Large-Language-Model Empowered Dose Volume Histogram Prediction for Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy
Authors:
Zehao Dong,
Yixin Chen,
Hiram Gay,
Yao Hao,
Geoffrey D. Hugo,
Pamela Samson,
Tianyu Zhao
Abstract:
Treatment planning is currently a patient specific, time-consuming, and resource demanding task in radiotherapy. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) prediction plays a critical role in automating this process. The geometric relationship between DVHs in radiotherapy plans and organs-at-risk (OAR) and planning target volume (PTV) has been well established. This study explores the potential of deep learning…
▽ More
Treatment planning is currently a patient specific, time-consuming, and resource demanding task in radiotherapy. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) prediction plays a critical role in automating this process. The geometric relationship between DVHs in radiotherapy plans and organs-at-risk (OAR) and planning target volume (PTV) has been well established. This study explores the potential of deep learning models for predicting DVHs using images and subsequent human intervention facilitated by a large-language model (LLM) to enhance the planning quality. We propose a pipeline to convert unstructured images to a structured graph consisting of image-patch nodes and dose nodes. A novel Dose Graph Neural Network (DoseGNN) model is developed for predicting DVHs from the structured graph. The proposed DoseGNN is enhanced with the LLM to encode massive knowledge from prescriptions and interactive instructions from clinicians. In this study, we introduced an online human-AI collaboration (OHAC) system as a practical implementation of the concept proposed for the automation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) planning. In comparison to the widely-employed DL models used in radiotherapy, DoseGNN achieved mean square errors that were 80$\%$, 76$\%$ and 41.0$\%$ of those predicted by Swin U-Net Transformer, 3D U-Net CNN and vanilla MLP, respectively. Moreover, the LLM-empowered DoseGNN model facilitates seamless adjustment to treatment plans through interaction with clinicians using natural language.
△ Less
Submitted 11 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
A quality assurance framework for real-time monitoring of deep learning segmentation models in radiotherapy
Authors:
Xiyao **,
Yao Hao,
Jessica Hilliard,
Zhehao Zhang,
Maria A. Thomas,
Hua Li,
Abhinav K. Jha,
Geoffrey D. Hugo
Abstract:
To safely deploy deep learning models in the clinic, a quality assurance framework is needed for routine or continuous monitoring of input-domain shift and the models' performance without ground truth contours. In this work, cardiac substructure segmentation was used as an example task to establish a QA framework. A benchmark dataset consisting of Computed Tomography (CT) images along with manual…
▽ More
To safely deploy deep learning models in the clinic, a quality assurance framework is needed for routine or continuous monitoring of input-domain shift and the models' performance without ground truth contours. In this work, cardiac substructure segmentation was used as an example task to establish a QA framework. A benchmark dataset consisting of Computed Tomography (CT) images along with manual cardiac delineations of 241 patients were collected, including one 'common' image domain and five 'uncommon' domains. Segmentation models were tested on the benchmark dataset for an initial evaluation of model capacity and limitations. An image domain shift detector was developed by utilizing a trained Denoising autoencoder (DAE) and two hand-engineered features. Another Variational Autoencoder (VAE) was also trained to estimate the shape quality of the auto-segmentation results. Using the extracted features from the image/segmentation pair as inputs, a regression model was trained to predict the per-patient segmentation accuracy, measured by Dice coefficient similarity (DSC). The framework was tested across 19 segmentation models to evaluate the generalizability of the entire framework.
As results, the predicted DSC of regression models achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) ranging from 0.036 to 0.046 with an averaged MAE of 0.041. When tested on the benchmark dataset, the performances of all segmentation models were not significantly affected by scanning parameters: FOV, slice thickness and reconstructions kernels. For input images with Poisson noise, CNN-based segmentation models demonstrated a decreased DSC ranging from 0.07 to 0.41, while the transformer-based model was not significantly affected.
△ Less
Submitted 19 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
