-
Revisiting $^{129}$Xe electric dipole moment measurements applying a new global phase fitting approach
Authors:
T. Liu,
K. Rolfs,
I. Fan,
S. Haude,
W. Kilian,
L. Li,
A. Schnabel,
J. Voigt,
L. Trahms
Abstract:
By measuring the nuclear magnetic spin precession frequencies of polarized $^{129}$Xe and $^{3}$He, a new upper limit on the $^{129}$Xe atomic electric dipole moment (EDM) $ d_\mathrm{A} (^{129}\mathrm{Xe})$ was reported in Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 143003 (2019). Here, we propose a new evaluation method based on global phase fitting (GPF) for analyzing the continuous phase development of the $^{3}$He…
▽ More
By measuring the nuclear magnetic spin precession frequencies of polarized $^{129}$Xe and $^{3}$He, a new upper limit on the $^{129}$Xe atomic electric dipole moment (EDM) $ d_\mathrm{A} (^{129}\mathrm{Xe})$ was reported in Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 143003 (2019). Here, we propose a new evaluation method based on global phase fitting (GPF) for analyzing the continuous phase development of the $^{3}$He-$^{129}$Xe comagnetometer signal. The Cramer-Rao Lower Bound on the $^{129}$Xe EDM for the GPF method is theoretically derived and shows the potential benefit of our new approach. The robustness of the GPF method is verified with Monte-Carlo studies. By optimizing the analysis parameters and adding data that could not be analyzed with the former method, we obtain a result of $d_\mathrm{A} (^{129}\mathrm{Xe}) = 1.1 \pm 3.6~\mathrm{(stat)} \pm 2.0~\mathrm{(syst)} \times 10^{-28}~ e~\mathrm{cm}$ in an unblinded analysis. For the systematic uncertainty analyses, we adopted all methods from the aforementioned PRL publication except the comagnetometer phase drift, which can be omitted using the GPF method. The updated null result can be interpreted as a new upper limit of $| d_\mathrm{A} (^{129}\mathrm{Xe}) | < 8.3 \times 10^{-28}~e~\mathrm{cm}$ at the 95\% C.L.
△ Less
Submitted 15 November, 2020; v1 submitted 18 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
Model-Independent Determination of the Cosmic Growth Factor
Authors:
Sophia Haude,
Shabnam Salehi,
Sofía Vidal,
Matteo Maturi,
Matthias Bartelmann
Abstract:
Since the discovery of the accelerated cosmic expansion, one of the most important tasks in observational cosmology is to determine the nature of the dark energy. We should build our understanding on a minimum of assumptions in order to avoid biases from assumed cosmological models. The two most important functions describing the evolution of the universe and its structures are the expansion funct…
▽ More
Since the discovery of the accelerated cosmic expansion, one of the most important tasks in observational cosmology is to determine the nature of the dark energy. We should build our understanding on a minimum of assumptions in order to avoid biases from assumed cosmological models. The two most important functions describing the evolution of the universe and its structures are the expansion function E(a) and the linear growth factor D_+(a). The expansion function has been determined in previous papers in a model-independent way using distance moduli to type-Ia supernovae and assuming only a metric theory of gravity, spatial isotropy and homogeneity. Here, we extend this analysis in three ways: (1) We extend the data sample by combining the Pantheon measurements of type-Ia supernovae with measurements of baryonic acoustic oscillations; (2) we substantially simplify and generalise our method for reconstructing the expansion function; and (3) we use the reconstructed expansion function to determine the linear growth factor of cosmic structures, equally independent of specific assumptions on an underlying cosmological model other than the usual spatial symmetries. We show that the result is quite insensitive to the initial conditions for solving the growth equation, leaving the present-day matter-density parameter Ω_m0 as the only relevant parameter for an otherwise purely empirical and accurate determination of the growth factor.
△ Less
Submitted 10 December, 2019;
originally announced December 2019.
-
New Limit on the Permanent Electric Dipole Moment of $^{129}$Xe using $^{3}$He Comagnetometry and SQUID Detection
Authors:
N. Sachdeva,
I. Fan,
E. Babcock,
M. Burghoff,
T. E. Chupp,
S. Degenkolb,
P. Fierlinger,
S. Haude,
E. Kraegeloh,
W. Kilian,
S. Knappe-Grüneberg,
F. Kuchler,
T. Liu,
M. Marino,
J. Meinel,
K. Rolfs,
Z. Salhi,
A. Schnabel,
J. T. Singh,
S. Stuiber,
W. A. Terrano,
L. Trahms,
J. Voigt
Abstract:
We report results of a new technique to measure the electric dipole moment of $^{129}$Xe with $^3$He comagnetometry. Both species are polarized using spin-exchange optical pum**, transferred to a measurement cell, and transported into a magnetically shielded room, where SQUID magnetometers detect free precession in applied electric and magnetic fields. The result from a one week measurement camp…
▽ More
We report results of a new technique to measure the electric dipole moment of $^{129}$Xe with $^3$He comagnetometry. Both species are polarized using spin-exchange optical pum**, transferred to a measurement cell, and transported into a magnetically shielded room, where SQUID magnetometers detect free precession in applied electric and magnetic fields. The result from a one week measurement campaign in 2017 and a 2.5 week campaign in 2018, combined with detailed study of systematic effects, is $d_A(^{129}\mathrm{Xe}) = (1.4 \pm 6.6_\mathrm{stat} \pm 2.0_\mathrm{syst})\times10^{-28}~e\,\mathrm{cm}$. This corresponds to an upper limit of $|d_A(^{129}\mathrm{Xe})| < 1.4 \times 10^{-27} ~e\,\mathrm{cm}~(95\%~\mathrm{CL})$, a factor of five more sensitive than the limit set in 2001.
△ Less
Submitted 26 September, 2019;
originally announced September 2019.
