-
Fusing Climate Data Products using a Spatially Varying Autoencoder
Authors:
Jacob A. Johnson,
Matthew J. Heaton,
William F. Christensen,
Lynsie R. Warr,
Summer B. Rupper
Abstract:
Autoencoders are powerful machine learning models used to compress information from multiple data sources. However, autoencoders, like all artificial neural networks, are often unidentifiable and uninterpretable. This research focuses on creating an identifiable and interpretable autoencoder that can be used to meld and combine climate data products. The proposed autoencoder utilizes a Bayesian st…
▽ More
Autoencoders are powerful machine learning models used to compress information from multiple data sources. However, autoencoders, like all artificial neural networks, are often unidentifiable and uninterpretable. This research focuses on creating an identifiable and interpretable autoencoder that can be used to meld and combine climate data products. The proposed autoencoder utilizes a Bayesian statistical framework, allowing for probabilistic interpretations while also varying spatially to capture useful spatial patterns across the various data products. Constraints are placed on the autoencoder as it learns patterns in the data, creating an interpretable consensus that includes the important features from each input. We demonstrate the utility of the autoencoder by combining information from multiple precipitation products in High Mountain Asia.
△ Less
Submitted 12 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Minibatch Markov chain Monte Carlo Algorithms for Fitting Gaussian Processes
Authors:
Matthew J Heaton,
Jacob A. Johnson
Abstract:
Gaussian processes (GPs) are a highly flexible, nonparametric statistical model that are commonly used to fit nonlinear relationships or account for correlation between observations. However, the computational load of fitting a Gaussian process is $\mathcal{O}(n^3)$ making them infeasible for use on large datasets. To make GPs more feasible for large datasets, this research focuses on the use of m…
▽ More
Gaussian processes (GPs) are a highly flexible, nonparametric statistical model that are commonly used to fit nonlinear relationships or account for correlation between observations. However, the computational load of fitting a Gaussian process is $\mathcal{O}(n^3)$ making them infeasible for use on large datasets. To make GPs more feasible for large datasets, this research focuses on the use of minibatching to estimate GP parameters. Specifically, we outline both approximate and exact minibatch Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms that substantially reduce the computation of fitting a GP by only considering small subsets of the data at a time. We demonstrate and compare this methodology using various simulations and real datasets.
△ Less
Submitted 26 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
A Case Study Competition Among Methods for Analyzing Large Spatial Data
Authors:
Matthew J. Heaton,
Abhirup Datta,
Andrew Finley,
Reinhard Furrer,
Rajarshi Guhaniyogi,
Florian Gerber,
Robert B. Gramacy,
Dorit Hammerling,
Matthias Katzfuss,
Finn Lindgren,
Douglas W. Nychka,
Furong Sun,
Andrew Zammit-Mangion
Abstract:
The Gaussian process is an indispensable tool for spatial data analysts. The onset of the "big data" era, however, has lead to the traditional Gaussian process being computationally infeasible for modern spatial data. As such, various alternatives to the full Gaussian process that are more amenable to handling big spatial data have been proposed. These modern methods often exploit low rank structu…
▽ More
The Gaussian process is an indispensable tool for spatial data analysts. The onset of the "big data" era, however, has lead to the traditional Gaussian process being computationally infeasible for modern spatial data. As such, various alternatives to the full Gaussian process that are more amenable to handling big spatial data have been proposed. These modern methods often exploit low rank structures and/or multi-core and multi-threaded computing environments to facilitate computation. This study provides, first, an introductory overview of several methods for analyzing large spatial data. Second, this study describes the results of a predictive competition among the described methods as implemented by different groups with strong expertise in the methodology. Specifically, each research group was provided with two training datasets (one simulated and one observed) along with a set of prediction locations. Each group then wrote their own implementation of their method to produce predictions at the given location and each which was subsequently run on a common computing environment. The methods were then compared in terms of various predictive diagnostics. Supplementary materials regarding implementation details of the methods and code are available for this article online.
△ Less
Submitted 25 April, 2018; v1 submitted 13 October, 2017;
originally announced October 2017.
-
Parameter tuning for a multi-fidelity dynamical model of the magnetosphere
Authors:
William Kleiber,
Stephan R. Sain,
Matthew J. Heaton,
Michael Wiltberger,
C. Shane Reese,
Derek Bingham
Abstract:
Geomagnetic storms play a critical role in space weather physics with the potential for far reaching economic impacts including power grid outages, air traffic rerouting, satellite damage and GPS disruption. The LFM-MIX is a state-of-the-art coupled magnetospheric-ionospheric model capable of simulating geomagnetic storms. Imbedded in this model are physical equations for turning the magnetohydrod…
▽ More
Geomagnetic storms play a critical role in space weather physics with the potential for far reaching economic impacts including power grid outages, air traffic rerouting, satellite damage and GPS disruption. The LFM-MIX is a state-of-the-art coupled magnetospheric-ionospheric model capable of simulating geomagnetic storms. Imbedded in this model are physical equations for turning the magnetohydrodynamic state parameters into energy and flux of electrons entering the ionosphere, involving a set of input parameters. The exact values of these input parameters in the model are unknown, and we seek to quantify the uncertainty about these parameters when model output is compared to observations. The model is available at different fidelities: a lower fidelity which is faster to run, and a higher fidelity but more computationally intense version. Model output and observational data are large spatiotemporal systems; the traditional design and analysis of computer experiments is unable to cope with such large data sets that involve multiple fidelities of model output. We develop an approach to this inverse problem for large spatiotemporal data sets that incorporates two different versions of the physical model. After an initial design, we propose a sequential design based on expected improvement. For the LFM-MIX, the additional run suggested by expected improvement diminishes posterior uncertainty by ruling out a posterior mode and shrinking the width of the posterior distribution. We also illustrate our approach using the Lorenz `96 system of equations for a simplified atmosphere, using known input parameters. For the Lorenz `96 system, after performing sequential runs based on expected improvement, the posterior mode converges to the true value and the posterior variability is reduced.
△ Less
Submitted 5 December, 2013; v1 submitted 27 March, 2013;
originally announced March 2013.
