-
Mercury Lander: Planetary Mission Concept Study for the 2023-2032 Decadal Survey
Authors:
Carolyn M. Ernst,
Sanae Kubota,
Nancy Chabot,
Rachel Klima,
Gabe Rogers,
Paul Byrne,
Steven A. Hauck II,
Kathleen E. Vander Kaaden,
Ronald J. Vervack Jr.,
Sebastien Besse,
David Blewett,
Brett Denevi,
Sander Goossens,
Stephen Indyk,
Noam Izenberg,
Catherine Johnson,
Lauren Jozwiak,
Haje Korth,
Ralph McNutt Jr.,
Scott Murchie,
Patrick Peplowski,
Jim Raines,
Elizabeth Rampe,
Michelle Thompson
Abstract:
As an end-member of terrestrial planet formation, Mercury holds unique clues about the original distribution of elements in the earliest stages of solar system development and how planets and exoplanets form and evolve in close proximity to their host stars. This Mercury Lander mission concept enables in situ surface measurements that address several fundamental science questions raised by MESSENG…
▽ More
As an end-member of terrestrial planet formation, Mercury holds unique clues about the original distribution of elements in the earliest stages of solar system development and how planets and exoplanets form and evolve in close proximity to their host stars. This Mercury Lander mission concept enables in situ surface measurements that address several fundamental science questions raised by MESSENGER's pioneering exploration of Mercury. Such measurements are needed to understand Mercury's unique mineralogy and geochemistry; to characterize the proportionally massive core's structure; to measure the planet's active and ancient magnetic fields at the surface; to investigate the processes that alter the surface and produce the exosphere; and to provide ground truth for current and future remote datasets. NASA's Planetary Mission Concept Studies program awarded this study to evaluate the feasibility of accomplishing transformative science through a New-Frontiers-class, landed mission to Mercury in the next decade. The resulting mission concept achieves one full Mercury year (~88 Earth days) of surface operations with an ambitious, high-heritage, landed science payload, corresponding well with the New Frontiers mission framework. The 11-instrument science payload is delivered to a landing site within Mercury's widely distributed low-reflectance material, and addresses science goals and objectives encompassing geochemistry, geophysics, the Mercury space environment, and surface geology. This mission concept is meant to be representative of any scientific landed mission to Mercury; alternate payload implementations and landing locations would be viable and compelling for a future landed Mercury mission.
△ Less
Submitted 14 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
White Paper on the Case for Landed Mercury Science
Authors:
Paul K. Byrne,
David T. Blewett,
Nancy L. Chabot,
Steven A. Hauck, II,
Erwan Mazarico,
Kathleen E. Vander Kaaden,
Ronald J. Vervack
Abstract:
We advocate for establishing key scientific priorities for the future of Mercury exploration, including the development of specific science goals for a landed mission. We support the Mercury science community in fostering closer collaboration with ongoing and planned exoplanet investigations. The continued exploration of Mercury should be conceived as a multi-mission, multi-generational effort, an…
▽ More
We advocate for establishing key scientific priorities for the future of Mercury exploration, including the development of specific science goals for a landed mission. We support the Mercury science community in fostering closer collaboration with ongoing and planned exoplanet investigations. The continued exploration of Mercury should be conceived as a multi-mission, multi-generational effort, and that the landed exploration of Mercury be a high scientific priority in the coming decade.
△ Less
Submitted 19 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
White Paper Towards a Fuller Understanding of Icy Satellite Seafloors, Interiors, and Habitability
Authors:
Paul K. Byrne,
Andrew J. Dombard,
Catherine M. Elder,
Steven A. Hauck, II,
Mohit Melwani Daswani,
Paul V. Regensburger,
Steven D. Vance
Abstract:
Icy satellites represent compelling astrobiological targets, but their rocky interiors must be better characterized. Fundamental research programs and thematic workshops promoting ocean world interdisciplinarity are key. Future missions to icy satellites should explicitly include objectives to characterize interfaces between rock and water or high-pressure ices.
Icy satellites represent compelling astrobiological targets, but their rocky interiors must be better characterized. Fundamental research programs and thematic workshops promoting ocean world interdisciplinarity are key. Future missions to icy satellites should explicitly include objectives to characterize interfaces between rock and water or high-pressure ices.
△ Less
Submitted 19 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
Mercury's Internal Structure
Authors:
Jean-Luc Margot,
Steven A. Hauck II,
Erwan Mazarico,
Sebastiano Padovan,
Stanton J. Peale
Abstract:
We describe the current state of knowledge about Mercury's interior structure. We review the available observational constraints, including mass, size, density, gravity field, spin state, composition, and tidal response. These data enable the construction of models that represent the distribution of mass inside Mercury. In particular, we infer radial profiles of the pressure, density, and gravity…
▽ More
We describe the current state of knowledge about Mercury's interior structure. We review the available observational constraints, including mass, size, density, gravity field, spin state, composition, and tidal response. These data enable the construction of models that represent the distribution of mass inside Mercury. In particular, we infer radial profiles of the pressure, density, and gravity in the core, mantle, and crust. We also examine Mercury's rotational dynamics and the influence of an inner core on the spin state and the determination of the moment of inertia. Finally, we discuss the wide-ranging implications of Mercury's internal structure on its thermal evolution, surface geology, capture in a unique spin-orbit resonance, and magnetic field generation.
△ Less
Submitted 6 June, 2018;
originally announced June 2018.
-
Effect of core--mantle and tidal torques on Mercury's spin axis orientation
Authors:
Stanton J. Peale,
Jean-Luc Margot,
Steven A Hauck, II,
Sean C. Solomon
Abstract:
The rotational evolution of Mercury's mantle and its core under conservative and dissipative torques is important for understanding the planet's spin state. Dissipation results from tides and viscous, magnetic and topographic core--mantle interactions. The dissipative core--mantle torques take the system to an equilibrium state wherein both spins are fixed in the frame precessing with the orbit, a…
▽ More
The rotational evolution of Mercury's mantle and its core under conservative and dissipative torques is important for understanding the planet's spin state. Dissipation results from tides and viscous, magnetic and topographic core--mantle interactions. The dissipative core--mantle torques take the system to an equilibrium state wherein both spins are fixed in the frame precessing with the orbit, and in which the mantle and core are differentially rotating. This equilibrium exhibits a mantle spin axis that is offset from the Cassini state by larger amounts for weaker core--mantle coupling for all three dissipative core--mantle coupling mechanisms, and the spin axis of the core is separated farther from that of the mantle, leading to larger differential rotation. The relatively strong core--mantle coupling necessary to bring the mantle spin axis to its observed position close to the Cassini state is not obtained by any of the three dissipative core--mantle coupling mechanisms. For a hydrostatic ellipsoidal core--mantle boundary, pressure coupling dominates the dissipative effects on the mantle and core positions, and dissipation together with pressure coupling brings the mantle spin solidly to the Cassini state. The core spin goes to a position displaced from that of the mantle by about 3.55 arcmin nearly in the plane containing the Cassini state. With the maximum viscosity considered of $ν\sim 15.0\,{\rm cm^2/s}$ if the coupling is by the circulation through an Ekman boundary layer or $ν\sim 8.75\times 10^5\,{\rm cm^2/s}$ for purely viscous coupling, the core spin lags the precessing Cassini plane by 23 arcsec, whereas the mantle spin lags by only 0.055 arcsec. Larger, non hydrostatic values of the CMB ellipticity also result in the mantle spin at the Cassini state, but the core spin is moved closer to the mantle spin.
△ Less
Submitted 16 January, 2014;
originally announced January 2014.
-
A Re-appraisal of the Habitability of Planets Around M Dwarf Stars
Authors:
Jill C. Tarter,
Peter R. Backus,
Rocco L. Mancinelli,
Jonathan M. Aurnou,
Dana E. Backman,
Gibor S. Basri,
Alan P. Boss,
Andrew Clarke,
Drake Deming,
Laurance R. Doyle,
Eric D. Feigelson,
Friedmann Freund,
David H. Grinspoon,
Robert M. Haberle,
Steven A. Hauck II,
Martin J. Heath,
Todd J. Henry,
Jeffery L. Hollingsworth,
Manoj M. Joshi,
Steven Kilston,
Michael C. Liu,
Eric Meikle,
I. Neill Reid,
Lynn J. Rothschild,
John M. Scalo
, et al. (7 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Stable, hydrogen-burning, M dwarf stars comprise about 75% of all stars in the Galaxy. They are extremely long-lived and because they are much smaller in mass than the Sun (between 0.5 and 0.08 MSun), their temperature and stellar luminosity are low and peaked in the red. We have re-examined what is known at present about the potential for a terrestrial planet forming within, or migrating into,…
▽ More
Stable, hydrogen-burning, M dwarf stars comprise about 75% of all stars in the Galaxy. They are extremely long-lived and because they are much smaller in mass than the Sun (between 0.5 and 0.08 MSun), their temperature and stellar luminosity are low and peaked in the red. We have re-examined what is known at present about the potential for a terrestrial planet forming within, or migrating into, the classic liquid-surface-water habitable zone close to an M dwarf star. Observations of protoplanetary disks suggest that planet-building materials are common around M dwarfs, but N-body simulations differ in their estimations of the likelihood of potentially-habitable, wet planets residing within their habitable zones, which are only ~ 1/5 to 1/50 of the width of that for a G star. Particularly in light of the claimed detection of the planets with masses as small as 5.5 and 7.5 MEarth orbiting M stars, there seems no reason to exclude the possibility of terrestrial planets. Tidally locked synchronous rotation within the narrow habitable zone doesn't necessarily lead to atmospheric collapse, and active stellar flaring may not be as much of an evolutionarily disadvantageous factor as has previously been supposed. We conclude that M dwarf stars may indeed be viable hosts for planets on which the origin and evolution of life can occur. A number of planetary processes such as cessation of geothermal activity, or thermal and non-thermal atmospheric loss processes may limit the duration of planetary habitability to periods far shorter than the extreme lifetime of the M dwarf star. Nevertheless, it makes sense to include M dwarf stars in programs that seek to find habitable worlds and evidence of life.
△ Less
Submitted 20 November, 2006; v1 submitted 28 September, 2006;
originally announced September 2006.
