Neural Mechanisms of Human Decision-Making
Authors:
Seth Herd,
Kai Krueger,
Ananta Nair,
Jessica Mollick,
Randall OReilly
Abstract:
We present a computational and theoretical model of the neural mechanisms underlying human decision-making. We propose a detailed model of the interaction between brain regions, under a proposer-predictor-actor-critic framework. Task-relevant areas of cortex propose a candidate plan using fast, model-free, parallel constraint-satisfaction computations. Other areas of cortex and medial temporal lob…
▽ More
We present a computational and theoretical model of the neural mechanisms underlying human decision-making. We propose a detailed model of the interaction between brain regions, under a proposer-predictor-actor-critic framework. Task-relevant areas of cortex propose a candidate plan using fast, model-free, parallel constraint-satisfaction computations. Other areas of cortex and medial temporal lobe can then predict likely outcomes of that plan in this situation. This step is optional. This prediction-(or model-) based computation produces better accuracy and generalization, at the expense of speed. Next, linked regions of basal ganglia act to accept or reject the proposed plan based on its reward history in similar contexts. Finally the reward-prediction system acts as a critic to determine the value of the outcome relative to expectations, and produce dopamine as a training signal for cortex and basal ganglia. This model gains many constraints from the hypothesis that the mechanisms of complex human decision-making are closely analogous to those that have been empirically studied in detail for animal action-selection. We argue that by operating sequentially and hierarchically, these same mechanisms are responsible for the most complex human plans and decisions. Finally, we use the computational model to generate novel hypotheses on causes of human risky decision-making, and compare this to other theories of human decision-making.
△ Less
Submitted 16 December, 2019;
originally announced December 2019.
Goal-Driven Cognition in the Brain: A Computational Framework
Authors:
Randall C. O'Reilly,
Thomas E. Hazy,
Jessica Mollick,
Prescott Mackie,
Seth Herd
Abstract:
Current theoretical and computational models of dopamine-based reinforcement learning are largely rooted in the classical behaviorist tradition, and envision the organism as a purely reactive recipient of rewards and punishments, with resulting behavior that essentially reflects the sum of this reinforcement history. This framework is missing some fundamental features of the affective nervous syst…
▽ More
Current theoretical and computational models of dopamine-based reinforcement learning are largely rooted in the classical behaviorist tradition, and envision the organism as a purely reactive recipient of rewards and punishments, with resulting behavior that essentially reflects the sum of this reinforcement history. This framework is missing some fundamental features of the affective nervous system, most importantly, the central role of goals in driving and organizing behavior in a teleological manner. Even when goal-directed behaviors are considered in current frameworks, they are typically conceived of as arising in reaction to the environment, rather than being in place from the start. We hypothesize that goal-driven cognition is primary, and organized into two discrete phases: goal selection and goal engaged, which each have a substantially different effective value function. This dichotomy can potentially explain a wide range of phenomena, playing a central role in many clinical disorders, such as depression, OCD, ADHD, and PTSD, and providing a sensible account of the detailed biology and function of the dopamine system and larger limbic system, including critical ventral and medial prefrontal cortex. Computationally, reasoning backward from active goals to action selection is more tractable than projecting alternative action choices forward to compute possible outcomes. An explicit computational model of these brain areas and their function in this goal-driven framework is described, as are numerous testable predictions from this framework.
△ Less
Submitted 30 April, 2014;
originally announced April 2014.
