-
Automated Completion of Statements and Proofs in Synthetic Geometry: an Approach based on Constraint Solving
Authors:
Salwa Tabet Gonzalez,
Predrag Janičić,
Julien Narboux
Abstract:
Conjecturing and theorem proving are activities at the center of mathematical practice and are difficult to separate. In this paper, we propose a framework for completing incomplete conjectures and incomplete proofs. The framework can turn a conjecture with missing assumptions and with an under-specified goal into a proper theorem. Also, the proposed framework can help in completing a proof sketch…
▽ More
Conjecturing and theorem proving are activities at the center of mathematical practice and are difficult to separate. In this paper, we propose a framework for completing incomplete conjectures and incomplete proofs. The framework can turn a conjecture with missing assumptions and with an under-specified goal into a proper theorem. Also, the proposed framework can help in completing a proof sketch into a human-readable and machine-checkable proof. Our approach is focused on synthetic geometry, and uses coherent logic and constraint solving. The proposed approach is uniform for all three kinds of tasks, flexible and, to our knowledge, unique such approach.
△ Less
Submitted 22 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
Automated Generation of Illustrations for Synthetic Geometry Proofs
Authors:
Predrag Janičić,
Julien Narboux
Abstract:
We report on a new, simple, modular, and flexible approach for automated generation of illustrations for (readable) synthetic geometry proofs. The underlying proofs are generated using the Larus automated prover for coherent logic, and corresponding illustrations are generated in the GCLC language. Animated illustrations are also supported.
We report on a new, simple, modular, and flexible approach for automated generation of illustrations for (readable) synthetic geometry proofs. The underlying proofs are generated using the Larus automated prover for coherent logic, and corresponding illustrations are generated in the GCLC language. Animated illustrations are also supported.
△ Less
Submitted 3 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
-
Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Automated Deduction in Geometry
Authors:
Predrag Janičić,
Zoltán Kovács
Abstract:
Automated Deduction in Geometry (ADG) is a forum to exchange ideas and views, to present research results and progress, and to demonstrate software tools at the intersection between geometry and automated deduction. Relevant topics include (but are not limited to): polynomial algebra, invariant and coordinate-free methods; probabilistic, synthetic, and logic approaches, techniques for automated g…
▽ More
Automated Deduction in Geometry (ADG) is a forum to exchange ideas and views, to present research results and progress, and to demonstrate software tools at the intersection between geometry and automated deduction. Relevant topics include (but are not limited to): polynomial algebra, invariant and coordinate-free methods; probabilistic, synthetic, and logic approaches, techniques for automated geometric reasoning from discrete mathematics, combinatorics, and numerics; interactive theorem proving in geometry; symbolic and numeric methods for geometric computation, geometric constraint solving, automated generation/reasoning and manipulation with diagrams; design and implementation of geometry software, automated theorem provers, special-purpose tools, experimental studies; applications of ADG in mechanics, geometric modelling, CAGD/CAD, computer vision, robotics and education.
Traditionally, the ADG conference is held every two years. The previous editions of ADG were held in Nanning in 2018, Strasbourg in 2016, Coimbra in 2014, Edinburgh in 2012, Munich in 2010, Shanghai in 2008, Pontevedra in 2006, Gainesville in 2004, Hagenberg in 2002, Zurich in 2000, Bei**g in 1998, and Toulouse in 1996. The 13th edition of ADG was supposed to be held in 2020 in Hagenberg, Austria, but due to the COVID-19 pandemic, it was postponed for 2021, and held online (still hosted by RISC Institute, Hagenberg, Austria), September 15-17, 2021 (https://www.risc.jku.at/conferences/adg2021).
△ Less
Submitted 28 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
Computer-Assisted Proving of Combinatorial Conjectures Over Finite Domains: A Case Study of a Chess Conjecture
Authors:
Predrag Janičić,
Filip Marić,
Marko Maliković
Abstract:
There are several approaches for using computers in deriving mathematical proofs. For their illustration, we provide an in-depth study of using computer support for proving one complex combinatorial conjecture -- correctness of a strategy for the chess KRK endgame. The final, machine verifiable, result presented in this paper is that there is a winning strategy for white in the KRK endgame general…
▽ More
There are several approaches for using computers in deriving mathematical proofs. For their illustration, we provide an in-depth study of using computer support for proving one complex combinatorial conjecture -- correctness of a strategy for the chess KRK endgame. The final, machine verifiable, result presented in this paper is that there is a winning strategy for white in the KRK endgame generalized to $n \times n$ board (for natural $n$ greater than $3$). We demonstrate that different approaches for computer-based theorem proving work best together and in synergy and that the technology currently available is powerful enough for providing significant help to humans deriving complex proofs.
△ Less
Submitted 27 March, 2019; v1 submitted 23 January, 2018;
originally announced January 2018.
-
A Vernacular for Coherent Logic
Authors:
Sana Stojanovic,
Julien Narboux,
Marc Bezem,
Predrag Janicic
Abstract:
We propose a simple, yet expressive proof representation from which proofs for different proof assistants can easily be generated. The representation uses only a few inference rules and is based on a frag- ment of first-order logic called coherent logic. Coherent logic has been recognized by a number of researchers as a suitable logic for many ev- eryday mathematical developments. The proposed pro…
▽ More
We propose a simple, yet expressive proof representation from which proofs for different proof assistants can easily be generated. The representation uses only a few inference rules and is based on a frag- ment of first-order logic called coherent logic. Coherent logic has been recognized by a number of researchers as a suitable logic for many ev- eryday mathematical developments. The proposed proof representation is accompanied by a corresponding XML format and by a suite of XSL transformations for generating formal proofs for Isabelle/Isar and Coq, as well as proofs expressed in a natural language form (formatted in LATEX or in HTML). Also, our automated theorem prover for coherent logic exports proofs in the proposed XML format. All tools are publicly available, along with a set of sample theorems.
△ Less
Submitted 14 May, 2014;
originally announced May 2014.
-
Towards Understanding Triangle Construction Problems
Authors:
Vesna Marinkovic,
Predrag Janicic
Abstract:
Straightedge and compass construction problems are one of the oldest and most challenging problems in elementary mathematics. The central challenge, for a human or for a computer program, in solving construction problems is a huge search space. In this paper we analyze one family of triangle construction problems, aiming at detecting a small core of the underlying geometry knowledge. The analysis…
▽ More
Straightedge and compass construction problems are one of the oldest and most challenging problems in elementary mathematics. The central challenge, for a human or for a computer program, in solving construction problems is a huge search space. In this paper we analyze one family of triangle construction problems, aiming at detecting a small core of the underlying geometry knowledge. The analysis leads to a small set of needed definitions, lemmas and primitive construction steps, and consequently, to a simple algorithm for automated solving of problems from this family. The same approach can be applied to other families of construction problems.
△ Less
Submitted 18 July, 2012;
originally announced July 2012.
-
Formalization and Implementation of Algebraic Methods in Geometry
Authors:
Filip Marić,
Ivan Petrović,
Danijela Petrović,
Predrag Janičić
Abstract:
We describe our ongoing project of formalization of algebraic methods for geometry theorem proving (Wu's method and the Groebner bases method), their implementation and integration in educational tools. The project includes formal verification of the algebraic methods within Isabelle/HOL proof assistant and development of a new, open-source Java implementation of the algebraic methods. The project…
▽ More
We describe our ongoing project of formalization of algebraic methods for geometry theorem proving (Wu's method and the Groebner bases method), their implementation and integration in educational tools. The project includes formal verification of the algebraic methods within Isabelle/HOL proof assistant and development of a new, open-source Java implementation of the algebraic methods. The project should fill-in some gaps still existing in this area (e.g., the lack of formal links between algebraic methods and synthetic geometry and the lack of self-contained implementations of algebraic methods suitable for integration with dynamic geometry tools) and should enable new applications of theorem proving in education.
△ Less
Submitted 22 February, 2012;
originally announced February 2012.
-
Formalization of Abstract State Transition Systems for SAT
Authors:
Filip Maric,
Predrag Janicic
Abstract:
We present a formalization of modern SAT solvers and their properties in a form of abstract state transition systems. SAT solving procedures are described as transition relations over states that represent the values of the solver's global variables. Several different SAT solvers are formalized, including both the classical DPLL procedure and its state-of-the-art successors. The formalization is…
▽ More
We present a formalization of modern SAT solvers and their properties in a form of abstract state transition systems. SAT solving procedures are described as transition relations over states that represent the values of the solver's global variables. Several different SAT solvers are formalized, including both the classical DPLL procedure and its state-of-the-art successors. The formalization is made within the Isabelle/HOL system and the total correctness (soundness, termination, completeness) is shown for each presented system (with respect to a simple notion of satisfiability that can be manually checked). The systems are defined in a general way and cover procedures used in a wide range of modern SAT solvers. Our formalization builds up on the previous work on state transition systems for SAT, but it gives machine-verifiable proofs, somewhat more general specifications, and weaker assumptions that ensure the key correctness properties. The presented proofs of formal correctness of the transition systems can be used as a key building block in proving correctness of SAT solvers by using other verification approaches.
△ Less
Submitted 27 September, 2011; v1 submitted 22 August, 2011;
originally announced August 2011.
-
Simple Algorithm Portfolio for SAT
Authors:
Mladen Nikolic,
Filip Maric,
Predrag Janicic
Abstract:
The importance of algorithm portfolio techniques for SAT has long been noted, and a number of very successful systems have been devised, including the most successful one --- SATzilla. However, all these systems are quite complex (to understand, reimplement, or modify). In this paper we propose a new algorithm portfolio for SAT that is extremely simple, but in the same time so efficient that it ou…
▽ More
The importance of algorithm portfolio techniques for SAT has long been noted, and a number of very successful systems have been devised, including the most successful one --- SATzilla. However, all these systems are quite complex (to understand, reimplement, or modify). In this paper we propose a new algorithm portfolio for SAT that is extremely simple, but in the same time so efficient that it outperforms SATzilla. For a new SAT instance to be solved, our portfolio finds its k-nearest neighbors from the training set and invokes a solver that performs the best at those instances. The main distinguishing feature of our algorithm portfolio is the locality of the selection procedure --- the selection of a SAT solver is based only on few instances similar to the input one.
△ Less
Submitted 13 December, 2011; v1 submitted 1 July, 2011;
originally announced July 2011.
-
URSA: A System for Uniform Reduction to SAT
Authors:
Predrag Janicic
Abstract:
There are a huge number of problems, from various areas, being solved by reducing them to SAT. However, for many applications, translation into SAT is performed by specialized, problem-specific tools. In this paper we describe a new system for uniform solving of a wide class of problems by reducing them to SAT. The system uses a new specification language URSA that combines imperative and declara…
▽ More
There are a huge number of problems, from various areas, being solved by reducing them to SAT. However, for many applications, translation into SAT is performed by specialized, problem-specific tools. In this paper we describe a new system for uniform solving of a wide class of problems by reducing them to SAT. The system uses a new specification language URSA that combines imperative and declarative programming paradigms. The reduction to SAT is defined precisely by the semantics of the specification language. The domain of the approach is wide (e.g., many NP-complete problems can be simply specified and then solved by the system) and there are problems easily solvable by the proposed system, while they can be hardly solved by using other programming languages or constraint programming systems. So, the system can be seen not only as a tool for solving problems by reducing them to SAT, but also as a general-purpose constraint solving system (for finite domains). In this paper, we also describe an open-source implementation of the described approach. The performed experiments suggest that the system is competitive to state-of-the-art related modelling systems.
△ Less
Submitted 28 September, 2012; v1 submitted 6 December, 2010;
originally announced December 2010.
