Showing 1–50 of 136 results for author: Hirsch, J E

Comment on "Trapped flux in a small crystal of CaKFe$_4$As$_4$ at ambient pressure and in a diamond anvil pressure cell" by S. L. Bud'ko et al

Authors: J. E. Hirsch, F. Marsiglio

Abstract: In their paper arXiv:2405.08189, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 37 (2024) 065010 [1], Bud'ko et al. present experimental results for trapped magnetic flux for a tiny sample of a type II superconductor. The paper aims to provide evidence in support of the interpretation that similar measurements performed in samples of hydrogen-rich materials under high pressure by Minkov, Bud'ko and coauthors [2] are co… ▽ More In their paper arXiv:2405.08189, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 37 (2024) 065010 [1], Bud'ko et al. present experimental results for trapped magnetic flux for a tiny sample of a type II superconductor. The paper aims to provide evidence in support of the interpretation that similar measurements performed in samples of hydrogen-rich materials under high pressure by Minkov, Bud'ko and coauthors [2] are conclusive evidence [3] for superconductivity in hydrides under pressure. Here we point out that the new evidence presented by Bud'ko et al. [1] further supports our interpretation [4],[5] that the reported measurements of trapped flux on hydrides under pressure [2] are evidence that the samples are $not$ superconducting. △ Less

Submitted 29 May, 2024; v1 submitted 25 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

Comments: Comment on arXiv:2405.08189

Reply to "Comment on `Nonstandard superconductivity or no superconductivity in hydrides under high pressure' "

Authors: J. E. Hirsch, F. Marsiglio

Abstract: In Ref. [1] we surveyed the known hydride superconductors, and compared their resistive behavior to that of typical known superconductors, including conventional (e.g. NbN and MgB$_2$) and unconventional (e.g. YBCO) superconductors, and concluded that the behavior of the hydrides was indicative of nonstandard or no superconductivity. In the preceding comment, Talantsev, Minkov, Balakirev and Ereme… ▽ More In Ref. [1] we surveyed the known hydride superconductors, and compared their resistive behavior to that of typical known superconductors, including conventional (e.g. NbN and MgB$_2$) and unconventional (e.g. YBCO) superconductors, and concluded that the behavior of the hydrides was indicative of nonstandard or no superconductivity. In the preceding comment, Talantsev, Minkov, Balakirev and Eremets [2] (arXiv:2311.07865) claim that we presented a "flawed analysis and a selective and inaccurate report of published data." Here we show that this claim is wrong. △ Less

Submitted 11 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

Comments: Reply to arXiv:2311.07865

Comment on arXiv:2312.04495 by M. I. Eremets and coauthors

Authors: J. E. Hirsch

Abstract: In the recently posted arXiv:2312.04495v3 [1], its authors used a computer code written by me supplied to them by the authors of Ref. [2], and claimed that the results that they obtained invalidate the results and conclusions presented in the paper J. Supercond. Nov. Mag. 35, 3141-3145 (2022) by F. Marsiglio and myself [2]. Here I point out that the authors' claim (i) resulted from improper unauth… ▽ More In the recently posted arXiv:2312.04495v3 [1], its authors used a computer code written by me supplied to them by the authors of Ref. [2], and claimed that the results that they obtained invalidate the results and conclusions presented in the paper J. Supercond. Nov. Mag. 35, 3141-3145 (2022) by F. Marsiglio and myself [2]. Here I point out that the authors' claim (i) resulted from improper unauthorized use of my computer code, (ii) is wrong, and (iii) is misleading to the scientific community. △ Less

Submitted 14 January, 2024; originally announced January 2024.

On the interpretation of flux trap** experiments in hydrides

Authors: J. E. Hirsch, F. Marsiglio

Abstract: In Ref. [1], Minkov et al. reported measurements of the magnetic moment that remains after a magnetic field is turned on and then turned off for hydride materials under high pressure in a diamond anvil cell. In Refs. [2,3], Minkov et al. reported magnetization measurements on the same samples as a function of applied magnetic field. Here we argue that the latter indicate that the signal measured i… ▽ More In Ref. [1], Minkov et al. reported measurements of the magnetic moment that remains after a magnetic field is turned on and then turned off for hydride materials under high pressure in a diamond anvil cell. In Refs. [2,3], Minkov et al. reported magnetization measurements on the same samples as a function of applied magnetic field. Here we argue that the latter indicate that the signal measured in the former does not provide evidence for superconductivity in these samples. Instead, the measured signal likely originates in ferromagnetism of either the sample or the background. △ Less

Submitted 26 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

Comments: under consideration by Nature Physics as Matters Arising on ref. [1]

On magnetic field screening and trap** in hydrogen-rich high-temperature superconductors: unpulling the wool over readers' eyes

Authors: J. E. Hirsch, F. Marsiglio

Abstract: In Nat Commun 13, 3194 (2022) [1], Minkov et al. reported magnetization measurements on hydrides under pressure that claimed to find a diamagnetic signal below a critical temperature demonstrating the existence of superconductivity. Here we present an analysis of raw data recently released [2] by the authors of [1] that shows that the measured data do not support their claim that the samples exhib… ▽ More In Nat Commun 13, 3194 (2022) [1], Minkov et al. reported magnetization measurements on hydrides under pressure that claimed to find a diamagnetic signal below a critical temperature demonstrating the existence of superconductivity. Here we present an analysis of raw data recently released [2] by the authors of [1] that shows that the measured data do not support their claim that the samples exhibit a diamagnetic response indicative of superconductivity. We also point out that Ref. [1] in its original form omitted essential information that resulted in presentation of a distorted picture of reality, and that important information on transformations performed on measured data remains undisclosed. Our analysis also calls into question the conclusions of Minkov et al's trapped flux experiments reported in Nat. Phys. (2023) [3] as supporting superconductivity in these materials. This work together with earlier work implies that there is no magnetic evidence for the existence of high-temperature superconductivity in hydrides under pressure. △ Less

Submitted 5 October, 2023; v1 submitted 5 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

Comments: 7 pages, 7 figures

Journal ref: Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism (2023)

Enormous variation in homogeneity and other anomalous features of room temperature superconductor samples: a Comment on Nature 615, 244 (2023)

Authors: J. E. Hirsch

Abstract: The resistive transition width of a recently discovered room temperature near-ambient-pressure superconductor [1] changes by more than three orders of magnitude between different samples, with the transition temperature nearly unchanged. For the narrowest transitions, the transition width relative to $T_c$ is only $0.014 \%$. The voltage-current characteristics indicate vanishing critical current,… ▽ More The resistive transition width of a recently discovered room temperature near-ambient-pressure superconductor [1] changes by more than three orders of magnitude between different samples, with the transition temperature nearly unchanged. For the narrowest transitions, the transition width relative to $T_c$ is only $0.014 \%$. The voltage-current characteristics indicate vanishing critical current, and the normal state resistance is unusually small. These anomalous behaviors and other issues indicate that this system is not a superconductor. Implications for other hydrides are discussed. △ Less

Submitted 17 April, 2023; v1 submitted 31 March, 2023; originally announced April 2023.

Comments: A shorter version was submitted as Matters Arising on "Evidence of near-ambient superconductivity in a N-doped lutetium hydride", Nature 615, 244 (2023)

Journal ref: J Supercond Nov Magn (2023)

Evidence against superconductivity in flux trap** experiments on hydrides under high pressure & On magnetic field screening and expulsion in hydride superconductors

Authors: J. E. Hirsch, F. Marsiglio

Abstract: It has recently been reported that hydrogen-rich materials under high pressure trap magnetic flux, a tell-tale signature of superconductivity [arXiv:2206.14108v1]. Here we point out that under the protocol used in these experiments the measured results indicate that the materials don't trap magnetic flux. Instead, the measured results are either experimental artifacts or originate in magnetic prop… ▽ More It has recently been reported that hydrogen-rich materials under high pressure trap magnetic flux, a tell-tale signature of superconductivity [arXiv:2206.14108v1]. Here we point out that under the protocol used in these experiments the measured results indicate that the materials don't trap magnetic flux. Instead, the measured results are either experimental artifacts or originate in magnetic properties of the sample or its environment unrelated to superconductivity, Together with other experimental evidence analyzed earlier, this clearly indicates that these materials are not superconductors. {\bf In a second part, we discuss magnetic field screening and expulsion.} △ Less

Submitted 14 March, 2023; v1 submitted 4 July, 2022; originally announced July 2022.

Comments: The first part of this submission was posted on arXiv on 14 July 2022 and published in J Supercond Nov Magn 35, 3141 (2022). The second part was originally submitted for posting to arXiv on 14 Nov. 2022 (unsuccessfully) and is under consideration for publication in Nature Communications

Journal ref: J Supercond Nov Magn 35, 3141 (2022) and 36, 1257 (2023)

Extended Comment on Nature 586, 373 (2020) by E. Snider et al

Authors: Dirk van der Marel, Jorge E Hirsch

Abstract: Recently the discovery of room-temperature superconductivity was announced for a carbonaceous sulfur hydride (CSH) under high pressure. The evidence for superconductivity was based on resistance and magnetic susceptibility measurements. In the figures showing the susceptibility it was stated that "the background signal, determined from a non-superconducting CSH sample at 108~GPa, has been subtract… ▽ More Recently the discovery of room-temperature superconductivity was announced for a carbonaceous sulfur hydride (CSH) under high pressure. The evidence for superconductivity was based on resistance and magnetic susceptibility measurements. In the figures showing the susceptibility it was stated that "the background signal, determined from a non-superconducting CSH sample at 108~GPa, has been subtracted from the data". From a thorough data analysis we show that the data are incompatible with the notion that the susceptibility data are obtained from the "measured voltage" using a background correction. On the other hand the data {\it are} compatible with the reverse procedure, namely the "measured voltage" is obtained by adding a "background signal" containing noise to what was reported as the background-corrected susceptibility. For all 6 of the reported pressures our analysis leads to the conclusion that: (i) the reported background-corrected susceptibility data are pathological, (ii) they were not obtained by the method described in this paper nor by any one of the alternative 3 methods that were subsequently provided by the authors and (iii) the "measured voltage" data are not raw data. △ Less

Submitted 6 August, 2022; v1 submitted 19 January, 2022; originally announced January 2022.

Comments: 22 pages, 30 figures, 15 references, open data. The article under discussion in this submission has since been retracted by the publisher, see https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05294-9 (26 Sep 2022)

Journal ref: International Journal of Modern Physics B, 2375001 (2022)

On the ac magnetic susceptibility of a room temperature superconductor: anatomy of a probable scientific fraud

Authors: J. E. Hirsch

Abstract: In Nature 586, 373 (2020), Snider et al announced the experimental discovery of room temperature superconductivity in a carbonaceous sulfur hydride under high pressure, hereafter called CSH. The paper reported sharp drops in the measured magnetic susceptibility as a function of temperature for five different pressures, that were claimed to be a superior test signaling a superconducting transition.… ▽ More In Nature 586, 373 (2020), Snider et al announced the experimental discovery of room temperature superconductivity in a carbonaceous sulfur hydride under high pressure, hereafter called CSH. The paper reported sharp drops in the measured magnetic susceptibility as a function of temperature for five different pressures, that were claimed to be a superior test signaling a superconducting transition. Here I present several arguments indicating that the susceptibility data published in that paper were probably fraudulent. This calls into question the validity of the entire paper and its claim of detection of room temperature superconductivity. I also describe the roadblocks that I have encountered in reaching this conclusion. A variety of implications of this situation are discussed. △ Less

Submitted 9 December, 2021; v1 submitted 15 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

Comments: arXiv admin note: This submission has been withdrawn by arXiv administrators due to a violation of professional communications standards

Clear evidence against superconductivity in hydrides under high pressure

Authors: J. E. Hirsch, F. Marsiglio

Abstract: The Meissner effect, magnetic field expulsion, is a hallmark of superconductivity. Associated with it, superconductors exclude applied magnetic fields. Recently Minkov et al. presented experimental results reportedly showing "definitive evidence of the Meissner effect" in sulfur hydride and lanthanum hydride under high pressure [1], and more recently Eremets et al. argued that "the arguments again… ▽ More The Meissner effect, magnetic field expulsion, is a hallmark of superconductivity. Associated with it, superconductors exclude applied magnetic fields. Recently Minkov et al. presented experimental results reportedly showing "definitive evidence of the Meissner effect" in sulfur hydride and lanthanum hydride under high pressure [1], and more recently Eremets et al. argued that "the arguments against superconductivity (in hydrides) can be either refuted or explained" [2]. Instead, we show here that the evidence presented in those papers does not support the case for superconductivity in these materials. Together with experimental evidence discussed in earlier papers, we argue that this strongly suggests that hydrides under pressure are not high-temperature superconductors. △ Less

Submitted 20 July, 2022; v1 submitted 14 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

Comments: 10 pages 7 figures

Journal ref: Matter and Radiation at Extremes 7, 058401 (2022)

Absence of evidence of superconductivity in sulfur hydride in optical reflectance experiments

Authors: J. E. Hirsch, F. Marsiglio

Abstract: Capitani and coworkers [1] reported that infrared optical reflectance measurements provided evidence for a superconducting transition in sulfur hydride [2] under 150 GPa pressure, and that the transition is driven by the electron-phonon interaction. Here we argue that the measured data did not provide evidence that the system undergoes a transition to a superconducting state, nor do the data suppo… ▽ More Capitani and coworkers [1] reported that infrared optical reflectance measurements provided evidence for a superconducting transition in sulfur hydride [2] under 150 GPa pressure, and that the transition is driven by the electron-phonon interaction. Here we argue that the measured data did not provide evidence that the system undergoes a transition to a superconducting state, nor do the data support any role of phonons in driving a transition. Rather, the data are consistent with the system remaining in the normal state down to temperature 50K, the lowest temperature measured in the experiment. This calls into further question [3,4] the generally accepted view [5] that sulfur hydride under pressure is a high temperature superconductor. △ Less

Submitted 25 September, 2021; v1 submitted 22 September, 2021; originally announced September 2021.

Comments: 3 pages, 3 figures. Nature Physics 2022

Journal ref: Nature Physics, published 11 Aug. 2022

Faulty evidence for superconductivity in ac magnetic susceptibility of sulfur hydride under pressure

Authors: J. E. Hirsch

Abstract: It is generally believed that sulfur hydride under high pressure is a high temperature superconductor. In National Science Review 6, 713 (2019) Huang and coworkers reported detection of superconductivity in sulfur hydride through a highly sensitive ac magnetic susceptibility technique and an unambiguous determination of the superconducting phase diagram. In this paper we present evidence showing t… ▽ More It is generally believed that sulfur hydride under high pressure is a high temperature superconductor. In National Science Review 6, 713 (2019) Huang and coworkers reported detection of superconductivity in sulfur hydride through a highly sensitive ac magnetic susceptibility technique and an unambiguous determination of the superconducting phase diagram. In this paper we present evidence showing that the experimental results reported in that paper do not support the conclusion that sulfur hydride is a superconductor. △ Less

Submitted 5 February, 2024; v1 submitted 7 September, 2021; originally announced September 2021.

Comments: Fig. 14 and Refs. 29, 30 were added

Journal ref: National Science Review 9: nwac086, 2022

Magnetic flux expulsion in a superconducting wire

Authors: J. E. Hirsch

Abstract: An electric current generates a magnetic field, and magnetic fields cannot exist in the interior of type I superconductors. As a consequence of these two facts, electric currents can only flow near the surface of a type I superconducting wire so that the self-field vanishes in the interior. Here we examine how an electric current flowing through the entire cross-section of a normal conducting wire… ▽ More An electric current generates a magnetic field, and magnetic fields cannot exist in the interior of type I superconductors. As a consequence of these two facts, electric currents can only flow near the surface of a type I superconducting wire so that the self-field vanishes in the interior. Here we examine how an electric current flowing through the entire cross-section of a normal conducting wire becomes a surface current when it enters a superconducting portion of the wire. This geometry provides insight into the dynamics of magnetic flux expulsion that is not apparent in the Meissner effect involving expulsion of an externally applied magnetic field. It provides clear evidence that the motion of magnetic field lines in superconductors is intimately tied to the motion of charge carriers, as occurs in classical plasmas (Alfven's theorem) and as proposed in the theory of hole superconductivity \cite{holesc}, in contradiction with the conventional London-BCS theory of superconductivity. △ Less

Submitted 1 June, 2021; originally announced June 2021.

Flux trap** in superconducting hydrides under high pressure

Authors: J. E. Hirsch, F. Marsiglio

Abstract: High-temperature conventional superconductivity in hydrogen-rich materials under high pressure has been reportedly found in twelve different compounds in recent years. However, the experimental evidence on which these claims are based has recently been called into question. Here we discuss the measurement of trapped magnetic flux, that should establish definitively that these materials are indeed… ▽ More High-temperature conventional superconductivity in hydrogen-rich materials under high pressure has been reportedly found in twelve different compounds in recent years. However, the experimental evidence on which these claims are based has recently been called into question. Here we discuss the measurement of trapped magnetic flux, that should establish definitively that these materials are indeed high-temperature superconductors. Its absence should confirm claims to the contrary. △ Less

Submitted 1 July, 2021; v1 submitted 8 April, 2021; originally announced April 2021.

Comments: minor changes; to be published in Physica C

Journal ref: Physica C 589, 1353916 (2021)

Absence of magnetic evidence for superconductivity in hydrides under high pressure

Authors: J. E. Hirsch, F. Marsiglio

Abstract: It is generally believed that magnetization measurements on sulfur hydride under high pressure performed in 2015 [1] provided "final convincing evidence of superconductivity" [2] in that material, in agreement with theoretical predictions [3,4]. Supported by this precedent, drops in resistance that were later observed in several other hydrides under high pressure [2,5] have been generally accepted… ▽ More It is generally believed that magnetization measurements on sulfur hydride under high pressure performed in 2015 [1] provided "final convincing evidence of superconductivity" [2] in that material, in agreement with theoretical predictions [3,4]. Supported by this precedent, drops in resistance that were later observed in several other hydrides under high pressure [2,5] have been generally accepted as evidence of superconductivity without corroborating evidence from magnetic measurements. In this paper we challenge the original interpretation that the magnetic measurements on sulfur hydride performed in 2015 were evidence of superconductivity. We point out that a large paramagnetic contribution to the magnetic susceptibility was detected below Tc and argue that its temperature dependence rules out the possibility that it would be a background signal; instead the temperature dependence indicates that the paramagnetic behavior originated in the sample. We discuss possible explanations for this remarkable behavior and conclude that standard superconductors would not show such behavior. We also survey all the other published data from magnetic measurements on this class of materials and conclude that they do not provide strong evidence for superconductivity. Consequently, we call into question the generally accepted view that conventional superconductivity in hydrogen-rich materials at high temperature and pressure is a reality, and discuss the implications if it is not. △ Less

Submitted 5 April, 2021; v1 submitted 28 February, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

Journal ref: Physica C 584, 1353866 (2021)

Intrinsic hysteresis in the presumed superconducting transition of hydrides under high pressure

Authors: J. E. Hirsch, F. Marsiglio

Abstract: Superconducting transitions in the absence of magnetic field should be non-hysteretic. Here we address the fact that the drops in electrical resistance that have been interpreted as evidence of superconductivity in several hydrides under high pressure (so-called "superhydrides") show hysteresis. We argue that the experimental evidence shows that the observed hysteresis cannot be attributed to expe… ▽ More Superconducting transitions in the absence of magnetic field should be non-hysteretic. Here we address the fact that the drops in electrical resistance that have been interpreted as evidence of superconductivity in several hydrides under high pressure (so-called "superhydrides") show hysteresis. We argue that the experimental evidence shows that the observed hysteresis cannot be attributed to experimental artifacts but is intrinsic to the samples. Assuming that the drops in resistance signal a thermodynamic phase transition, we argue that the presence of intrinsic thermal hysteresis indicates that these are first order transitions, whereas for standard superconductors the transition in the absence of applied magnetic field is always second order. We conclude that this is another feature that qualitatively distinguishes superhydrides from standard superconductors, in addition to the ones that have been pointed out earlier [1,2], $assuming$ these materials are superconductors. Alternatively and more likely, whether or not the drops in resistance signal a thermodynamic phase transition, our analysis indicates that superhydrides are not superconductors. △ Less

Submitted 25 January, 2021; v1 submitted 18 January, 2021; originally announced January 2021.

Comments: Paper withdrawn because we received additional information from the authors of Refs.[6] and [8] that supports their statements that the hysteresis is due to lack of thermal equilibration. Also the authors of Ref.[4] informed us that a diamond had cracked on or after the cooling cycle, resulting in an uncontrolled pressure shift that could explain the hysteresis in their Fig.3

Meissner effect in nonstandard superconductors

Authors: J. E. Hirsch, F. Marsiglio

Abstract: It was recently pointed out that so-called "superhydrides", hydrogen-rich materials that appear to become superconducting at high temperatures and pressures, exhibit physical properties that are different from both conventional and unconventional standard type I and type II superconductors [1,2]. Here we consider magnetic field expulsion in the first material in this class discovered in 2015, sulf… ▽ More It was recently pointed out that so-called "superhydrides", hydrogen-rich materials that appear to become superconducting at high temperatures and pressures, exhibit physical properties that are different from both conventional and unconventional standard type I and type II superconductors [1,2]. Here we consider magnetic field expulsion in the first material in this class discovered in 2015, sulfur hydride [3]. A nuclear resonant scattering experiment has been interpreted as demonstration that the Meissner effect takes place in this material [4,5]. Here we point out that the observed effect, under the assumption that the system is in thermodynamic equilibrium, implies a Meissner pressure [6] in this material that is {\it much larger} than that of standard superconductors. This suggests that hydride superconductors are qualitatively different from the known standard superconductors {\it if} they are superconductors. △ Less

Submitted 13 April, 2021; v1 submitted 5 January, 2021; originally announced January 2021.

Comments: 6 pages, 2 figures

Journal ref: Physica C 587, 1353896 (2021)

Nonstandard superconductivity or no superconductivity in hydrides under high pressure

Authors: J. E. Hirsch, F. Marsiglio

Abstract: Over the past six years, superconductivity at high temperatures has been reported in a variety of hydrogen-rich compounds under high pressure. That high-temperature superconductivity should exist in these materials is expected according to the conventional theory of superconductivity, as shown by detailed calculations. However here we argue that experimental observations rule out conventional supe… ▽ More Over the past six years, superconductivity at high temperatures has been reported in a variety of hydrogen-rich compounds under high pressure. That high-temperature superconductivity should exist in these materials is expected according to the conventional theory of superconductivity, as shown by detailed calculations. However here we argue that experimental observations rule out conventional superconductivity in these materials. Our results indicate that either these materials are unconventional superconductors of a novel kind, which we term `nonstandard superconductors', or alternatively that they are not superconductors. If the former, we point out that the critical current in these materials should be five orders of magnitude larger than in standard superconductors, potentially opening up the way to important technological applications. If the latter, which we believe is more likely, we suggest that the signals interpreted as superconductivity are either experimental artifacts or they signal other interesting physics but not superconductivity. △ Less

Submitted 6 April, 2021; v1 submitted 23 December, 2020; originally announced December 2020.

Comments: 11 pages, 13 figures

Journal ref: Phys. Rev. B 103, 134505 (2021)

About the Pressure-Induced Superconducting State of Europium Metal at Low Temperatures

Authors: J. E. Hirsch

Abstract: In Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 197002 (2009) it was reported that the element Eu becomes superconducting in the pressure and temperature range [84-142GPa], [1.8-2.75K]. The claim was largely based on ac susceptibility measurements. Recently reported ac susceptibility measurements on a hydride compound under pressure that appears to become superconducting near room temperature (Nature 586, 373 (2020)) ca… ▽ More In Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 197002 (2009) it was reported that the element Eu becomes superconducting in the pressure and temperature range [84-142GPa], [1.8-2.75K]. The claim was largely based on ac susceptibility measurements. Recently reported ac susceptibility measurements on a hydride compound under pressure that appears to become superconducting near room temperature (Nature 586, 373 (2020)) cast serious doubt on the validity of the results for Eu as well as for the hydride. Here I present results that shed new light on the true behaviour of Eu. It is argued that the experiments on Eu have to be repeated to either validate or rule out the claim that it is a superconducting element. △ Less

Submitted 9 December, 2021; v1 submitted 25 November, 2020; originally announced December 2020.

Comments: arXiv admin note: This submission has been withdrawn by arXiv administrators due to inflammatory content and unprofessional language

Absence of high temperature superconductivity in hydrides under pressure

Authors: J. E. Hirsch, F. Marsiglio

Abstract: The long-sought goal of room-temperature superconductivity has reportedly recently been realized in a carbonaceous sulfur hydride compound under high pressure, as reported by Snider et al. [1]. The evidence presented in that paper is stronger than in other similar recent reports of high temperature superconductivity in hydrides under high pressure [2-7], and has been received with universal acclai… ▽ More The long-sought goal of room-temperature superconductivity has reportedly recently been realized in a carbonaceous sulfur hydride compound under high pressure, as reported by Snider et al. [1]. The evidence presented in that paper is stronger than in other similar recent reports of high temperature superconductivity in hydrides under high pressure [2-7], and has been received with universal acclaim [8-10]. Here we point out that features of the experimental data shown in Ref. [1] indicate that the phenomenon observed in that material is not superconductivity. This observation calls into question earlier similar claims of high temperature conventional superconductivity in hydrides under high pressure based on similar or weaker evidence [2-7]. △ Less

Submitted 20 October, 2020; originally announced October 2020.

Comments: 3 pages

Journal ref: Nature 596, E9-E10 (2021)

Superconductivity, what the H? The emperor has no clothes

Authors: J. E. Hirsch

Abstract: A magnetic field H is expelled from the interior of a metal becoming superconducting. Everybody thinks the phenomenon is perfectly well understood, particularly scientists with the highest H-index think that. I don't. I will explain why I believe that without Holes, conceptualized by Heisenberg in 1931 fifty years after Hall had first detected them in some metals, neither magnetic field expulsion… ▽ More A magnetic field H is expelled from the interior of a metal becoming superconducting. Everybody thinks the phenomenon is perfectly well understood, particularly scientists with the highest H-index think that. I don't. I will explain why I believe that without Holes, conceptualized by Heisenberg in 1931 fifty years after Hall had first detected them in some metals, neither magnetic field expulsion nor anything else about superconductivity can be understood. I have been a Heretic in the field of superconductivity for over 30 years, and believe that Hans' little story about the emperor perfectly captures the essence of the situation. Here is (a highly condensed version of) the wHole story. △ Less

Submitted 26 January, 2020; originally announced January 2020.

Journal ref: APS Forum on Physics and Society Newsletter, January 2020, p. 4-9

Joule heating in the normal-superconductor phase transition in a magnetic field

Authors: J. E. Hirsch

Abstract: Joule heating is a non-equilibrium dissipative process that occurs in a normal metal when an electric current flows, in an amount proportional to the metal's resistance. When it is induced by eddy currents resulting from a change in magnetic flux, it is also proportional to the rate at which the magnetic flux changes. Here we show that in the phase transformation between normal and superconducting… ▽ More Joule heating is a non-equilibrium dissipative process that occurs in a normal metal when an electric current flows, in an amount proportional to the metal's resistance. When it is induced by eddy currents resulting from a change in magnetic flux, it is also proportional to the rate at which the magnetic flux changes. Here we show that in the phase transformation between normal and superconducting states of a metal in a magnetic field, the total amount of Joule heating is determined by the thermodynamic properties of the system and is independent of the resistivity of the normal metal. We also show that Joule heating only occurs in the normal region of the material. The conventional theory of superconductivity however predicts that Joule heating occurs also in the superconducting region within a London penetration depth of the phase boundary. This implies that there is a problem with the conventional theory of superconductivity. △ Less

Submitted 13 February, 2020; v1 submitted 7 January, 2020; originally announced January 2020.

Journal ref: Physica C 576, 1353687 (2020)

Inconsistency of the conventional theory of superconductivity

Authors: J. E. Hirsch

Abstract: In a process where the temperature of a type I superconductor in a magnetic field changes, the conventional theory of superconductivity predicts that Joule heat is generated and that the final state is independent of the speed of the process. I show that these two predictions cannot be simultaneously reconciled with the laws of thermodynamics. I propose a resolution of this paradox. In a process where the temperature of a type I superconductor in a magnetic field changes, the conventional theory of superconductivity predicts that Joule heat is generated and that the final state is independent of the speed of the process. I show that these two predictions cannot be simultaneously reconciled with the laws of thermodynamics. I propose a resolution of this paradox. △ Less

Submitted 25 April, 2020; v1 submitted 18 September, 2019; originally announced September 2019.

Comments: Final version. To be published in Europhysics Letters

Journal ref: EPL 130, 17006 (2020)

How Alfven's theorem explains the Meissner effect

Authors: J. E. Hirsch

Abstract: Alfven's theorem states that in a perfectly conducting fluid magnetic field lines move with the fluid without dissipation. When a metal becomes superconducting in the presence of a magnetic field, magnetic field lines move from the interior to the surface (Meissner effect) in a reversible way. This indicates that a perfectly conducting fluid is flowing outward. We point this out and show that this… ▽ More Alfven's theorem states that in a perfectly conducting fluid magnetic field lines move with the fluid without dissipation. When a metal becomes superconducting in the presence of a magnetic field, magnetic field lines move from the interior to the surface (Meissner effect) in a reversible way. This indicates that a perfectly conducting fluid is flowing outward. We point this out and show that this fluid carries neither charge nor mass, but carries $effective$ $mass$. This implies that the effective mass of carriers is lowered when a system goes from the normal to the superconducting state, which agrees with the prediction of the unconventional theory of hole superconductivity and with optical experiments in some superconducting materials. The 60-year old conventional understanding of the Meissner effect ignores Alfven's theorem and for that reason we argue that it does not provide a valid understanding of real superconductors. △ Less

Submitted 29 September, 2019; v1 submitted 17 September, 2019; originally announced September 2019.

Hole superconductivity in infinite-layer nickelates

Authors: J. E. Hirsch, F. Marsiglio

Abstract: We propose that the superconductivity recently observed in Nd$_{0.8}$Sr$_{0.2}$NiO$_2$ with critical temperature in the range $9$ K to $15$ K results from the same charge carriers and the same mechanism that we have proposed give rise to superconductivity in both hole-doped and electron-doped cuprates: pairing of hole carriers in oxygen $pπ$ orbitals, driven by a correlated hop** term in the eff… ▽ More We propose that the superconductivity recently observed in Nd$_{0.8}$Sr$_{0.2}$NiO$_2$ with critical temperature in the range $9$ K to $15$ K results from the same charge carriers and the same mechanism that we have proposed give rise to superconductivity in both hole-doped and electron-doped cuprates: pairing of hole carriers in oxygen $pπ$ orbitals, driven by a correlated hop** term in the effective Hamiltonian that lowers the kinetic energy, as described by the theory of hole superconductivity. We predict a large increase in $T_c$ with compressive epitaxial strain. △ Less

Submitted 30 September, 2019; v1 submitted 1 September, 2019; originally announced September 2019.

Comments: 4 pages, 4 figures

Journal ref: Physica C 566 (2019) 1353534 (online at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921453419303053)

Superconducting materials: the w$hole$ story

Authors: J. E. Hirsch

Abstract: Ted Geballe has contributed enormously to the knowledge of superconducting materials during an illustrious scientific career spanning seven decades, encompassing groundbreaking discoveries and studies of both so-called conventional and unconventional superconductors. On the year of his 100th birthday I would like to argue that all superconducting materials that Ted investigated, as well as those h… ▽ More Ted Geballe has contributed enormously to the knowledge of superconducting materials during an illustrious scientific career spanning seven decades, encompassing groundbreaking discoveries and studies of both so-called conventional and unconventional superconductors. On the year of his 100th birthday I would like to argue that all superconducting materials that Ted investigated, as well as those he did not, have one thing in common that is not generally recognized: hole carriers. This includes $PbTe$ doped with $Tl$, for which Ted has proposed that superconductivity is driven by negative-U pairing. I will discuss why hole carriers are necessary for a material to be a superconductor, and the implications of this for the understanding of the fundamental physics of superconductivity. △ Less

Submitted 4 August, 2019; originally announced August 2019.

Comments: To be published in Ted@100 Festschrift, a special issue of JSNM in honor of Ted Geballe's 100th birthday

Journal ref: J Supercond Nov Magn (2019), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10948-019-05284-5

Thermodynamic inconsistency of the conventional theory of superconductivity

Authors: J. E. Hirsch

Abstract: A type I superconductor expels a magnetic field from its interior to a surface layer of thickness $λ_L$, the London penetration depth. $λ_L$ is a function of temperature, becoming smaller as the temperature decreases. Here we analyze the process of cooling (or heating) a type I superconductor in a magnetic field, with the system remaining always in the superconducting state. The conventional theor… ▽ More A type I superconductor expels a magnetic field from its interior to a surface layer of thickness $λ_L$, the London penetration depth. $λ_L$ is a function of temperature, becoming smaller as the temperature decreases. Here we analyze the process of cooling (or heating) a type I superconductor in a magnetic field, with the system remaining always in the superconducting state. The conventional theory predicts that Joule heat is generated in this process, the amount of which depends on the rate at which the temperature changes. Assuming the final state of the superconductor is independent of history, as the conventional theory assumes, we show that this process violates the first and second laws of thermodynamics. We conclude that the conventional theory of superconductivity is internally inconsistent. Instead, we suggest that the alternative theory of hole superconductivity may be able to resolve this problem. △ Less

Submitted 30 December, 2019; v1 submitted 25 July, 2019; originally announced July 2019.

Comments: Removed referees' comments to comply with arXiv policies

Journal ref: International Journal of Modern Physics B 34, 2050175 (2020)

Alfven-like waves along normal-superconductor phase boundaries

Authors: J. E. Hirsch

Abstract: Alfven waves are transverse magneto-hydrodynamic waves resulting from motion of a conducting fluid in direction perpendicular to an applied magnetic field, that propagate along the magnetic field direction. I propose that Alfven-like waves can propagate along normal-superconductor phase boundaries in the presence of a magnetic field. This requires charge flow and backflow across the normal-superco… ▽ More Alfven waves are transverse magneto-hydrodynamic waves resulting from motion of a conducting fluid in direction perpendicular to an applied magnetic field, that propagate along the magnetic field direction. I propose that Alfven-like waves can propagate along normal-superconductor phase boundaries in the presence of a magnetic field. This requires charge flow and backflow across the normal-superconductor phase boundary when the boundary moves, which is predicted by the theory of hole superconductivity but not by the conventional theory of superconductivity. The magnetic field and the domain wall energy provide elasticity, and the normal charge carriers' effective mass provides inertia. It is essential that the normal state charge carriers are holes. I propose an experimental search for Alfven-like waves in superconductors. △ Less

Submitted 6 June, 2019; originally announced June 2019.

Journal ref: Physica C 564, 42 (2019)

Understanding electron-doped cuprate superconductors as hole superconductors

Authors: J. E. Hirsch, F. Marsiglio

Abstract: Since their experimental discovery in 1989, the electron-doped cuprate superconductors have presented both a major challenge and a major opportunity. The major challenge has been to determine whether these materials are fundamentally different from or essentially similar to their hole-doped counterparts; a major opportunity because answering this question would strongly constrain the possible expl… ▽ More Since their experimental discovery in 1989, the electron-doped cuprate superconductors have presented both a major challenge and a major opportunity. The major challenge has been to determine whether these materials are fundamentally different from or essentially similar to their hole-doped counterparts; a major opportunity because answering this question would strongly constrain the possible explanations for what is the essential physics that leads to high temperature superconductivity in the cuprates, which is still not agreed upon. Here we argue that experimental results over the past 30 years on electron-doped cuprate materials have provided conclusive answers to these fundamental questions, by establishing that both in hole- and electron-doped cuprates, superconductivity originates in pairing of hole carriers in the same band. We discuss a model to describe this physics that is different from the generally accepted ones, and calculate physical observables that agree with experiment, in particular tunneling characteristics. We argue that our model is simpler, more natural and more compelling than other models. Unlike other models, ours was originally proposed before rather than after many key experiments were performed. △ Less

Submitted 23 April, 2019; v1 submitted 15 April, 2019; originally announced April 2019.

Journal ref: Physica C 564, 29 (2019)

Defying inertia: how rotating superconductors generate magnetic fields

Authors: J. E. Hirsch

Abstract: I discuss the process of magnetic field generation in rotating superconductors in simply connected and multiply connected geometries. In cooling a normal metal into the superconducting state while it is rotating, electrons slow down or speed up depending on the geometry and their location in the sample, apparently defying inertia. I argue that the conventional theory of superconductivity does not… ▽ More I discuss the process of magnetic field generation in rotating superconductors in simply connected and multiply connected geometries. In cooling a normal metal into the superconducting state while it is rotating, electrons slow down or speed up depending on the geometry and their location in the sample, apparently defying inertia. I argue that the conventional theory of superconductivity does not explain these processes. Instead, the theory of hole superconductivity does. Its predictions agree with experimental observations of Hendricks, King and Rohrschach for solid and hollow cylinders. △ Less

Submitted 10 April, 2019; v1 submitted 10 December, 2018; originally announced December 2018.

Comments: A section was added (IX)

Spinning superconductors and ferromagnets

Authors: J. E. Hirsch

Abstract: When a magnetic field is applied to a ferromagnetic body it starts to spin (Einstein-de Haas effect). This demonstrates the intimate connection between the electron's magnetic moment $μ_B=e\hbar/2m_ec$, associated with its spin angular momentum $S=\hbar/2$, and ferromagnetism. When a magnetic field is applied to a superconducting body it also starts to spin (gyromagnetic effect), and when a normal… ▽ More When a magnetic field is applied to a ferromagnetic body it starts to spin (Einstein-de Haas effect). This demonstrates the intimate connection between the electron's magnetic moment $μ_B=e\hbar/2m_ec$, associated with its spin angular momentum $S=\hbar/2$, and ferromagnetism. When a magnetic field is applied to a superconducting body it also starts to spin (gyromagnetic effect), and when a normal metal in a magnetic field becomes superconducting and expels the magnetic field (Meissner effect) the body also starts to spin. Yet according to the conventional theory of superconductivity the electron's spin only role is to label states, and the electron's magnetic moment plays no role in superconductivity. Instead, within the unconventional theory of hole superconductivity, the electron's spin and associated magnetic moment play a fundamental role in superconductivity. Just like in ferromagnets the magnetization of superconductors is predicted to result from an aggregation of magnetic moments with angular momenta $\hbar/2$. This gives rise to a "Spin Meissner effect", the existence of a spin current in the ground state of superconductors. The theory explains how a superconducting body starts spinning when it expels magnetic fields, it provides a dynamical explanation for the Meissner effect, and it explains how supercurrents stop without dissipation, all of which we argue the conventional theory fails to explain. Essential elements of the theory of hole superconductivity are that superconductivity is driven by lowering of kinetic energy, which we have also proposed is true for ferromagnets], that the normal state charge carriers in superconducting materials are holes, and that the spin-orbit interaction plays a key role in superconductivity. The theory is proposed to apply to all superconductors. △ Less

Submitted 2 November, 2018; originally announced November 2018.

Comments: this paper was written before the latest progress reported in arXiv:1808.02857

Journal ref: Acta Physica Polonica A 133, 350 (2018)

Comment on arXiv:1810.04634v1 [cond-mat.str-el], "Hole-pocket-driven superconductivity and its universal features in the electron-doped cuprates"

Authors: J. E. Hirsch

Abstract: The following letter, titled "Electron-Superconductivity in Oxides?", was submitted to Nature [Scientific Correspondence Section] on March 2, 1989, shortly after the experimental discovery of electron-doped cuprates announced in Nature on January 26, 1989. It predicted the findings recently reported in arXiv:1810.04634 by Yangmu Li, W. Tabis, Y. Tang, G. Yu, J. Jaroszynski, N. Barisic and M. Greve… ▽ More The following letter, titled "Electron-Superconductivity in Oxides?", was submitted to Nature [Scientific Correspondence Section] on March 2, 1989, shortly after the experimental discovery of electron-doped cuprates announced in Nature on January 26, 1989. It predicted the findings recently reported in arXiv:1810.04634 by Yangmu Li, W. Tabis, Y. Tang, G. Yu, J. Jaroszynski, N. Barisic and M. Greven that "clearly point to hole-pocket-driven superconductivity in these nominally electron-doped materials", "reveal hole superconductivity in the electron-doped high-temperature superconductors" "after three decades of enormous scientific inquiry", and point to "a single underlying hole-related mechanism of superconductivity in the cuprates regardless of nominal carrier type". Many more papers on this topic were published by F. Marsiglio and the author in the ensuing 30 years from 1989 to the present. In omitting to refer to any of these theoretical works, arXiv:1810.04634 presents a misleading picture. △ Less

Submitted 24 October, 2018; originally announced October 2018.

$\mathbf{h_α}$: An index to quantify an individual's scientific leadership

Authors: J. E. Hirsch

Abstract: The $α$ person is the dominant person in a group. We define the $α$-author of a paper as the author of the paper with the highest $h$-index among all the coauthors, and an $α$-paper of a scientist as a paper authored or coauthored by the scientist where he/she is the $α$-author. For most but not all papers in the literature there is only one $α$-author. We define the $h_α$ index of a scientist as… ▽ More The $α$ person is the dominant person in a group. We define the $α$-author of a paper as the author of the paper with the highest $h$-index among all the coauthors, and an $α$-paper of a scientist as a paper authored or coauthored by the scientist where he/she is the $α$-author. For most but not all papers in the literature there is only one $α$-author. We define the $h_α$ index of a scientist as the number of papers in the $h$-core of the scientist (i.e. the set of papers that contribute to the $h$-index of the scientist) where this scientist is the $α$-author. We also define the $h'_α$ index of a scientist as the number of $α$-papers of this scientist that have $\geq$ $h'_α$ citations. $h_α$ and $h'_α$ contain similar information, while $h'_α$ is conceptually more appealing it is harder to obtain from existing databases, hence of less current practical interest. We propose that the $h_α$ and/or $h'_α$ indices, or other variants discussed in the paper, are useful complements to the $h$-index of a scientist to quantify his/her scientific achievement, that rectify an inherent drawback of the $h$-index, its inability to distinguish between authors with different coauthorships patterns. A high $h$ index in conjunction with a high $h_α/h$ ratio is a hallmark of scientific leadership. △ Less

Submitted 10 December, 2018; v1 submitted 3 October, 2018; originally announced October 2018.

Comments: Some changes in response to referees' comments

Journal ref: Scientometrics Vol 118, p. 673-686 (2019)

Moment of inertia of superconductors

Authors: J. E. Hirsch

Abstract: We find that the bulk moment of inertia per unit volume of a metal becoming superconducting increases by the amount $m_e/(πr_c)$, with $m_e$ the bare electron mass and $r_c=e^2/m_e c^2$ the classical electron radius. This is because superfluid electrons acquire an intrinsic moment of inertia $m_e (2λ_L)^2$, with $λ_L$ the London penetration depth. As a consequence, we predict that when a rotating… ▽ More We find that the bulk moment of inertia per unit volume of a metal becoming superconducting increases by the amount $m_e/(πr_c)$, with $m_e$ the bare electron mass and $r_c=e^2/m_e c^2$ the classical electron radius. This is because superfluid electrons acquire an intrinsic moment of inertia $m_e (2λ_L)^2$, with $λ_L$ the London penetration depth. As a consequence, we predict that when a rotating long cylinder becomes superconducting its angular velocity does not change, contrary to the prediction of conventional BCS-London theory that it will rotate faster. We explain the dynamics of magnetic field generation when a rotating normal metal becomes superconducting. △ Less

Submitted 22 March, 2019; v1 submitted 6 August, 2018; originally announced August 2018.

Comments: An error in Fig. 2 was corrected

Journal ref: Phys. Lett. A 383, 83 (2019)

Enhancement of Superconducting $T_c$ due to the Spin-orbit Interaction

Authors: Joel Hutchinson, J. E. Hirsch, Frank Marsiglio

Abstract: We calculate the superconducting $T_c$ for a system which experiences Rashba spin-orbit interactions. Contrary to the usual case where the electron-electron interaction is assumed to be wave vector-independent, where superconductivity is suppressed by the spin-orbit interaction (except for a small region at low electron or hole densities), we find an enhancement of the superconducting transition t… ▽ More We calculate the superconducting $T_c$ for a system which experiences Rashba spin-orbit interactions. Contrary to the usual case where the electron-electron interaction is assumed to be wave vector-independent, where superconductivity is suppressed by the spin-orbit interaction (except for a small region at low electron or hole densities), we find an enhancement of the superconducting transition temperature when we include a correlated hop** interaction between electrons. This interaction originates in the expansion of atomic orbitals due to electron-electron repulsion and gives rise to superconductivity only at high electron (low hole) densities. When superconductivity results from this interaction it is enhanced by spin-orbit coupling, in spite of a suppression of the density of states. The degree of electron-hole asymmetry about the Fermi surface is also enhanced. △ Less

Submitted 15 May, 2018; v1 submitted 26 January, 2018; originally announced January 2018.

Comments: 8 pages, 8 figures

Journal ref: Phys. Rev. B 97, 184513 (2018)

Towards an understanding of hole superconductivity

Authors: J. E. Hirsch

Abstract: From the very beginning K. Alex Müller emphasized that the materials he and George Bednorz discovered in 1986 were $hole$ superconductors. Here I would like to share with him and others what I believe to be $the$ key reason for why high $T_c$ cuprates as well as all other superconductors are hole superconductors, which I only came to understand a few months ago. This paper is dedicated to Alex Mül… ▽ More From the very beginning K. Alex Müller emphasized that the materials he and George Bednorz discovered in 1986 were $hole$ superconductors. Here I would like to share with him and others what I believe to be $the$ key reason for why high $T_c$ cuprates as well as all other superconductors are hole superconductors, which I only came to understand a few months ago. This paper is dedicated to Alex Müller on the occasion of his 90th birthday. △ Less

Submitted 20 April, 2017; originally announced April 2017.

Comments: Dedicated to Alex Müller on the Occasion of his 90th Birthday. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1703.09777

Why only hole conductors can be superconductors

Authors: J. E. Hirsch

Abstract: The conventional theory of superconductivity says that charge carriers in a metal that becomes superconducting can be either electrons or holes. I argue that this is incorrect. In order to satisfy conservation of mechanical momentum and of entropy of the universe in the superconductor to normal transition in the presence of a magnetic field it is necessary that the normal state charge carriers are… ▽ More The conventional theory of superconductivity says that charge carriers in a metal that becomes superconducting can be either electrons or holes. I argue that this is incorrect. In order to satisfy conservation of mechanical momentum and of entropy of the universe in the superconductor to normal transition in the presence of a magnetic field it is necessary that the normal state charge carriers are holes. I will also review the empirical evidence in favor of the hypothesis that all superconductors are hole superconductors, and discuss the implications of this for the search for higher $T_c$ superconductors. △ Less

Submitted 20 March, 2017; originally announced March 2017.

Journal ref: Proc. SPIE 10105, Oxide-based Materials and Devices VIII, 101051V (March 7, 2017)

Entropy generation and momentum transfer in the superconductor-normal and normal-superconductor phase transformations and the consistency of the conventional theory of superconductivity

Authors: J. E. Hirsch

Abstract: Since the discovery of the Meissner effect the superconductor to normal (S-N) phase transition in the presence of a magnetic field is understood to be a first order phase transformation that is reversible under ideal conditions and obeys the laws of thermodynamics. The reverse (N-S) transition is the Meissner effect. This implies in particular that the kinetic energy of the supercurrent is not dis… ▽ More Since the discovery of the Meissner effect the superconductor to normal (S-N) phase transition in the presence of a magnetic field is understood to be a first order phase transformation that is reversible under ideal conditions and obeys the laws of thermodynamics. The reverse (N-S) transition is the Meissner effect. This implies in particular that the kinetic energy of the supercurrent is not dissipated as Joule heat in the process where the superconductor becomes normal and the supercurrent stops. In this paper we analyze the entropy generation and the momentum transfer between the supercurrent and the body in the S-N transition and the N-S transition as described by the conventional theory of superconductivity. We find that it is impossible to explain the transition in a way that is consistent with the laws of thermodynamics unless the momentum transfer between the supercurrent and the body occurs with zero entropy generation, for which the conventional theory of superconductivity provides no mechanism. Instead, we point out that the alternative theory of hole superconductivity does not encounter such difficulties. △ Less

Submitted 19 April, 2018; v1 submitted 9 March, 2017; originally announced March 2017.

Journal ref: Int. J. Mod. Phys. Vol. 32, 1850158 (2018)

Momentum of superconducting electrons and the explanation of the Meissner effect

Authors: J. E. Hirsch

Abstract: Momentum and energy conservation are fundamental tenets of physics, that valid physical theories have to satisfy. In the reversible transformation between superconducting and normal phases in the presence of a magnetic field, the mechanical momentum of the supercurrent has to be transferred to the body as a whole and vice versa, the kinetic energy of the supercurrent stays in the electronic degree… ▽ More Momentum and energy conservation are fundamental tenets of physics, that valid physical theories have to satisfy. In the reversible transformation between superconducting and normal phases in the presence of a magnetic field, the mechanical momentum of the supercurrent has to be transferred to the body as a whole and vice versa, the kinetic energy of the supercurrent stays in the electronic degrees of freedom, and no energy is dissipated nor entropy is generated in the process. We argue on general grounds that to explain these processes it is necessary that the electromagnetic field mediates the transfer of momentum between electrons and the body as a whole, and this requires that when the phase boundary between normal and superconducting phases is displaced, a flow and counterflow of charge occurs in direction perpendicular to the phase boundary. This flow and counterflow does not occur according to the conventional BCS-London theory of superconductivity, therefore we argue that within BCS-London theory the Meissner transition is a `forbidden transition'. Furthermore, to explain the phase transformation in a way that is consistent with the experimental observations requires that (i) the wavefunction $and$ charge distribution of superconducting electrons near the phase boundary extend into the normal phase, and (ii) that the charge carriers in the normal state have hole-like character. The conventional theory of superconductivity does not have these physical elements, the theory of hole superconductivity does. △ Less

Submitted 21 December, 2016; v1 submitted 21 September, 2016; originally announced September 2016.

Comments: Appendix B added in response to reviewer's comments

Journal ref: Phys. Rev. B 95, 014503 (2017)

Corrigendum: "On the dynamics of the Meissner effect", arXiv:1508.03307, Phys. Scr. 91, 035801 (2016)

Authors: J. E. Hirsch

Abstract: The paper erroneously assumed that the normal carriers giving rise to the backflow could be either electrons or holes. The paper erroneously assumed that the normal carriers giving rise to the backflow could be either electrons or holes. △ Less

Submitted 1 August, 2016; originally announced September 2016.

Comments: The referee's entire report after 2 months of pondering this Corrigendum was "This is a relatively minor erratum". Instead, the author believes this is an absolutely major erratum. The reader should judge for him/herself

Journal ref: Physica Scripta 91, 099501 (2016)

What is the speed of the supercurrent in superconductors?

Authors: J. E. Hirsch

Abstract: Within the conventional theory of superconductivity superfluid carriers respond to an applied magnetic field and acquire a speed according to their effective (band) mass. On the other hand it can be shown theoretically and is confirmed experimentally that the mechanical momentum of the supercurrent carriers is given by the product of the supercurrent speed and the $bare$ electron mass. By combinin… ▽ More Within the conventional theory of superconductivity superfluid carriers respond to an applied magnetic field and acquire a speed according to their effective (band) mass. On the other hand it can be shown theoretically and is confirmed experimentally that the mechanical momentum of the supercurrent carriers is given by the product of the supercurrent speed and the $bare$ electron mass. By combining these two well-established facts we show that the conventional BCS-London theory of superconductivity applied to Bloch electrons is $internally$ $inconsistent$. Furthermore, we argue that BCS-London theory with Bloch electrons does not describe the phase rigidity and macroscopic quantum behavior exhibited by superconductors. Experimentally the speed of the supercurrent in superconductors has never been measured and has been argued to be non-measurable, however we point out that it is in principle measurable by a Compton scattering experiment. We predict that such experiments will show that superfluid carriers respond to an applied magnetic field according to their bare mass, in other words, that they respond as $free$ $electrons$, undressed from the electron-ion interaction, rather than as Bloch electrons. This is inconsistent with the conventional theory of superconductivity and consistent with the alternative theory of hole superconductivity. Furthermore we point out that in principle Compton scattering experiments can also detect the presence of a spin current in the ground state of superconductors predicted by the theory of hole superconductivity. △ Less

Submitted 13 July, 2016; v1 submitted 30 May, 2016; originally announced May 2016.

Comments: submitted to Phys. Rev. B

On the reversibitity of the Meissner effect and the angular momentum puzzle

Authors: J. E. Hirsch

Abstract: It is generally believed that the laws of thermodynamics govern superconductivity as an equilibrium state of matter. Here we point out that within the conventional BCS-London description of the normal-superconductor transition in the presence of a magnetic field, the transition cannot be reversible, in contradiction with the thermodynamic description and with experiments. This indicates that the c… ▽ More It is generally believed that the laws of thermodynamics govern superconductivity as an equilibrium state of matter. Here we point out that within the conventional BCS-London description of the normal-superconductor transition in the presence of a magnetic field, the transition cannot be reversible, in contradiction with the thermodynamic description and with experiments. This indicates that the conventional theory of superconductivity is internally inconsistent. We argue that to describe a reversible transition it is necessary to assume that charge transfer occurs across the normal-superconductor phase boundary, as proposed in the theory of hole superconductiviy. This provides also a solution to the angular momentum puzzle pointed out in previous work. Our explanation can only apply if the current carriers in the normal state are holes. An experimental test of these ideas is proposed. △ Less

Submitted 13 April, 2016; originally announced April 2016.

Journal ref: Annals of Physics 373, 230 (2016)

The disappearing momentum of the supercurrent in the superconductor to normal phase transformation

Authors: J. E. Hirsch

Abstract: A superconductor in a magnetic field has surface currents that prevent the magnetic field from penetrating its interior. These currents carry kinetic energy and mechanical momentum. When the temperature is raised and the system becomes normal the currents disappear. Where do the kinetic energy and mechanical momentum of the currents go, and how? Here we propose that the answer to this question rev… ▽ More A superconductor in a magnetic field has surface currents that prevent the magnetic field from penetrating its interior. These currents carry kinetic energy and mechanical momentum. When the temperature is raised and the system becomes normal the currents disappear. Where do the kinetic energy and mechanical momentum of the currents go, and how? Here we propose that the answer to this question reveals a key necessary condition for materials to be superconductors, that is not part of conventional BCS-London theory: superconducting materials need to have hole carriers. △ Less

Submitted 12 April, 2016; originally announced April 2016.

Comments: Does not meet the Physical Review Letters criteria of impact, innovation, and interest according to Editor Dr. Hebboul

Journal ref: Europhys. Lett. 114, 57001 (2016)

The Bohr superconductor

Authors: J. E. Hirsch

Abstract: Superconductors have often been described as `giant atoms'. The simplest description of atoms that heralded their quantum understanding was proposed by Bohr in 1913. The Bohr atom starts from some simple assumptions and deduces that the angular momentum of the electron in Bohr orbits is quantized in integer units of $\hbar$. This remarkable result, which does not appear to be implicit in the assum… ▽ More Superconductors have often been described as `giant atoms'. The simplest description of atoms that heralded their quantum understanding was proposed by Bohr in 1913. The Bohr atom starts from some simple assumptions and deduces that the angular momentum of the electron in Bohr orbits is quantized in integer units of $\hbar$. This remarkable result, which does not appear to be implicit in the assumptions of the model, can be interpreted as a `theoretical proof' of the model's validity to describe physical reality at some level. Similarly we point out here that from some simple assumptions it can be deduced that electrons in superconductors reside in mesoscopic orbits with orbital angular momentum $\hbar/2$. This implies that both in superconductors and in ferromagnets the long-range order results from elementary units of identical angular momentum. Similarly to the case of the Bohr atom we propose that this remarkable result is compelling evidence that this physics, which is not part of conventional BCS theory, describes physical reality at some level and heralds a qualitatively new understanding of superconductors. △ Less

Submitted 15 December, 2015; originally announced December 2015.

Journal ref: Europhys. Lett. 113, 37001 (2016)

On the dynamics of the Meissner effect

Authors: J. E. Hirsch

Abstract: The question of how a metal becoming superconducting expels a magnetic field is addressed. It is argued that the conventional theory of superconductivity has not answered this question despite its obvious importance. We argue that the growth of the superconducting into the normal region and associated expulsion of magnetic field from the superconducting region can only be understood if it is accom… ▽ More The question of how a metal becoming superconducting expels a magnetic field is addressed. It is argued that the conventional theory of superconductivity has not answered this question despite its obvious importance. We argue that the growth of the superconducting into the normal region and associated expulsion of magnetic field from the superconducting region can only be understood if it is accompanied by motion of charge from the superconducting into the normal region. From a microscopic point of view it is shown that the perfect diamagnetism of superconductors requires that superconducting electrons reside in orbits of spatial extent $2λ_L$, with $λ_L$ the London penetration depth. Associated with this physics, the spin-orbit interaction of the electron magnetic moment and the positively charged ionic background gives rise to a "Spin Meissner" effect, the generation of a macroscopic spin current near the surface of superconductors. We point out that both the Meissner and the Spin Meissner effect can be understood dynamically under the assumption that the superfluid condensate wavefunction $Ψ(\vec{r})$ does not screen itself, just like the $Ψ(\vec{r})$ for an electron in a hydrogen atom. We argue that the conventional theory of superconductivity cannot explain the Meissner effect because it does not contain the physical elements discussed here. △ Less

Submitted 13 August, 2015; originally announced August 2015.

Journal ref: Physica Scripta 91, 035801 (2016)

Dynamics of the normal-superconductor phase transition and the puzzle of the Meissner effect

Authors: J. E. Hirsch

Abstract: The analisis of Pippard \cite{pip} for the growth of the normal phase into the superconducting phase in the presence of a magnetic field $H>H_c$ is applied in reverse to the case $H<H_c$ ($H_c=$critical magnetic field). We carry out the analysis both for a planar and a cylindrical geometry. As the superconducting phase grows into the normal phase, a supercurrent is generated at the superconductor-… ▽ More The analisis of Pippard \cite{pip} for the growth of the normal phase into the superconducting phase in the presence of a magnetic field $H>H_c$ is applied in reverse to the case $H<H_c$ ($H_c=$critical magnetic field). We carry out the analysis both for a planar and a cylindrical geometry. As the superconducting phase grows into the normal phase, a supercurrent is generated at the superconductor-normal phase boundary that flows in direction opposite to the Faraday electric field resulting from the moving phase boundary. This supercurrent motion is in direction opposite to what is dictated by the Lorentz force on the current carriers, and in addition requires that mechanical momentum of opposite sign be tranferred to the system as a whole to ensure momentum conservation. In the cylindrical geometry case, a macroscopic torque of unknown origin acts on the body as a whole as the magnetic field is expelled. We argue that the conventional BCS-London theory of superconductivity cannot explain these facts, and that as a consequence the Meissner effect remains unexplained within the conventional theory of superconductivity. We propose that the Meissner effect can only be understood by assuming that there is motion of charge in direction perpendicular to the normal-superconductor phase boundary and point out that the unconventional theory of hole superconductivity describes this physics △ Less

Submitted 22 May, 2015; v1 submitted 20 April, 2015; originally announced April 2015.

Comments: Discussion of cylindrical geometry added

Journal ref: Annals of Physics 362, 1 (2015)

Superconducting materials classes: introduction and overview

Authors: J. E. Hirsch, M. B. Maple, F. Marsiglio

Abstract: An introduction to and overview of the contents of this Special Issue are given. 32 classes of superconducting materials are discussed, grouped under the three categories "conventional", "possibly unconventional" and "unconventional" according to the mechanism believed to give rise to superconductivity. An introduction to and overview of the contents of this Special Issue are given. 32 classes of superconducting materials are discussed, grouped under the three categories "conventional", "possibly unconventional" and "unconventional" according to the mechanism believed to give rise to superconductivity. △ Less

Submitted 13 April, 2015; originally announced April 2015.

Comments: Introduction to Physica C Special Issue on Superconducting Materials, Volume 514 (2015)

Journal ref: Physica C Vol 514, 1 (2015)

Absence of Josephson coupling between certain superconductors

Authors: J. E. Hirsch

Abstract: It is generally believed that superconductivity can occur in materials irrespective of whether the charge carriers in the material are electrons or holes. Here we point out that Josephson tunneling would not occur between superconductors with charge carriers of opposite sign. Consequently, observation of Josephson tunneling between two superconductors implies that their charge carriers have the sa… ▽ More It is generally believed that superconductivity can occur in materials irrespective of whether the charge carriers in the material are electrons or holes. Here we point out that Josephson tunneling would not occur between superconductors with charge carriers of opposite sign. Consequently, observation of Josephson tunneling between two superconductors implies that their charge carriers have the same sign. We propose that this has profound implications for the understanding of superconductivity and in particular is consistent with the theory of hole superconductivity. △ Less

Submitted 7 April, 2015; v1 submitted 25 February, 2015; originally announced February 2015.

Journal ref: Europhys. Lett. 109, 67005 (2015)

Superconductivity in the elements, alloys and simple compounds

Authors: G. W. Webb, F. Marsiglio, J. E. Hirsch

Abstract: We give a brief review of superconductivity at ambient pressure in elements, alloys, and simple three-dimensional compounds. Historically these were the first superconducting materials studied, and based on the experimental knowledge gained from them the BCS theory of superconductivity was developed in 1957. Extended to include the effect of phonon retardation, the theory is believed to describe t… ▽ More We give a brief review of superconductivity at ambient pressure in elements, alloys, and simple three-dimensional compounds. Historically these were the first superconducting materials studied, and based on the experimental knowledge gained from them the BCS theory of superconductivity was developed in 1957. Extended to include the effect of phonon retardation, the theory is believed to describe the subset of superconducting materials known as `conventional superconductors', where superconductivity is caused by the electron-phonon interaction. These include the elements, alloys and simple compounds discussed in this article and several other classes of materials discussed in other articles in this Special Issue. △ Less

Submitted 16 February, 2015; originally announced February 2015.

Comments: Accepted for publication in Physica C, Special Issue on Superconducting Materials

Journal ref: Physica C Vol 514, 17 (2015)

Hole superconductivity in $H_2S$ and other sulfides under high pressure

Authors: J. E. Hirsch, F. Marsiglio

Abstract: Superconductivity at temperatures up to 190 K at high pressures has recently been observed in $H_2S$ and interpreted as conventional BCS-electron-phonon-driven superconductivity.\cite{h2s} Instead we propose that it is another example of the mechanism of hole superconductivity at work. Within this mechanism high temperature superconductivity arises when holes conduct through negatively charged ani… ▽ More Superconductivity at temperatures up to 190 K at high pressures has recently been observed in $H_2S$ and interpreted as conventional BCS-electron-phonon-driven superconductivity.\cite{h2s} Instead we propose that it is another example of the mechanism of hole superconductivity at work. Within this mechanism high temperature superconductivity arises when holes conduct through negatively charged anions in close proximity. We propose that electron transfer from $H$ to $S$ leads to conduction by holes in a nearly full band arising from direct overlap of $S^=$ $p$ orbitals in a planar structure. The superconductivity is non-phononic and is driven by pairing of heavily dressed hole carriers to lower their kinetic energy. Possible explanations for the observed lower critical temperature of $D_2S$ are discussed. We predict that high temperature superconductivity will also be found in other sulfides under high pressure such as $Li_2S$, $Na_2S$ and $K_2S$. △ Less

Submitted 19 December, 2014; originally announced December 2014.

Journal ref: Physica C 511, 45 (2015)