Limited substitutability, relative price changes and the uplifting of public natural capital values
Authors:
Moritz A. Drupp,
Zachary M. Turk,
Ben Groom,
Jonas Heckenhahn
Abstract:
As the global economy continues to grow, ecosystem services tend to stagnate or decline. Economic theory has shown how such shifts in relative scarcities can be reflected in the appraisal of public projects and environmental-economic accounting, but empirical evidence has been lacking to put the theory into practice. To estimate the relative price change in ecosystem services that can be used to m…
▽ More
As the global economy continues to grow, ecosystem services tend to stagnate or decline. Economic theory has shown how such shifts in relative scarcities can be reflected in the appraisal of public projects and environmental-economic accounting, but empirical evidence has been lacking to put the theory into practice. To estimate the relative price change in ecosystem services that can be used to make such adjustments, we perform a global meta-analysis of environmental valuation studies to derive income elasticities of willingness to pay (WTP) for ecosystem services as a proxy for the degree of limited substitutability. Based on 861 income-WTP pairs, we estimate an income elasticity of WTP of around 0.79 (95-CI: 0.60 to 0.97). Combining these results with a global data set on shifts in the relative scarcity of ecosystem services, we estimate relative price change of ecosystem services of around 2.2 percent per year. In an application to natural capital valuation of non-timber forest ecosystem services by the World Bank, we show that their natural capital value should be uplifted by more than 50 percent (95-CI: 32 to 78 percent), materially elevating the role of public natural capital. We discuss implications for relative price adjustments in policy appraisal and for improving estimates of comprehensive national accounts.
△ Less
Submitted 7 March, 2024; v1 submitted 8 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
Argument Identification in Public Comments from eRulemaking
Authors:
Vlad Eidelman,
Brian Grom
Abstract:
Administrative agencies in the United States receive millions of comments each year concerning proposed agency actions during the eRulemaking process. These comments represent a diversity of arguments in support and opposition of the proposals. While agencies are required to identify and respond to substantive comments, they have struggled to keep pace with the volume of information. In this work…
▽ More
Administrative agencies in the United States receive millions of comments each year concerning proposed agency actions during the eRulemaking process. These comments represent a diversity of arguments in support and opposition of the proposals. While agencies are required to identify and respond to substantive comments, they have struggled to keep pace with the volume of information. In this work we address the tasks of identifying argumentative text, classifying the type of argument claims employed, and determining the stance of the comment. First, we propose a taxonomy of argument claims based on an analysis of thousands of rules and millions of comments. Second, we collect and semi-automatically bootstrap annotations to create a dataset of millions of sentences with argument claim type annotation at the sentence level. Third, we build a system for automatically determining argumentative spans and claim type using our proposed taxonomy in a hierarchical classification model.
△ Less
Submitted 13 May, 2019; v1 submitted 2 May, 2019;
originally announced May 2019.
