Showing 1–24 of 24 results for author: Gribling, S

On computing approximate Lewis weights

Authors: Simon Apers, Sander Gribling, Aaron Sidford

Abstract: In this note we provide and analyze a simple method that given an $n \times d$ matrix, outputs approximate $\ell_p$-Lewis weights, a natural measure of the importance of the rows with respect to the $\ell_p$ norm, for $p \geq 2$. More precisely, we provide a simple post-processing procedure that turns natural one-sided approximate $\ell_p$-Lewis weights into two-sided approximations. When combined… ▽ More In this note we provide and analyze a simple method that given an $n \times d$ matrix, outputs approximate $\ell_p$-Lewis weights, a natural measure of the importance of the rows with respect to the $\ell_p$ norm, for $p \geq 2$. More precisely, we provide a simple post-processing procedure that turns natural one-sided approximate $\ell_p$-Lewis weights into two-sided approximations. When combined with a simple one-sided approximation algorithm presented by Lee (PhD thesis, `16) this yields an algorithm for computing two-sided approximations of the $\ell_p$-Lewis weights of an $n \times d$-matrix using $\mathrm{poly}(d,p)$ approximate leverage score computations. While efficient high-accuracy algorithms for approximating $\ell_p$-Lewis had been established previously by Fazel, Lee, Padmanabhan and Sidford (SODA `22), the simple structure and approximation tolerance of our algorithm may make it of use for different applications. △ Less

Submitted 3 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Quantum Optimization: Potential, Challenges, and the Path Forward

Authors: Amira Abbas, Andris Ambainis, Brandon Augustino, Andreas Bärtschi, Harry Buhrman, Carleton Coffrin, Giorgio Cortiana, Vedran Dunjko, Daniel J. Egger, Bruce G. Elmegreen, Nicola Franco, Filippo Fratini, Bryce Fuller, Julien Gacon, Constantin Gonciulea, Sander Gribling, Swati Gupta, Stuart Hadfield, Raoul Heese, Gerhard Kircher, Thomas Kleinert, Thorsten Koch, Georgios Korpas, Steve Lenk, Jakub Marecek , et al. (21 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Recent advances in quantum computers are demonstrating the ability to solve problems at a scale beyond brute force classical simulation. As such, a widespread interest in quantum algorithms has developed in many areas, with optimization being one of the most pronounced domains. Across computer science and physics, there are a number of algorithmic approaches, often with little linkage. This is fur… ▽ More Recent advances in quantum computers are demonstrating the ability to solve problems at a scale beyond brute force classical simulation. As such, a widespread interest in quantum algorithms has developed in many areas, with optimization being one of the most pronounced domains. Across computer science and physics, there are a number of algorithmic approaches, often with little linkage. This is further complicated by the fragmented nature of the field of mathematical optimization, where major classes of optimization problems, such as combinatorial optimization, convex optimization, non-convex optimization, and stochastic extensions, have devoted communities. With these aspects in mind, this work draws on multiple approaches to study quantum optimization. Provably exact versus heuristic settings are first explained using computational complexity theory - highlighting where quantum advantage is possible in each context. Then, the core building blocks for quantum optimization algorithms are outlined to subsequently define prominent problem classes and identify key open questions that, if answered, will advance the field. The effects of scaling relevant problems on noisy quantum devices are also outlined in detail, alongside meaningful benchmarking problems. We underscore the importance of benchmarking by proposing clear metrics to conduct appropriate comparisons with classical optimization techniques. Lastly, we highlight two domains - finance and sustainability - as rich sources of optimization problems that could be used to benchmark, and eventually validate, the potential real-world impact of quantum optimization. △ Less

Submitted 4 December, 2023; originally announced December 2023.

Comments: 70 pages, 9 Figures, 4 Tables

Quantum speedups for linear programming via interior point methods

Authors: Simon Apers, Sander Gribling

Abstract: We describe a quantum algorithm based on an interior point method for solving a linear program with $n$ inequality constraints on $d$ variables. The algorithm explicitly returns a feasible solution that is $\varepsilon$-close to optimal, and runs in time $\sqrt{n} \cdot \mathrm{poly}(d,\log(n),\log(1/\varepsilon))$ which is sublinear for tall linear programs (i.e., $n \gg d$). Our algorithm speeds… ▽ More We describe a quantum algorithm based on an interior point method for solving a linear program with $n$ inequality constraints on $d$ variables. The algorithm explicitly returns a feasible solution that is $\varepsilon$-close to optimal, and runs in time $\sqrt{n} \cdot \mathrm{poly}(d,\log(n),\log(1/\varepsilon))$ which is sublinear for tall linear programs (i.e., $n \gg d$). Our algorithm speeds up the Newton step in the state-of-the-art interior point method of Lee and Sidford [FOCS~'14]. This requires us to efficiently approximate the Hessian and gradient of the barrier function, and these are our main contributions. To approximate the Hessian, we describe a quantum algorithm for the \emph{spectral approximation} of $A^T A$ for a tall matrix $A \in \mathbb R^{n \times d}$. The algorithm uses leverage score sampling in combination with Grover search, and returns a $δ$-approximation by making $O(\sqrt{nd}/δ)$ row queries to $A$. This generalizes an earlier quantum speedup for graph sparsification by Apers and de Wolf~[FOCS~'20]. To approximate the gradient, we use a recent quantum algorithm for multivariate mean estimation by Cornelissen, Hamoudi and Jerbi [STOC '22]. While a naive implementation introduces a dependence on the condition number of the Hessian, we avoid this by pre-conditioning our random variable using our quantum algorithm for spectral approximation. △ Less

Submitted 11 April, 2024; v1 submitted 6 November, 2023; originally announced November 2023.

A note on the computational complexity of the moment-SOS hierarchy for polynomial optimization

Authors: Sander Gribling, Sven Polak, Lucas Slot

Abstract: The moment-sum-of-squares (moment-SOS) hierarchy is one of the most celebrated and widely applied methods for approximating the minimum of an n-variate polynomial over a feasible region defined by polynomial (in)equalities. A key feature of the hierarchy is that, at a fixed level, it can be formulated as a semidefinite program of size polynomial in the number of variables n. Although this suggests… ▽ More The moment-sum-of-squares (moment-SOS) hierarchy is one of the most celebrated and widely applied methods for approximating the minimum of an n-variate polynomial over a feasible region defined by polynomial (in)equalities. A key feature of the hierarchy is that, at a fixed level, it can be formulated as a semidefinite program of size polynomial in the number of variables n. Although this suggests that it may therefore be computed in polynomial time, this is not necessarily the case. Indeed, as O'Donnell (2017) and later Raghavendra & Weitz (2017) show, there exist examples where the sos-representations used in the hierarchy have exponential bit-complexity. We study the computational complexity of the moment-SOS hierarchy, complementing and expanding upon earlier work of Raghavendra & Weitz (2017). In particular, we establish algebraic and geometric conditions under which polynomial-time computation is guaranteed to be possible. △ Less

Submitted 24 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

Comments: 10 pages

MSC Class: 90C22; 90C23

Basic quantum subroutines: finding multiple marked elements and summing numbers

Authors: Joran van Apeldoorn, Sander Gribling, Harold Nieuwboer

Abstract: We show how to find all $k$ marked elements in a list of size $N$ using the optimal number $O(\sqrt{N k})$ of quantum queries and only a polylogarithmic overhead in the gate complexity, in the setting where one has a small quantum memory. Previous algorithms either incurred a factor $k$ overhead in the gate complexity, or had an extra factor $\log(k)$ in the query complexity. We then consider th… ▽ More We show how to find all $k$ marked elements in a list of size $N$ using the optimal number $O(\sqrt{N k})$ of quantum queries and only a polylogarithmic overhead in the gate complexity, in the setting where one has a small quantum memory. Previous algorithms either incurred a factor $k$ overhead in the gate complexity, or had an extra factor $\log(k)$ in the query complexity. We then consider the problem of finding a multiplicative $δ$-approximation of $s = \sum_{i=1}^N v_i$ where $v=(v_i) \in [0,1]^N$, given quantum query access to a binary description of $v$. We give an algorithm that does so, with probability at least $1-ρ$, using $O(\sqrt{N \log(1/ρ) / δ})$ quantum queries (under mild assumptions on $ρ$). This quadratically improves the dependence on $1/δ$ and $\log(1/ρ)$ compared to a straightforward application of amplitude estimation. To obtain the improved $\log(1/ρ)$ dependence we use the first result. △ Less

Submitted 5 March, 2024; v1 submitted 20 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

Comments: 29 pages, accepted in Quantum

Journal ref: Quantum 8, 1284 (2024)

Grothendieck inequalities characterize converses to the polynomial method

Authors: Jop Briët, Francisco Escudero Gutiérrez, Sander Gribling

Abstract: A surprising 'converse to the polynomial method' of Aaronson et al. (CCC'16) shows that any bounded quadratic polynomial can be computed exactly in expectation by a 1-query algorithm up to a universal multiplicative factor related to the famous Grothendieck constant. Here we show that such a result does not generalize to quartic polynomials and 2-query algorithms, even when we allow for additive a… ▽ More A surprising 'converse to the polynomial method' of Aaronson et al. (CCC'16) shows that any bounded quadratic polynomial can be computed exactly in expectation by a 1-query algorithm up to a universal multiplicative factor related to the famous Grothendieck constant. Here we show that such a result does not generalize to quartic polynomials and 2-query algorithms, even when we allow for additive approximations. We also show that the additive approximation implied by their result is tight for bounded bilinear forms, which gives a new characterization of the Grothendieck constant in terms of 1-query quantum algorithms. Along the way we provide reformulations of the completely bounded norm of a form, and its dual norm. △ Less

Submitted 30 December, 2023; v1 submitted 16 December, 2022; originally announced December 2022.

Comments: This version adds to the previous one part of the results of an earlier work by the first two authors (arXiv:2204.12303)

A (simple) classical algorithm for estimating Betti numbers

Authors: Simon Apers, Sander Gribling, Sayantan Sen, Dániel Szabó

Abstract: We describe a simple algorithm for estimating the $k$-th normalized Betti number of a simplicial complex over $n$ elements using the path integral Monte Carlo method. For a general simplicial complex, the running time of our algorithm is $n^{O\left(\frac{1}{\sqrtγ}\log\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)}$ with $γ$ measuring the spectral gap of the combinatorial Laplacian and $\varepsilon \in (0,1)$ the a… ▽ More We describe a simple algorithm for estimating the $k$-th normalized Betti number of a simplicial complex over $n$ elements using the path integral Monte Carlo method. For a general simplicial complex, the running time of our algorithm is $n^{O\left(\frac{1}{\sqrtγ}\log\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)}$ with $γ$ measuring the spectral gap of the combinatorial Laplacian and $\varepsilon \in (0,1)$ the additive precision. In the case of a clique complex, the running time of our algorithm improves to $\left(n/λ_{\max}\right)^{O\left(\frac{1}{\sqrtγ}\log\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)}$ with $λ_{\max} \geq k$, where $λ_{\max}$ is the maximum eigenvalue of the combinatorial Laplacian. Our algorithm provides a classical benchmark for a line of quantum algorithms for estimating Betti numbers. On clique complexes it matches their running time when, for example, $γ\in Ω(1)$ and $k \in Ω(n)$. △ Less

Submitted 5 December, 2023; v1 submitted 17 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

Comments: v3: final version, accepted to Quantum

Journal ref: Quantum 7, 1202 (2023)

Hamiltonian Monte Carlo for efficient Gaussian sampling: long and random steps

Authors: Simon Apers, Sander Gribling, Dániel Szilágyi

Abstract: Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) is a Markov chain algorithm for sampling from a high-dimensional distribution with density $e^{-f(x)}$, given access to the gradient of $f$. A particular case of interest is that of a $d$-dimensional Gaussian distribution with covariance matrix $Σ$, in which case $f(x) = x^\top Σ^{-1} x$. We show that HMC can sample from a distribution that is $\varepsilon$-close in t… ▽ More Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) is a Markov chain algorithm for sampling from a high-dimensional distribution with density $e^{-f(x)}$, given access to the gradient of $f$. A particular case of interest is that of a $d$-dimensional Gaussian distribution with covariance matrix $Σ$, in which case $f(x) = x^\top Σ^{-1} x$. We show that HMC can sample from a distribution that is $\varepsilon$-close in total variation distance using $\widetilde{O}(\sqrtκ d^{1/4} \log(1/\varepsilon))$ gradient queries, where $κ$ is the condition number of $Σ$. Our algorithm uses long and random integration times for the Hamiltonian dynamics. This contrasts with (and was motivated by) recent results that give an $\widetildeΩ(κd^{1/2})$ query lower bound for HMC with fixed integration times, even for the Gaussian case. △ Less

Submitted 26 September, 2022; originally announced September 2022.

Comments: 21 pages

Mutually unbiased bases: polynomial optimization and symmetry

Authors: Sander Gribling, Sven Polak

Abstract: A set of $k$ orthonormal bases of $\mathbb C^d$ is called mutually unbiased if $|\langle e,f\rangle |^2 = 1/d$ whenever $e$ and $f$ are basis vectors in distinct bases. A natural question is for which pairs $(d,k)$ there exist~$k$ mutually unbiased bases in dimension $d$. The (well-known) upper bound $k \leq d+1$ is attained when~$d$ is a power of a prime. For all other dimensions it is an open pr… ▽ More A set of $k$ orthonormal bases of $\mathbb C^d$ is called mutually unbiased if $|\langle e,f\rangle |^2 = 1/d$ whenever $e$ and $f$ are basis vectors in distinct bases. A natural question is for which pairs $(d,k)$ there exist~$k$ mutually unbiased bases in dimension $d$. The (well-known) upper bound $k \leq d+1$ is attained when~$d$ is a power of a prime. For all other dimensions it is an open problem whether the bound can be attained. Navascués, Pironio, and Acín showed how to reformulate the existence question in terms of the existence of a certain $C^*$-algebra. This naturally leads to a noncommutative polynomial optimization problem and an associated hierarchy of semidefinite programs. The problem has a symmetry coming from the wreath product of $S_d$ and $S_k$. We exploit this symmetry (analytically) to reduce the size of the semidefinite programs making them (numerically) tractable. A key step is a novel explicit decomposition of the $S_d \wr S_k$-module $\mathbb C^{([d]\times [k])^t}$ into irreducible modules. We present numerical results for small $d,k$ and low levels of the hierarchy. In particular, we obtain sum-of-squares proofs for the (well-known) fact that there do not exist $d+2$ mutually unbiased bases in dimensions~$d=2,3,4,5,6,7,8$. Moreover, our numerical results indicate that a sum-of-squares refutation, in the above-mentioned framework, of the existence of more than $3$ MUBs in dimension $6$ requires polynomials of total degree at least~$12$. △ Less

Submitted 15 April, 2024; v1 submitted 10 November, 2021; originally announced November 2021.

Comments: 34 pages

Journal ref: Quantum 8, 1318 (2024)

Improved quantum lower and upper bounds for matrix scaling

Authors: Sander Gribling, Harold Nieuwboer

Abstract: Matrix scaling is a simple to state, yet widely applicable linear-algebraic problem: the goal is to scale the rows and columns of a given non-negative matrix such that the rescaled matrix has prescribed row and column sums. Motivated by recent results on first-order quantum algorithms for matrix scaling, we investigate the possibilities for quantum speedups for classical second-order algorithms, w… ▽ More Matrix scaling is a simple to state, yet widely applicable linear-algebraic problem: the goal is to scale the rows and columns of a given non-negative matrix such that the rescaled matrix has prescribed row and column sums. Motivated by recent results on first-order quantum algorithms for matrix scaling, we investigate the possibilities for quantum speedups for classical second-order algorithms, which comprise the state-of-the-art in the classical setting. We first show that there can be essentially no quantum speedup in terms of the input size in the high-precision regime: any quantum algorithm that solves the matrix scaling problem for $n \times n$ matrices with at most $m$ non-zero entries and with $\ell_2$-error $\varepsilon=\widetildeΘ(1/m)$ must make $\widetildeΩ(m)$ queries to the matrix, even when the success probability is exponentially small in $n$. Additionally, we show that for $\varepsilon\in[1/n,1/2]$, any quantum algorithm capable of producing $\frac{\varepsilon}{100}$-$\ell_1$-approximations of the row-sum vector of a (dense) normalized matrix uses $Ω(n/\varepsilon)$ queries, and that there exists a constant $\varepsilon_0>0$ for which this problem takes $Ω(n^{1.5})$ queries. To complement these results we give improved quantum algorithms in the low-precision regime: with quantum graph sparsification and amplitude estimation, a box-constrained Newton method can be sped up in the large-$\varepsilon$ regime, and outperforms previous quantum algorithms. For entrywise-positive matrices, we find an $\varepsilon$-$\ell_1$-scaling in time $\widetilde O(n^{1.5}/\varepsilon^2)$, whereas the best previously known bounds were $\widetilde O(n^2\mathrm{polylog}(1/\varepsilon))$ (classical) and $\widetilde O(n^{1.5}/\varepsilon^3)$ (quantum). △ Less

Submitted 30 September, 2021; originally announced September 2021.

Comments: 30 pages

Bounding the separable rank via polynomial optimization

Authors: Sander Gribling, Monique Laurent, Andries Steenkamp

Abstract: We investigate questions related to the set $\mathcal{SEP}_d$ consisting of the linear maps $ρ$ acting on $\mathbb{C}^d\otimes \mathbb{C}^d$ that can be written as a convex combination of rank one matrices of the form $xx^*\otimes yy^*$. Such maps are known in quantum information theory as the separable bipartite states, while nonseparable states are called entangled. In particular we introduce bo… ▽ More We investigate questions related to the set $\mathcal{SEP}_d$ consisting of the linear maps $ρ$ acting on $\mathbb{C}^d\otimes \mathbb{C}^d$ that can be written as a convex combination of rank one matrices of the form $xx^*\otimes yy^*$. Such maps are known in quantum information theory as the separable bipartite states, while nonseparable states are called entangled. In particular we introduce bounds for the separable rank $\mathrm{rank_{sep}}(ρ)$, defined as the smallest number of rank one states $xx^*\otimes yy^*$ entering the decomposition of a separable state $ρ$. Our approach relies on the moment method and yields a hierarchy of semidefinite-based lower bounds, that converges to a parameter $τ_{\mathrm{sep}}(ρ)$, a natural convexification of the combinatorial parameter $\mathrm{rank_{sep}}(ρ)$. A distinguishing feature is exploiting the positivity constraint $ρ-xx^*\otimes yy^* \succeq 0$ to impose positivity of a polynomial matrix localizing map, the dual notion of the notion of sum-of-squares polynomial matrices. Our approach extends naturally to the multipartite setting and to the real separable rank, and it permits strengthening some known bounds for the completely positive rank. In addition, we indicate how the moment approach also applies to define hierarchies of semidefinite relaxations for the set $\mathcal{SEP}_d$ and permits to give new proofs, using only tools from moment theory, for convergence results on the DPS hierarchy from (A.C. Doherty, P.A. Parrilo and F.M. Spedalieri. Distinguishing separable and entangled states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88(18):187904, 2002). △ Less

Submitted 29 September, 2021; originally announced September 2021.

Approximate Pythagoras Numbers on $*$-algebras over $\mathbb{C}$

Authors: Paria Abbasi, Sander Gribling, Andreas Klingler, Tim Netzer

Abstract: The Pythagoras number of a sum of squares is the shortest length among its sums of squares representations. In many algebras, for example real polynomial algebras in two or more variables, there exists no upper bound on the Pythagoras number for all sums of squares. In this paper, we study how Pythagoras numbers in $*$-algebras over $\mathbb{C}$ behave with respect to small perturbations of elemen… ▽ More The Pythagoras number of a sum of squares is the shortest length among its sums of squares representations. In many algebras, for example real polynomial algebras in two or more variables, there exists no upper bound on the Pythagoras number for all sums of squares. In this paper, we study how Pythagoras numbers in $*$-algebras over $\mathbb{C}$ behave with respect to small perturbations of elements. More precisely, the approximate Pythagoras number of an element is the smallest Pythagoras number among all elements in its $\varepsilon$-ball. We show that these approximate Pythagoras numbers are often significantly smaller than their exact versions, and allow for (almost) dimension-independent upper bounds. Our results use low-rank approximations for Gram matrices of sums of squares and estimates for the operator norm of the Gram map. △ Less

Submitted 26 July, 2022; v1 submitted 10 September, 2021; originally announced September 2021.

Comments: v2: new title, added a table collecting all norms in the paper

Journal ref: J. Complex. 74, 101698 (2023)

Improving quantum linear system solvers via a gradient descent perspective

Authors: Sander Gribling, Iordanis Kerenidis, Dániel Szilágyi

Abstract: Solving systems of linear equations is one of the most important primitives in quantum computing that has the potential to provide a practical quantum advantage in many different areas, including in optimization, simulation, and machine learning. In this work, we revisit quantum linear system solvers from the perspective of convex optimization, and in particular gradient descent-type algorithms. T… ▽ More Solving systems of linear equations is one of the most important primitives in quantum computing that has the potential to provide a practical quantum advantage in many different areas, including in optimization, simulation, and machine learning. In this work, we revisit quantum linear system solvers from the perspective of convex optimization, and in particular gradient descent-type algorithms. This leads to a considerable constant-factor improvement in the runtime (or, conversely, a several orders of magnitude smaller error with the same runtime/circuit depth). More precisely, we first show how the asymptotically optimal quantum linear system solver of Childs, Kothari, and Somma is related to the gradient descent algorithm on the convex function $\|A\vec x - \vec b\|_2^2$: their linear system solver is based on a truncation in the Chebyshev basis of the degree-$(t-1)$ polynomial (in $A$) that maps the initial solution $\vec{x}_1 := \vec{b}$ to the $t$-th iterate $\vec{x}_t$ in the basic gradient descent algorithm. Then, instead of starting from the basic gradient descent algorithm, we use the optimal Chebyshev iteration method (which can be viewed as an accelerated gradient descent algorithm) and show that this leads to considerable improvements in the quantum solver. △ Less

Submitted 9 September, 2021; originally announced September 2021.

On a tracial version of Haemers bound

Authors: Li Gao, Sander Gribling, Yinan Li

Abstract: We extend upper bounds on the quantum independence number and the quantum Shannon capacity of graphs to their counterparts in the commuting operator model. We introduce a von Neumann algebraic generalization of the fractional Haemers bound (over $\mathbb{C}$) and prove that the generalization upper bounds the commuting quantum independence number. We call our bound the tracial Haemers bound, and w… ▽ More We extend upper bounds on the quantum independence number and the quantum Shannon capacity of graphs to their counterparts in the commuting operator model. We introduce a von Neumann algebraic generalization of the fractional Haemers bound (over $\mathbb{C}$) and prove that the generalization upper bounds the commuting quantum independence number. We call our bound the tracial Haemers bound, and we prove that it is multiplicative with respect to the strong product. In particular, this makes it an upper bound on the Shannon capacity. The tracial Haemers bound is incomparable with the Lovász theta function, another well-known upper bound on the Shannon capacity. We show that separating the tracial and fractional Haemers bounds would refute Connes' embedding conjecture. Along the way, we prove that the tracial rank and tracial Haemers bound are elements of the (commuting quantum) asymptotic spectrum of graphs (Zuiddam, Combinatorica, 2019). We also show that the inertia bound (an upper bound on the quantum independence number) upper bounds the commuting quantum independence number. △ Less

Submitted 19 May, 2022; v1 submitted 6 July, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

Comments: Accepted for publication at IEEE transactions on information theory. Close to the published version

Quantum algorithms for matrix scaling and matrix balancing

Authors: Joran van Apeldoorn, Sander Gribling, Yinan Li, Harold Nieuwboer, Michael Walter, Ronald de Wolf

Abstract: Matrix scaling and matrix balancing are two basic linear-algebraic problems with a wide variety of applications, such as approximating the permanent, and pre-conditioning linear systems to make them more numerically stable. We study the power and limitations of quantum algorithms for these problems. We provide quantum implementations of two classical (in both senses of the word) methods: Sinkhor… ▽ More Matrix scaling and matrix balancing are two basic linear-algebraic problems with a wide variety of applications, such as approximating the permanent, and pre-conditioning linear systems to make them more numerically stable. We study the power and limitations of quantum algorithms for these problems. We provide quantum implementations of two classical (in both senses of the word) methods: Sinkhorn's algorithm for matrix scaling and Osborne's algorithm for matrix balancing. Using amplitude estimation as our main tool, our quantum implementations both run in time $\tilde O(\sqrt{mn}/\varepsilon^4)$ for scaling or balancing an $n \times n$ matrix (given by an oracle) with $m$ non-zero entries to within $\ell_1$-error $\varepsilon$. Their classical analogs use time $\tilde O(m/\varepsilon^2)$, and every classical algorithm for scaling or balancing with small constant $\varepsilon$ requires $Ω(m)$ queries to the entries of the input matrix. We thus achieve a polynomial speed-up in terms of $n$, at the expense of a worse polynomial dependence on the obtained $\ell_1$-error $\varepsilon$. We emphasize that even for constant $\varepsilon$ these problems are already non-trivial (and relevant in applications). Along the way, we extend the classical analysis of Sinkhorn's and Osborne's algorithm to allow for errors in the computation of marginals. We also adapt an improved analysis of Sinkhorn's algorithm for entrywise-positive matrices to the $\ell_1$-setting, leading to an $\tilde O(n^{1.5}/\varepsilon^3)$-time quantum algorithm for $\varepsilon$-$\ell_1$-scaling in this case. We also prove a lower bound, showing that our quantum algorithm for matrix scaling is essentially optimal for constant $\varepsilon$: every quantum algorithm for matrix scaling that achieves a constant $\ell_1$-error with respect to uniform marginals needs to make at least $Ω(\sqrt{mn})$ queries. △ Less

Submitted 25 November, 2020; originally announced November 2020.

Comments: 62 pages

The Haemers bound of noncommutative graphs

Authors: Sander Gribling, Yinan Li

Abstract: We continue the study of the quantum channel version of Shannon's zero-error capacity problem. We generalize the celebrated Haemers bound to noncommutative graphs (obtained from quantum channels). We prove basic properties of this bound, such as additivity under the direct sum and submultiplicativity under the tensor product. The Haemers bound upper bounds the Shannon capacity of noncommutative gr… ▽ More We continue the study of the quantum channel version of Shannon's zero-error capacity problem. We generalize the celebrated Haemers bound to noncommutative graphs (obtained from quantum channels). We prove basic properties of this bound, such as additivity under the direct sum and submultiplicativity under the tensor product. The Haemers bound upper bounds the Shannon capacity of noncommutative graphs, and we show that it can outperform other known upper bounds, including noncommutative analogues of the Lovász theta function (Duan-Severini-Winter, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 2013 and Boreland-Todorov-Winter, arXiv, 2019). △ Less

Submitted 7 February, 2020; originally announced February 2020.

Comments: Comments welcome

Semidefinite programming formulations for the completely bounded norm of a tensor

Authors: Sander Gribling, Monique Laurent

Abstract: We show that a certain tensor norm, the completely bounded norm, can be expressed by a semidefinite program. This tensor norm recently attracted attention in the field of quantum computing, where it was used by Arunachalam, Briët and Palazuelos for characterizing the quantum query complexity of Boolean functions. Combined with their results, we obtain a new characterization of the quantum query co… ▽ More We show that a certain tensor norm, the completely bounded norm, can be expressed by a semidefinite program. This tensor norm recently attracted attention in the field of quantum computing, where it was used by Arunachalam, Briët and Palazuelos for characterizing the quantum query complexity of Boolean functions. Combined with their results, we obtain a new characterization of the quantum query complexity through semidefinite programming. Using the duality theory of semidefinite programming we obtain a new type of certificates for large query complexity. We show that our class of certificates encompasses the linear programming certificates corresponding to the approximate degree of a Boolean function. △ Less

Submitted 15 January, 2019; originally announced January 2019.

Simon's problem for linear functions

Authors: Joran van Apeldoorn, Sander Gribling

Abstract: Simon's problem asks the following: determine if a function $f: \{0,1\}^n \rightarrow \{0,1\}^n$ is one-to-one or if there exists a unique $s \in \{0,1\}^n$ such that $f(x) = f(x \oplus s)$ for all $x \in \{0,1\}^n$, given the promise that exactly one of the two holds. A classical algorithm that can solve this problem for every $f$ requires $2^{Ω(n)}$ queries to $f$. Simon showed that there is a q… ▽ More Simon's problem asks the following: determine if a function $f: \{0,1\}^n \rightarrow \{0,1\}^n$ is one-to-one or if there exists a unique $s \in \{0,1\}^n$ such that $f(x) = f(x \oplus s)$ for all $x \in \{0,1\}^n$, given the promise that exactly one of the two holds. A classical algorithm that can solve this problem for every $f$ requires $2^{Ω(n)}$ queries to $f$. Simon showed that there is a quantum algorithm that can solve this promise problem for every $f$ using only $\mathcal O(n)$ quantum queries to $f$. A matching lower bound on the number of quantum queries was given by Koiran et al., even for functions $f: {\mathbb{F}_p^n} \to {\mathbb{F}_p^n}$. We give a short proof that $\mathcal O(n)$ quantum queries is optimal even when we are additionally promised that $f$ is linear. This is somewhat surprising because for linear functions there even exists a classical $n$-query algorithm. △ Less

Submitted 3 January, 2019; v1 submitted 29 October, 2018; originally announced October 2018.

Comments: 7 pages

Convex optimization using quantum oracles

Authors: Joran van Apeldoorn, András Gilyén, Sander Gribling, Ronald de Wolf

Abstract: We study to what extent quantum algorithms can speed up solving convex optimization problems. Following the classical literature we assume access to a convex set via various oracles, and we examine the efficiency of reductions between the different oracles. In particular, we show how a separation oracle can be implemented using $\tilde{O}(1)$ quantum queries to a membership oracle, which is an exp… ▽ More We study to what extent quantum algorithms can speed up solving convex optimization problems. Following the classical literature we assume access to a convex set via various oracles, and we examine the efficiency of reductions between the different oracles. In particular, we show how a separation oracle can be implemented using $\tilde{O}(1)$ quantum queries to a membership oracle, which is an exponential quantum speed-up over the $Ω(n)$ membership queries that are needed classically. We show that a quantum computer can very efficiently compute an approximate subgradient of a convex Lipschitz function. Combining this with a simplification of recent classical work of Lee, Sidford, and Vempala gives our efficient separation oracle. This in turn implies, via a known algorithm, that $\tilde{O}(n)$ quantum queries to a membership oracle suffice to implement an optimization oracle (the best known classical upper bound on the number of membership queries is quadratic). We also prove several lower bounds: $Ω(\sqrt{n})$ quantum separation (or membership) queries are needed for optimization if the algorithm knows an interior point of the convex set, and $Ω(n)$ quantum separation queries are needed if it does not. △ Less

Submitted 20 December, 2019; v1 submitted 3 September, 2018; originally announced September 2018.

Comments: 29 pages. Version 4: appears in Quantum, alongside an independent paper with similar results by Shouvanik Chakrabarti, Andrew Childs, Tongyang Li, and Xiaodi Wu <arXiv:1809.01731>

Journal ref: Quantum 4, 220 (2020)

On the complexity of solving a decision problem with flow-depending costs: the case of the IJsselmeer dikes

Authors: Aida Abiad, Sander Gribling, Domenico Lahaye, Matthias Mnich, Guus Regts, Lluis Vena, Gerard Verweij, Peter Zwaneveld

Abstract: We consider a fundamental integer programming (IP) model for cost-benefit analysis flood protection through dike building in the Netherlands, due to Verweij and Zwaneveld. Experimental analysis with data for the Ijsselmeer lead to integral optimal solution of the linear programming relaxation of the IP model. This naturally led to the question of integrality of the polytope associated with the… ▽ More We consider a fundamental integer programming (IP) model for cost-benefit analysis flood protection through dike building in the Netherlands, due to Verweij and Zwaneveld. Experimental analysis with data for the Ijsselmeer lead to integral optimal solution of the linear programming relaxation of the IP model. This naturally led to the question of integrality of the polytope associated with the IP model. In this paper we first give a negative answer to this question by establishing non-integrality of the polytope. Second, we establish natural conditions that guarantee the linear programming relaxation of the IP model to be integral. We then test the most recent data on flood probabilities, damage and investment costs of the IJsselmeer for these conditions. Third, we show that the IP model can be solved in polynomial time when the number of dike segments, or the number of feasible barrier heights, are constant. △ Less

Submitted 25 April, 2018; originally announced April 2018.

Comments: 23 pages, 7 figures

Bounds on entanglement dimensions and quantum graph parameters via noncommutative polynomial optimization

Authors: Sander Gribling, David de Laat, Monique Laurent

Abstract: In this paper we study bipartite quantum correlations using techniques from tracial noncommutative polynomial optimization. We construct a hierarchy of semidefinite programming lower bounds on the minimal entanglement dimension of a bipartite correlation. This hierarchy converges to a new parameter: the minimal average entanglement dimension, which measures the amount of entanglement needed to rep… ▽ More In this paper we study bipartite quantum correlations using techniques from tracial noncommutative polynomial optimization. We construct a hierarchy of semidefinite programming lower bounds on the minimal entanglement dimension of a bipartite correlation. This hierarchy converges to a new parameter: the minimal average entanglement dimension, which measures the amount of entanglement needed to reproduce a quantum correlation when access to shared randomness is free. For synchronous correlations, we show a correspondence between the minimal entanglement dimension and the completely positive semidefinite rank of an associated matrix. We then study optimization over the set of synchronous correlations by investigating quantum graph parameters. We unify existing bounds on the quantum chromatic number and the quantum stability number by placing them in the framework of tracial optimization. In particular, we show that the projective packing number, the projective rank, and the tracial rank arise naturally when considering tracial analogues of the Lasserre hierarchy for the stability and chromatic number of a graph. We also introduce semidefinite programming hierarchies converging to the commuting quantum chromatic number and commuting quantum stability number. △ Less

Submitted 9 January, 2018; v1 submitted 31 August, 2017; originally announced August 2017.

Comments: 26 pages

Lower bounds on matrix factorization ranks via noncommutative polynomial optimization

Authors: Sander Gribling, David de Laat, Monique Laurent

Abstract: We use techniques from (tracial noncommutative) polynomial optimization to formulate hierarchies of semidefinite programming lower bounds on matrix factorization ranks. In particular, we consider the nonnegative rank, the positive semidefinite rank, and their symmetric analogues: the completely positive rank and the completely positive semidefinite rank. We study the convergence properties of our… ▽ More We use techniques from (tracial noncommutative) polynomial optimization to formulate hierarchies of semidefinite programming lower bounds on matrix factorization ranks. In particular, we consider the nonnegative rank, the positive semidefinite rank, and their symmetric analogues: the completely positive rank and the completely positive semidefinite rank. We study the convergence properties of our hierarchies, compare them extensively to known lower bounds, and provide some (numerical) examples. △ Less

Submitted 5 November, 2018; v1 submitted 4 August, 2017; originally announced August 2017.

Comments: 51 pages, 2 figures. The source file includes two implementations of all bounds constructed in this paper, one in Matlab and one in Julia

MSC Class: 15B48; 15A23; 90C22

Quantum SDP-Solvers: Better upper and lower bounds

Authors: Joran van Apeldoorn, András Gilyén, Sander Gribling, Ronald de Wolf

Abstract: Brandão and Svore very recently gave quantum algorithms for approximately solving semidefinite programs, which in some regimes are faster than the best-possible classical algorithms in terms of the dimension $n$ of the problem and the number $m$ of constraints, but worse in terms of various other parameters. In this paper we improve their algorithms in several ways, getting better dependence on th… ▽ More Brandão and Svore very recently gave quantum algorithms for approximately solving semidefinite programs, which in some regimes are faster than the best-possible classical algorithms in terms of the dimension $n$ of the problem and the number $m$ of constraints, but worse in terms of various other parameters. In this paper we improve their algorithms in several ways, getting better dependence on those other parameters. To this end we develop new techniques for quantum algorithms, for instance a general way to efficiently implement smooth functions of sparse Hamiltonians, and a generalized minimum-finding procedure. We also show limits on this approach to quantum SDP-solvers, for instance for combinatorial optimizations problems that have a lot of symmetry. Finally, we prove some general lower bounds showing that in the worst case, the complexity of every quantum LP-solver (and hence also SDP-solver) has to scale linearly with $mn$ when $m\approx n$, which is the same as classical. △ Less

Submitted 12 February, 2020; v1 submitted 4 May, 2017; originally announced May 2017.

Comments: v4: 69 pages, small corrections and clarifications. This version will appear in Quantum

Journal ref: Quantum 4, 230 (2020)

Matrices with high completely positive semidefinite rank

Authors: Sander Gribling, David de Laat, Monique Laurent

Abstract: A real symmetric matrix $M$ is completely positive semidefinite if it admits a Gram representation by (Hermitian) positive semidefinite matrices of any size $d$. The smallest such $d$ is called the (complex) completely positive semidefinite rank of $M$, and it is an open question whether there exists an upper bound on this number as a function of the matrix size. We construct completely positive s… ▽ More A real symmetric matrix $M$ is completely positive semidefinite if it admits a Gram representation by (Hermitian) positive semidefinite matrices of any size $d$. The smallest such $d$ is called the (complex) completely positive semidefinite rank of $M$, and it is an open question whether there exists an upper bound on this number as a function of the matrix size. We construct completely positive semidefinite matrices of size $4k^2+2k+2$ with complex completely positive semidefinite rank $2^k$ for any positive integer $k$. This shows that if such an upper bound exists, it has to be at least exponential in the matrix size. For this we exploit connections to quantum information theory and we construct extremal bipartite correlation matrices of large rank. We also exhibit a class of completely positive matrices with quadratic (in terms of the matrix size) completely positive rank, but with linear completely positive semidefinite rank, and we make a connection to the existence of Hadamard matrices. △ Less

Submitted 26 October, 2016; v1 submitted 3 May, 2016; originally announced May 2016.

Comments: 21 pages

MSC Class: 15B48 (Primary); 15A23; 90C22 (Secondary)

Journal ref: Linear Algebra and its Applications 513 (2017), 122-148