Tightly Seal Your Sensitive Pointers with PACTight
Authors:
Mohannad Ismail,
Andrew Quach,
Christopher Jelesnianski,
Yeong** Jang,
Changwoo Min
Abstract:
ARM is becoming more popular in desktops and data centers, opening a new realm in terms of security attacks against ARM. ARM has released Pointer Authentication, a new hardware security feature that is intended to ensure pointer integrity with cryptographic primitives. In this paper, we utilize Pointer Authentication (PA) to build a novel scheme to completely prevent any misuse of security-sensiti…
▽ More
ARM is becoming more popular in desktops and data centers, opening a new realm in terms of security attacks against ARM. ARM has released Pointer Authentication, a new hardware security feature that is intended to ensure pointer integrity with cryptographic primitives. In this paper, we utilize Pointer Authentication (PA) to build a novel scheme to completely prevent any misuse of security-sensitive pointers. We propose PACTight to tightly seal these pointers. PACTight utilizes a strong and unique modifier that addresses the current issues with the state-of-the-art PA defense mechanisms. We implement four defenses based on the PACTight mechanism. Our security and performance evaluation results show that PACTight defenses are more efficient and secure. Using real PA instructions, we evaluated PACTight on 30 different applications, including NGINX web server, with an average performance overhead of 4.07% even when enforcing our strongest defense. PACTight demonstrates its effectiveness and efficiency with real PA instructions on real hardware.
△ Less
Submitted 28 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
Making Code Re-randomization Practical with MARDU
Authors:
Christopher Jelesnianski,
**woo Yom,
Changwoo Min,
Yeong** Jang
Abstract:
Defense techniques such as Data Execution Prevention (DEP) and Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) were the early role models preventing primitive code injection and return-oriented programming (ROP) attacks. Notably, these techniques did so in an elegant and utilitarian manner, kee** performance and scalability in the forefront, making them one of the few widely-adopted defense techniques…
▽ More
Defense techniques such as Data Execution Prevention (DEP) and Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) were the early role models preventing primitive code injection and return-oriented programming (ROP) attacks. Notably, these techniques did so in an elegant and utilitarian manner, kee** performance and scalability in the forefront, making them one of the few widely-adopted defense techniques. As code re-use has evolved in complexity from JIT-ROP, to BROP and data-only attacks, defense techniques seem to have tunneled on defending at all costs, losing-their-way in pragmatic defense design. Some fail to provide comprehensive coverage, being too narrow in scope, while others provide unrealistic overheads leaving users willing to take their chances to maintain performance expectations.
We present Mardu, an on-demand system-wide re-randomization technique that improves re-randomization and refocuses efforts to simultaneously embrace key characteristics of defense techniques: security, performance, and scalability. Our code sharing with diversification is achieved by implementing reactive and scalable, rather than continuous or one-time diversification while the use of hardware supported eXecute-only Memory (XoM) and shadow stack prevent memory disclosure; entwining and enabling code sharing further minimizes needed tracking, patching costs, and memory overhead. Mardu's evaluation shows performance and scalability to have low average overhead in both compute-intensive (5.5% on SPEC) and real-world applications (4.4% on NGINX). With this design, Mardu demonstrates that strong and scalable security guarantees are possible to achieve at a practical cost to encourage deployment.
△ Less
Submitted 19 September, 2019;
originally announced September 2019.
