Grids of stellar models with rotation VII: Models from 0.8 to 300 M$_\odot$ at super-solar metallicity (Z = 0.020)
Authors:
Norhasliza Yusof,
Raphael Hirschi,
Patrick Eggenberger,
Sylvia Ekström,
Cyril Georgy,
Yves Sibony,
Paul A. Crowther,
Georges Meynet,
Hasan Abu Kassim,
Wan Aishah Wan Harun,
André Maeder,
Jose H. Groh,
Eoin Farrell,
Laura Murphy
Abstract:
We present a grid of stellar models at super-solar metallicity (Z = 0.020) extending the previous grids of Geneva models at solar and sub-solar metallicities. A metallicity of Z = 0.020 was chosen to match that of the inner Galactic disk. A modest increase of 43% (=0.02/0.014) in metallicity compared to solar models means that the models evolve similarly to solar models but with slightly larger ma…
▽ More
We present a grid of stellar models at super-solar metallicity (Z = 0.020) extending the previous grids of Geneva models at solar and sub-solar metallicities. A metallicity of Z = 0.020 was chosen to match that of the inner Galactic disk. A modest increase of 43% (=0.02/0.014) in metallicity compared to solar models means that the models evolve similarly to solar models but with slightly larger mass loss. Mass loss limits the final total masses of the super-solar models to 35 M$_\odot$ even for stars with initial masses much larger than 100 M$_\odot$. Mass loss is strong enough in stars above 20 M$_\odot$ for rotating stars (25 M$_\odot$ for non-rotating stars) to remove the entire hydrogen-rich envelope. Our models thus predict SNII below 20 M$_\odot$ for rotating stars (25 M$_\odot$ for non-rotating stars) and SNIb (possibly SNIc) above that. We computed both isochrones and synthetic clusters to compare our super-solar models to the Westerlund 1 (Wd1) massive young cluster. A synthetic cluster combining rotating and non-rotating models with an age spread between log10 (age/yr) = 6.7 and 7.0 is able to reproduce qualitatively the observed populations of WR, RSG and YSG stars in Wd1, in particular their simultaneous presence at log10(L/L$_\odot$) = 5-5.5. The quantitative agreement is imperfect and we discuss the likely causes: synthetic cluster parameters, binary interactions, mass loss and their related uncertainties. In particular, mass loss in the cool part of the HRD plays a key role.
△ Less
Submitted 21 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
