-
Statistical phase estimation and error mitigation on a superconducting quantum processor
Authors:
Nick S. Blunt,
Laura Caune,
Róbert Izsák,
Earl T. Campbell,
Nicole Holzmann
Abstract:
Quantum phase estimation (QPE) is a key quantum algorithm, which has been widely studied as a method to perform chemistry and solid-state calculations on future fault-tolerant quantum computers. Recently, several authors have proposed statistical alternatives to QPE that have benefits on early fault-tolerant devices, including shorter circuits and better suitability for error mitigation techniques…
▽ More
Quantum phase estimation (QPE) is a key quantum algorithm, which has been widely studied as a method to perform chemistry and solid-state calculations on future fault-tolerant quantum computers. Recently, several authors have proposed statistical alternatives to QPE that have benefits on early fault-tolerant devices, including shorter circuits and better suitability for error mitigation techniques. However, practical implementations of the algorithm on real quantum processors are lacking. In this paper we practically implement statistical phase estimation on Rigetti's superconducting processors. We specifically use the method of Lin and Tong [PRX Quantum 3, 010318 (2022)] using the improved Fourier approximation of Wan et al. [PRL 129, 030503 (2022)], and applying a variational compilation technique to reduce circuit depth. We then incorporate error mitigation strategies including zero-noise extrapolation and readout error mitigation with bit-flip averaging. We propose a simple method to estimate energies from the statistical phase estimation data, which is found to improve the accuracy in final energy estimates by one to two orders of magnitude with respect to prior theoretical bounds, reducing the cost to perform accurate phase estimation calculations. We apply these methods to chemistry problems for active spaces up to 4 electrons in 4 orbitals, including the application of a quantum embedding method, and use them to correctly estimate energies within chemical precision. Our work demonstrates that statistical phase estimation has a natural resilience to noise, particularly after mitigating coherent errors, and can achieve far higher accuracy than suggested by previous analysis, demonstrating its potential as a valuable quantum algorithm for early fault-tolerant devices.
△ Less
Submitted 11 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
Measuring Electron Correlation. The Impact of Symmetry and Orbital Transformations
Authors:
Róbert Izsák,
Aleksei V Ivanov,
Nick S. Blunt,
Nicole Holzmann,
Frank Neese
Abstract:
In this perspective, the various measures of electron correlation used in wavefunction theory, density functional theory and quantum information theory are briefly reviewed. We then focus on a more traditional metric based on dominant weights in the full configuration solution and discuss its behaviour with respect to the choice of the $N$-electron and the one-electron basis. The impact of symmetr…
▽ More
In this perspective, the various measures of electron correlation used in wavefunction theory, density functional theory and quantum information theory are briefly reviewed. We then focus on a more traditional metric based on dominant weights in the full configuration solution and discuss its behaviour with respect to the choice of the $N$-electron and the one-electron basis. The impact of symmetry is discussed and we emphasize that the distinction between determinants, configuration state functions and configurations as reference functions is useful because the latter incorporate spin-coupling into the reference and should thus reduce the complexity of the wavefunction expansion. The corresponding notions of single determinant, single spin-coupling and single configuration wavefunctions are discussed and the effect of orbital rotations on the multireference character is reviewed by analysing a simple model system. In molecular systems, the extent of correlation effects should be limited by finite system size and in most cases the appropriate choices of one-electron and $N$-electron bases should be able to incorporate these into a low-complexity reference function, often a single configurational one.
△ Less
Submitted 6 April, 2023; v1 submitted 30 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
Quantum Computation for Periodic Solids in Second Quantization
Authors:
Aleksei V. Ivanov,
Christoph Sünderhauf,
Nicole Holzmann,
Tom Ellaby,
Rachel N. Kerber,
Glenn Jones,
Joan Camps
Abstract:
In this work, we present a quantum algorithm for ground-state energy calculations of periodic solids on error-corrected quantum computers. The algorithm is based on the sparse qubitization approach in second quantization and developed for Bloch and Wannier basis sets. We show that Wannier functions require less computational resources with respect to Bloch functions because: (i) the L$_1$ norm of…
▽ More
In this work, we present a quantum algorithm for ground-state energy calculations of periodic solids on error-corrected quantum computers. The algorithm is based on the sparse qubitization approach in second quantization and developed for Bloch and Wannier basis sets. We show that Wannier functions require less computational resources with respect to Bloch functions because: (i) the L$_1$ norm of the Hamiltonian is considerably lower and (ii) the translational symmetry of Wannier functions can be exploited in order to reduce the amount of classical data that must be loaded into the quantum computer. The resource requirements of the quantum algorithm are estimated for periodic solids such as NiO and PdO. These transition metal oxides are industrially relevant for their catalytic properties. We find that ground-state energy estimation of Hamiltonians approximated using 200--900 spin orbitals requires {\it ca.}~$10{}^{10}$--$10^{12}$ T gates and up to $3\cdot10^8$ physical qubits for a physical error rate of $0.1\%$.
△ Less
Submitted 15 May, 2023; v1 submitted 5 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
A perspective on the current state-of-the-art of quantum computing for drug discovery applications
Authors:
Nick S. Blunt,
Joan Camps,
Ophelia Crawford,
Róbert Izsák,
Sebastian Leontica,
Arjun Mirani,
Alexandra E. Moylett,
Sam A. Scivier,
Christoph Sünderhauf,
Patrick Schopf,
Jacob M. Taylor,
Nicole Holzmann
Abstract:
Computational chemistry is an essential tool in the pharmaceutical industry. Quantum computing is a fast evolving technology that promises to completely shift the computational capabilities in many areas of chemical research by bringing into reach currently impossible calculations. This perspective illustrates the near-future applicability of quantum computation to pharmaceutical problems. We brie…
▽ More
Computational chemistry is an essential tool in the pharmaceutical industry. Quantum computing is a fast evolving technology that promises to completely shift the computational capabilities in many areas of chemical research by bringing into reach currently impossible calculations. This perspective illustrates the near-future applicability of quantum computation to pharmaceutical problems. We briefly summarize and compare the scaling properties of state-of-the-art quantum algorithms, and provide novel estimates of the quantum computational cost of simulating progressively larger embedding regions of a pharmaceutically relevant covalent protein-drug complex involving the drug Ibrutinib. Carrying out these calculations requires an error-corrected quantum architecture, that we describe. Our estimates showcase that recent developments on quantum algorithms have dramatically reduced the quantum resources needed to run fully quantum calculations in active spaces of around 50 orbitals and electrons, from estimated over 1000 years using the Trotterisation approach to just a few days with sparse qubitisation, painting a picture of fast and exciting progress in this nascent field.
△ Less
Submitted 20 March, 2023; v1 submitted 1 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
Quantum Computing in Pharma: A Multilayer Embedding Approach for Near Future Applications
Authors:
Robert Izsak,
Christoph Riplinger,
Nick S. Blunt,
Bernardo de Souza,
Nicole Holzmann,
Ophelia Crawford,
Joan Camps,
Frank Neese,
Patrick Schopf
Abstract:
Quantum computers are special purpose machines that are expected to be particularly useful in simulating strongly correlated chemical systems. The quantum computer excels at treating a moderate number of orbitals within an active space in a fully quantum mechanical manner. We present a quantum phase estimation calculation on F$_2$ in a (2,2) active space on Rigetti's Aspen-11 QPU. While this is a…
▽ More
Quantum computers are special purpose machines that are expected to be particularly useful in simulating strongly correlated chemical systems. The quantum computer excels at treating a moderate number of orbitals within an active space in a fully quantum mechanical manner. We present a quantum phase estimation calculation on F$_2$ in a (2,2) active space on Rigetti's Aspen-11 QPU. While this is a promising start, it also underlines the need for carefully selecting the orbital spaces treated by the quantum computer. In this work, a scheme for selecting such an active space automatically is described and simulated results obtained using both the quantum phase estimation (QPE) and variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) algorithms are presented and combined with a subtractive method to enable accurate description of the environment. The active occupied space is selected from orbitals localized on the chemically relevant fragment of the molecule, while the corresponding virtual space is chosen based on the magnitude of interactions with the occupied space calculated from perturbation theory. This protocol is then applied to two chemical systems of pharmaceutical relevance: the enzyme [Fe] hydrogenase and the photosenzitizer temoporfin. While the sizes of the active spaces currently amenable to a quantum computational treatment are not enough to demonstrate quantum advantage, the procedure outlined here is applicable to any active space size, including those that are outside the reach of classical computation.
△ Less
Submitted 4 June, 2022; v1 submitted 9 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
