Showing 1–15 of 15 results for author: Jensen, F V

Analysis in HUGIN of Data Conflict

Authors: Bo Chamberlain, Finn Verner Jensen, Frank Jensen, Torsten Nordahl

Abstract: After a brief introduction to causal probabilistic networks and the HUGIN approach, the problem of conflicting data is discussed. A measure of conflict is defined, and it is used in the medical diagnostic system MUNIN. Finally, it is discussed how to distinguish between conflicting data and a rare case. After a brief introduction to causal probabilistic networks and the HUGIN approach, the problem of conflicting data is discussed. A measure of conflict is defined, and it is used in the medical diagnostic system MUNIN. Finally, it is discussed how to distinguish between conflicting data and a rare case. △ Less

Submitted 27 March, 2013; originally announced April 2013.

Comments: Appears in Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI1990)

Report number: UAI-P-1990-PG-546-554

aHUGIN: A System Creating Adaptive Causal Probabilistic Networks

Authors: Kristian G. Olesen, Steffen L. Lauritzen, Finn Verner Jensen

Abstract: The paper describes aHUGIN, a tool for creating adaptive systems. aHUGIN is an extension of the HUGIN shell, and is based on the methods reported by Spiegelhalter and Lauritzen (1990a). The adaptive systems resulting from aHUGIN are able to adjust the C011ditional probabilities in the model. A short analysis of the adaptation task is given and the features of aHUGIN are described. Finally a se… ▽ More The paper describes aHUGIN, a tool for creating adaptive systems. aHUGIN is an extension of the HUGIN shell, and is based on the methods reported by Spiegelhalter and Lauritzen (1990a). The adaptive systems resulting from aHUGIN are able to adjust the C011ditional probabilities in the model. A short analysis of the adaptation task is given and the features of aHUGIN are described. Finally a session with experiments is reported and the results are discussed. △ Less

Submitted 13 March, 2013; originally announced March 2013.

Comments: Appears in Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI1992)

Report number: UAI-P-1992-PG-223-229

From Influence Diagrams to Junction Trees

Authors: Frank Jensen, Finn Verner Jensen, Soren L. Dittmer

Abstract: We present an approach to the solution of decision problems formulated as influence diagrams. This approach involves a special triangulation of the underlying graph, the construction of a junction tree with special properties, and a message passing algorithm operating on the junction tree for computation of expected utilities and optimal decision policies. We present an approach to the solution of decision problems formulated as influence diagrams. This approach involves a special triangulation of the underlying graph, the construction of a junction tree with special properties, and a message passing algorithm operating on the junction tree for computation of expected utilities and optimal decision policies. △ Less

Submitted 27 February, 2013; originally announced February 2013.

Comments: Appears in Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI1994)

Report number: UAI-P-1994-PG-367-373

Optimal Junction Trees

Authors: Finn Verner Jensen, Frank Jensen

Abstract: The paper deals with optimality issues in connection with updating beliefs in networks. We address two processes: triangulation and construction of junction trees. In the first part, we give a simple algorithm for constructing an optimal junction tree from a triangulated network. In the second part, we argue that any exact method based on local calculations must either be less efficient than the j… ▽ More The paper deals with optimality issues in connection with updating beliefs in networks. We address two processes: triangulation and construction of junction trees. In the first part, we give a simple algorithm for constructing an optimal junction tree from a triangulated network. In the second part, we argue that any exact method based on local calculations must either be less efficient than the junction tree method, or it has an optimality problem equivalent to that of triangulation. △ Less

Submitted 27 February, 2013; originally announced February 2013.

Comments: Appears in Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI1994)

Report number: UAI-P-1994-PG-360-366

Cautious Propagation in Bayesian Networks

Authors: Finn Verner Jensen

Abstract: Consider the situation where some evidence e has been entered to a Bayesian network. When performing conflict analysis, sensitivity analysis, or when answering questions like "What if the finding on X had been y instead of x?" you need probabilities P (e'| h), where e' is a subset of e, and h is a configuration of a (possibly empty) set of variables. Cautious propagation is a modification of HUGI… ▽ More Consider the situation where some evidence e has been entered to a Bayesian network. When performing conflict analysis, sensitivity analysis, or when answering questions like "What if the finding on X had been y instead of x?" you need probabilities P (e'| h), where e' is a subset of e, and h is a configuration of a (possibly empty) set of variables. Cautious propagation is a modification of HUGIN propagation into a Shafer-Shenoy-like architecture. It is less efficient than HUGIN propagation; however, it provides easy access to P (e'| h) for a great deal of relevant subsets e'. △ Less

Submitted 20 February, 2013; originally announced February 2013.

Comments: Appears in Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI1995)

Report number: UAI-P-1995-PG-323-328

MIDAS - An Influence Diagram for Management of Mildew in Winter Wheat

Authors: Allan Leck Jensen, Finn Verner Jensen

Abstract: We present a prototype of a decision support system for management of the fungal disease mildew in winter wheat. The prototype is based on an influence diagram which is used to determine the optimal time and dose of mildew treatments. This involves multiple decision opportunities over time, stochasticity, inaccurate information and incomplete knowledge. The paper describes the practical and the… ▽ More We present a prototype of a decision support system for management of the fungal disease mildew in winter wheat. The prototype is based on an influence diagram which is used to determine the optimal time and dose of mildew treatments. This involves multiple decision opportunities over time, stochasticity, inaccurate information and incomplete knowledge. The paper describes the practical and theoretical problems encountered during the construction of the influence diagram, and also the experience with the prototype. △ Less

Submitted 13 February, 2013; originally announced February 2013.

Comments: Appears in Proceedings of the Twelfth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI1996)

Report number: UAI-P-1996-PG-349-356

Myopic Value of Information in Influence Diagrams

Authors: Soren L. Dittmer, Finn Verner Jensen

Abstract: We present a method for calculation of myopic value of information in influence diagrams (Howard & Matheson, 1981) based on the strong junction tree framework (Jensen, Jensen & Dittmer, 1994). The difference in instantiation order in the influence diagrams is reflected in the corresponding junction trees by the order in which the chance nodes are marginalized. This order of marginalization can b… ▽ More We present a method for calculation of myopic value of information in influence diagrams (Howard & Matheson, 1981) based on the strong junction tree framework (Jensen, Jensen & Dittmer, 1994). The difference in instantiation order in the influence diagrams is reflected in the corresponding junction trees by the order in which the chance nodes are marginalized. This order of marginalization can be changed by table expansion and in effect the same junction tree with expanded tables may be used for calculating the expected utility for scenarios with different instantiation order. We also compare our method to the classic method of modeling different instantiation orders in the same influence diagram. △ Less

Submitted 6 February, 2013; originally announced February 2013.

Comments: Appears in Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI1997)

Report number: UAI-P-1997-PG-142-149

Lazy Propagation in Junction Trees

Authors: Anders L. Madsen, Finn Verner Jensen

Abstract: The efficiency of algorithms using secondary structures for probabilistic inference in Bayesian networks can be improved by exploiting independence relations induced by evidence and the direction of the links in the original network. In this paper we present an algorithm that on-line exploits independence relations induced by evidence and the direction of the links in the original network to reduc… ▽ More The efficiency of algorithms using secondary structures for probabilistic inference in Bayesian networks can be improved by exploiting independence relations induced by evidence and the direction of the links in the original network. In this paper we present an algorithm that on-line exploits independence relations induced by evidence and the direction of the links in the original network to reduce both time and space costs. Instead of multiplying the conditional probability distributions for the various cliques, we determine on-line which potentials to multiply when a message is to be produced. The performance improvement of the algorithm is emphasized through empirical evaluations involving large real world Bayesian networks, and we compare the method with the HUGIN and Shafer-Shenoy inference algorithms. △ Less

Submitted 30 January, 2013; originally announced January 2013.

Comments: Appears in Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI1998)

Report number: UAI-P-1998-PG-362-369

Inference in Multiply Sectioned Bayesian Networks with Extended Shafer-Shenoy and Lazy Propagation

Authors: Finn Verner Jensen

Abstract: As Bayesian networks are applied to larger and more complex problem domains, search for flexible modeling and more efficient inference methods is an ongoing effort. Multiply sectioned Bayesian networks (MSBNs) extend the HUGIN inference for Bayesian networks into a coherent framework for flexible modeling and distributed inference.Lazy propagation extends the Shafer-Shenoy and HUGIN inference met… ▽ More As Bayesian networks are applied to larger and more complex problem domains, search for flexible modeling and more efficient inference methods is an ongoing effort. Multiply sectioned Bayesian networks (MSBNs) extend the HUGIN inference for Bayesian networks into a coherent framework for flexible modeling and distributed inference.Lazy propagation extends the Shafer-Shenoy and HUGIN inference methods with reduced space complexity. We apply the Shafer-Shenoy and lazy propagation to inference in MSBNs. The combination of the MSBN framework and lazy propagation provides a better framework for modeling and inference in very large domains. It retains the modeling flexibility of MSBNs and reduces the runtime space complexity, allowing exact inference in much larger domains given the same computational resources. △ Less

Submitted 23 January, 2013; originally announced January 2013.

Comments: Appears in Proceedings of the Fifteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI1999)

Report number: UAI-P-1999-PG-680-687

Welldefined Decision Scenarios

Authors: Thomas D. Nielsen, Finn Verner Jensen

Abstract: Influence diagrams serve as a powerful tool for modelling symmetric decision problems. When solving an influence diagram we determine a set of strategies for the decisions involved. A strategy for a decision variable is in principle a function over its past. However, some of the past may be irrelevant for the decision, and for computational reasons it is important not to deal with redundant variab… ▽ More Influence diagrams serve as a powerful tool for modelling symmetric decision problems. When solving an influence diagram we determine a set of strategies for the decisions involved. A strategy for a decision variable is in principle a function over its past. However, some of the past may be irrelevant for the decision, and for computational reasons it is important not to deal with redundant variables in the strategies. We show that current methods (e.g. the "Decision Bayes-ball" algorithm by Shachter UAI98) do not determine the relevant past, and we present a complete algorithm. Actually, this paper takes a more general outset: When formulating a decision scenario as an influence diagram, a linear temporal ordering of the decisions variables is required. This constraint ensures that the decision scenario is welldefined. However, the structure of a decision scenario often yields certain decisions conditionally independent, and it is therefore unnecessary to impose a linear temporal ordering on the decisions. In this paper we deal with partial influence diagrams i.e. influence diagrams with only a partial temporal ordering specified. We present a set of conditions which are necessary and sufficient to ensure that a partial influence diagram is welldefined. These conditions are used as a basis for the construction of an algorithm for determining whether or not a partial influence diagram is welldefined. △ Less

Submitted 23 January, 2013; originally announced January 2013.

Comments: Appears in Proceedings of the Fifteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI1999)

Report number: UAI-P-1999-PG-502-511

Lazy Evaluation of Symmetric Bayesian Decision Problems

Authors: Anders L. Madsen, Finn Verner Jensen

Abstract: Solving symmetric Bayesian decision problems is a computationally intensive task to perform regardless of the algorithm used. In this paper we propose a method for improving the efficiency of algorithms for solving Bayesian decision problems. The method is based on the principle of lazy evaluation - a principle recently shown to improve the efficiency of inference in Bayesian networks. The basic i… ▽ More Solving symmetric Bayesian decision problems is a computationally intensive task to perform regardless of the algorithm used. In this paper we propose a method for improving the efficiency of algorithms for solving Bayesian decision problems. The method is based on the principle of lazy evaluation - a principle recently shown to improve the efficiency of inference in Bayesian networks. The basic idea is to maintain decompositions of potentials and to postpone computations for as long as possible. The efficiency improvements obtained with the lazy evaluation based method is emphasized through examples. Finally, the lazy evaluation based method is compared with the hugin and valuation-based systems architectures for solving symmetric Bayesian decision problems. △ Less

Submitted 23 January, 2013; originally announced January 2013.

Comments: Appears in Proceedings of the Fifteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI1999)

Report number: UAI-P-1999-PG-382-390

Using ROBDDs for Inference in Bayesian Networks with Troubleshooting as an Example

Authors: Thomas D. Nielsen, Pierre-Henri Wuillemin, Finn Verner Jensen, Uffe Kjærulff

Abstract: When using Bayesian networks for modelling the behavior of man-made machinery, it usually happens that a large part of the model is deterministic. For such Bayesian networks deterministic part of the model can be represented as a Boolean function, and a central part of belief updating reduces to the task of calculating the number of satisfying configurations in a Boolean function. In this paper we… ▽ More When using Bayesian networks for modelling the behavior of man-made machinery, it usually happens that a large part of the model is deterministic. For such Bayesian networks deterministic part of the model can be represented as a Boolean function, and a central part of belief updating reduces to the task of calculating the number of satisfying configurations in a Boolean function. In this paper we explore how advances in the calculation of Boolean functions can be adopted for belief updating, in particular within the context of troubleshooting. We present experimental results indicating a substantial speed-up compared to traditional junction tree propagation. △ Less

Submitted 16 January, 2013; originally announced January 2013.

Comments: Appears in Proceedings of the Sixteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI2000)

Report number: UAI-P-2000-PG-426-435

Representing and Solving Asymmetric Bayesian Decision Problems

Authors: Thomas D. Nielsen, Finn Verner Jensen

Abstract: This paper deals with the representation and solution of asymmetric Bayesian decision problems. We present a formal framework, termed asymmetric influence diagrams, that is based on the influence diagram and allows an efficient representation of asymmetric decision problems. As opposed to existing frameworks, the asymmetric influece diagram primarily encodes asymmetry at the qualitative level and… ▽ More This paper deals with the representation and solution of asymmetric Bayesian decision problems. We present a formal framework, termed asymmetric influence diagrams, that is based on the influence diagram and allows an efficient representation of asymmetric decision problems. As opposed to existing frameworks, the asymmetric influece diagram primarily encodes asymmetry at the qualitative level and it can therefore be read directly from the model. We give an algorithm for solving asymmetric influence diagrams. The algorithm initially decomposes the asymmetric decision problem into a structure of symmetric subproblems organized as a tree. A solution to the decision problem can then be found by propagating from the leaves toward the root using existing evaluation methods to solve the sub-problems. △ Less

Submitted 16 January, 2013; originally announced January 2013.

Comments: Appears in Proceedings of the Sixteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI2000)

Report number: UAI-P-2000-PG-416-425

Unconstrained Influence Diagrams

Authors: Finn Verner Jensen, Marta Vomlelova

Abstract: We extend the language of influence diagrams to cope with decision scenarios where the order of decisions and observations is not determined. As the ordering of decisions is dependent on the evidence, a step-strategy of such a scenario is a sequence of dependent choices of the next action. A strategy is a step-strategy together with selection functions for decision actions. The structure of a ste… ▽ More We extend the language of influence diagrams to cope with decision scenarios where the order of decisions and observations is not determined. As the ordering of decisions is dependent on the evidence, a step-strategy of such a scenario is a sequence of dependent choices of the next action. A strategy is a step-strategy together with selection functions for decision actions. The structure of a step-strategy can be represented as a DAG with nodes labeled with action variables. We introduce the concept of GS-DAG: a DAG incorporating an optimal step-strategy for any instantiation. We give a method for constructing GS-DAGs, and we show how to use a GS-DAG for determining an optimal strategy. Finally we discuss how analysis of relevant past can be used to reduce the size of the GS-DAG. △ Less

Submitted 12 December, 2012; originally announced January 2013.

Comments: Appears in Proceedings of the Eighteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI2002)

Report number: UAI-P-2002-PG-234-241

The Cost of Troubleshooting Cost Clusters with Inside Information

Authors: Thorsten J. Ottosen, Finn Verner Jensen

Abstract: Decision theoretical troubleshooting is about minimizing the expected cost of solving a certain problem like repairing a complicated man-made device. In this paper we consider situations where you have to take apart some of the device to get access to certain clusters and actions. Specifically, we investigate troubleshooting with independent actions in a tree of clusters where actions inside a clu… ▽ More Decision theoretical troubleshooting is about minimizing the expected cost of solving a certain problem like repairing a complicated man-made device. In this paper we consider situations where you have to take apart some of the device to get access to certain clusters and actions. Specifically, we investigate troubleshooting with independent actions in a tree of clusters where actions inside a cluster cannot be performed before the cluster is opened. The problem is non-trivial because there is a cost associated with opening and closing a cluster. Troubleshooting with independent actions and no clusters can be solved in O(n lg n) time (n being the number of actions) by the well-known "P-over-C" algorithm due to Kadane and Simon, but an efficient and optimal algorithm for a tree cluster model has not yet been found. In this paper we describe a "bottom-up P-over-C" O(n lg n) time algorithm and show that it is optimal when the clusters do not need to be closed to test whether the actions solved the problem. △ Less

Submitted 15 March, 2012; originally announced March 2012.

Comments: Appears in Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI2010)

Report number: UAI-P-2010-PG-409-416