-
The Operating System of the Neuromorphic BrainScaleS-1 System
Authors:
Eric Müller,
Sebastian Schmitt,
Christian Mauch,
Sebastian Billaudelle,
Andreas Grübl,
Maurice Güttler,
Dan Husmann,
Joscha Ilmberger,
Sebastian Jeltsch,
Jakob Kaiser,
Johann Klähn,
Mitja Kleider,
Christoph Koke,
José Montes,
Paul Müller,
Johannes Partzsch,
Felix Passenberg,
Hartmut Schmidt,
Bernhard Vogginger,
Jonas Weidner,
Christian Mayr,
Johannes Schemmel
Abstract:
BrainScaleS-1 is a wafer-scale mixed-signal accelerated neuromorphic system targeted for research in the fields of computational neuroscience and beyond-von-Neumann computing. The BrainScaleS Operating System (BrainScaleS OS) is a software stack giving users the possibility to emulate networks described in the high-level network description language PyNN with minimal knowledge of the system. At th…
▽ More
BrainScaleS-1 is a wafer-scale mixed-signal accelerated neuromorphic system targeted for research in the fields of computational neuroscience and beyond-von-Neumann computing. The BrainScaleS Operating System (BrainScaleS OS) is a software stack giving users the possibility to emulate networks described in the high-level network description language PyNN with minimal knowledge of the system. At the same time, expert usage is facilitated by allowing to hook into the system at any depth of the stack. We present operation and development methodologies implemented for the BrainScaleS-1 neuromorphic architecture and walk through the individual components of BrainScaleS OS constituting the software stack for BrainScaleS-1 platform operation.
△ Less
Submitted 2 February, 2022; v1 submitted 30 March, 2020;
originally announced March 2020.
-
Pattern representation and recognition with accelerated analog neuromorphic systems
Authors:
Mihai A. Petrovici,
Sebastian Schmitt,
Johann Klähn,
David Stöckel,
Anna Schroeder,
Guillaume Bellec,
Johannes Bill,
Oliver Breitwieser,
Ilja Bytschok,
Andreas Grübl,
Maurice Güttler,
Andreas Hartel,
Stephan Hartmann,
Dan Husmann,
Kai Husmann,
Sebastian Jeltsch,
Vitali Karasenko,
Mitja Kleider,
Christoph Koke,
Alexander Kononov,
Christian Mauch,
Eric Müller,
Paul Müller,
Johannes Partzsch,
Thomas Pfeil
, et al. (11 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Despite being originally inspired by the central nervous system, artificial neural networks have diverged from their biological archetypes as they have been remodeled to fit particular tasks. In this paper, we review several possibilites to reverse map these architectures to biologically more realistic spiking networks with the aim of emulating them on fast, low-power neuromorphic hardware. Since…
▽ More
Despite being originally inspired by the central nervous system, artificial neural networks have diverged from their biological archetypes as they have been remodeled to fit particular tasks. In this paper, we review several possibilites to reverse map these architectures to biologically more realistic spiking networks with the aim of emulating them on fast, low-power neuromorphic hardware. Since many of these devices employ analog components, which cannot be perfectly controlled, finding ways to compensate for the resulting effects represents a key challenge. Here, we discuss three different strategies to address this problem: the addition of auxiliary network components for stabilizing activity, the utilization of inherently robust architectures and a training method for hardware-emulated networks that functions without perfect knowledge of the system's dynamics and parameters. For all three scenarios, we corroborate our theoretical considerations with experimental results on accelerated analog neuromorphic platforms.
△ Less
Submitted 3 July, 2017; v1 submitted 17 March, 2017;
originally announced March 2017.
-
Six networks on a universal neuromorphic computing substrate
Authors:
Thomas Pfeil,
Andreas Grübl,
Sebastian Jeltsch,
Eric Müller,
Paul Müller,
Mihai A. Petrovici,
Michael Schmuker,
Daniel Brüderle,
Johannes Schemmel,
Karlheinz Meier
Abstract:
In this study, we present a highly configurable neuromorphic computing substrate and use it for emulating several types of neural networks. At the heart of this system lies a mixed-signal chip, with analog implementations of neurons and synapses and digital transmission of action potentials. Major advantages of this emulation device, which has been explicitly designed as a universal neural network…
▽ More
In this study, we present a highly configurable neuromorphic computing substrate and use it for emulating several types of neural networks. At the heart of this system lies a mixed-signal chip, with analog implementations of neurons and synapses and digital transmission of action potentials. Major advantages of this emulation device, which has been explicitly designed as a universal neural network emulator, are its inherent parallelism and high acceleration factor compared to conventional computers. Its configurability allows the realization of almost arbitrary network topologies and the use of widely varied neuronal and synaptic parameters. Fixed-pattern noise inherent to analog circuitry is reduced by calibration routines. An integrated development environment allows neuroscientists to operate the device without any prior knowledge of neuromorphic circuit design. As a showcase for the capabilities of the system, we describe the successful emulation of six different neural networks which cover a broad spectrum of both structure and functionality.
△ Less
Submitted 21 February, 2013; v1 submitted 26 October, 2012;
originally announced October 2012.
-
A Comprehensive Workflow for General-Purpose Neural Modeling with Highly Configurable Neuromorphic Hardware Systems
Authors:
Daniel Brüderle,
Mihai A. Petrovici,
Bernhard Vogginger,
Matthias Ehrlich,
Thomas Pfeil,
Sebastian Millner,
Andreas Grübl,
Karsten Wendt,
Eric Müller,
Marc-Olivier Schwartz,
Dan Husmann de Oliveira,
Sebastian Jeltsch,
Johannes Fieres,
Moritz Schilling,
Paul Müller,
Oliver Breitwieser,
Venelin Petkov,
Lyle Muller,
Andrew P. Davison,
Pradeep Krishnamurthy,
Jens Kremkow,
Mikael Lundqvist,
Eilif Muller,
Johannes Partzsch,
Stefan Scholze
, et al. (9 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
In this paper we present a methodological framework that meets novel requirements emerging from upcoming types of accelerated and highly configurable neuromorphic hardware systems. We describe in detail a device with 45 million programmable and dynamic synapses that is currently under development, and we sketch the conceptual challenges that arise from taking this platform into operation. More spe…
▽ More
In this paper we present a methodological framework that meets novel requirements emerging from upcoming types of accelerated and highly configurable neuromorphic hardware systems. We describe in detail a device with 45 million programmable and dynamic synapses that is currently under development, and we sketch the conceptual challenges that arise from taking this platform into operation. More specifically, we aim at the establishment of this neuromorphic system as a flexible and neuroscientifically valuable modeling tool that can be used by non-hardware-experts. We consider various functional aspects to be crucial for this purpose, and we introduce a consistent workflow with detailed descriptions of all involved modules that implement the suggested steps: The integration of the hardware interface into the simulator-independent model description language PyNN; a fully automated translation between the PyNN domain and appropriate hardware configurations; an executable specification of the future neuromorphic system that can be seamlessly integrated into this biology-to-hardware map** process as a test bench for all software layers and possible hardware design modifications; an evaluation scheme that deploys models from a dedicated benchmark library, compares the results generated by virtual or prototype hardware devices with reference software simulations and analyzes the differences. The integration of these components into one hardware-software workflow provides an ecosystem for ongoing preparative studies that support the hardware design process and represents the basis for the maturity of the model-to-hardware map** software. The functionality and flexibility of the latter is proven with a variety of experimental results.
△ Less
Submitted 21 July, 2011; v1 submitted 12 November, 2010;
originally announced November 2010.
