-
Induced matching vs edge open packing: trees and product graphs
Authors:
Bostjan Bresar,
Tanja Dravec,
Jaka Hedzet,
Babak Samadi
Abstract:
Given a graph $G$, the maximum size of an induced subgraph of $G$ each component of which is a star is called the edge open packing number, $ρ_{e}^{o}(G)$, of $G$. Similarly, the maximum size of an induced subgraph of $G$ each component of which is the star $K_{1,1}$ is the induced matching number, $ν_I(G)$, of $G$. While the inequality $ρ_e^o(G)\geq ν_{I}(G)$ clearly holds for all graphs $G$, we…
▽ More
Given a graph $G$, the maximum size of an induced subgraph of $G$ each component of which is a star is called the edge open packing number, $ρ_{e}^{o}(G)$, of $G$. Similarly, the maximum size of an induced subgraph of $G$ each component of which is the star $K_{1,1}$ is the induced matching number, $ν_I(G)$, of $G$. While the inequality $ρ_e^o(G)\geq ν_{I}(G)$ clearly holds for all graphs $G$, we provide a structural characterization of those trees that attain the equality. We prove that the induced matching number of the lexicographic product $G\circ H$ of arbitrary two graphs $G$ and $H$ equals $α(G)ν_I(H)$. By similar techniques, we prove sharp lower and upper bounds on the edge open packing number of the lexicographic product of graphs, which in particular lead to NP-hardness results in triangular graphs for both invariants studied in this paper. For the direct product $G\times H$ of two graphs we provide lower bounds on $ν_I(G\times H)$ and $ρ_{e}^{o}(G\times H)$, both of which are widely sharp. We also present sharp lower bounds for both invariants in the Cartesian and the strong product of two graphs. Finally, we consider the edge open packing number in hypercubes establishing the exact values of $ρ_e^o(Q_n)$ when $n$ is a power of $2$, and present a closed formula for the induced matching number of the rooted product of arbitrary two graphs over an arbitrary root vertex.
△ Less
Submitted 7 June, 2024; v1 submitted 6 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Bootstrap percolation and $P_3$-hull number in direct products of graphs
Authors:
Boštjan Brešar,
Jaka Hedžet,
Rebekah Herrman
Abstract:
The $r$-neighbor bootstrap percolation is a graph infection process based on the update rule by which a vertex with $r$ infected neighbors becomes infected. We say that an initial set of infected vertices propagates if all vertices of a graph $G$ are eventually infected, and the minimum cardinality of such a set in $G$ is called the $r$-bootstrap percolation number, $m(G,r)$, of $G$. In this paper…
▽ More
The $r$-neighbor bootstrap percolation is a graph infection process based on the update rule by which a vertex with $r$ infected neighbors becomes infected. We say that an initial set of infected vertices propagates if all vertices of a graph $G$ are eventually infected, and the minimum cardinality of such a set in $G$ is called the $r$-bootstrap percolation number, $m(G,r)$, of $G$. In this paper, we study percolating sets in direct products of graphs. While in general graphs there is no non-trivial upper bound on $m(G\times H,r)$, we prove several upper bounds under the assumption $δ(G)\ge r$. We also characterize the connected graphs $G$ and $H$ with minimum degree $2$ that satisfy $m(G \times H, 2) = \frac{|V(G \times H)|}{2}$. In addition, we determine the exact values of $m(P_n \times P_m, 2)$, which are $m+n-1$ if $m$ and $n$ are of different parities, and $m+n$ otherwise.
△ Less
Submitted 16 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Spreading in graphs
Authors:
Boštjan Brešar,
Tanja Dravec,
Aysel Erey,
Jaka Hedžet
Abstract:
Several concepts that model processes of spreading (of information, disease, objects, etc.) in graphs or networks have been studied. In many contexts, we assume that some vertices of a graph $G$ are contaminated initially, before the process starts. By the $q$-forcing rule, a contaminated vertex having at most $q$ uncontaminated neighbors enforces all the neighbors to become contaminated, while by…
▽ More
Several concepts that model processes of spreading (of information, disease, objects, etc.) in graphs or networks have been studied. In many contexts, we assume that some vertices of a graph $G$ are contaminated initially, before the process starts. By the $q$-forcing rule, a contaminated vertex having at most $q$ uncontaminated neighbors enforces all the neighbors to become contaminated, while by the $p$-percolation rule, an uncontaminated vertex becomes contaminated if at least $p$ of its neighbors are contaminated. In this paper, we consider sets $S$ that are at the same time $q$-forcing sets and $p$-percolating sets, and call them $(p,q)$-spreading sets. Given positive integers $p$ and $q$, the minimum cardinality of a $(p,q)$-spreading set in $G$ is a $(p,q)$-spreading number, $σ_{(p,q)}(G)$, of $G$. While $q$-forcing sets have been studied in a dozen of papers, the decision version of the corresponding graph invariant has not been considered earlier, and we fill the gap by proving its NP-completeness. This, in turn, enables us to prove the NP-completeness of the decision version of the $(p,q)$-spreading number in graphs for an arbitrary choice of $p$ and $q$. Again, for every $p\in \mathbb{N}$ and $q\in\mathbb{N}\cup\{\infty\}$, we find a linear-time algorithm for determining the $(p,q)$-spreading number of a tree. In addition, we present a lower and an upper bound on the $(p,q)$-spreading number of a tree and characterize extremal families of trees. In the case of square grids, we combine some known results and new results on $(2,1)$-spreading and $(4,q)$-spreading to obtain $σ_{(p,q)}(P_m\Box P_n)$ for all $(p,q)\in (\mathbb{N}\setminus\{3\})\times (\mathbb{N}\cup\{\infty\})$ and all $m,n\in\mathbb{N}$.
△ Less
Submitted 2 October, 2023; v1 submitted 28 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
$3$-Neighbor bootstrap percolation on grids
Authors:
Jaka Hedžet,
Michael A. Henning
Abstract:
Given a graph $G$ and assuming that some vertices of $G$ are infected, the $r$-neighbor bootstrap percolation rule makes an uninfected vertex $v$ infected if $v$ has at least $r$ infected neighbors. The $r$-percolation number, $m(G, r)$, of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a set of initially infected vertices in $G$ such that after continuously performing the $r$-neighbor bootstrap percolation ru…
▽ More
Given a graph $G$ and assuming that some vertices of $G$ are infected, the $r$-neighbor bootstrap percolation rule makes an uninfected vertex $v$ infected if $v$ has at least $r$ infected neighbors. The $r$-percolation number, $m(G, r)$, of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a set of initially infected vertices in $G$ such that after continuously performing the $r$-neighbor bootstrap percolation rule each vertex of $G$ eventually becomes infected. In this paper, we consider the $3$-bootstrap percolation number of grids with fixed widths. If $G$ is the cartesian product $P_3 \square P_m$ of two paths of orders~$3$ and $m$, we prove that $m(G,3)=\frac{3}{2}(m+1)-1$, when $m$ is odd, and $m(G,3)=\frac{3}{2}m +1$, when $m$ is even. Moreover if $G$ is the cartesian product $P_5 \square P_m$, we prove that $m(G,3)=2m+2$, when $m$ is odd, and $m(G,3)=2m+3$, when $m$ is even. If $G$ is the cartesian product $P_4 \square P_m$, we prove that $m(G,3)$ takes on one of two possible values, namely $m(G,3) = \lfloor \frac{5(m+1)}{3} \rfloor + 1$ or $m(G,3) = \lfloor \frac{5(m+1)}{3} \rfloor + 2$.
△ Less
Submitted 26 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
Bootstrap percolation in strong products of graphs
Authors:
Boštjan Brešar,
Jaka Hedžet
Abstract:
Given a graph $G$ and assuming that some vertices of $G$ are infected, the $r$-neighbor bootstrap percolation rule makes an uninfected vertex $v$ infected if $v$ has at least $r$ infected neighbors. The $r$-percolation number, $m(G,r)$, of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a set of initially infected vertices in $G$ such that after continuously performing the $r$-neighbor bootstrap percolation rul…
▽ More
Given a graph $G$ and assuming that some vertices of $G$ are infected, the $r$-neighbor bootstrap percolation rule makes an uninfected vertex $v$ infected if $v$ has at least $r$ infected neighbors. The $r$-percolation number, $m(G,r)$, of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a set of initially infected vertices in $G$ such that after continuously performing the $r$-neighbor bootstrap percolation rule each vertex of $G$ eventually becomes infected. In this paper, we consider percolation numbers of strong products of graphs. If $G$ is the strong product $G_1\boxtimes \cdots \boxtimes G_k$ of $k$ connected graphs, we prove that $m(G,r)=r$ as soon as $r\le 2^{k-1}$ and $|V(G)|\ge r$. As a dichotomy, we present a family of strong products of $k$ connected graphs with the $(2^{k-1}+1)$-percolation number arbitrarily large. We refine these results for strong products of graphs in which at least two factors have at least three vertices. In addition, when all factors $G_i$ have at least three vertices we prove that $m(G_1 \boxtimes \dots \boxtimes G_k,r)\leq 3^{k-1} -k$ for all $r\leq 2^k-1$, and we again get a dichotomy, since there exist families of strong products of $k$ graphs such that their $2^{k}$-percolation numbers are arbitrarily large. While $m(G\boxtimes H,3)=3$ if both $G$ and $H$ have at least three vertices, we also characterize the strong prisms $G\boxtimes K_2$ for which this equality holds. Some of the results naturally extend to infinite graphs, and we briefly consider percolation numbers of strong products of two-way infinite paths.
△ Less
Submitted 13 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
Variety of mutual-visibility problems in graphs
Authors:
Serafino Cicerone,
Gabriele Di Stefano,
Lara Drozek,
Jaka Hedzet,
Sandi Klavzar,
Ismael G. Yero
Abstract:
If $X$ is a subset of vertices of a graph $G$, then vertices $u$ and $v$ are $X$-visible if there exists a shortest $u,v$-path $P$ such that $V(P)\cap X \subseteq \{u,v\}$. If each two vertices from $X$ are $X$-visible, then $X$ is a mutual-visibility set. The mutual-visibility number of $G$ is the cardinality of a largest mutual-visibility set of $G$ and has been already investigated. In this pap…
▽ More
If $X$ is a subset of vertices of a graph $G$, then vertices $u$ and $v$ are $X$-visible if there exists a shortest $u,v$-path $P$ such that $V(P)\cap X \subseteq \{u,v\}$. If each two vertices from $X$ are $X$-visible, then $X$ is a mutual-visibility set. The mutual-visibility number of $G$ is the cardinality of a largest mutual-visibility set of $G$ and has been already investigated. In this paper a variety of mutual-visibility problems is introduced based on which natural pairs of vertices are required to be $X$-visible. This yields the total, the dual, and the outer mutual-visibility numbers. We first show that these graph invariants are related to each other and to the classical mutual-visibility number, and then we prove that the three newly introduced mutual-visibility problems are computationally difficult. According to this result, we compute or bound their values for several graphs classes that include for instance grid graphs and tori. We conclude the study by presenting some inter-comparison between the values of such parameters, which is based on the computations we made for some specific families.
△ Less
Submitted 29 July, 2023; v1 submitted 3 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
