-
Evaluating the sustainability of a de facto harvest strategy for British Columbia's Spot Prawn (Pandalus platyceros) fishery in the presence of environmental drivers of recruitment and hyperstable catch rates
Authors:
Steven P. Rossi,
Sean P. Cox,
Samuel D. N. Johnson,
Ashleen J. Benson
Abstract:
The Spot Prawn trap fishery off the west coast of British Columbia (BC) is managed using a fixed escapement strategy that aims to prevent recruitment overfishing while maximizing expected long-term yield by closing the fishery when the catch rate of spawners, projected to the following spring, drops below 1.7 spawners per trap (the de jure rule). We develop a management strategy evaluation framewo…
▽ More
The Spot Prawn trap fishery off the west coast of British Columbia (BC) is managed using a fixed escapement strategy that aims to prevent recruitment overfishing while maximizing expected long-term yield by closing the fishery when the catch rate of spawners, projected to the following spring, drops below 1.7 spawners per trap (the de jure rule). We develop a management strategy evaluation framework for BC's Spot Prawn fishery that examines the expected performance of the management procedure implemented in practice (the de facto rule), which was significantly more conservative than the de jure rule, usually closing the fishery when spawner catch rates were at least twice as high as specified by the de jure rule. Simulations indicate that the de facto spawner index rule using average empirical March 31st targets from 2000 to 2019 maintains most stocks near or above 0.8 BMSY with or without accounting for environmental effects and/or increasing future SST on recruitment. Abundance indices were found to be strongly hyperstable, with fishing efficiency 1.5 to 3.0 times higher under low biomass than high biomass.
△ Less
Submitted 13 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
Hierarchical stock assessment methods improve management performance in multi-species, data-limited fisheries
Authors:
Samuel D. N. Johnson,
Sean P. Cox
Abstract:
Management performance of five alternative stock assessment methods was evaluated by using them to set harvest levels targeting multi-species maximum yield in a multi-species flatfish fishery, including single-species and hierarchical multi-species models, and methods that pooled data across species and spatial strata, with catch outcomes of each method under three data scenarios compared to catch…
▽ More
Management performance of five alternative stock assessment methods was evaluated by using them to set harvest levels targeting multi-species maximum yield in a multi-species flatfish fishery, including single-species and hierarchical multi-species models, and methods that pooled data across species and spatial strata, with catch outcomes of each method under three data scenarios compared to catch under an omniscient manager simulation. Operating models included technical interactions between species intended to produce choke effects often observed in output controlled multi-species fisheries. Hierarchical multi-species models outperformed all other methods under data-poor and data-moderate scenarios, and outperformed single-species models under the data-rich scenario. Hierarchical models were least sensitive to prior precision, sometimes improving in performance when prior precision was reduced. Choke effects were found to both positive and negative effects, sometimes leading to underfishing of non-choke species, but at other times preventing overfishing of non-choke species. We highlight the importance of including technical interactions in multi-species assessment models and management objectives, how choke species can indicate mismatches between management objectives and system dynamics, and recommend hierarchical multi-species models for multi-species fishery management systems.
△ Less
Submitted 25 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Evaluating the role of data quality when sharing information in hierarchical multi-stock assessment models, with an application to Dover Sole
Authors:
Samuel D. N. Johnson,
Sean P. Cox
Abstract:
An emerging approach to data-limited fisheries stock assessment uses hierarchical multi-stock assessment models to group stocks together, sharing information from data-rich to data-poor stocks. In this paper, we simulate data-rich and data-poor fishery and survey data scenarios for a complex of dover sole stocks. Simulated data for individual stocks were used to compare estimation performance for…
▽ More
An emerging approach to data-limited fisheries stock assessment uses hierarchical multi-stock assessment models to group stocks together, sharing information from data-rich to data-poor stocks. In this paper, we simulate data-rich and data-poor fishery and survey data scenarios for a complex of dover sole stocks. Simulated data for individual stocks were used to compare estimation performance for single-stock and hierarchical multi-stock versions of a Schaefer production model. The single-stock and best performing multi-stock models were then used in stock assessments for the real dover sole data. Multi-stock models often had lower estimation errors than single-stock models when assessment data had low statistical power. Relative errors for productivity and relative biomass parameters were lower for multi-stock assessment model configurations. In addition, multi-stock models that estimated hierarchical priors for survey catchability performed the best under data-poor scenarios. We conclude that hierarchical multi-stock assessment models are useful for data-limited stocks and could provide a more flexible alternative to data-pooling and catch only methods; however, these models are subject to non-linear side-effects of parameter shrinkage. Therefore, we recommend testing hierarchical multi-stock models in closed-loop simulations before application to real fishery management systems.
△ Less
Submitted 20 October, 2018; v1 submitted 10 April, 2018;
originally announced April 2018.
