Snapshot Metrics Are Not Enough: Analyzing Software Repositories with Longitudinal Metrics
Authors:
Nicholas Synovic,
Matt Hyatt,
Rohan Sethi,
Sohini Thota,
Shilpika,
Allan J. Miller,
Wenxin Jiang,
Emmanuel S. Amobi,
Austin Pinderski,
Konstantin Läufer,
Nicholas J. Hayward,
Neil Klingensmith,
James C. Davis,
George K. Thiruvathukal
Abstract:
Software metrics capture information about software development processes and products. These metrics support decision-making, e.g., in team management or dependency selection. However, existing metrics tools measure only a snapshot of a software project. Little attention has been given to enabling engineers to reason about metric trends over time -- longitudinal metrics that give insight about pr…
▽ More
Software metrics capture information about software development processes and products. These metrics support decision-making, e.g., in team management or dependency selection. However, existing metrics tools measure only a snapshot of a software project. Little attention has been given to enabling engineers to reason about metric trends over time -- longitudinal metrics that give insight about process, not just product. In this work, we present PRiME (PRocess MEtrics), a tool for computing and visualizing process metrics. The currently-supported metrics include productivity, issue density, issue spoilage, and bus factor. We illustrate the value of longitudinal data and conclude with a research agenda. The tool's demo video can be watched at https://youtu.be/YigEHy3_JCo. The source code can be found at https://github.com/SoftwareSystemsLaboratory/prime.
△ Less
Submitted 24 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
Metrics Dashboard: A Hosted Platform for Software Quality Metrics
Authors:
George K. Thiruvathukal,
Shilpika,
Nicholas J. Hayward,
Konstantin Läufer
Abstract:
There is an emerging consensus in the scientific software community that progress in scientific research is dependent on the "quality and accessibility of software at all levels" (wssspe.researchcomputing.org.uk/). This progress depends on embracing the best traditional---and emergent---practices in software engineering, especially agile practices that intersect with the more formal tradition of s…
▽ More
There is an emerging consensus in the scientific software community that progress in scientific research is dependent on the "quality and accessibility of software at all levels" (wssspe.researchcomputing.org.uk/). This progress depends on embracing the best traditional---and emergent---practices in software engineering, especially agile practices that intersect with the more formal tradition of software engineering. As a first step in our larger exploratory project to study in-process quality metrics for software development projects in Computational Science and Engineering (CSE), we have developed the Metrics Dashboard, a platform for producing and observing metrics by mining open-source software repositories on GitHub. Unlike GitHub and similar systems that provide individual performance metrics (e.g. commits), the Metrics Dashboard focuses on metrics indicative of team progress and project health. The Metrics Dashboard allows the user to submit the URL of a hosted repository for batch analysis, whose results are then cached. Upon completion, the user can interactively study various metrics over time (at varying granularity), numerically and visually. The initial version of the system is up and running as a public cloud service (SaaS) and supports project size (KLOC), defect density, defect spoilage, and productivity. While our system is by no means the first to support software metrics, we believe it may be one of the first community-focused extensible resources that can be used by any hosted project.
△ Less
Submitted 8 April, 2018; v1 submitted 5 April, 2018;
originally announced April 2018.
