Skip to main content

Showing 1–8 of 8 results for author: Haug, L

.
  1. arXiv:2011.09264  [pdf, other

    cs.LG cs.AI

    Inverse Reinforcement Learning via Matching of Optimality Profiles

    Authors: Luis Haug, Ivan Ovinnikov, Eugene Bykovets

    Abstract: The goal of inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) is to infer a reward function that explains the behavior of an agent performing a task. The assumption that most approaches make is that the demonstrated behavior is near-optimal. In many real-world scenarios, however, examples of truly optimal behavior are scarce, and it is desirable to effectively leverage sets of demonstrations of suboptimal or h… ▽ More

    Submitted 19 November, 2020; v1 submitted 18 November, 2020; originally announced November 2020.

  2. Semantic Segmentation of Histopathological Slides for the Classification of Cutaneous Lymphoma and Eczema

    Authors: Jérémy Scheurer, Claudio Ferrari, Luis Berenguer Todo Bom, Michaela Beer, Werner Kempf, Luis Haug

    Abstract: Mycosis fungoides (MF) is a rare, potentially life threatening skin disease, which in early stages clinically and histologically strongly resembles Eczema, a very common and benign skin condition. In order to increase the survival rate, one needs to provide the appropriate treatment early on. To this end, one crucial step for specialists is the evaluation of histopathological slides (glass slides)… ▽ More

    Submitted 10 September, 2020; originally announced September 2020.

    Comments: Submitted to https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-52791-4_3

    Journal ref: Papież B., Namburete A., Yaqub M., Noble J. (eds) Medical Image Understanding and Analysis. MIUA 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1248. Springer, Cham

  3. arXiv:2003.09712  [pdf, other

    cs.LG cs.AI stat.ML

    Understanding the Power and Limitations of Teaching with Imperfect Knowledge

    Authors: Rati Devidze, Farnam Mansouri, Luis Haug, Yuxin Chen, Adish Singla

    Abstract: Machine teaching studies the interaction between a teacher and a student/learner where the teacher selects training examples for the learner to learn a specific task. The typical assumption is that the teacher has perfect knowledge of the task---this knowledge comprises knowing the desired learning target, having the exact task representation used by the learner, and knowing the parameters capturi… ▽ More

    Submitted 21 March, 2020; originally announced March 2020.

  4. arXiv:1906.00429  [pdf, other

    cs.LG cs.AI stat.ML

    Learner-aware Teaching: Inverse Reinforcement Learning with Preferences and Constraints

    Authors: Sebastian Tschiatschek, Ahana Ghosh, Luis Haug, Rati Devidze, Adish Singla

    Abstract: Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) enables an agent to learn complex behavior by observing demonstrations from a (near-)optimal policy. The typical assumption is that the learner's goal is to match the teacher's demonstrated behavior. In this paper, we consider the setting where the learner has its own preferences that it additionally takes into consideration. These preferences can for example c… ▽ More

    Submitted 29 October, 2019; v1 submitted 2 June, 2019; originally announced June 2019.

  5. arXiv:1810.08926  [pdf, other

    cs.LG stat.ML

    Teaching Inverse Reinforcement Learners via Features and Demonstrations

    Authors: Luis Haug, Sebastian Tschiatschek, Adish Singla

    Abstract: Learning near-optimal behaviour from an expert's demonstrations typically relies on the assumption that the learner knows the features that the true reward function depends on. In this paper, we study the problem of learning from demonstrations in the setting where this is not the case, i.e., where there is a mismatch between the worldviews of the learner and the expert. We introduce a natural qua… ▽ More

    Submitted 27 March, 2019; v1 submitted 21 October, 2018; originally announced October 2018.

    Comments: NeurIPS'2018 (extended version)

  6. Lagrangian antisurgery

    Authors: Luis Haug

    Abstract: We describe an operation which modifies a Lagrangian submanifold $L$ in a symplectic manifold $(M, ω)$ such as to produce a new immersed Lagrangian submanifold $L'$, which as a smooth manifold is obtained by surgery along a framed sphere in $L$. Intuitively, this can be described as collapsing an isotropic disc with boundary on $L$ to a point. The inverse operation generalizes classical Lagrangian… ▽ More

    Submitted 20 January, 2021; v1 submitted 16 November, 2015; originally announced November 2015.

    Comments: 27 pages, 13 figures. v2: Major update that makes Theorem 1.2 more precise and removes erroneous claims about the existence of certain monotone Lagrangian cobordisms made in the previous version. v3: Minor update to agree with published version

    Journal ref: Mathematical Research Letters, Vol. 27, No. 5 (2020), pp. 1423-1464

  7. The Lagrangian cobordism group of $T^2$

    Authors: Luis Haug

    Abstract: We compute the Lagrangian cobordism group of the standard symplectic 2-torus and prove that it is isomorphic to the Grothendieck group of its derived Fukaya category. The proofs use homological mirror symmetry for the 2-torus.

    Submitted 25 November, 2014; v1 submitted 30 October, 2013; originally announced October 2013.

    Comments: 43 pages, 12 figures. V2: Result of computation of the cobordism group reformulated; further minor changes and corrections. V3: Updated such as to agree with accepted version. To appear in Selecta Mathematica

    Journal ref: Selecta Mathematica: Volume 21, Issue 3 (2015), Page 1021-1069

  8. On the Quantum Homology of Real Lagrangians in Fano Toric Manifolds

    Authors: Luis Haug

    Abstract: We study the Lagrangian quantum homology of real parts of Fano toric manifolds of minimal Chern number at least 2, using coefficients in a ring of Laurent polynomials over Z/2Z. We show that these Lagrangians are wide, in the sense that their quantum homology is isomorphic as a module to their classical homology tensored with this ring. Moreover, we show that the quantum homology is isomorphic as… ▽ More

    Submitted 30 October, 2013; v1 submitted 29 August, 2011; originally announced August 2011.

    Comments: 36 pages, figures. Version 2: Typos corrected, minor changes. Version 3: Journal reference added

    Journal ref: Int Math Res Notices (2013) 2013 (14): 3171-3220