-
On the Performance of Co-existence between Public eMBB and Non-public URLLC Networks
Authors:
Yanpeng Yang,
Kimmo Hiltunen,
Fedor Chernogorov
Abstract:
To ensure the high level of automation required in today's industrial applications, next-generation wireless networks must enable real-time control and automation of dynamic processes with the requirements of extreme low-latency and ultra-reliable communications. In this paper, we provide a performance assessment for the co-existence of a public enhanced mobile broadband (eMBB) and a local non-pub…
▽ More
To ensure the high level of automation required in today's industrial applications, next-generation wireless networks must enable real-time control and automation of dynamic processes with the requirements of extreme low-latency and ultra-reliable communications. In this paper, we provide a performance assessment for the co-existence of a public enhanced mobile broadband (eMBB) and a local non-public factory (URLLC) network and evaluate the network conditions under which the stringent latency and reliability requirements of factory automation applications are met. The evaluations consider both an unsynchronized and a synchronized time division duplexing (TDD) deployment between the networks, as well as scenarios both with and without any macro eMBB traffic located inside the factory. The results show that an unsynchronized deployment is possible if the isolation between the networks is sufficiently high, either as a result of a separation distance, wall loss or the use of separate frequencies for the networks. A synchronized deployment will avoid the cross-link interference, but it will not resolve the problems related to the closed access and the near-far interference. If the factory contains eMBB traffic served by the overlaid macro cells, the performance of both networks will suffer due to a high level of cross-link and near-far interference. The problems related to the cross-link interference can be resolved by synchronizing the networks, while the level of the near-far interference can be reduced by allowing the eMBB users to be connected to base stations located inside the factory. Finally, if an unsynchronized deployment is desired, the factory should be deployed on an isolated frequency.
△ Less
Submitted 30 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Impact of Network Densification on the Performance of a Non-Public URLLC Factory Network
Authors:
Kimmo Hiltunen,
Yanpeng Yang,
Fedor Chernogorov
Abstract:
Densification of the network deployment, for example by adding new sectors or sites within an existing mobile communication network, has traditionally been an efficient way to improve the system coverage and capacity. That will be the case even for the ultra-reliable low-latency communication (URLLC) services, but the overall situation and the feasibility of the different deployment options will d…
▽ More
Densification of the network deployment, for example by adding new sectors or sites within an existing mobile communication network, has traditionally been an efficient way to improve the system coverage and capacity. That will be the case even for the ultra-reliable low-latency communication (URLLC) services, but the overall situation and the feasibility of the different deployment options will depend on the characteristics of the URLLC service in question. URLLC services with relaxed latency requirements, allowing multiple transmission attempts, can tolerate a decent level of inter-cell interference while still being able to guarantee the desired quality-of-service for all users, which makes it possible to improve the URLLC service capacity by adding new gNodeBs with omnidirectional or directional antennas. However, when the URLLC services require extremely low latency that do not allow for retransmissions, the system performance becomes quite sensitive to the inter-cell interference, which means that in practice the gNodeBs should be equipped with beamformed antennas to reach high levels of URLLC service capacity. Finally, an active distributed antenna system could be an efficient way to secure good coverage throughout the desired service area.
△ Less
Submitted 29 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
UAV-Aided Interference Assessment for Private 5G NR Deployments: Challenges and Solutions
Authors:
Jani Urama,
Richard Wiren,
Olga Galinina,
Juhani Kauppi,
Kimmo Hiltunen,
Juha Erkkilä,
Fedor Chernogorov,
Pentti Eteläaho,
Marjo Heikkilä,
Johan Torsner,
Sergey Andreev,
Mikko Valkama
Abstract:
Industrial automation has created a high demand for private 5G networks, the deployment of which calls for an efficient and reliable solution to ensure strict compliance with the regulatory emission limits. While traditional methods for measuring outdoor interference include collecting real-world data by walking or driving, the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) offers an attractive alternativ…
▽ More
Industrial automation has created a high demand for private 5G networks, the deployment of which calls for an efficient and reliable solution to ensure strict compliance with the regulatory emission limits. While traditional methods for measuring outdoor interference include collecting real-world data by walking or driving, the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) offers an attractive alternative due to their flexible mobility and adaptive altitude. As UAVs perform measurements quickly and semiautomatically, they can potentially assist in near realtime adjustments of the network configuration and fine-tuning its parameters, such as antenna settings and transmit power, as well as help improve indoor connectivity while respecting outdoor emission constraints. This article offers a firsthand tutorial on using aerial 5G emission assessment for interference management in nonpublic networks (NPNs) by reviewing the key challenges of UAV-mounted radio-scanner measurements. Particularly, we (i) outline the challenges of practical assessment of the outdoor interference originating from a local indoor 5G network while discussing regulatory and other related constraints and (ii) address practical methods and tools while summarizing the recent results of our measurement campaign. The reported proof of concept confirms that UAV-based systems represent a promising tool for capturing outdoor interference from private 5G systems.
△ Less
Submitted 13 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Performance Evaluation for the Co-existence of eMBB and URLLC Networks: Synchronized versus Unsynchronized TDD
Authors:
Ursula Challita,
Kimmo Hiltunen,
Miurel Tercero
Abstract:
To ensure the high level of automation required in today's industrial applications, next-generation wireless networks must enable real-time control and automation of dynamic processes with the requirements of extreme low-latency and ultra-reliable communications. In this paper, we provide a performance assessment for the co-existence of a macro (eMBB) and a local factory (URLLC) network and evalua…
▽ More
To ensure the high level of automation required in today's industrial applications, next-generation wireless networks must enable real-time control and automation of dynamic processes with the requirements of extreme low-latency and ultra-reliable communications. In this paper, we provide a performance assessment for the co-existence of a macro (eMBB) and a local factory (URLLC) network and evaluate the network conditions under which the latency and reliability requirements of factory automation applications are met. In particular, we evaluate the co-existence of the eMBB and URLLC networks under two scenarios: (i) synchronized TDD, in which both networks follow the same TDD pattern, and (ii) unsynchronized TDD, in which the eMBB and URLLC networks follow different TDD patterns. Simulation results show that the high downlink interference from the macro base stations towards the factory results in a reduction of the downlink URLLC capacity and service availability in case of synchronized TDD and a reduction of the uplink URLLC capacity and service availability in case of unsynchronized TDD. Finally, it is shown that a promising case for co-existence is the adjacent channel allocation, for both synchronized and unsynchronized TDD deployments. Here, the required isolation to protect the URLLC network in the worst-case scenario where the factory is located next to a macro site can be handled via the factory wall penetration loss (e.g., considering high concrete or metal-coated building walls) along with other solutions such as filters, larger separation distance, and band pairing.
△ Less
Submitted 1 June, 2019;
originally announced June 2019.
