The Group Access Bounds for Binary Search Trees
Authors:
Parinya Chalermsook,
Manoj Gupta,
Wanchote Jiamjitrak,
Akash Pareek,
Sorrachai Yingchareonthawornchai
Abstract:
The access lemma (Sleator and Tarjan, JACM 1985) is a property of binary search trees that implies interesting consequences such as static optimality, static finger, and working set property. However, there are known corollaries of the dynamic optimality that cannot be derived via the access lemma, such as the dynamic finger, and any $o(\log n)$-competitive ratio to the optimal BST where $n$ is th…
▽ More
The access lemma (Sleator and Tarjan, JACM 1985) is a property of binary search trees that implies interesting consequences such as static optimality, static finger, and working set property. However, there are known corollaries of the dynamic optimality that cannot be derived via the access lemma, such as the dynamic finger, and any $o(\log n)$-competitive ratio to the optimal BST where $n$ is the number of keys.
In this paper, we introduce the group access bound that can be defined with respect to a reference group access tree. Group access bounds generalize the access lemma and imply properties that are far stronger than those implied by the access lemma. For each of the following results, there is a group access tree whose group access bound
Is $O(\sqrt{\log n})$-competitive to the optimal BST.
Achieves the $k$-finger bound with an additive term of $O(m \log k \log \log n)$ (randomized) when the reference tree is an almost complete binary tree.
Satisfies the unified bound with an additive term of $O(m \log \log n)$.
Matches the unified bound with a time window $k$ with an additive term of $O(m \log k \log \log n)$ (randomized).
Furthermore, we prove simulation theorem: For every group access tree, there is an online BST algorithm that is $O(1)$-competitive with its group access bound. In particular, any new group access bound will automatically imply a new BST algorithm achieving the same bound. Thereby, we obtain an improved $k$-finger bound (reference tree is an almost complete binary tree), an improved unified bound with a time window $k$, and matching the best-known bound for Unified bound in the BST model. Since any dynamically optimal BST must achieve the group access bounds, we believe our results provide a new direction towards proving $o(\log n)$-competitiveness of Splay tree and Greedy.
△ Less
Submitted 24 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
Improved Pattern-Avoidance Bounds for Greedy BSTs via Matrix Decomposition
Authors:
Parinya Chalermsook,
Manoj Gupta,
Wanchote Jiamjitrak,
Nidia Obscura Acosta,
Akash Pareek,
Sorrachai Yingchareonthawornchai
Abstract:
Greedy BST (or simply Greedy) is an online self-adjusting binary search tree defined in the geometric view ([Lucas, 1988; Munro, 2000; Demaine, Harmon, Iacono, Kane, Patrascu, SODA 2009). Along with Splay trees (Sleator, Tarjan 1985), Greedy is considered the most promising candidate for being dynamically optimal, i.e., starting with any initial tree, their access costs on any sequence is conjectu…
▽ More
Greedy BST (or simply Greedy) is an online self-adjusting binary search tree defined in the geometric view ([Lucas, 1988; Munro, 2000; Demaine, Harmon, Iacono, Kane, Patrascu, SODA 2009). Along with Splay trees (Sleator, Tarjan 1985), Greedy is considered the most promising candidate for being dynamically optimal, i.e., starting with any initial tree, their access costs on any sequence is conjectured to be within $O(1)$ factor of the offline optimal. However, in the past four decades, the question has remained elusive even for highly restricted input.
In this paper, we prove new bounds on the cost of Greedy in the ''pattern avoidance'' regime. Our new results include:
The (preorder) traversal conjecture for Greedy holds up to a factor of $O(2^{α(n)})$, improving upon the bound of $2^{α(n)^{O(1)}}$ in (Chalermsook et al., FOCS 2015). This is the best known bound obtained by any online BSTs.
We settle the postorder traversal conjecture for Greedy.
The deque conjecture for Greedy holds up to a factor of $O(α(n))$, improving upon the bound $2^{O(α(n))}$ in (Chalermsook, et al., WADS 2015).
The split conjecture holds for Greedy up to a factor of $O(2^{α(n)})$.
Key to all these results is to partition (based on the input structures) the execution log of Greedy into several simpler-to-analyze subsets for which classical forbidden submatrix bounds can be leveraged. Finally, we show the applicability of this technique to handle a class of increasingly complex pattern-avoiding input sequences, called $k$-increasing sequences.
As a bonus, we discover a new class of permutation matrices whose extremal bounds are polynomially bounded. This gives a partial progress on an open question by Jacob Fox (2013).
△ Less
Submitted 8 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
