Showing 1–50 of 93 results for author: Henning, M

Power Domination and Resolving Power Domination of Fractal Cubic Network

Authors: S. Prabhu, A. K. Arulmozhi, Michael A. Henning, M. Arulperumjothi

Abstract: In network theory, the domination parameter is vital in investigating several structural features of the networks, including connectedness, their tendency to form clusters, compactness, and symmetry. In this context, various domination parameters have been created using several properties to determine where machines should be placed to ensure that all the places are monitored. To ensure efficient… ▽ More In network theory, the domination parameter is vital in investigating several structural features of the networks, including connectedness, their tendency to form clusters, compactness, and symmetry. In this context, various domination parameters have been created using several properties to determine where machines should be placed to ensure that all the places are monitored. To ensure efficient and effective operation, a piece of equipment must monitor their network (power networks) to answer whenever there is a change in the demand and availability conditions. Consequently, phasor measurement units (PMUs) are utilised by numerous electrical companies to monitor their networks perpetually. Overseeing an electrical system which consists of minimum PMUs is the same as the vertex covering the problem of graph theory, in which a subset D of a vertex set V is a power dominating set (PDS) if it monitors generators, cables, and all other components, in the electrical system using a few guidelines. Hypercube is one of the versatile, most popular, adaptable, and convertible interconnection networks. Its appealing qualities led to the development of other hypercube variants. A fractal cubic network is a new variant of the hypercube that can be used as a best substitute in case faults occur in the hypercube, which was wrongly defined in [Eng. Sci. Technol. 18(1) (2015) 32-41]. Arulperumjothi et al. have recently corrected this definition and redefined this variant with the exact definition in [Appl. Math. Comput. 452 (2023) 128037]. This article determines the PDS of the fractal cubic network. Further, we investigate the resolving power dominating set (RPDS), which contrasts starkly with hypercubes, where resolving power domination is inherently challenging. △ Less

Submitted 2 July, 2024; originally announced July 2024.

MSC Class: 05C69; 05C12

On total domination subdivision numbers of trees

Authors: Michael A. Henning, Jerzy Topp

Abstract: A set $S$ of vertices in a graph $G$ is a total dominating set of $G$ if every vertex is adjacent to a vertex in $S$. The total domination number $γ_t(G)$ is the minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of $G$. The total domination subdivision number $\mbox{sd}_{γ_t}(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the minimum number of edges that must be subdivided (where each edge in $G$ can be subdivided at most onc… ▽ More A set $S$ of vertices in a graph $G$ is a total dominating set of $G$ if every vertex is adjacent to a vertex in $S$. The total domination number $γ_t(G)$ is the minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of $G$. The total domination subdivision number $\mbox{sd}_{γ_t}(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the minimum number of edges that must be subdivided (where each edge in $G$ can be subdivided at most once) in order to increase the total domination number. Haynes et al. (Discrete Math. 286 (2004) 195--202) have given a constructive characterization of trees whose total domination subdivision number is~$3$. In this paper, we give new characterizations of trees whose total domination subdivision number is 3. △ Less

Submitted 24 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Comments: 15 pages, 7 figures

MSC Class: 05C69

Identifying codes in graphs of given maximum degree. II. Triangle-free graphs

Authors: Dipayan Chakraborty, Florent Foucaud, Michael A. Henning, Tuomo Lehtilä

Abstract: An $\textit{identifying code}$ of a closed-twin-free graph $G$ is a set $S$ of vertices of $G$ such that any two vertices in $G$ have a distinct intersection between their closed neighborhood and $S$. It was conjectured that there exists a constant $c$ such that for every connected closed-twin-free graph $G$ of order $n$ and maximum degree $Δ$, the graph $G$ admits an identifying code of size at m… ▽ More An $\textit{identifying code}$ of a closed-twin-free graph $G$ is a set $S$ of vertices of $G$ such that any two vertices in $G$ have a distinct intersection between their closed neighborhood and $S$. It was conjectured that there exists a constant $c$ such that for every connected closed-twin-free graph $G$ of order $n$ and maximum degree $Δ$, the graph $G$ admits an identifying code of size at most $\left( \frac{Δ-1}Δ \right) n+c$. In a companion paper, we proved the conjecture for all trees. We show that the conjecture holds for all triangle-free graphs, with the same lists of exceptional graphs needing $c>0$ as for trees: for $Δ\ge 3$, $c=1/3$ suffices and there is only a set of 12 trees requiring $c>0$ for $Δ=3$, and when $Δ\ge 4$ this set is reduced to the $Δ$-star only. Our proof is by induction, whose starting point is the above result for trees. Along the way, we prove a generalized version of Bondy's theorem on induced subsets [J. A. Bondy. Induced subsets. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 1972] that we use as a tool in our proofs. We also use our main result for triangle-free graphs, to prove the upper bound $\left( \frac{Δ-1}Δ \right) n+1/Δ+4t$ for graphs that can be made triangle-free by the removal of $t$ edges. △ Less

Submitted 26 March, 2024; originally announced March 2024.

MSC Class: 05C69; 05C07

Best possible upper bounds on the restrained domination number of cubic graphs

Authors: Boštjan Brešar, Michael A. Henning

Abstract: A dominating set in a graph $G$ is a set $S$ of vertices such that every vertex in $V(G) \setminus S$ is adjacent to a vertex in $S$. A restrained dominating set of $G$ is a dominating set $S$ with the additional restraint that the graph $G - S$ obtained by removing all vertices in $S$ is isolate-free. The domination number $γ(G)$ and the restrained domination number $γ_{r}(G)$ are the minimum car… ▽ More A dominating set in a graph $G$ is a set $S$ of vertices such that every vertex in $V(G) \setminus S$ is adjacent to a vertex in $S$. A restrained dominating set of $G$ is a dominating set $S$ with the additional restraint that the graph $G - S$ obtained by removing all vertices in $S$ is isolate-free. The domination number $γ(G)$ and the restrained domination number $γ_{r}(G)$ are the minimum cardinalities of a dominating set and restrained dominating set, respectively, of $G$. Let $G$ be a cubic graph of order~$n$. A classical result of Reed [Combin. Probab. Comput. 5 (1996), 277--295] states that $γ(G) \le \frac{3}{8}n$, and this bound is best possible. To determine a best possible upper bound on the restrained domination number of $G$ is more challenging, and we prove that $γ_{r}(G) \le \frac{2}{5}n$. △ Less

Submitted 25 March, 2024; originally announced March 2024.

Comments: 39 pages, 16 figures

MSC Class: 05C69

Identifying codes in graphs of given maximum degree. I. Trees

Authors: Dipayan Chakraborty, Florent Foucaud, Michael A. Henning, Tuomo Lehtilä

Abstract: An identifying code of a closed-twin-free graph $G$ is a dominating set $S$ of vertices of $G$ such that any two vertices in $G$ have a distinct intersection between their closed neighborhoods and $S$. It was conjectured that there exists an absolute constant $c$ such that for every connected graph $G$ of order $n$ and maximum degree $Δ$, the graph $G$ admits an identifying code of size at most… ▽ More An identifying code of a closed-twin-free graph $G$ is a dominating set $S$ of vertices of $G$ such that any two vertices in $G$ have a distinct intersection between their closed neighborhoods and $S$. It was conjectured that there exists an absolute constant $c$ such that for every connected graph $G$ of order $n$ and maximum degree $Δ$, the graph $G$ admits an identifying code of size at most $( \frac{Δ-1}Δ )n +c$. We provide significant support for this conjecture by proving that it holds for all trees. Moreover, our proof allows us to precisely determine the constant $c$ for trees, and the list of trees requiring $c>0$. For $Δ=2$ (the graph is a path or a cycle), it is long known that $c=3/2$ suffices. For trees, for each $Δ\ge 3$, we show that $c=1/Δ\le 1/3$ suffices and that $c$ is required to be a positive number only for a finite number of trees. In particular, for $Δ= 3$, there are 12 trees with diameter at most $6$ with a positive constant $c$ and, for each $Δ\ge 4$, the only tree with positive constant $c$ is the $Δ$-star. Our proof is based on induction and utilizes recent results from [F. Foucaud, T. Lehtilä. Revisiting and improving upper bounds for identifying codes. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, 2022]. We also remark that there are infinitely many trees for which the bound is tight when $Δ=3$; for every $Δ\ge 4$, we construct an infinite family of trees of order $n$ with identification number very close to the bound, namely $\left( \frac{Δ-1+\frac{1}{Δ-2}}{Δ+\frac{2}{Δ-2}} \right) n > (\frac{Δ-1}Δ ) n -\frac{n}{Δ^2}$. △ Less

Submitted 19 March, 2024; originally announced March 2024.

MSC Class: 05C69; 05C05; 05C07

The 1/3-conjectures for domination in cubic graphs

Authors: Paul Dorbec, Michael Antony Henning

Abstract: A set S of vertices in a graph G is a dominating set of G if every vertex not in S is adjacent to a vertex in S . The domination number of G, denoted by $γ$(G), is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set in G. In a breakthrough paper in 2008, L{ö}wenstein and Rautenbach proved that if G is a cubic graph of order n and girth at least 83, then $γ$(G) $\le$ n/3. A natural question is if this girt… ▽ More A set S of vertices in a graph G is a dominating set of G if every vertex not in S is adjacent to a vertex in S . The domination number of G, denoted by $γ$(G), is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set in G. In a breakthrough paper in 2008, L{ö}wenstein and Rautenbach proved that if G is a cubic graph of order n and girth at least 83, then $γ$(G) $\le$ n/3. A natural question is if this girth condition can be lowered. The question gave birth to two 1/3-conjectures for domination in cubic graphs. The first conjecture, posed by Verstraete in 2010, states that if G is a cubic graph on n vertices with girth at least 6, then $γ$(G) $\le$ n/3. The second conjecture, first posed as a question by Kostochka in 2009, states that if G is a cubic, bipartite graph of order n, then $γ$(G) $\le$n/3. In this paper, we prove Verstraete's conjecture when there is no 7-cycle and no 8-cycle, and we prove the Kostochka's related conjecture for bipartite graphs when there is no 4-cycle and no 8-cycle. △ Less

Submitted 31 January, 2024; originally announced January 2024.

$k$-Domination invariants on Kneser graphs

Authors: Boštjan Brešar, María Gracia Cornet, Tanja Dravec, Michael A. Henning

Abstract: In this follow-up to [M.G.~Cornet, P.~Torres, arXiv:2308.15603], where the $k$-tuple domination number and the 2-packing number in Kneser graphs $K(n,r)$ were studied, we are concerned with two variations, the $k$-domination number, ${γ_{k}}(K(n,r))$, and the $k$-tuple total domination number, ${γ_{t\times k}}(K(n,r))$, of $K(n,r)$. For both invariants we prove monotonicity results by showing that… ▽ More In this follow-up to [M.G.~Cornet, P.~Torres, arXiv:2308.15603], where the $k$-tuple domination number and the 2-packing number in Kneser graphs $K(n,r)$ were studied, we are concerned with two variations, the $k$-domination number, ${γ_{k}}(K(n,r))$, and the $k$-tuple total domination number, ${γ_{t\times k}}(K(n,r))$, of $K(n,r)$. For both invariants we prove monotonicity results by showing that ${γ_{k}}(K(n,r))\ge {γ_{k}}(K(n+1,r))$ holds for any $n\ge 2(k+r)$, and ${γ_{t\times k}}(K(n,r))\ge {γ_{t\times k}}(K(n+1,r))$ holds for any $n\ge 2r+1$. We prove that ${γ_{k}}(K(n,r))={γ_{t\times k}}(K(n,r))=k+r$ when $n\geq r(k+r)$, and that in this case every ${γ_{k}}$-set and ${γ_{t\times k}}$-set is a clique, while ${γ_{k}}(r(k+r)-1,r)={γ_{t\times k}}(r(k+r)-1,r)=k+r+1$, for any $k\ge 2$. Concerning the 2-packing number, $ρ_2(K(n,r))$, of $K(n,r)$, we prove the exact values of $ρ_2(K(3r-3,r))$ when $r\ge 10$, and give sufficient conditions for $ρ_2(K(n,r))$ to be equal to some small values by imposing bounds on $r$ with respect to $n$. We also prove a version of monotonicity for the $2$-packing number of Kneser graphs. △ Less

Submitted 24 December, 2023; originally announced December 2023.

Comments: 15 pages, 3 tables

MSC Class: 05C69; 05D05

Bounds on zero forcing using (upper) total domination and minimum degree

Authors: Boštjan Brešar, María Gracia Cornet, Tanja Dravec, Michael Henning

Abstract: While a number of bounds are known on the zero forcing number $Z(G)$ of a graph $G$ expressed in terms of the order of a graph and maximum or minimum degree, we present two bounds that are related to the (upper) total domination number $γ_t(G)$ (resp. $Γ_t(G)$) of $G$. We prove that $Z(G)+γ_t(G)\le n(G)$ and $Z(G)+\frac{Γ_t(G)}{2}\le n(G)$ holds for any graph $G$ with no isolated vertices of order… ▽ More While a number of bounds are known on the zero forcing number $Z(G)$ of a graph $G$ expressed in terms of the order of a graph and maximum or minimum degree, we present two bounds that are related to the (upper) total domination number $γ_t(G)$ (resp. $Γ_t(G)$) of $G$. We prove that $Z(G)+γ_t(G)\le n(G)$ and $Z(G)+\frac{Γ_t(G)}{2}\le n(G)$ holds for any graph $G$ with no isolated vertices of order $n(G)$. Both bounds are sharp as demonstrated by several infinite families of graphs. In particular, we show that every graph $H$ is an induced subgraph of a graph $G$ with $Z(G)+\frac{Γ_t(G)}{2}=n(G)$. Furthermore, we prove a characterization of graphs with power domination equal to $1$, from which we derive a characterization of the extremal graphs attaining the trivial lower bound $Z(G)\ge δ(G)$. The class of graphs that appears in the corresponding characterizations is obtained by extending an idea from [D.D.~Row, A technique for computing the zero forcing number of a graph with a cut-vertex, Linear Alg.\ Appl.\ 436 (2012) 4423--4432], where the graphs with zero forcing number equal to $2$ were characterized. △ Less

Submitted 11 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Comments: 18 pages, 1 figure

Indicated total domination game

Authors: Michael A. Henning, Douglas F. Rall

Abstract: A vertex $u$ in a graph $G$ totally dominates a vertex $v$ if $u$ is adjacent to $v$ in $G$. A total dominating set of $G$ is a set $S$ of vertices of $G$ such that every vertex of $G$ is totally dominated by a vertex in $S$. The indicated total domination game is played on a graph $G$ by two players, Dominator and Staller, who take turns making a move. In each of his moves, Dominator indicates a… ▽ More A vertex $u$ in a graph $G$ totally dominates a vertex $v$ if $u$ is adjacent to $v$ in $G$. A total dominating set of $G$ is a set $S$ of vertices of $G$ such that every vertex of $G$ is totally dominated by a vertex in $S$. The indicated total domination game is played on a graph $G$ by two players, Dominator and Staller, who take turns making a move. In each of his moves, Dominator indicates a vertex $v$ of the graph that has not been totally dominated in the previous moves, and Staller chooses (or selects) any vertex adjacent to $v$ that has not yet been played, and adds it to a set $D$ that is being built during the game. The game ends when every vertex is totally dominated, that is, when $D$ is a total dominating set of $G$. The goal of Dominator is to minimize the size of $D$, while Staller wants just the opposite. Providing that both players are playing optimally with respect to their goals, the size of the resulting set $D$ is the indicated total domination number of $G$, denoted by $γ_t^{\rm i}(G)$. In this paper we present several results on indicated total domination game. Among other results we prove that the indicated total domination number of a graph is bounded below by the well studied upper total domination number. △ Less

Submitted 1 February, 2024; v1 submitted 5 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Comments: 20 pages, 6 figures, 18 references, correction is Section 2

MSC Class: 05C65; 05C69

The Sierpiński Domination Number

Authors: Michael A. Henning, Sandi Klavžar, Elżbieta Kleszcz, Monika Pilśniak

Abstract: Let $G$ and $H$ be graphs and let $f \colon V(G)\rightarrow V(H)$ be a function. The Sierpiński product of $G$ and $H$ with respect to $f$, denoted by $G \otimes _f H$, is defined as the graph on the vertex set $V(G)\times V(H)$, consisting of $|V(G)|$ copies of $H$; for every edge $gg'$ of $G$ there is an edge between copies $gH$ and $g'H$ of $H$ associated with the vertices $g$ and $g'$ of $G$,… ▽ More Let $G$ and $H$ be graphs and let $f \colon V(G)\rightarrow V(H)$ be a function. The Sierpiński product of $G$ and $H$ with respect to $f$, denoted by $G \otimes _f H$, is defined as the graph on the vertex set $V(G)\times V(H)$, consisting of $|V(G)|$ copies of $H$; for every edge $gg'$ of $G$ there is an edge between copies $gH$ and $g'H$ of $H$ associated with the vertices $g$ and $g'$ of $G$, respectively, of the form $(g,f(g'))(g',f(g))$. In this paper, we define the Sierpiński domination number as the minimum of $γ(G\otimes _f H)$ over all functions $f \colon V(G)\rightarrow V(H)$. The upper Sierpiński domination number is defined analogously as the corresponding maximum. After establishing general upper and lower bounds, we determine the upper Sierpiński domination number of the Sierpiński product of two cycles, and determine the lower Sierpiński domination number of the Sierpiński product of two cycles in half of the cases and in the other half cases restrict it to two values. △ Less

Submitted 27 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

Resolvability and convexity properties in the Sierpiński product of graphs

Authors: Michael A. Henning, Sandi Klavžar, Ismael G. Yero

Abstract: Let $G$ and $H$ be graphs and let $f \colon V(G)\rightarrow V(H)$ be a function. The Sierpiński product of $G$ and $H$ with respect to $f$, denoted by $G \otimes _f H$, is defined as the graph on the vertex set $V(G)\times V(H)$, consisting of $|V(G)|$ copies of $H$; for every edge $gg'$ of $G$ there is an edge between copies $gH$ and $g'H$ of $H$ associated with the vertices $g$ and $g'$ of $G$,… ▽ More Let $G$ and $H$ be graphs and let $f \colon V(G)\rightarrow V(H)$ be a function. The Sierpiński product of $G$ and $H$ with respect to $f$, denoted by $G \otimes _f H$, is defined as the graph on the vertex set $V(G)\times V(H)$, consisting of $|V(G)|$ copies of $H$; for every edge $gg'$ of $G$ there is an edge between copies $gH$ and $g'H$ of $H$ associated with the vertices $g$ and $g'$ of $G$, respectively, of the form $(g,f(g'))(g',f(g))$. The Sierpiński metric dimension and the upper Sierpiński metric dimension of two graphs are determined. Closed formulas are determined for Sierpiński products of trees, and for Sierpiński products of two cycles where the second factor is a triangle. We also prove that the layers with respect to the second factor in a Sierpiński product graph are convex. △ Less

Submitted 26 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

Advancing Frame-Drop** in Multi-Object Tracking-by-Detection Systems Through Event-Based Detection Triggering

Authors: Matti Henning, Michael Buchholz, Klaus Dietmayer

Abstract: With rising computational requirements modern automated vehicles (AVs) often consider trade-offs between energy consumption and perception performance, potentially jeopardizing their safe operation. Frame-drop** in tracking-by-detection perception systems presents a promising approach, although late traffic participant detection might be induced. In this paper, we extend our previous work on f… ▽ More With rising computational requirements modern automated vehicles (AVs) often consider trade-offs between energy consumption and perception performance, potentially jeopardizing their safe operation. Frame-drop** in tracking-by-detection perception systems presents a promising approach, although late traffic participant detection might be induced. In this paper, we extend our previous work on frame-drop** in tracking-by-detection perception systems. We introduce an additional event-based triggering mechanism using camera object detections to increase both the system's efficiency, as well as its safety. Evaluating both single and multi-modal tracking methods we show that late object detections are mitigated while the potential for reduced energy consumption is significantly increased, reaching nearly 60 Watt per reduced point in HOTA score. △ Less

Submitted 1 August, 2023; originally announced August 2023.

Comments: Accepted for publication at the 26th IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2023

$3$-Neighbor bootstrap percolation on grids

Authors: Jaka Hedžet, Michael A. Henning

Abstract: Given a graph $G$ and assuming that some vertices of $G$ are infected, the $r$-neighbor bootstrap percolation rule makes an uninfected vertex $v$ infected if $v$ has at least $r$ infected neighbors. The $r$-percolation number, $m(G, r)$, of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a set of initially infected vertices in $G$ such that after continuously performing the $r$-neighbor bootstrap percolation ru… ▽ More Given a graph $G$ and assuming that some vertices of $G$ are infected, the $r$-neighbor bootstrap percolation rule makes an uninfected vertex $v$ infected if $v$ has at least $r$ infected neighbors. The $r$-percolation number, $m(G, r)$, of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a set of initially infected vertices in $G$ such that after continuously performing the $r$-neighbor bootstrap percolation rule each vertex of $G$ eventually becomes infected. In this paper, we consider the $3$-bootstrap percolation number of grids with fixed widths. If $G$ is the cartesian product $P_3 \square P_m$ of two paths of orders~$3$ and $m$, we prove that $m(G,3)=\frac{3}{2}(m+1)-1$, when $m$ is odd, and $m(G,3)=\frac{3}{2}m +1$, when $m$ is even. Moreover if $G$ is the cartesian product $P_5 \square P_m$, we prove that $m(G,3)=2m+2$, when $m$ is odd, and $m(G,3)=2m+3$, when $m$ is even. If $G$ is the cartesian product $P_4 \square P_m$, we prove that $m(G,3)$ takes on one of two possible values, namely $m(G,3) = \lfloor \frac{5(m+1)}{3} \rfloor + 1$ or $m(G,3) = \lfloor \frac{5(m+1)}{3} \rfloor + 2$. △ Less

Submitted 26 July, 2023; originally announced July 2023.

Comments: 27 pages, 13 figures

MSC Class: 05C38; 05C69

The minmin coalition number in graphs

Authors: Davood Bakhshesh, Michael A. Henning

Abstract: A set $S$ of vertices in a graph $G$ is a dominating set if every vertex of $V(G) \setminus S$ is adjacent to a vertex in $S$. A coalition in $G$ consists of two disjoint sets of vertices $X$ and $Y$ of $G$, neither of which is a dominating set but whose union $X \cup Y$ is a dominating set of $G$. Such sets $X$ and $Y$ form a coalition in $G$. A coalition partition, abbreviated $c$-partition, in… ▽ More A set $S$ of vertices in a graph $G$ is a dominating set if every vertex of $V(G) \setminus S$ is adjacent to a vertex in $S$. A coalition in $G$ consists of two disjoint sets of vertices $X$ and $Y$ of $G$, neither of which is a dominating set but whose union $X \cup Y$ is a dominating set of $G$. Such sets $X$ and $Y$ form a coalition in $G$. A coalition partition, abbreviated $c$-partition, in $G$ is a partition $\mathcal{X} = \{X_1,\ldots,X_k\}$ of the vertex set $V(G)$ of $G$ such that for all $i \in [k]$, each set $X_i \in \mathcal{X}$ satisfies one of the following two conditions: (1) $X_i$ is a dominating set of $G$ with a single vertex, or (2) $X_i$ forms a coalition with some other set $X_j \in \mathcal{X}$. %The coalition number ${C}(G)$ is the maximum cardinality of a $c$-partition of $G$. Let ${\cal A} = \{A_1,\ldots,A_r\}$ and ${\cal B}= \{B_1,\ldots, B_s\}$ be two partitions of $V(G)$. Partition ${\cal B}$ is a refinement of partition ${\cal A}$ if every set $B_i \in {\cal B} $ is either equal to, or a proper subset of, some set $A_j \in {\cal A}$. Further if ${\cal A} \ne {\cal B}$, then ${\cal B}$ is a proper refinement of ${\cal A}$. Partition ${\cal A}$ is a minimal $c$-partition if it is not a proper refinement of another $c$-partition. Haynes et al. [AKCE Int. J. Graphs Combin. 17 (2020), no. 2, 653--659] defined the minmin coalition number $c_{\min}(G)$ of $G$ to equal the minimum order of a minimal $c$-partition of $G$. We show that $2 \le c_{\min}(G) \le n$, and we characterize graphs $G$ of order $n$ satisfying $c_{\min}(G) = n$. A polynomial-time algorithm is given to determine if $c_{\min}(G)=2$ for a given graph $G$. A necessary and sufficient condition for a graph $G$ to satisfy $c_{\min}(G) \ge 3$ is given, and a characterization of graphs $G$ with minimum degree~$2$ and $c_{\min}(G)= 4$ is provided. △ Less

Submitted 2 July, 2023; originally announced July 2023.

Mostar index and bounded maximum degree

Authors: Michael A. Henning, Johannes Pardey, Dieter Rautenbach, Florian Werner

Abstract: Došlić et al. defined the Mostar index of a graph $G$ as $Mo(G)=\sum\limits_{uv\in E(G)}|n_G(u,v)-n_G(v,u)|$, where, for an edge $uv$ of $G$, the term $n_G(u,v)$ denotes the number of vertices of $G$ that have a smaller distance in $G$ to $u$ than to $v$. For a graph $G$ of order $n$ and maximum degree at most $Δ$, we show $Mo(G)\leq \fracΔ{2}n^2-(1-o(1))c_Δn\log(\log(n)),$ where $c_Δ>0$ only depe… ▽ More Došlić et al. defined the Mostar index of a graph $G$ as $Mo(G)=\sum\limits_{uv\in E(G)}|n_G(u,v)-n_G(v,u)|$, where, for an edge $uv$ of $G$, the term $n_G(u,v)$ denotes the number of vertices of $G$ that have a smaller distance in $G$ to $u$ than to $v$. For a graph $G$ of order $n$ and maximum degree at most $Δ$, we show $Mo(G)\leq \fracΔ{2}n^2-(1-o(1))c_Δn\log(\log(n)),$ where $c_Δ>0$ only depends on $Δ$ and the $o(1)$ term only depends on $n$. Furthermore, for integers $n_0$ and $Δ$ at least $3$, we show the existence of a $Δ$-regular graph of order $n$ at least $n_0$ with $Mo(G)\geq \fracΔ{2}n^2-c'_Δn\log(n),$ where $c'_Δ>0$ only depends on $Δ$. △ Less

Submitted 15 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

Strong domination number of graphs from primary subgraphs

Authors: Saeid Alikhani, Nima Ghanbari, Michael A. Henning

Abstract: A set $D$ of vertices is a strong dominating set in a graph $G$, if for every vertex $x\in V(G) \setminus D$ there is a vertex $y\in D$ with $xy\in E(G)$ and $deg(x) \leq deg(y)$. The strong domination number $γ_{st}(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a strong dominating set in $G$. Let $G$ be a connected graph constructed from pairwise disjoint connected graphs $G_1,\ldots ,G_k$ by selectin… ▽ More A set $D$ of vertices is a strong dominating set in a graph $G$, if for every vertex $x\in V(G) \setminus D$ there is a vertex $y\in D$ with $xy\in E(G)$ and $deg(x) \leq deg(y)$. The strong domination number $γ_{st}(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a strong dominating set in $G$. Let $G$ be a connected graph constructed from pairwise disjoint connected graphs $G_1,\ldots ,G_k$ by selecting a vertex of $G_1$, a vertex of $G_2$, and identifying these two vertices, and thereafter continuing in this manner inductively. The graphs $G_1,\ldots ,G_k$ are the primary subgraphs of $G$. In this paper, we study the strong domination number of $K_r$-gluing of two graphs and investigate the strong domination number for some particular cases of graphs from their primary subgraphs. △ Less

Submitted 2 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

Comments: 20 pages, 13 figures

MSC Class: 05C15; 05C25; 05C69

The Impact of Frame-Drop** on Performance and Energy Consumption for Multi-Object Tracking

Authors: Matti Henning, Michael Buchholz, Klaus Dietmayer

Abstract: The safety of automated vehicles (AVs) relies on the representation of their environment. Consequently, state-of-the-art AVs employ potent sensor systems to achieve the best possible environment representation at all times. Although these high-performing systems achieve impressive results, they induce significant requirements for the processing capabilities of an AV's computational hardware compon… ▽ More The safety of automated vehicles (AVs) relies on the representation of their environment. Consequently, state-of-the-art AVs employ potent sensor systems to achieve the best possible environment representation at all times. Although these high-performing systems achieve impressive results, they induce significant requirements for the processing capabilities of an AV's computational hardware components and their energy consumption. To enable a dynamic adaptation of such perception systems based on the situational perception requirements, we introduce a model-agnostic method for the scalable employment of single-frame object detection models using frame-drop** in tracking-by-detection systems. We evaluate our approach on the KITTI 3D Tracking Benchmark, showing that significant energy savings can be achieved at acceptable performance degradation, reaching up to 28% reduction of energy consumption at a performance decline of 6.6% in HOTA score. △ Less

Submitted 1 August, 2023; v1 submitted 17 April, 2023; originally announced April 2023.

Comments: V1: Accepted for publication at the IEEE Intelligent Vehicle Symposium, 2023 V2: Added DOI 10.1109/IV55152.2023.10186653

Journal ref: 2023 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Anchorage, AK, USA, 2023, pp. 1-6

Singleton Coalition Graph Chains

Authors: Davood Bakhshesh, Michael A. Henning, Dinabandhu Pradhan

Abstract: Let $G$ be graph with vertex set $V$ and order $n=|V|$. A coalition in $G$ is a combination of two distinct sets, $A\subseteq V$ and $B\subseteq V$, which are disjoint and are not dominating sets of $G$, but $A\cup B$ is a dominating set of $G$. A coalition partition of $G$ is a partition $\mathcal{P}=\{S_1,\ldots,S_k\}$ of its vertex set $V$, where each set $S_i\in \mathcal{P}$ is either a domina… ▽ More Let $G$ be graph with vertex set $V$ and order $n=|V|$. A coalition in $G$ is a combination of two distinct sets, $A\subseteq V$ and $B\subseteq V$, which are disjoint and are not dominating sets of $G$, but $A\cup B$ is a dominating set of $G$. A coalition partition of $G$ is a partition $\mathcal{P}=\{S_1,\ldots,S_k\}$ of its vertex set $V$, where each set $S_i\in \mathcal{P}$ is either a dominating set of $G$ with only one vertex, or it is not a dominating set but forms a coalition with some other set $S_j \in \mathcal{P}$. The coalition number $C(G)$ is the maximum cardinality of a coalition partition of $G$. To represent a coalition partition $\mathcal{P}$ of $G$, a coalition graph $\CG(G, \mathcal{P})$ is created, where each vertex of the graph corresponds to a member of $\mathcal{P}$ and two vertices are adjacent if and only if their corresponding sets form a coalition in $G$. A coalition partition $\mathcal{P}$ of $G$ is a singleton coalition partition if every set in $\mathcal{P}$ consists of a single vertex. If a graph $G$ has a singleton coalition partition, then $G$ is referred to as a singleton-partition graph. A graph $H$ is called a singleton coalition graph of a graph $G$ if there exists a singleton coalition partition $\mathcal{P}$ of $G$ such that the coalition graph $\CG(G,\mathcal{P})$ is isomorphic to $H$. A singleton coalition graph chain with an initial graph $G_1$ is defined as the sequence $G_1\rightarrow G_2\rightarrow G_3\rightarrow\cdots$ where all graphs $G_i$ are singleton-partition graphs, and $\CG(G_i,Γ_1)=G_{i+1}$, where $Γ_1$ represents a singleton coalition partition of $G_i$. In this paper, we address two open problems posed by Haynes et al. We characterize all graphs $G$ of order $n$ and minimum degree $δ(G)=2$ such that $C(G)=n$ and investigate the singleton coalition graph chain starting with graphs $G$ where $δ(G)\le 2$. △ Less

Submitted 15 April, 2023; originally announced April 2023.

Complexity of total dominator coloring in graphs

Authors: Michael A. Henning, Kusum, Arti Pandey, Kaustav Paul

Abstract: Let $G=(V,E)$ be a graph with no isolated vertices. A vertex $v$ totally dominate a vertex $w$ ($w \ne v$), if $v$ is adjacent to $w$. A set $D \subseteq V$ called a total dominating set of $G$ if every vertex $v\in V$ is totally dominated by some vertex in $D$. The minimum cardinality of a total dominating set is the total domination number of $G$ and is denoted by $γ_t(G)$. A total dominator col… ▽ More Let $G=(V,E)$ be a graph with no isolated vertices. A vertex $v$ totally dominate a vertex $w$ ($w \ne v$), if $v$ is adjacent to $w$. A set $D \subseteq V$ called a total dominating set of $G$ if every vertex $v\in V$ is totally dominated by some vertex in $D$. The minimum cardinality of a total dominating set is the total domination number of $G$ and is denoted by $γ_t(G)$. A total dominator coloring of graph $G$ is a proper coloring of vertices of $G$, so that each vertex totally dominates some color class. The total dominator chromatic number $χ_{td}(G)$ of $G$ is the least number of colors required for a total dominator coloring of $G$. The Total Dominator Coloring problem is to find a total dominator coloring of $G$ using the minimum number of colors. It is known that the decision version of this problem is NP-complete for general graphs. We show that it remains NP-complete even when restricted to bipartite, planar and split graphs. We further study the Total Dominator Coloring problem for various graph classes, including trees, cographs and chain graphs. First, we characterize the trees having $χ_{td}(T)=γ_t(T)+1$, which completes the characterization of trees achieving all possible values of $χ_{td}(T)$. Also, we show that for a cograph $G$, $χ_{td}(G)$ can be computed in linear-time. Moreover, we show that $2 \le χ_{td}(G) \le 4$ for a chain graph $G$ and give characterization of chain graphs for every possible value of $χ_{td}(G)$ in linear-time. △ Less

Submitted 3 March, 2023; originally announced March 2023.

Comments: V1, 18 pages, 1 figure

Progress towards the two-thirds conjecture on locating-total dominating sets

Authors: Dipayan Chakraborty, Florent Foucaud, Anni Hakanen, Michael A. Henning, Annegret K. Wagler

Abstract: We study upper bounds on the size of optimum locating-total dominating sets in graphs. A set $S$ of vertices of a graph $G$ is a locating-total dominating set if every vertex of $G$ has a neighbor in $S$, and if any two vertices outside $S$ have distinct neighborhoods within $S$. The smallest size of such a set is denoted by $γ^L_t(G)$. It has been conjectured that $γ^L_t(G)\leq\frac{2n}{3}$ holds… ▽ More We study upper bounds on the size of optimum locating-total dominating sets in graphs. A set $S$ of vertices of a graph $G$ is a locating-total dominating set if every vertex of $G$ has a neighbor in $S$, and if any two vertices outside $S$ have distinct neighborhoods within $S$. The smallest size of such a set is denoted by $γ^L_t(G)$. It has been conjectured that $γ^L_t(G)\leq\frac{2n}{3}$ holds for every twin-free graph $G$ of order $n$ without isolated vertices. We prove that the conjecture holds for cobipartite graphs, split graphs, block graphs, subcubic graphs and outerplanar graphs. △ Less

Submitted 25 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

Characterization of $α$-excellent $2$-trees

Authors: Magda Dettlaff, Michael A. Henning, Jerzy Topp

Abstract: A graph is $α$-excellent if every vertex of the graph is contained in some maximum independent set of the graph. In this paper, we present two characterizations of the $α$-excellent $2$-trees. A graph is $α$-excellent if every vertex of the graph is contained in some maximum independent set of the graph. In this paper, we present two characterizations of the $α$-excellent $2$-trees. △ Less

Submitted 25 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

Comments: 10 pages, 3 figures

MSC Class: 05C69; 05C85

End Super Dominating Sets in Graphs

Authors: Saieed Akbari, Nima Ghanbari, Michael A. Henning

Abstract: Let $G=(V,E)$ be a simple graph. A dominating set of $G$ is a subset $S\subseteq V$ such that every vertex not in $S$ is adjacent to at least one vertex in $S$. The cardinality of a smallest dominating set of $G$, denoted by $γ(G)$, is the domination number of $G$. Two vertices are neighbors if they are adjacent. A super dominating set is a dominating set $S$ with the additional property that ever… ▽ More Let $G=(V,E)$ be a simple graph. A dominating set of $G$ is a subset $S\subseteq V$ such that every vertex not in $S$ is adjacent to at least one vertex in $S$. The cardinality of a smallest dominating set of $G$, denoted by $γ(G)$, is the domination number of $G$. Two vertices are neighbors if they are adjacent. A super dominating set is a dominating set $S$ with the additional property that every vertex in $V \setminus S$ has a neighbor in $S$ that is adjacent to no other vertex in $V \setminus S$. Moreover if every vertex in $V \setminus S$ has degree at least~$2$, then $S$ is an end super dominating set. The end super domination number is the minimum cardinality of an end super dominating set. We give applications of end super dominating sets as main servers and temporary servers of networks. We determine the exact value of the end super domination number for specific classes of graphs, and we count the number of end super dominating sets in these graphs. Tight upper bounds on the end super domination number are established, where the graph is modified by vertex (edge) removal and contraction. △ Less

Submitted 14 November, 2022; v1 submitted 7 September, 2022; originally announced September 2022.

Comments: 25 pages, 11 figures

MSC Class: 05C38; 05C69; 05C90

On $α$-excellent graphs

Authors: M. Dettlaff, M. A. Henning, J. Topp

Abstract: A graph $G$ is $α$-excellent if every vertex of $G$ is contained in some maximum independent set of $G$. In this paper, we characterize $α$-excellent bipartite graphs, $α$-excellent unicyclic graphs, $α$-excellent simplicial graphs, $α$-excellent chordal graphs, $α$-excellent block graphs, and we show that every generalized Petersen graph is $α$-excellent. A graph $G$ is $α$-excellent if every vertex of $G$ is contained in some maximum independent set of $G$. In this paper, we characterize $α$-excellent bipartite graphs, $α$-excellent unicyclic graphs, $α$-excellent simplicial graphs, $α$-excellent chordal graphs, $α$-excellent block graphs, and we show that every generalized Petersen graph is $α$-excellent. △ Less

Submitted 17 August, 2022; originally announced August 2022.

Comments: 15 pages, 4 figures

ACM Class: F.2.2

Common domination perfect graphs

Authors: Magda Dettlaff, Michael A. Henning, Jerzy Topp

Abstract: A dominating set in a graph $G$ is a set $S$ of vertices such that every vertex that does not belong to $S$ is adjacent to a vertex in $S$. The domination number $γ(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set of $G$. The common independence number $α_c(G)$ of $G$ is the greatest integer $r$ such that every vertex of $G$ belongs to some independent set of cardinality at least~$r$. The… ▽ More A dominating set in a graph $G$ is a set $S$ of vertices such that every vertex that does not belong to $S$ is adjacent to a vertex in $S$. The domination number $γ(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set of $G$. The common independence number $α_c(G)$ of $G$ is the greatest integer $r$ such that every vertex of $G$ belongs to some independent set of cardinality at least~$r$. The common independence number is squeezed between the independent domination number $i(G)$ and the independence number $α(G)$ of $G$, that is, $γ(G) \le i(G) \le α_c(G) \le α(G)$. A graph $G$ is domination perfect if $γ(H) = i(H)$ for every induced subgraph $H$ of $G$. We define a graph $G$ as common domination perfect if $γ(H) = α_c(H)$ for every induced subgraph $H$ of $G$. We provide a characterization of common domination perfect graphs in terms of ten forbidden induced subgraphs. △ Less

Submitted 15 August, 2022; originally announced August 2022.

Comments: 11 pages, 2 figures

ACM Class: F.2.2

Identification of Threat Regions From a Dynamic Occupancy Grid Map for Situation-Aware Environment Perception

Authors: Matti Henning, Jan Strohbeck, Michael Buchholz, Klaus Dietmayer

Abstract: The advance towards higher levels of automation within the field of automated driving is accompanied by increasing requirements for the operational safety of vehicles. Induced by the limitation of computational resources, trade-offs between the computational complexity of algorithms and their potential to ensure safe operation of automated vehicles are often encountered. Situation-aware environmen… ▽ More The advance towards higher levels of automation within the field of automated driving is accompanied by increasing requirements for the operational safety of vehicles. Induced by the limitation of computational resources, trade-offs between the computational complexity of algorithms and their potential to ensure safe operation of automated vehicles are often encountered. Situation-aware environment perception presents one promising example, where computational resources are distributed to regions within the perception area that are relevant for the task of the automated vehicle. While prior map knowledge is often leveraged to identify relevant regions, in this work, we present a lightweight identification of safety-relevant regions that relies solely on online information. We show that our approach enables safe vehicle operation in critical scenarios, while retaining the benefits of non-uniformly distributed resources within the environment perception. △ Less

Submitted 14 February, 2023; v1 submitted 5 July, 2022; originally announced July 2022.

Comments: Accepted for publication at the 25th IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2022. V2: added IEEE copyright notice V3: Added DOI

Journal ref: 2022 IEEE 25th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2022, pp. 805-810

Situation-Aware Environment Perception for Decentralized Automation Architectures

Authors: Matti Henning, Michael Buchholz, Klaus Dietmayer

Abstract: Advances in the field of environment perception for automated agents have resulted in an ongoing increase in generated sensor data. The available computational resources to process these data are bound to become insufficient for real-time applications. Reducing the amount of data to be processed by identifying the most relevant data based on the agents' situation, often referred to as situation-aw… ▽ More Advances in the field of environment perception for automated agents have resulted in an ongoing increase in generated sensor data. The available computational resources to process these data are bound to become insufficient for real-time applications. Reducing the amount of data to be processed by identifying the most relevant data based on the agents' situation, often referred to as situation-awareness, has gained increasing research interest, and the importance of complementary approaches is expected to increase further in the near future. In this work, we extend the applicability range of our recently introduced concept for situation-aware environment perception to the decentralized automation architecture of the UNICARagil project. Considering the specific driving capabilities of the vehicle and using real-world data on target hardware in a post-processing manner, we provide an estimate for the daily reduction in power consumption that accumulates to 36.2%. While achieving these promising results, we additionally show the need to consider scalability in data processing in the design of software modules as well as in the design of functional systems if the benefits of situation-awareness shall be leveraged optimally. △ Less

Submitted 26 July, 2022; v1 submitted 5 July, 2022; originally announced July 2022.

Comments: V2: added DOI to copyright notice

Journal ref: 2022 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 2022, pp. 1087-1092

Situation-Aware Environment Perception Using a Multi-Layer Attention Map

Authors: Matti Henning, Johannes Müller, Fabian Gies, Michael Buchholz, Klaus Dietmayer

Abstract: Within the field of automated driving, a clear trend in environment perception tends towards more sensors, higher redundancy, and overall increase in computational power. This is mainly driven by the paradigm to perceive the entire environment as best as possible at all times. However, due to the ongoing rise in functional complexity, compromises have to be considered to ensure real-time capabilit… ▽ More Within the field of automated driving, a clear trend in environment perception tends towards more sensors, higher redundancy, and overall increase in computational power. This is mainly driven by the paradigm to perceive the entire environment as best as possible at all times. However, due to the ongoing rise in functional complexity, compromises have to be considered to ensure real-time capabilities of the perception system. In this work, we introduce a concept for situation-aware environment perception to control the resource allocation towards processing relevant areas within the data as well as towards employing only a subset of functional modules for environment perception, if sufficient for the current driving task. Specifically, we propose to evaluate the context of an automated vehicle to derive a multi-layer attention map (MLAM) that defines relevant areas. Using this MLAM, the optimum of active functional modules is dynamically configured and intra-module processing of only relevant data is enforced. We outline the feasibility of application of our concept using real-world data in a straight-forward implementation for our system at hand. While retaining overall functionality, we achieve a reduction of accumulated processing time of 59%. △ Less

Submitted 4 April, 2022; v1 submitted 2 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

Comments: Update 1: Removed minor typos, corrected FKZ. Update 2: Extension of Section III-E. Rewording in some sections to improve clarity. Added IEEE Copyright Notice

Report number: Volume: 8, Issue: 1, January 2023

Journal ref: IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 2023

On the coalition number of trees

Authors: Davood Bakhshesh, Michael A. Henning, Dinabandhu Pradhan

Abstract: Let $G$ be a graph with vertex set $V$ and of order $n = |V|$, and let $δ(G)$ and $Δ(G)$ be the minimum and maximum degree of $G$, respectively. Two disjoint sets $V_1, V_2 \subseteq V$ form a coalition in $G$ if none of them is a dominating set of $G$ but their union $V_1\cup V_2$ is. A vertex partition $Ψ=\{V_1,\ldots, V_k\}$ of $V$ is a coalition partition of $G$ if every set $V_i\in Ψ$ is eith… ▽ More Let $G$ be a graph with vertex set $V$ and of order $n = |V|$, and let $δ(G)$ and $Δ(G)$ be the minimum and maximum degree of $G$, respectively. Two disjoint sets $V_1, V_2 \subseteq V$ form a coalition in $G$ if none of them is a dominating set of $G$ but their union $V_1\cup V_2$ is. A vertex partition $Ψ=\{V_1,\ldots, V_k\}$ of $V$ is a coalition partition of $G$ if every set $V_i\in Ψ$ is either a dominating set of $G$ with the cardinality $|V_i|=1$, or is not a dominating set but for some $V_j\in Ψ$, $V_i$ and $V_j$ form a coalition. The maximum cardinality of a coalition partition of $G$ is the coalition number $\mathcal{C}(G)$ of $G$. Given a coalition partition $Ψ= \{V_1, \ldots, V_k\}$ of $G$, a coalition graph $\CG(G, Ψ)$ is associated on $Ψ$ such that there is a one-to-one correspondence between its vertices and the members of $Ψ$, where two vertices of $\CG(G, Ψ)$ are adjacent if and only if the corresponding sets form a coalition in $G$. In this paper, we partially solve one of the open problems posed in Haynes et al. \cite{coal0} and we solve two open problems posed by Haynes et al. \cite{coal1}. We characterize all graphs $G$ with $δ(G) \le 1$ and $\mathcal{C}(G)=n$, and we characterize all trees $T$ with $\mathcal{C}(T)=n-1$. We determine the number of coalition graphs that can be defined by all coalition partitions of a given path. Furthermore, we show that there is no universal coalition path, a path whose coalition partitions defines all possible coalition graphs. △ Less

Submitted 1 November, 2022; v1 submitted 17 November, 2021; originally announced November 2021.

Anomaly Detection in Radar Data Using PointNets

Authors: Thomas Griebel, Dominik Authaler, Markus Horn, Matti Henning, Michael Buchholz, Klaus Dietmayer

Abstract: For autonomous driving, radar is an important sensor type. On the one hand, radar offers a direct measurement of the radial velocity of targets in the environment. On the other hand, in literature, radar sensors are known for their robustness against several kinds of adverse weather conditions. However, on the downside, radar is susceptible to ghost targets or clutter which can be caused by severa… ▽ More For autonomous driving, radar is an important sensor type. On the one hand, radar offers a direct measurement of the radial velocity of targets in the environment. On the other hand, in literature, radar sensors are known for their robustness against several kinds of adverse weather conditions. However, on the downside, radar is susceptible to ghost targets or clutter which can be caused by several different causes, e.g., reflective surfaces in the environment. Ghost targets, for instance, can result in erroneous object detections. To this end, it is desirable to identify anomalous targets as early as possible in radar data. In this work, we present an approach based on PointNets to detect anomalous radar targets. Modifying the PointNet-architecture driven by our task, we developed a novel grou** variant which contributes to a multi-form grou** module. Our method is evaluated on a real-world dataset in urban scenarios and shows promising results for the detection of anomalous radar targets. △ Less

Submitted 20 September, 2021; originally announced September 2021.

Comments: Accepted for presentation at the 2021 IEEE 24th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), September 19-22, 2021, Indianapolis, USA

Towards robust and domain agnostic reinforcement learning competitions

Authors: William Hebgen Guss, Stephanie Milani, Nicholay Topin, Brandon Houghton, Sharada Mohanty, Andrew Melnik, Augustin Harter, Benoit Buschmaas, Bjarne Jaster, Christoph Berganski, Dennis Heitkamp, Marko Henning, Helge Ritter, Chengjie Wu, Xiaotian Hao, Yiming Lu, Hangyu Mao, Yihuan Mao, Chao Wang, Michal Opanowicz, Anssi Kanervisto, Yanick Schraner, Christian Scheller, Xiren Zhou, Lu Liu , et al. (4 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Reinforcement learning competitions have formed the basis for standard research benchmarks, galvanized advances in the state-of-the-art, and shaped the direction of the field. Despite this, a majority of challenges suffer from the same fundamental problems: participant solutions to the posed challenge are usually domain-specific, biased to maximally exploit compute resources, and not guaranteed to… ▽ More Reinforcement learning competitions have formed the basis for standard research benchmarks, galvanized advances in the state-of-the-art, and shaped the direction of the field. Despite this, a majority of challenges suffer from the same fundamental problems: participant solutions to the posed challenge are usually domain-specific, biased to maximally exploit compute resources, and not guaranteed to be reproducible. In this paper, we present a new framework of competition design that promotes the development of algorithms that overcome these barriers. We propose four central mechanisms for achieving this end: submission retraining, domain randomization, desemantization through domain obfuscation, and the limitation of competition compute and environment-sample budget. To demonstrate the efficacy of this design, we proposed, organized, and ran the MineRL 2020 Competition on Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning. In this work, we describe the organizational outcomes of the competition and show that the resulting participant submissions are reproducible, non-specific to the competition environment, and sample/resource efficient, despite the difficult competition task. △ Less

Submitted 7 June, 2021; originally announced June 2021.

Comments: 20 pages, several figures, published PMLR

Compelling Colorings: A generalization of the dominator chromatic number

Authors: Anna Bachstein, Wayne Goddard, Michael A. Henning, John Xue

Abstract: We define a $P$-compelling coloring as a proper coloring of the vertices of a graph such that every subset consisting of one vertex of each color has property $P$. The $P$-compelling chromatic number is the minimum number of colors in such a coloring. We show that this notion generalizes the dominator and total dominator chromatic numbers, and provide some general bounds and algorithmic results. W… ▽ More We define a $P$-compelling coloring as a proper coloring of the vertices of a graph such that every subset consisting of one vertex of each color has property $P$. The $P$-compelling chromatic number is the minimum number of colors in such a coloring. We show that this notion generalizes the dominator and total dominator chromatic numbers, and provide some general bounds and algorithmic results. We also investigate the specific cases where $P$ is that the subset contains at least one edge or that the subset is connected. △ Less

Submitted 8 May, 2021; originally announced May 2021.

MSC Class: 05C15

Conjecture of TxGraffiti: Independence, domination, and matchings

Authors: Yair Caro, Randy Davila, Michael Henning, Ryan Pepper

Abstract: TxGraffiti is an automated conjecturing program that produces graph theoretic conjectures in the form of conjectured inequalities. This program written and maintained by the second author since 2017 was inspired by the successes of previous automated conjecturing programs including Fajtlowicz's GRAFFITI and DeLaViña's GRAFFITI.pc. In this paper we prove and generalize several conjectures generated… ▽ More TxGraffiti is an automated conjecturing program that produces graph theoretic conjectures in the form of conjectured inequalities. This program written and maintained by the second author since 2017 was inspired by the successes of previous automated conjecturing programs including Fajtlowicz's GRAFFITI and DeLaViña's GRAFFITI.pc. In this paper we prove and generalize several conjectures generated by TxGraffiti when it was prompted to conjecture on the \emph{independence number}, the \emph{domination number}, and the \emph{matching number} (and generalizations of each of these graph invariants). Moreover, in several instances we also show the proposed inequalities relating these graph invariants are sharp. △ Less

Submitted 2 April, 2021; originally announced April 2021.

Graphs with disjoint 2-dominating sets

Authors: Michael A. Henning, Jerzy Topp

Abstract: A subset $D\subseteq V_G$ is a dominating set of $G$ if every vertex in $V_G\setminus D$ has a neighbor in $D$, while $D$ is a 2-dominating set of $G$ if every vertex belonging to $V_G\setminus D$ is joined by at least two edges with a vertex or vertices in $D$. A graph $G$ is a $(2,2)$-dominated graph if it has a pair $(D,D')$ of disjoint $2$-dominating sets of vertices of $G$. In this paper we p… ▽ More A subset $D\subseteq V_G$ is a dominating set of $G$ if every vertex in $V_G\setminus D$ has a neighbor in $D$, while $D$ is a 2-dominating set of $G$ if every vertex belonging to $V_G\setminus D$ is joined by at least two edges with a vertex or vertices in $D$. A graph $G$ is a $(2,2)$-dominated graph if it has a pair $(D,D')$ of disjoint $2$-dominating sets of vertices of $G$. In this paper we present two characterizations of minimal $(2,2)$-dominated graphs. △ Less

Submitted 21 August, 2021; v1 submitted 4 March, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

Comments: 8 pages, 4 figures

MSC Class: 05C69; 05C85

Minimal graphs with disjoint dominating and total dominating sets

Authors: Michael A. Henning, Jerzy Topp

Abstract: A graph $G$ is a DTDP-graph if it has a pair $(D,T)$ of disjoint sets of vertices of $G$ such that $D$ is a dominating set and $T$ is a total dominating set of $G$. Such graphs were studied in a number of research papers. In this paper we study further properties of DTDP-graphs and, in particular, we characterize minimal DTDP-gaphs without loops. A graph $G$ is a DTDP-graph if it has a pair $(D,T)$ of disjoint sets of vertices of $G$ such that $D$ is a dominating set and $T$ is a total dominating set of $G$. Such graphs were studied in a number of research papers. In this paper we study further properties of DTDP-graphs and, in particular, we characterize minimal DTDP-gaphs without loops. △ Less

Submitted 4 March, 2021; v1 submitted 15 January, 2021; originally announced January 2021.

Comments: 23 pages, 12 figures

MSC Class: 05C69; 05C85

Total connected domination game

Authors: Csilla Bujtás, Michael A. Henning, Vesna Iršič, Sandi Klavžar

Abstract: The (total) connected domination game on a graph $G$ is played by two players, Dominator and Staller, according to the standard (total) domination game with the additional requirement that at each stage of the game the selected vertices induce a connected subgraph of $G$. If Dominator starts the game and both players play optimally, then the number of vertices selected during the game is the (tota… ▽ More The (total) connected domination game on a graph $G$ is played by two players, Dominator and Staller, according to the standard (total) domination game with the additional requirement that at each stage of the game the selected vertices induce a connected subgraph of $G$. If Dominator starts the game and both players play optimally, then the number of vertices selected during the game is the (total) connected game domination number ($γ_{\rm tcg}(G)$) $γ_{\rm cg}(G)$ of $G$. We show that $γ_{\rm tcg}(G)\in \{γ_{\rm cg}(G), γ_{\rm cg}(G) + 1, γ_{\rm cg}(G) + 2\}$, and consequently define $G$ as Class $i$ if $γ_{\rm tcg}(G) = γ_{\rm cg} + i$ for $i \in \{0,1,2\}$. A large family of Class $0$ graphs is constructed which contains all connected Cartesian product graphs and connected direct product graphs with minumum degree at least $2$. We show that no tree is Class $2$ and characterize Class $1$ trees. We provide an infinite family of Class $2$ bipartite graphs. △ Less

Submitted 10 October, 2020; originally announced October 2020.

Comments: 12 pages, 2 figures

MSC Class: 05C57; 05C69; 91A43

Semipaired Domination in Some Subclasses of Chordal Graphs

Authors: Michael A. Henning, Arti Pandey, Vikash Tripathi

Abstract: A dominating set $D$ of a graph $G$ without isolated vertices is called semipaired dominating set if $D$ can be partitioned into $2$-element subsets such that the vertices in each set are at distance at most $2$. The semipaired domination number, denoted by $γ_{pr2}(G)$ is the minimum cardinality of a semipaired dominating set of $G$. Given a graph $G$ with no isolated vertices, the \textsc{Minimu… ▽ More A dominating set $D$ of a graph $G$ without isolated vertices is called semipaired dominating set if $D$ can be partitioned into $2$-element subsets such that the vertices in each set are at distance at most $2$. The semipaired domination number, denoted by $γ_{pr2}(G)$ is the minimum cardinality of a semipaired dominating set of $G$. Given a graph $G$ with no isolated vertices, the \textsc{Minimum Semipaired Domination} problem is to find a semipaired dominating set of $G$ of cardinality $γ_{pr2}(G)$. The decision version of the \textsc{Minimum Semipaired Domination} problem is already known to be NP-complete for chordal graphs, an important graph class. In this paper, we show that the decision version of the \textsc{Minimum Semipaired Domination} problem remains NP-complete for split graphs, a subclass of chordal graphs. On the positive side, we propose a linear-time algorithm to compute a minimum cardinality semipaired dominating set of block graphs. In addition, we prove that the \textsc{Minimum Semipaired Domination} problem is APX-complete for graphs with maximum degree $3$. △ Less

Submitted 3 July, 2021; v1 submitted 31 August, 2020; originally announced August 2020.

Journal ref: Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 23 no. 1, Discrete Algorithms (July 6, 2021) dmtcs:6782

The Enclaveless Competition Game

Authors: Michael A. Henning, Douglas F. Rall

Abstract: For a subset $S$ of vertices in a graph $G$, a vertex $v \in S$ is an enclave of $S$ if $v$ and all of its neighbors are in $S$, where a neighbor of $v$ is a vertex adjacent to $v$. A set $S$ is enclaveless if it does not contain any enclaves. The enclaveless number $Ψ(G)$ of $G$ is the maximum cardinality of an enclaveless set in $G$. As first observed in 1997 by Slater [J. Res. Nat. Bur. Standar… ▽ More For a subset $S$ of vertices in a graph $G$, a vertex $v \in S$ is an enclave of $S$ if $v$ and all of its neighbors are in $S$, where a neighbor of $v$ is a vertex adjacent to $v$. A set $S$ is enclaveless if it does not contain any enclaves. The enclaveless number $Ψ(G)$ of $G$ is the maximum cardinality of an enclaveless set in $G$. As first observed in 1997 by Slater [J. Res. Nat. Bur. Standards 82 (1977), 197--202], if $G$ is a graph with $n$ vertices, then $γ(G) + Ψ(G) = n$ where $γ(G)$ is the well-studied domination number of $G$. In this paper, we continue the study of the competition-enclaveless game introduced in 2001 by Phillips and Slater [Graph Theory Notes N. Y. 41 (2001), 37--41] and defined as follows. Two players take turns in constructing a maximal enclaveless set $S$, where one player, Maximizer, tries to maximize $|S|$ and one player, Minimizer, tries to minimize~$|S|$. The competition-enclaveless game number $Ψ_g^+(G)$ of $G$ is the number of vertices played when Maximizer starts the game and both players play optimally. We study among other problems the conjecture that if $G$ is an isolate-free graph of order $n$, then $Ψ_g^+(G) \ge \frac{1}{2}n$. We prove this conjecture for regular graphs and for claw-free graphs. △ Less

Submitted 4 June, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

Comments: 15 pages, 1 figure, 23 references

MSC Class: 05C65; 05C69

Independent Domination in Subcubic Graphs

Authors: A. Akbari, S. Akbari, A. Doosthosseini, Z. Hadizadeh, Michael A. Henning, A. Naraghi

Abstract: A set $S$ of vertices in a graph $G$ is a dominating set if every vertex not in $S$ is adjacent to a vertex in $S$. If, in addition, $S$ is an independent set, then $S$ is an independent dominating set. The independent domination number $i(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of an independent dominating set in $G$. In 2013 Goddard and Henning [Discrete Math 313 (2013), 839--854] conjectured that… ▽ More A set $S$ of vertices in a graph $G$ is a dominating set if every vertex not in $S$ is adjacent to a vertex in $S$. If, in addition, $S$ is an independent set, then $S$ is an independent dominating set. The independent domination number $i(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of an independent dominating set in $G$. In 2013 Goddard and Henning [Discrete Math 313 (2013), 839--854] conjectured that if $G$ is a connected cubic graph of order $n$, then $i(G) \le \frac{3}{8}n$, except if $G$ is the complete bipartite graph $K_{3,3}$ or the $5$-prism $C_5 \, \Box \, K_2$. Further they construct two infinite families of connected cubic graphs with independent domination three-eighths their order. They remark that perhaps it is even true that for $n > 10$ these two families are only families for which equality holds. In this paper, we provide a new family of connected cubic graphs $G$ of order $n$ such that $i(G) = \frac{3}{8}n$. We also show that if $G$ is a subcubic graph of order $n$ with no isolated vertex, then $i(G) \le \frac{1}{2}n$, and we characterize the graphs achieving equality in this bound. △ Less

Submitted 9 January, 2020; originally announced January 2020.

Comments: Submitted to Discrete Applied Mathematics Journal, 08 Jan 2020

Minimal graphs with disjoint dominating and paired-dominating sets

Authors: Michael A. Henning, Jerzy Topp

Abstract: A subset $D\subseteq V_G$ is a dominating set of $G$ if every vertex in $V_G-D$ has a~neighbor in $D$, while $D$ is a paired-dominating set of $G$ if $D$ is a~dominating set and the subgraph induced by $D$ contains a perfect matching. A graph $G$ is a $D\!P\!D\!P$-graph if it has a pair $(D,P)$ of disjoint sets of vertices of $G$ such that $D$ is a dominating set and $P$ is a paired-dominating set… ▽ More A subset $D\subseteq V_G$ is a dominating set of $G$ if every vertex in $V_G-D$ has a~neighbor in $D$, while $D$ is a paired-dominating set of $G$ if $D$ is a~dominating set and the subgraph induced by $D$ contains a perfect matching. A graph $G$ is a $D\!P\!D\!P$-graph if it has a pair $(D,P)$ of disjoint sets of vertices of $G$ such that $D$ is a dominating set and $P$ is a paired-dominating set of $G$. The study of the $D\!P\!D\!P$-graphs was initiated by Southey and Henning (Cent. Eur. J. Math. 8 (2010) 459--467; J. Comb. Optim. 22 (2011) 217--234). In this paper, we provide conditions which ensure that a graph is a $D\!P\!D\!P$-graph. In particular, we characterize the minimal $D\!P\!D\!P$-graphs. △ Less

Submitted 12 August, 2019; originally announced August 2019.

Comments: 4 figures

MSC Class: 05C69; 05C85

Journal ref: Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory 41 (2021) 827-847

Domination versus edge domination

Authors: Julien Baste, Maximilian Fürst, Michael A. Henning, Elena Mohr, Dieter Rautenbach

Abstract: We propose the conjecture that the domination number $γ(G)$ of a $Δ$-regular graph $G$ with $Δ\geq 1$ is always at most its edge domination number $γ_e(G)$, which coincides with the domination number of its line graph. We prove that $γ(G)\leq \left(1+\frac{2(Δ-1)}{Δ2^Δ}\right)γ_e(G)$ for general $Δ\geq 1$, and $γ(G)\leq \left(\frac{7}{6}-\frac{1}{204}\right)γ_e(G)$ for $Δ=3$. Furthermore, we verif… ▽ More We propose the conjecture that the domination number $γ(G)$ of a $Δ$-regular graph $G$ with $Δ\geq 1$ is always at most its edge domination number $γ_e(G)$, which coincides with the domination number of its line graph. We prove that $γ(G)\leq \left(1+\frac{2(Δ-1)}{Δ2^Δ}\right)γ_e(G)$ for general $Δ\geq 1$, and $γ(G)\leq \left(\frac{7}{6}-\frac{1}{204}\right)γ_e(G)$ for $Δ=3$. Furthermore, we verify our conjecture for cubic claw-free graphs. △ Less

Submitted 7 July, 2019; v1 submitted 25 June, 2019; originally announced June 2019.

Traceability of Connected Domination Critical Graphs

Authors: Michael A. Henning, Nawarat Ananchuen, Pawaton Kaemawichanurat

Abstract: A dominating set in a graph $G$ is a set $S$ of vertices of $G$ such that every vertex outside $S$ is adjacent to a vertex in $S$. A connected dominating set in $G$ is a dominating set $S$ such that the subgraph $G[S]$ induced by $S$ is connected. The connected domination number of $G$, $γ_c(G)$, is the minimum cardinality of a connected dominating set of $G$. A graph $G$ is said to be $k$-… ▽ More A dominating set in a graph $G$ is a set $S$ of vertices of $G$ such that every vertex outside $S$ is adjacent to a vertex in $S$. A connected dominating set in $G$ is a dominating set $S$ such that the subgraph $G[S]$ induced by $S$ is connected. The connected domination number of $G$, $γ_c(G)$, is the minimum cardinality of a connected dominating set of $G$. A graph $G$ is said to be $k$-$γ_{c}$-critical if the connected domination number $γ_{c}(G)$ is equal to $k$ and $γ_{c}(G + uv) < k$ for every pair of non-adjacent vertices $u$ and $v$ of $G$. Let $ζ$ be the number of cut-vertices of $G$. It is known that if $G$ is a $k$-$γ_{c}$-critical graph, then $G$ has at most $k - 2$ cut-vertices, that is $ζ\le k - 2$. In this paper, for $k \ge 4$ and $0 \le ζ\le k - 2$, we show that every $k$-$γ_{c}$-critical graph with $ζ$ cut-vertices has a hamiltonian path if and only if $k - 3 \le ζ\le k - 2$. △ Less

Submitted 20 June, 2019; originally announced June 2019.

Comments: 26 pages

MSC Class: 05C69; 05C45

Bounding and approximating minimum maximal matchings in regular graphs

Authors: Julien Baste, Maximilian Fürst, Michael A. Henning, Elena Mohr, Dieter Rautenbach

Abstract: The edge domination number $γ_e(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the minimum size of a maximal matching in $G$. It is well known that this parameter is computationally very hard, and several approximation algorithms and heuristics have been studied. In the present paper, we provide best possible upper bounds on $γ_e(G)$ for regular and non-regular graphs $G$ in terms of their order and maximum degree. Furthe… ▽ More The edge domination number $γ_e(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the minimum size of a maximal matching in $G$. It is well known that this parameter is computationally very hard, and several approximation algorithms and heuristics have been studied. In the present paper, we provide best possible upper bounds on $γ_e(G)$ for regular and non-regular graphs $G$ in terms of their order and maximum degree. Furthermore, we discuss algorithmic consequences of our results and their constructive proofs. △ Less

Submitted 29 May, 2019; originally announced May 2019.

Complexity and Algorithms for Semipaired Domination in Graphs

Authors: Michael A. Henning, Arti Pandey, Vikash Tripathi

Abstract: For a graph $G=(V,E)$ with no isolated vertices, a set $D\subseteq V$ is called a semipaired dominating set of G if $(i)$ $D$ is a dominating set of $G$, and $(ii)$ $D$ can be partitioned into two element subsets such that the vertices in each two element set are at distance at most two. The minimum cardinality of a semipaired dominating set of $G$ is called the semipaired domination number of… ▽ More For a graph $G=(V,E)$ with no isolated vertices, a set $D\subseteq V$ is called a semipaired dominating set of G if $(i)$ $D$ is a dominating set of $G$, and $(ii)$ $D$ can be partitioned into two element subsets such that the vertices in each two element set are at distance at most two. The minimum cardinality of a semipaired dominating set of $G$ is called the semipaired domination number of $G$, and is denoted by $γ_{pr2}(G)$. The \textsc{Minimum Semipaired Domination} problem is to find a semipaired dominating set of $G$ of cardinality $γ_{pr2}(G)$. In this paper, we initiate the algorithmic study of the \textsc{Minimum Semipaired Domination} problem. We show that the decision version of the \textsc{Minimum Semipaired Domination} problem is NP-complete for bipartite graphs and split graphs. On the positive side, we present a linear-time algorithm to compute a minimum cardinality semipaired dominating set of interval graphs and trees. We also propose a $1+\ln(2Δ+2)$-approximation algorithm for the \textsc{Minimum Semipaired Domination} problem, where $Δ$ denote the maximum degree of the graph and show that the \textsc{Minimum Semipaired Domination} problem cannot be approximated within $(1-ε) \ln|V|$ for any $ε> 0$ unless NP $\subseteq$ DTIME$(|V|^{O(\log\log|V|)})$. △ Less

Submitted 1 April, 2019; originally announced April 2019.

Comments: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1711.10891

Maker-Breaker total domination game

Authors: Valentin Gledel, Michael A. Henning, Vesna Iršič, Sandi Klavžar

Abstract: Maker-Breaker total domination game in graphs is introduced as a natural counterpart to the Maker-Breaker domination game recently studied by Duchêne, Gledel, Parreau, and Renault. Both games are instances of the combinatorial Maker-Breaker games. The Maker-Breaker total domination game is played on a graph $G$ by two players who alternately take turns choosing vertices of $G$. The first player, D… ▽ More Maker-Breaker total domination game in graphs is introduced as a natural counterpart to the Maker-Breaker domination game recently studied by Duchêne, Gledel, Parreau, and Renault. Both games are instances of the combinatorial Maker-Breaker games. The Maker-Breaker total domination game is played on a graph $G$ by two players who alternately take turns choosing vertices of $G$. The first player, Dominator, selects a vertex in order to totally dominate $G$ while the other player, Staller, forbids a vertex to Dominator in order to prevent him to reach his goal. It is shown that there are infinitely many connected cubic graphs in which Staller wins and that no minimum degree condition is sufficient to guarantee that Dominator wins when Staller starts the game. An amalgamation lemma is established and used to determine the outcome of the game played on grids. Cacti are also classified with respect to the outcome of the game. A connection between the game and hypergraphs is established. It is proved that the game is PSPACE-complete on split and bipartite graphs. Several problems and questions are also posed. △ Less

Submitted 1 February, 2019; originally announced February 2019.

Comments: 21 pages, 5 figures

MSC Class: 05C57; 05C69; 68Q25; 91A43

Uniquely restricted matchings in subcubic graphs

Authors: Maximilian Fürst, Michael A. Henning, Dieter Rautenbach

Abstract: A matching $M$ in a graph $G$ is uniquely restricted if no other matching in $G$ covers the same set of vertices. We conjecture that every connected subcubic graph with $m$ edges and $b$ bridges that is distinct from $K_{3,3}$ has a uniquely restricted matching of size at least $\frac{m+b}{6}$, and we establish this bound with $b$ replaced by the number of bridges that lie on a path between two ve… ▽ More A matching $M$ in a graph $G$ is uniquely restricted if no other matching in $G$ covers the same set of vertices. We conjecture that every connected subcubic graph with $m$ edges and $b$ bridges that is distinct from $K_{3,3}$ has a uniquely restricted matching of size at least $\frac{m+b}{6}$, and we establish this bound with $b$ replaced by the number of bridges that lie on a path between two vertices of degree at most $2$. Moreover, we prove that every connected subcubic graph of order $n$ and girth at least $7$ has a uniquely restricted matching of size at least $\frac{n-1}{3}$, which partially confirms a Conjecture of Fürst and Rautenbach (Some bounds on the uniquely restricted matching number, arXiv:1803.11032). △ Less

Submitted 2 May, 2018; originally announced May 2018.

On the maximum number of minimum total dominating sets in forests

Authors: Michael A. Henning, Elena Mohr, Dieter Rautenbach

Abstract: We propose the conjecture that every tree with order $n$ at least $2$ and total domination number $γ_t$ has at most $\left(\frac{n-\frac{γ_t}{2}}{\frac{γ_t}{2}}\right)^{\frac{γ_t}{2}}$ minimum total dominating sets. As a relaxation of this conjecture, we show that every forest $F$ with order $n$, no isolated vertex, and total domination number $γ_t$ has at most… ▽ More We propose the conjecture that every tree with order $n$ at least $2$ and total domination number $γ_t$ has at most $\left(\frac{n-\frac{γ_t}{2}}{\frac{γ_t}{2}}\right)^{\frac{γ_t}{2}}$ minimum total dominating sets. As a relaxation of this conjecture, we show that every forest $F$ with order $n$, no isolated vertex, and total domination number $γ_t$ has at most $\min\left\{\left(8\sqrt{e}\, \right)^{γ_t}\left(\frac{n-\frac{γ_t}{2}}{\frac{γ_t}{2}}\right)^{\frac{γ_t}{2}}, (1+\sqrt{2})^{n-γ_t},1.4865^n\right\}$ minimum total dominating sets. △ Less

Submitted 17 January, 2019; v1 submitted 27 April, 2018; originally announced April 2018.

Journal ref: Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science, Vol. 21 no. 3 , Graph Theory (January 23, 2019) dmtcs:4787

Cutting Lemma and Union Lemma for the Domination Game

Authors: Paul Dorbec, Michael A. Henning, Sandi Klavžar, Gašper Košmrlj

Abstract: Two new techniques are introduced into the theory of the domination game. The cutting lemma bounds the game domination number of a partially dominated graph with the game domination number of suitably modified partially dominated graph. The union lemma bounds the S-game domination number of a disjoint union of paths using appropriate weighting functions. Using these tools a conjecture asserting th… ▽ More Two new techniques are introduced into the theory of the domination game. The cutting lemma bounds the game domination number of a partially dominated graph with the game domination number of suitably modified partially dominated graph. The union lemma bounds the S-game domination number of a disjoint union of paths using appropriate weighting functions. Using these tools a conjecture asserting that the so-called three legged spiders are game domination critical graphs is proved. An extended cutting lemma is also derived and all game domination critical trees on 18, 19, and 20 vertices are listed. △ Less

Submitted 21 February, 2018; originally announced February 2018.

Zero Forcing in Claw-Free Cubic Graphs

Authors: Randy Davila, Michael Henning

Abstract: The zero forcing number of a simple graph, written $Z(G)$, is a NP-hard graph invariant which is the result of the zero forcing color change rule. This graph invariant has been heavily studied by linear algebraists, physicists, and graph theorist. It's broad applicability and interesting combinatorial properties have attracted the attention of many researchers. Of particular interest, is that of b… ▽ More The zero forcing number of a simple graph, written $Z(G)$, is a NP-hard graph invariant which is the result of the zero forcing color change rule. This graph invariant has been heavily studied by linear algebraists, physicists, and graph theorist. It's broad applicability and interesting combinatorial properties have attracted the attention of many researchers. Of particular interest, is that of bounding the zero forcing number from above. In this paper we show a surprising relation between the zero forcing number of a graph and the independence number of a graph, denoted $α(G)$. Our main theorem states that if $G \ne K_4$ is a connected, cubic, claw-free graph, then $Z(G) \le α(G) + 1$. This improves on best known upper bounds for $Z(G)$, as well as known lower bounds on $α(G)$. As a consequence of this result, if $G \ne K_4$ is a connected, cubic, claw-free graph with order $n$, then $Z(G) \le \frac{2}{5}n + 1$. Additionally, under the hypothesis of our main theorem, we further show $Z(G) \le α'(G)$, where $α'(G)$ denotes the matching number of $G$. △ Less

Submitted 8 February, 2018; originally announced February 2018.

Transversals in Uniform Linear Hypergraphs

Authors: Michael A. Henning, Anders Yeo

Abstract: The transversal number $τ(H)$ of a hypergraph $H$ is the minimum number of vertices that intersect every edge of $H$. A linear hypergraph is one in which every two distinct edges intersect in at most one vertex. A $k$-uniform hypergraph has all edges of size $k$. It is known that $τ(H) \le (n + m)/(k+1)$ holds for all $k$-uniform, linear hypergraphs $H$ when $k \in \{2,3\}$ or when $k \ge 4$ and t… ▽ More The transversal number $τ(H)$ of a hypergraph $H$ is the minimum number of vertices that intersect every edge of $H$. A linear hypergraph is one in which every two distinct edges intersect in at most one vertex. A $k$-uniform hypergraph has all edges of size $k$. It is known that $τ(H) \le (n + m)/(k+1)$ holds for all $k$-uniform, linear hypergraphs $H$ when $k \in \{2,3\}$ or when $k \ge 4$ and the maximum degree of $H$ is at most two. It has been conjectured that $τ(H) \le (n+m)/(k+1)$ holds for all $k$-uniform, linear hypergraphs $H$. We disprove the conjecture for large $k$, and show that the best possible constant $c_k$ in the bound $τ(H) \le c_k (n+m)$ has order $\ln(k)/k$ for both linear (which we show in this paper) and non-linear hypergraphs. We show that for those $k$ where the conjecture holds, it is tight for a large number of densities if there exists an affine plane $AG(2,k)$ of order $k \ge 2$. We raise the problem to find the smallest value, $k_{\min}$, of $k$ for which the conjecture fails. We prove a general result, which when applied to a projective plane of order $331$ shows that $k_{\min} \le 166$. Even though the conjecture fails for large $k$, our main result is that it still holds for $k=4$, implying that $k_{\min} \ge 5$. The case $k=4$ is much more difficult than the cases $k \in \{2,3\}$, as the conjecture does not hold for general (non-linear) hypergraphs when $k=4$. Key to our proof is the completely new technique of the deficiency of a hypergraph introduced in this paper. △ Less

Submitted 6 February, 2018; originally announced February 2018.

Comments: 105 pages

MSC Class: 05C65; 51E15

Matching, Path Covers, and Total Forcing Sets

Authors: Randy Davila, Michael Henning

Abstract: A dynamic coloring of the vertices of a graph $G$ starts with an initial subset $S$ of colored vertices, with all remaining vertices being non-colored. At each discrete time interval, a colored vertex with exactly one non-colored neighbor forces this non-colored neighbor to be colored. The initial set $S$ is called a forcing set of $G$ if, by iteratively applying the forcing process, every vertex… ▽ More A dynamic coloring of the vertices of a graph $G$ starts with an initial subset $S$ of colored vertices, with all remaining vertices being non-colored. At each discrete time interval, a colored vertex with exactly one non-colored neighbor forces this non-colored neighbor to be colored. The initial set $S$ is called a forcing set of $G$ if, by iteratively applying the forcing process, every vertex in $G$ becomes colored. If the initial set $S$ has the added property that it induces a subgraph of $G$ without isolated vertices, then $S$ is called a total forcing set in $G$. The minimum cardinality of a total forcing set in $G$ is its total forcing number, denoted $F_t(G)$. The path cover number of $G$, denoted $\pc(G)$, is the minimum number of vertex disjoint paths such that every vertex belongs to a path in the cover, while the matching number of $G$, denoted $α'(T)$, is the number of edges in a maximum matching of $G$. Let $T$ be a tree of order at least two. We observe that $\pc(T) + 1 \le F_t(T) \le 2\pc(T)$, and we prove that $F_t(T) \le α'(T) + \pc(T)$. Further, we characterize the extremal trees achieving equality in these bounds. △ Less

Submitted 14 January, 2018; originally announced January 2018.

Comments: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1702.06496