Approximate Minimum Diameter
Authors:
Mohammad Ghodsi,
Hamid Homapour,
Masoud Seddighin
Abstract:
We study the minimum diameter problem for a set of inexact points. By inexact, we mean that the precise location of the points is not known. Instead, the location of each point is restricted to a contineus region ($\impre$ model) or a finite set of points ($\indec$ model). Given a set of inexact points in one of $\impre$ or $\indec$ models, we wish to provide a lower-bound on the diameter of the r…
▽ More
We study the minimum diameter problem for a set of inexact points. By inexact, we mean that the precise location of the points is not known. Instead, the location of each point is restricted to a contineus region ($\impre$ model) or a finite set of points ($\indec$ model). Given a set of inexact points in one of $\impre$ or $\indec$ models, we wish to provide a lower-bound on the diameter of the real points.
In the first part of the paper, we focus on $\indec$ model. We present an $O(2^{\frac{1}{ε^d}} \cdot ε^{-2d} \cdot n^3 )$ time approximation algorithm of factor $(1+ε)$ for finding minimum diameter of a set of points in $d$ dimensions. This improves the previously proposed algorithms for this problem substantially.
Next, we consider the problem in $\impre$ model. In $d$-dimensional space, we propose a polynomial time $\sqrt{d}$-approximation algorithm. In addition, for $d=2$, we define the notion of $α$-separability and use our algorithm for $\indec$ model to obtain $(1+ε)$-approximation algorithm for a set of $α$-separable regions in time $O(2^{\frac{1}{ε^2}}\allowbreak . \frac{n^3}{ε^{10} .\sin(α/2)^3} )$.
△ Less
Submitted 31 March, 2017;
originally announced March 2017.
Fast Approximation and Randomized Algorithms for Diameter
Authors:
Sharareh Alipour,
Bahman Kalantari,
Hamid Homapour
Abstract:
We consider approximation of diameter of a set $S$ of $n$ points in dimension $m$. E$\tilde{g}$ecio$\tilde{g}$lu and Kalantari \cite{kal} have shown that given any $p \in S$, by computing its farthest in $S$, say $q$, and in turn the farthest point of $q$, say $q'$, we have ${\rm diam}(S) \leq \sqrt{3} d(q,q')$. Furthermore, iteratively replacing $p$ with an appropriately selected point on the lin…
▽ More
We consider approximation of diameter of a set $S$ of $n$ points in dimension $m$. E$\tilde{g}$ecio$\tilde{g}$lu and Kalantari \cite{kal} have shown that given any $p \in S$, by computing its farthest in $S$, say $q$, and in turn the farthest point of $q$, say $q'$, we have ${\rm diam}(S) \leq \sqrt{3} d(q,q')$. Furthermore, iteratively replacing $p$ with an appropriately selected point on the line segment $pq$, in at most $t \leq n$ additional iterations, the constant bound factor is improved to $c_*=\sqrt{5-2\sqrt{3}} \approx 1.24$. Here we prove when $m=2$, $t=1$. This suggests in practice a few iterations may produce good solutions in any dimension. Here we also propose a randomized version and present large scale computational results with these algorithm for arbitrary $m$. The algorithms outperform many existing algorithms. On sets of data as large as $1,000,000$ points, the proposed algorithms compute solutions to within an absolute error of $10^{-4}$.
△ Less
Submitted 8 October, 2014;
originally announced October 2014.
