Showing 1–14 of 14 results for author: Hansen, T D

ARRIVAL: Next Stop in CLS

Authors: Bernd Gärtner, Thomas Dueholm Hansen, Pavel Hubáček, Karel Král, Hagar Mosaad, Veronika Slívová

Abstract: We study the computational complexity of ARRIVAL, a zero-player game on $n$-vertex switch graphs introduced by Dohrau, Gärtner, Kohler, Matoušek, and Welzl. They showed that the problem of deciding termination of this game is contained in $\text{NP} \cap \text{coNP}$. Karthik C. S. recently introduced a search variant of ARRIVAL and showed that it is in the complexity class PLS. In this work, we s… ▽ More We study the computational complexity of ARRIVAL, a zero-player game on $n$-vertex switch graphs introduced by Dohrau, Gärtner, Kohler, Matoušek, and Welzl. They showed that the problem of deciding termination of this game is contained in $\text{NP} \cap \text{coNP}$. Karthik C. S. recently introduced a search variant of ARRIVAL and showed that it is in the complexity class PLS. In this work, we significantly improve the known upper bounds for both the decision and the search variants of ARRIVAL. First, we resolve a question suggested by Dohrau et al. and show that the decision variant of ARRIVAL is in $\text{UP} \cap \text{coUP}$. Second, we prove that the search variant of ARRIVAL is contained in CLS. Third, we give a randomized $\mathcal{O}(1.4143^n)$-time algorithm to solve both variants. Our main technical contributions are (a) an efficiently verifiable characterization of the unique witness for termination of the ARRIVAL game, and (b) an efficient way of sampling from the state space of the game. We show that the problem of finding the unique witness is contained in CLS, whereas it was previously conjectured to be FPSPACE-complete. The efficient sampling procedure yields the first algorithm for the problem that has expected runtime $\mathcal{O}(c^n)$ with $c<2$. △ Less

Submitted 21 February, 2018; originally announced February 2018.

Comments: 13 pages, 6 figures

ACM Class: F.1.3; F.2.2; G.2.2

Faster Algorithms for Computing Maximal 2-Connected Subgraphs in Sparse Directed Graphs

Authors: Shiri Chechik, Thomas Dueholm Hansen, Giuseppe F. Italiano, Veronika Loitzenbauer, Nikos Parotsidis

Abstract: Connectivity related concepts are of fundamental interest in graph theory. The area has received extensive attention over four decades, but many problems remain unsolved, especially for directed graphs. A directed graph is 2-edge-connected (resp., 2-vertex-connected) if the removal of any edge (resp., vertex) leaves the graph strongly connected. In this paper we present improved algorithms for com… ▽ More Connectivity related concepts are of fundamental interest in graph theory. The area has received extensive attention over four decades, but many problems remain unsolved, especially for directed graphs. A directed graph is 2-edge-connected (resp., 2-vertex-connected) if the removal of any edge (resp., vertex) leaves the graph strongly connected. In this paper we present improved algorithms for computing the maximal 2-edge- and 2-vertex-connected subgraphs of a given directed graph. These problems were first studied more than 35 years ago, with $\widetilde{O}(mn)$ time algorithms for graphs with m edges and n vertices being known since the late 1980s. In contrast, the same problems for undirected graphs are known to be solvable in linear time. Henzinger et al. [ICALP 2015] recently introduced $O(n^2)$ time algorithms for the directed case, thus improving the running times for dense graphs. Our new algorithms run in time $O(m^{3/2})$, which further improves the running times for sparse graphs. The notion of 2-connectivity naturally generalizes to k-connectivity for $k>2$. For constant values of k, we extend one of our algorithms to compute the maximal k-edge-connected in time $O(m^{3/2} \log{n})$, improving again for sparse graphs the best known algorithm by Henzinger et al. [ICALP 2015] that runs in $O(n^2 \log n)$ time. △ Less

Submitted 30 May, 2017; originally announced May 2017.

Comments: Revised version of SODA 2017 paper including details for k-edge-connected subgraphs

Decremental Data Structures for Connectivity and Dominators in Directed Graphs

Authors: Loukas Georgiadis, Thomas Dueholm Hansen, Giuseppe F. Italiano, Sebastian Krinninger, Nikos Parotsidis

Abstract: We introduce a new dynamic data structure for maintaining the strongly connected components (SCCs) of a directed graph (digraph) under edge deletions, so as to answer a rich repertoire of connectivity queries. Our main technical contribution is a decremental data structure that supports sensitivity queries of the form "are $ u $ and $ v $ strongly connected in the graph $ G \setminus w $?", for an… ▽ More We introduce a new dynamic data structure for maintaining the strongly connected components (SCCs) of a directed graph (digraph) under edge deletions, so as to answer a rich repertoire of connectivity queries. Our main technical contribution is a decremental data structure that supports sensitivity queries of the form "are $ u $ and $ v $ strongly connected in the graph $ G \setminus w $?", for any triple of vertices $ u, v, w $, while $ G $ undergoes deletions of edges. Our data structure processes a sequence of edge deletions in a digraph with $n$ vertices in $O(m n \log{n})$ total time and $O(n^2 \log{n})$ space, where $m$ is the number of edges before any deletion, and answers the above queries in constant time. We can leverage our data structure to obtain decremental data structures for many more types of queries within the same time and space complexity. For instance for edge-related queries, such as testing whether two query vertices $u$ and $v$ are strongly connected in $G \setminus e$, for some query edge $e$. As another important application of our decremental data structure, we provide the first nontrivial algorithm for maintaining the dominator tree of a flow graph under edge deletions. We present an algorithm that processes a sequence of edge deletions in a flow graph in $O(m n \log{n})$ total time and $O(n^2 \log{n})$ space. For reducible flow graphs we provide an $O(mn)$-time and $O(m + n)$-space algorithm. We give a conditional lower bound that provides evidence that these running times may be tight up to subpolynomial factors. △ Less

Submitted 26 April, 2017; originally announced April 2017.

Comments: Accepted to the 44th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2017)

Improved Algorithms for Computing the Cycle of Minimum Cost-to-Time Ratio in Directed Graphs

Authors: Karl Bringmann, Thomas Dueholm Hansen, Sebastian Krinninger

Abstract: We study the problem of finding the cycle of minimum cost-to-time ratio in a directed graph with $ n $ nodes and $ m $ edges. This problem has a long history in combinatorial optimization and has recently seen interesting applications in the context of quantitative verification. We focus on strongly polynomial algorithms to cover the use-case where the weights are relatively large compared to the… ▽ More We study the problem of finding the cycle of minimum cost-to-time ratio in a directed graph with $ n $ nodes and $ m $ edges. This problem has a long history in combinatorial optimization and has recently seen interesting applications in the context of quantitative verification. We focus on strongly polynomial algorithms to cover the use-case where the weights are relatively large compared to the size of the graph. Our main result is an algorithm with running time $ \tilde O (m^{3/4} n^{3/2}) $, which gives the first improvement over Megiddo's $ \tilde O (n^3) $ algorithm [JACM'83] for sparse graphs. We further demonstrate how to obtain both an algorithm with running time $ n^3 / 2^{Ω{(\sqrt{\log n})}} $ on general graphs and an algorithm with running time $ \tilde O (n) $ on constant treewidth graphs. To obtain our main result, we develop a parallel algorithm for negative cycle detection and single-source shortest paths that might be of independent interest. △ Less

Submitted 26 April, 2017; originally announced April 2017.

Comments: Accepted to the 44th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2017)

Simulating Branching Programs with Edit Distance and Friends or: A Polylog Shaved is a Lower Bound Made

Authors: Amir Abboud, Thomas Dueholm Hansen, Virginia Vassilevska Williams, Ryan Williams

Abstract: A recent and active line of work achieves tight lower bounds for fundamental problems under the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH). A celebrated result of Backurs and Indyk (STOC'15) proves that the Edit Distance of two sequences of length n cannot be computed in strongly subquadratic time under SETH. The result was extended by follow-up works to simpler looking problems like finding the Lo… ▽ More A recent and active line of work achieves tight lower bounds for fundamental problems under the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH). A celebrated result of Backurs and Indyk (STOC'15) proves that the Edit Distance of two sequences of length n cannot be computed in strongly subquadratic time under SETH. The result was extended by follow-up works to simpler looking problems like finding the Longest Common Subsequence (LCS). SETH is a very strong assumption, asserting that even linear size CNF formulas cannot be analyzed for satisfiability with an exponential speedup over exhaustive search. We consider much safer assumptions, e.g. that such a speedup is impossible for SAT on much more expressive representations, like NC circuits. Intuitively, this seems much more plausible: NC circuits can implement complex cryptographic primitives, while CNFs cannot even approximately compute an XOR of bits. Our main result is a surprising reduction from SAT on Branching Programs to fundamental problems in P like Edit Distance, LCS, and many others. Truly subquadratic algorithms for these problems therefore have consequences that we consider to be far more remarkable than merely faster CNF SAT algorithms. For example, SAT on arbitrary o(n)-depth bounded fan-in circuits (and therefore also NC-Circuit-SAT) can be solved in (2-eps)^n time. A very interesting feature of our work is that we can prove major consequences even from mildly subquadratic algorithms for Edit Distance or LCS. For example, we show that if we can shave an arbitrarily large polylog factor from n^2 for Edit Distance then NEXP does not have non-uniform NC^1 circuits. A more fine-grained examination shows that even shaving a $\log^c{n}$ factor, for a specific constant $c \approx 10^3$, already implies new circuit lower bounds. △ Less

Submitted 18 November, 2015; originally announced November 2015.

Hollow Heaps

Authors: Thomas Dueholm Hansen, Haim Kaplan, Robert E. Tarjan, Uri Zwick

Abstract: We introduce the hollow heap, a very simple data structure with the same amortized efficiency as the classical Fibonacci heap. All heap operations except delete and delete-min take $O(1)$ time, worst case as well as amortized; delete and delete-min take $O(\log n)$ amortized time on a heap of $n$ items. Hollow heaps are by far the simplest structure to achieve this. Hollow heaps combine two novel… ▽ More We introduce the hollow heap, a very simple data structure with the same amortized efficiency as the classical Fibonacci heap. All heap operations except delete and delete-min take $O(1)$ time, worst case as well as amortized; delete and delete-min take $O(\log n)$ amortized time on a heap of $n$ items. Hollow heaps are by far the simplest structure to achieve this. Hollow heaps combine two novel ideas: the use of lazy deletion and re-insertion to do decrease-key operations, and the use of a dag (directed acyclic graph) instead of a tree or set of trees to represent a heap. Lazy deletion produces hollow nodes (nodes without items), giving the data structure its name. △ Less

Submitted 22 October, 2015; originally announced October 2015.

Comments: 27 pages, 7 figures, preliminary version appeared in ICALP 2015

Subtree Isomorphism Revisited

Authors: Amir Abboud, Arturs Backurs, Thomas Dueholm Hansen, Virginia Vassilevska Williams, Or Zamir

Abstract: The Subtree Isomorphism problem asks whether a given tree is contained in another given tree. The problem is of fundamental importance and has been studied since the 1960s. For some variants, e.g., ordered trees, near-linear time algorithms are known, but for the general case truly subquadratic algorithms remain elusive. Our first result is a reduction from the Orthogonal Vectors problem to Subt… ▽ More The Subtree Isomorphism problem asks whether a given tree is contained in another given tree. The problem is of fundamental importance and has been studied since the 1960s. For some variants, e.g., ordered trees, near-linear time algorithms are known, but for the general case truly subquadratic algorithms remain elusive. Our first result is a reduction from the Orthogonal Vectors problem to Subtree Isomorphism, showing that a truly subquadratic algorithm for the latter refutes the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH). In light of this conditional lower bound, we focus on natural special cases for which no truly subquadratic algorithms are known. We classify these cases against the quadratic barrier, showing in particular that: -- Even for binary, rooted trees, a truly subquadratic algorithm refutes SETH. -- Even for rooted trees of depth $O(\log\log{n})$, where $n$ is the total number of vertices, a truly subquadratic algorithm refutes SETH. -- For every constant $d$, there is a constant $ε_d>0$ and a randomized, truly subquadratic algorithm for degree-$d$ rooted trees of depth at most $(1+ ε_d) \log_{d}{n}$. In particular, there is an $O(\min\{ 2.85^h ,n^2 \})$ algorithm for binary trees of depth $h$. Our reductions utilize new "tree gadgets" that are likely useful for future SETH-based lower bounds for problems on trees. Our upper bounds apply a folklore result from randomized decision tree complexity. △ Less

Submitted 15 October, 2015; originally announced October 2015.

Errata for: A subexponential lower bound for the Random Facet algorithm for Parity Games

Authors: Oliver Friedmann, Thomas Dueholm Hansen, Uri Zwick

Abstract: In Friedmann, Hansen, and Zwick (2011) we claimed that the expected number of pivoting steps performed by the Random-Facet algorithm of Kalai and of Matousek, Sharir, and Welzl is equal to the expected number of pivoting steps performed by Random-Facet^*, a variant of Random-Facet that bases its random decisions on one random permutation. We then obtained a lower bound on the expected number of pi… ▽ More In Friedmann, Hansen, and Zwick (2011) we claimed that the expected number of pivoting steps performed by the Random-Facet algorithm of Kalai and of Matousek, Sharir, and Welzl is equal to the expected number of pivoting steps performed by Random-Facet^*, a variant of Random-Facet that bases its random decisions on one random permutation. We then obtained a lower bound on the expected number of pivoting steps performed by Random-Facet^* and claimed that the same lower bound holds also for Random-Facet. Unfortunately, the claim that the expected numbers of steps performed by Random-Facet and Random-Facet^* are the same is false. We provide here simple examples that show that the expected numbers of steps performed by the two algorithms are not the same. △ Less

Submitted 29 October, 2014; originally announced October 2014.

Random-Facet and Random-Bland require subexponential time even for shortest paths

Authors: Oliver Friedmann, Thomas Dueholm Hansen, Uri Zwick

Abstract: The Random-Facet algorithm of Kalai and of Matousek, Sharir and Welzl is an elegant randomized algorithm for solving linear programs and more general LP-type problems. Its expected subexponential time of $2^{\tilde{O}(\sqrt{m})}$, where $m$ is the number of inequalities, makes it the fastest known combinatorial algorithm for solving linear programs. We previously showed that Random-Facet performs… ▽ More The Random-Facet algorithm of Kalai and of Matousek, Sharir and Welzl is an elegant randomized algorithm for solving linear programs and more general LP-type problems. Its expected subexponential time of $2^{\tilde{O}(\sqrt{m})}$, where $m$ is the number of inequalities, makes it the fastest known combinatorial algorithm for solving linear programs. We previously showed that Random-Facet performs an expected number of $2^{\tildeΩ(\sqrt[3]{m})}$ pivoting steps on some LPs with $m$ inequalities that correspond to $m$-action Markov Decision Processes (MDPs). We also showed that Random-Facet-1P, a one permutation variant of Random-Facet, performs an expected number of $2^{\tilde{O}(\sqrt{m})}$ pivoting steps on these examples. Here we show that the same results can be obtained using LPs that correspond to instances of the classical shortest paths problem. This shows that the stochasticity of the MDPs, which is essential for obtaining lower bounds for Random-Edge, is not needed in order to obtain lower bounds for Random-Facet. We also show that our new $2^{\tildeΩ(\sqrt{m})}$ lower bound applies to Random-Bland, a randomized variant of the classical anti-cycling rule suggested by Bland. △ Less

Submitted 28 October, 2014; originally announced October 2014.

The complexity of interior point methods for solving discounted turn-based stochastic games

Authors: Thomas Dueholm Hansen, Rasmus Ibsen-Jensen

Abstract: We study the problem of solving discounted, two player, turn based, stochastic games (2TBSGs). Jurdzinski and Savani showed that 2TBSGs with deterministic transitions can be reduced to solving $P$-matrix linear complementarity problems (LCPs). We show that the same reduction works for general 2TBSGs. This implies that a number of interior point methods for solving $P$-matrix LCPs can be used to so… ▽ More We study the problem of solving discounted, two player, turn based, stochastic games (2TBSGs). Jurdzinski and Savani showed that 2TBSGs with deterministic transitions can be reduced to solving $P$-matrix linear complementarity problems (LCPs). We show that the same reduction works for general 2TBSGs. This implies that a number of interior point methods for solving $P$-matrix LCPs can be used to solve 2TBSGs. We consider two such algorithms. First, we consider the unified interior point method of Kojima, Megiddo, Noma, and Yoshise, which runs in time $O((1+κ)n^{3.5}L)$, where $κ$ is a parameter that depends on the $n \times n$ matrix $M$ defining the LCP, and $L$ is the number of bits in the representation of $M$. Second, we consider the interior point potential reduction algorithm of Kojima, Megiddo, and Ye, which runs in time $O(\frac{-δ}θn^4\log ε^{-1})$, where $δ$ and $θ$ are parameters that depend on $M$, and $ε$ describes the quality of the solution. For 2TBSGs with $n$ states and discount factor $γ$ we prove that in the worst case $κ= Θ(n/(1-γ)^2)$, $-δ= Θ(\sqrt{n}/(1-γ))$, and $1/θ= Θ(n/(1-γ)^2)$. The lower bounds for $κ$, $-δ$, and $1/θ$ are obtained using the same family of deterministic games. △ Less

Submitted 17 December, 2014; v1 submitted 6 April, 2013; originally announced April 2013.

A Faster Algorithm for Solving One-Clock Priced Timed Games

Authors: Thomas Dueholm Hansen, Rasmus Ibsen-Jensen, Peter Bro Miltersen

Abstract: One-clock priced timed games is a class of two-player, zero-sum, continuous-time games that was defined and thoroughly studied in previous works. We show that one-clock priced timed games can be solved in time m 12^n n^(O(1)), where n is the number of states and m is the number of actions. The best previously known time bound for solving one-clock priced timed games was 2^(O(n^2+m)), due to Rutkow… ▽ More One-clock priced timed games is a class of two-player, zero-sum, continuous-time games that was defined and thoroughly studied in previous works. We show that one-clock priced timed games can be solved in time m 12^n n^(O(1)), where n is the number of states and m is the number of actions. The best previously known time bound for solving one-clock priced timed games was 2^(O(n^2+m)), due to Rutkowski. For our improvement, we introduce and study a new algorithm for solving one-clock priced timed games, based on the sweep-line technique from computational geometry and the strategy iteration paradigm from the algorithmic theory of Markov decision processes. As a corollary, we also improve the analysis of previous algorithms due to Bouyer, Cassez, Fleury, and Larsen; and Alur, Bernadsky, and Madhusudan. △ Less

Submitted 11 January, 2013; v1 submitted 17 January, 2012; originally announced January 2012.

Strategy iteration is strongly polynomial for 2-player turn-based stochastic games with a constant discount factor

Authors: Thomas Dueholm Hansen, Peter Bro Miltersen, Uri Zwick

Abstract: Ye showed recently that the simplex method with Dantzig pivoting rule, as well as Howard's policy iteration algorithm, solve discounted Markov decision processes (MDPs), with a constant discount factor, in strongly polynomial time. More precisely, Ye showed that both algorithms terminate after at most $O(\frac{mn}{1-γ}\log(\frac{n}{1-γ}))$ iterations, where $n$ is the number of states, $m$ is the… ▽ More Ye showed recently that the simplex method with Dantzig pivoting rule, as well as Howard's policy iteration algorithm, solve discounted Markov decision processes (MDPs), with a constant discount factor, in strongly polynomial time. More precisely, Ye showed that both algorithms terminate after at most $O(\frac{mn}{1-γ}\log(\frac{n}{1-γ}))$ iterations, where $n$ is the number of states, $m$ is the total number of actions in the MDP, and $0<γ<1$ is the discount factor. We improve Ye's analysis in two respects. First, we improve the bound given by Ye and show that Howard's policy iteration algorithm actually terminates after at most $O(\frac{m}{1-γ}\log(\frac{n}{1-γ}))$ iterations. Second, and more importantly, we show that the same bound applies to the number of iterations performed by the strategy iteration (or strategy improvement) algorithm, a generalization of Howard's policy iteration algorithm used for solving 2-player turn-based stochastic games with discounted zero-sum rewards. This provides the first strongly polynomial algorithm for solving these games, resolving a long standing open problem. △ Less

Submitted 3 August, 2010; originally announced August 2010.

On Pure and (approximate) Strong Equilibria of Facility Location Games

Authors: Thomas Dueholm Hansen, Orestis A. Telelis

Abstract: We study social cost losses in Facility Location games, where $n$ selfish agents install facilities over a network and connect to them, so as to forward their local demand (expressed by a non-negative weight per agent). Agents using the same facility share fairly its installation cost, but every agent pays individually a (weighted) connection cost to the chosen location. We study the Price of St… ▽ More We study social cost losses in Facility Location games, where $n$ selfish agents install facilities over a network and connect to them, so as to forward their local demand (expressed by a non-negative weight per agent). Agents using the same facility share fairly its installation cost, but every agent pays individually a (weighted) connection cost to the chosen location. We study the Price of Stability (PoS) of pure Nash equilibria and the Price of Anarchy of strong equilibria (SPoA), that generalize pure equilibria by being resilient to coalitional deviations. A special case of recently studied network design games, Facility Location merits separate study as a classic model with numerous applications and individual characteristics: our analysis for unweighted agents on metric networks reveals constant upper and lower bounds for the PoS, while an $O(\ln n)$ upper bound implied by previous work is tight for non-metric networks. Strong equilibria do not always exist, even for the unweighted metric case. We show that $e$-approximate strong equilibria exist ($e=2.718...$). The SPoA is generally upper bounded by $O(\ln W)$ ($W$ is the sum of agents' weights), which becomes tight $Θ(\ln n)$ for unweighted agents. For the unweighted metric case we prove a constant upper bound. We point out several challenging open questions that arise. △ Less

Submitted 8 March, 2009; v1 submitted 28 September, 2008; originally announced September 2008.

Comments: 19 pages, 5 figures, 2 tables, partially appeared in WINE 2008

Approximability and parameterized complexity of minmax values

Authors: Kristoffer Arnsfelt Hansen, Thomas Dueholm Hansen, Peter Bro Miltersen, Troels Bjerre Sørensen

Abstract: We consider approximating the minmax value of a multi-player game in strategic form. Tightening recent bounds by Borgs et al., we observe that approximating the value with a precision of epsilon log n digits (for any constant epsilon>0 is NP-hard, where n is the size of the game. On the other hand, approximating the value with a precision of c log log n digits (for any constant c >= 1) can be do… ▽ More We consider approximating the minmax value of a multi-player game in strategic form. Tightening recent bounds by Borgs et al., we observe that approximating the value with a precision of epsilon log n digits (for any constant epsilon>0 is NP-hard, where n is the size of the game. On the other hand, approximating the value with a precision of c log log n digits (for any constant c >= 1) can be done in quasi-polynomial time. We consider the parameterized complexity of the problem, with the parameter being the number of pure strategies k of the player for which the minmax value is computed. We show that if there are three players, k=2 and there are only two possible rational payoffs, the minmax value is a rational number and can be computed exactly in linear time. In the general case, we show that the value can be approximated with any polynomial number of digits of accuracy in time n^(O(k)). On the other hand, we show that minmax value approximation is W[1]-hard and hence not likely to be fixed parameter tractable. Concretely, we show that if k-CLIQUE requires time n^(Omega(k)) then so does minmax value computation. △ Less

Submitted 26 June, 2008; originally announced June 2008.