Community White Paper Working Group - Training, Staffing and Careers
Authors:
HEP Software Foundation,
:,
Dario Berzano,
Riccardo Maria Bianchi,
Peter Elmer,
Sergei V. Gleyzer John Harvey,
Roger Jones,
Michel Jouvin,
Daniel S. Katz,
Sudhir Malik,
Dario Menasce,
Mark Neubauer,
Fernanda Psihas,
Albert Puig Navarro,
Graeme A. Stewart,
Christopher Tunnell,
Justin A. Vasel,
Sean-Jiun Wang
Abstract:
The rapid evolution of technology and the parallel increasing complexity of algorithmic analysis in HEP requires developers to acquire a much larger portfolio of programming skills. Young researchers graduating from universities worldwide currently do not receive adequate preparation in the very diverse fields of modern computing to respond to growing needs of the most advanced experimental challe…
▽ More
The rapid evolution of technology and the parallel increasing complexity of algorithmic analysis in HEP requires developers to acquire a much larger portfolio of programming skills. Young researchers graduating from universities worldwide currently do not receive adequate preparation in the very diverse fields of modern computing to respond to growing needs of the most advanced experimental challenges. There is a growing consensus in the HEP community on the need for training programmes to bring researchers up to date with new software technologies, in particular in the domains of concurrent programming and artificial intelligence. We review some of the initiatives under way for introducing new training programmes and highlight some of the issues that need to be taken into account for these to be successful.
△ Less
Submitted 17 January, 2019; v1 submitted 8 July, 2018;
originally announced July 2018.
-
HEP Software Foundation Community White Paper Working Group - Software Development, Deployment and Validation
Authors:
Benjamin Couturier,
Giulio Eulisse,
Hadrien Grasland,
Benedikt Hegner,
Michel Jouvin,
Meghan Kane,
Daniel S. Katz,
Thomas Kuhr,
David Lange,
Patricia Mendez Lorenzo,
Martin Ritter,
Graeme Andrew Stewart,
Andrea Valassi
Abstract:
The High Energy Phyiscs community has developed and needs to maintain many tens of millions of lines of code and to integrate effectively the work of thousands of developers across large collaborations. Software needs to be built, validated, and deployed across hundreds of sites. Software also has a lifetime of many years, frequently beyond that of the original developer, it must be developed with…
▽ More
The High Energy Phyiscs community has developed and needs to maintain many tens of millions of lines of code and to integrate effectively the work of thousands of developers across large collaborations. Software needs to be built, validated, and deployed across hundreds of sites. Software also has a lifetime of many years, frequently beyond that of the original developer, it must be developed with sustainability in mind. Adequate recognition of software development as a critical task in the HEP community needs to be fostered and an appropriate publication and citation strategy needs to be developed. As part of the HEP Softare Foundation's Community White Paper process a working group on Software Development, Deployment and Validation was formed to examine all of these issues, identify best practice and to formulare recommendations for the next decade. Its report is presented here.
△ Less
Submitted 15 June, 2018; v1 submitted 21 December, 2017;
originally announced December 2017.
-
A Roadmap for HEP Software and Computing R&D for the 2020s
Authors:
Johannes Albrecht,
Antonio Augusto Alves Jr,
Guilherme Amadio,
Giuseppe Andronico,
Nguyen Anh-Ky,
Laurent Aphecetche,
John Apostolakis,
Makoto Asai,
Luca Atzori,
Marian Babik,
Giuseppe Bagliesi,
Marilena Bandieramonte,
Sunanda Banerjee,
Martin Barisits,
Lothar A. T. Bauerdick,
Stefano Belforte,
Douglas Benjamin,
Catrin Bernius,
Wahid Bhimji,
Riccardo Maria Bianchi,
Ian Bird,
Catherine Biscarat,
Jakob Blomer,
Kenneth Bloom,
Tommaso Boccali
, et al. (285 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Particle physics has an ambitious and broad experimental programme for the coming decades. This programme requires large investments in detector hardware, either to build new facilities and experiments, or to upgrade existing ones. Similarly, it requires commensurate investment in the R&D of software to acquire, manage, process, and analyse the shear amounts of data to be recorded. In planning for…
▽ More
Particle physics has an ambitious and broad experimental programme for the coming decades. This programme requires large investments in detector hardware, either to build new facilities and experiments, or to upgrade existing ones. Similarly, it requires commensurate investment in the R&D of software to acquire, manage, process, and analyse the shear amounts of data to be recorded. In planning for the HL-LHC in particular, it is critical that all of the collaborating stakeholders agree on the software goals and priorities, and that the efforts complement each other. In this spirit, this white paper describes the R&D activities required to prepare for this software upgrade.
△ Less
Submitted 19 December, 2018; v1 submitted 18 December, 2017;
originally announced December 2017.
