-
Decision-making Oriented Clustering: Application to Pricing and Power Consumption Scheduling
Authors:
Chao Zhang,
Samson Lasaulce,
Martin Hennebel,
Lucas Saludjian,
Patrick Panciatici,
H. Vincent Poor
Abstract:
Data clustering is an instrumental tool in the area of energy resource management. One problem with conventional clustering is that it does not take the final use of the clustered data into account, which may lead to a very suboptimal use of energy or computational resources. When clustered data are used by a decision-making entity, it turns out that significant gains can be obtained by tailoring…
▽ More
Data clustering is an instrumental tool in the area of energy resource management. One problem with conventional clustering is that it does not take the final use of the clustered data into account, which may lead to a very suboptimal use of energy or computational resources. When clustered data are used by a decision-making entity, it turns out that significant gains can be obtained by tailoring the clustering scheme to the final task performed by the decision-making entity. The key to having good final performance is to automatically extract the important attributes of the data space that are inherently relevant to the subsequent decision-making entity, and partition the data space based on these attributes instead of partitioning the data space based on predefined conventional metrics. For this purpose, we formulate the framework of decision-making oriented clustering and propose an algorithm providing a decision-based partition of the data space and good representative decisions. By applying this novel framework and algorithm to a typical problem of real-time pricing and that of power consumption scheduling, we obtain several insightful analytical results such as the expression of the best representative price profiles for real-time pricing and a very significant reduction in terms of required clusters to perform power consumption scheduling as shown by our simulations.
△ Less
Submitted 2 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
Introducing Decentralized EV Charging Coordination for the Voltage Regulation
Authors:
Olivier Beaude,
Yujun He,
Martin Hennebel
Abstract:
This paper investigates a decentralized optimization methodology to coordinate Electric Vehicles (EV) charging in order to contribute to the voltage control on a residential electrical distribution feeder. This aims to maintain the voltage level in function of the EV's power injection using the sensitivity matrix approach. The decentralized optimization is tested with two different methods, respec…
▽ More
This paper investigates a decentralized optimization methodology to coordinate Electric Vehicles (EV) charging in order to contribute to the voltage control on a residential electrical distribution feeder. This aims to maintain the voltage level in function of the EV's power injection using the sensitivity matrix approach. The decentralized optimization is tested with two different methods, respectively global and local, when EV take into account their impact on all the nodes of the network or only on a local neighborhood of their connection point. EV can also update their decisions asynchronously or synchronously. While only the global approach with asynchronous update is theoretically proven to converge, using results from game theory, simulations show the potential of other algorithms for which fewer iterations or fewer informations are necessary. Finally, using Monte Carlo simulations over a wide range of EV localization configurations, the first analysis have also shown a promising performance in comparison with uncoordinated charging or with a "voltage droop charging control" recently proposed in the literature.
△ Less
Submitted 25 September, 2015;
originally announced September 2015.
-
Charging Games in Networks of Electrical Vehicles
Authors:
Olivier Beaude,
Samson Lasaulce,
Martin Hennebel
Abstract:
In this paper, a static non-cooperative game formulation of the problem of distributed charging in electrical vehicle (EV) networks is proposed. This formulation allows one to model the interaction between several EV which are connected to a common residential distribution transformer. Each EV aims at choosing the time at which it starts charging its battery in order to minimize an individual cost…
▽ More
In this paper, a static non-cooperative game formulation of the problem of distributed charging in electrical vehicle (EV) networks is proposed. This formulation allows one to model the interaction between several EV which are connected to a common residential distribution transformer. Each EV aims at choosing the time at which it starts charging its battery in order to minimize an individual cost which is mainly related to the total power delivered by the transformer, the location of the time interval over which the charging operation is performed, and the charging duration needed for the considered EV to have its battery fully recharged. As individual cost functions are assumed to be memoryless, it is possible to show that the game of interest is always an ordinal potential game. More precisely, both an atomic and nonatomic versions of the charging game are considered. In both cases, equilibrium analysis is conducted. In particular, important issues such as equilibrium uniqueness and efficiency are tackled. Interestingly, both analytical and numerical results show that the efficiency loss due to decentralization (e.g., when cost functions such as distribution network Joule losses or life of residential distribution transformers when no thermal inertia is assumed) induced by charging is small and the corresponding "efficiency", a notion close to the Price of Anarchy, tends to one when the number of EV increases.
△ Less
Submitted 24 September, 2015;
originally announced September 2015.
-
Minimizing the impact of EV charging on the electricity distribution network
Authors:
Olivier Beaude,
Samson Lasaulce,
Martin Hennebel,
Jamal Daafouz
Abstract:
The main objective of this paper is to design electric vehicle (EV) charging policies which minimize the impact of charging on the electricity distribution network (DN). More precisely, the considered cost function results from a linear combination of two parts: a cost with memory and a memoryless cost. In this paper, the first component is identified to be the transformer ageing while the second…
▽ More
The main objective of this paper is to design electric vehicle (EV) charging policies which minimize the impact of charging on the electricity distribution network (DN). More precisely, the considered cost function results from a linear combination of two parts: a cost with memory and a memoryless cost. In this paper, the first component is identified to be the transformer ageing while the second one corresponds to distribution Joule losses. First, we formulate the problem as a non-trivial discrete-time optimal control problem with finite time horizon. It is non-trivial because of the presence of saturation constraints and a non-quadratic cost. It turns out that the system state, which is the transformer hot-spot (HS) temperature here, can be expressed as a function of the sequence of control variables; the cost function is then seen to be convex in the control for typical values for the model parameters. The problem of interest thus becomes a standard optimization problem. While the corresponding problem can be solved by using available numerical routines, three distributed charging policies are provided. The motivation is threefold: to decrease the computational complexity; to model the important scenario where the charging profile is chosen by the EV itself; to circumvent the allocation problem which arises with the proposed formulation. Remarkably, the performance loss induced by decentralization is verified to be small through simulations. Numerical results show the importance of the choice of the charging policies. For instance, the gain in terms of transformer lifetime can be very significant when implementing advanced charging policies instead of plug-and-charge policies. The impact of the accuracy of the non-EV demand forecasting is equally assessed.
△ Less
Submitted 24 September, 2015;
originally announced September 2015.
-
Reducing the Impact of EV Charging Operations on the Distribution Network
Authors:
Oliver Beaude,
Samson Lasaulce,
Martin Hennebel,
Ibrahim Mohand-Kaci
Abstract:
A key assumption made in this paper is that electric vehicle (EV) battery charging profiles are rectangular. This requires a specific and new formulation of the charging problem, involving discrete action sets for the EVs in particular. The considered cost function comprises of three components: the distribution transformer aging, the distribution energy losses, and a component inherent to the EV…
▽ More
A key assumption made in this paper is that electric vehicle (EV) battery charging profiles are rectangular. This requires a specific and new formulation of the charging problem, involving discrete action sets for the EVs in particular. The considered cost function comprises of three components: the distribution transformer aging, the distribution energy losses, and a component inherent to the EV itself (e.g., the battery charging monetary cost). Charging start times are determined by the proposed distributed algorithm, whose analysis is conducted by using game-theoretic tools such as ordinal potential games. Convergence of the proposed algorithm is shown to be guaranteed for some important special cases. Remarkably, the performance loss w.r.t. the centralized solution is shown to be small. Simulations, based on realistic public data, allow one to gain further insights on the issues of convergence and optimality loss and provide clear messages about the tradeoff associated with the presence of the three components in the considered cost function. While simulations show that the proposed charging policy performs quite similarly to existing (continuous) charging policies such as valley-filling-type solutions when the non-EV demand forecast is perfect, they reveal an additional asset of rectangular profiles in presence of forecasting errors.
△ Less
Submitted 23 September, 2015;
originally announced September 2015.
