-
Mobility Segregation Dynamics and Residual Isolation During Pandemic Interventions
Authors:
Rafiazka Millanida Hilman,
Manuel García-Herranz,
Vedran Sekara,
Márton Karsai
Abstract:
External shocks embody an unexpected and disruptive impact on the regular life of people. This was the case during the COVID-19 outbreak that rapidly led to changes in the typical mobility patterns in urban areas. In response, people reorganised their daily errands throughout space. However, these changes might not have been the same across socioeconomic classes leading to possibile additional det…
▽ More
External shocks embody an unexpected and disruptive impact on the regular life of people. This was the case during the COVID-19 outbreak that rapidly led to changes in the typical mobility patterns in urban areas. In response, people reorganised their daily errands throughout space. However, these changes might not have been the same across socioeconomic classes leading to possibile additional detrimental effects on inequality due to the pandemic. In this paper we study the reorganisation of mobility segregation networks due to external shocks and show that the diversity of visited places in terms of locations and socioeconomic status is affected by the enforcement of mobility restriction during pandemic. We use the case of COVID-19 as a natural experiment in several cities to observe not only the effect of external shocks but also its mid-term consequences and residual effects. We build on anonymised and privacy-preserved mobility data in four cities: Bogota, Jakarta, London, and New York. We couple mobility data with socioeconomic information to capture inequalities in mobility among different socioeconomic groups and see how it changes dynamically before, during, and after different lockdown periods. We find that the first lockdowns induced considerable increases in mobility segregation in each city, while loosening mobility restrictions did not necessarily diminished isolation between different socioeconomic groups, as mobility mixing has not recovered fully to its pre-pandemic level even weeks after the interruption of interventions. Our results suggest that a one fits-all policy does not equally affect the way people adjust their mobility, which calls for socioeconomically informed intervention policies in the future.
△ Less
Submitted 5 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Stratified Mobility, Segregated Boundary, and Socioeconomic Mixing in New York
Authors:
Rafiazka Millanida Hilman
Abstract:
Mobility cross spatial units represents the embodiment of how people manage activities between locations along temporal sequences. Spatiotemporal pattern nevertheless interacts with the socioeconomic characteristics of respected origin (push factors) and destination (pull factors) which widely discussed in spatial interaction literature. Observing this dynamics at higher spatial resolution allows…
▽ More
Mobility cross spatial units represents the embodiment of how people manage activities between locations along temporal sequences. Spatiotemporal pattern nevertheless interacts with the socioeconomic characteristics of respected origin (push factors) and destination (pull factors) which widely discussed in spatial interaction literature. Observing this dynamics at higher spatial resolution allows us to entangle multifaceted nature of city, its complexity as a system or network, and the way it shapes movement of people. This study explore the extent interconnected elements of urban system or urban networks, in parallel with the appearance of external shock namely COVID outbreak, may affect estimation of mobility flows. To improve predictive power, gravity model is extended to urban system model by augmenting the complexities of urban network based on micro-analytical approach (intra-city networks). Our findings reveals better performance of a more complex urban system model as to compared with gravity model. Here, we leverage stratification in mobility by specifying mobility flows with respect to income status of respected areas. The occurrence of COVID outbreak followed by lockdown measure increases intra-class mobility, indicating the coupling between socioeconomic distance and geographical distance. Flows between areas with similar economic ranges are more predictable than the one of different level. Furthermore, the presence of pull factors is more affluent than push factors in determining mobility regardless the severity of external shock.
△ Less
Submitted 2 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Socioeconomic biases in urban mixing patterns of US metropolitan areas
Authors:
Rafiazka Millanida Hilman,
Gerardo Iñiguez,
Márton Karsai
Abstract:
Urban areas serve as melting pots of people with diverse socioeconomic backgrounds, who may not only be segregated but have characteristic mobility patterns in the city. While mobility is driven by individual needs and preferences, the specific choice of venues to visit is usually constrained by the socioeconomic status of people. The complex interplay between people and places they visit, given t…
▽ More
Urban areas serve as melting pots of people with diverse socioeconomic backgrounds, who may not only be segregated but have characteristic mobility patterns in the city. While mobility is driven by individual needs and preferences, the specific choice of venues to visit is usually constrained by the socioeconomic status of people. The complex interplay between people and places they visit, given their personal attributes and homophily leaning, is a key mechanism behind the emergence of socioeconomic stratification patterns ultimately leading to urban segregation at large. Here we investigate mixing patterns of mobility in the twenty largest cities of the United States by coupling individual check-in data from the social location platform Foursquare with census information from the American Community Survey. We find strong signs of stratification indicating that people mostly visit places in their own socioeconomic class, occasionally visiting locations from higher classes. The intensity of this `upwards bias' increases with socioeconomic status and correlates with standard measures of racial residential segregation. Our results indicate an even stronger socioeconomic segregation in individual mobility than one would expect from system-level distributions, shedding further light on uneven mobility mixing patterns in cities.
△ Less
Submitted 8 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
