Showing 1–45 of 45 results for author: Gravin, N

Bidder Selection Problem in Position Auctions: A Fast and Simple Algorithm via Poisson Approximation

Authors: Nickolai Gravin, Yixuan Even Xu, Renfei Zhou

Abstract: In the Bidder Selection Problem (BSP) there is a large pool of $n$ potential advertisers competing for ad slots on the user's web page. Due to strict computational restrictions, the advertising platform can run a proper auction only for a fraction $k<n$ of advertisers. We consider the basic optimization problem underlying BSP: given $n$ independent prior distributions, how to efficiently find a su… ▽ More In the Bidder Selection Problem (BSP) there is a large pool of $n$ potential advertisers competing for ad slots on the user's web page. Due to strict computational restrictions, the advertising platform can run a proper auction only for a fraction $k<n$ of advertisers. We consider the basic optimization problem underlying BSP: given $n$ independent prior distributions, how to efficiently find a subset of $k$ with the objective of either maximizing expected social welfare or revenue of the platform. We study BSP in the classic multi-winner model of position auctions for welfare and revenue objectives using the optimal (respectively, VCG mechanism, or Myerson's auction) format for the selected set of bidders. Previous PTAS results for BSP optimization were only known for single-item auctions and in case of [Segev and Singla 2021] for $l$-unit auctions. More importantly, all of these PTASes were computational complexity results with impractically large running times, which defeats the purpose of using these algorithms under severe computational constraints. We propose a novel Poisson relaxation of BSP for position auctions that immediately implies that 1) BSP is polynomial-time solvable up to a vanishingly small error as the problem size $k$ grows; 2) there is a PTAS for position auctions after combining our relaxation with the trivial brute force algorithm. Unlike all previous PTASes, we implemented our algorithm and did extensive numerical experiments on practically relevant input sizes. First, our experiments corroborate the previous experimental findings of Mehta et al. that a few simple heuristics used in practice perform surprisingly well in terms of approximation factor. Furthermore, our algorithm outperforms Greedy both in running time and approximation on medium and large-sized instances. △ Less

Submitted 27 April, 2024; v1 submitted 18 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

Comments: 19 pages; in WWW 2024

MSC Class: 68W25

Bidder Subset Selection Problem in Auction Design

Authors: Xiaohui Bei, Nick Gravin, Pinyan Lu, Zhihao Gavin Tang

Abstract: Motivated by practical concerns in the online advertising industry, we study a bidder subset selection problem in single-item auctions. In this problem, a large pool of candidate bidders have independent values sampled from known prior distributions. The seller needs to pick a subset of bidders and run a given auction format on the selected subset to maximize her expected revenue. We propose two f… ▽ More Motivated by practical concerns in the online advertising industry, we study a bidder subset selection problem in single-item auctions. In this problem, a large pool of candidate bidders have independent values sampled from known prior distributions. The seller needs to pick a subset of bidders and run a given auction format on the selected subset to maximize her expected revenue. We propose two frameworks for the subset restrictions: (i) capacity constraint on the set of selected bidders; and (ii) incurred costs for the bidders invited to the auction. For the second-price auction with anonymous reserve (SPA-AR), we give constant approximation polynomial time algorithms in both frameworks (in the latter framework under mild assumptions about the market). Our results are in stark contrast to the previous work of Mehta, Nadav, Psomas, Rubinstein [NeurIPS 2020], who showed hardness of approximation for the SPA without a reserve price. We also give complimentary approximation results for other well-studied auction formats such as anonymous posted pricing and sequential posted pricing. On a technical level, we find that the revenue of SPA-AR as a set function $f(S)$ of its bidders $S$ is fractionally-subadditive but not submodular. Our bidder selection problem with invitation costs is a natural question about (approximately) answering a demand oracle for $f(\cdot)$ under a given vector of costs, a common computational assumption in the literature on combinatorial auctions. △ Less

Submitted 20 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

Comments: 17 pages. To appear at SODA 2023

Lookahead Auctions with Pooling

Authors: Almog Wald, Michal Feldman, Nick Gravin, Zhihao Gavin Tang

Abstract: A Lookahead Auction (LA), introduced by Ronen, is an auction format for the sale of a single item among multiple buyers, which is considered simpler and more fair than the optimal auction. Indeed, it anonymously selects a provisional winner by a symmetric ascending-price process, and only then uses a personalized posted price. A LA auction extracts at least 1/2 of the optimal revenue, even under a… ▽ More A Lookahead Auction (LA), introduced by Ronen, is an auction format for the sale of a single item among multiple buyers, which is considered simpler and more fair than the optimal auction. Indeed, it anonymously selects a provisional winner by a symmetric ascending-price process, and only then uses a personalized posted price. A LA auction extracts at least 1/2 of the optimal revenue, even under a correlated value distribution. This bound is tight, even for 2 buyers with independent values. We introduce a natural extension of LA, called lookahead with pooling (LAP). A LAP auction proceeds as LA, with one difference: it allows the seller to pool together a range of values during the ascending-price stage, and treat them the same; thus, it preserves the simplicity and fairness of LA. Our main result is that this simple pooling operation improves the revenue guarantees for independent buyers from 1/2 to 4/7 of the optimal revenue. We also give a complementary negative result, showing that for arbitrary correlated priors LAP cannot do better than 1/2 approximation. △ Less

Submitted 26 September, 2022; originally announced September 2022.

Journal ref: SAGT (2022) Algorithmic Game Theory 60-77

Online Ordinal Problems: Optimality of Comparison-based Algorithms and their Cardinal Complexity

Authors: Nick Gravin, Enze Sun, Zhihao Gavin Tang

Abstract: We consider ordinal online problems, i.e., tasks that only require pairwise comparisons between elements of the input. A classic example is the secretary problem and the game of googol, as well as its multiple combinatorial extensions such as $(J,K)$-secretary, $2$-sided game of googol, ordinal-competitive matroid secretary. A natural approach to these tasks is to use ordinal algorithms that at ea… ▽ More We consider ordinal online problems, i.e., tasks that only require pairwise comparisons between elements of the input. A classic example is the secretary problem and the game of googol, as well as its multiple combinatorial extensions such as $(J,K)$-secretary, $2$-sided game of googol, ordinal-competitive matroid secretary. A natural approach to these tasks is to use ordinal algorithms that at each step only consider relative ranking among the arrived elements, without looking at the numerical values of the input. We formally study the question of how cardinal algorithms can improve upon ordinal algorithms. We give first a universal construction of the input distribution for any ordinal online problem, such that the advantage of any cardinal algorithm over the ordinal algorithms is at most $1+\varepsilon$ for arbitrary small $\varepsilon> 0$. As an implication, previous lower bounds for the aforementioned variants of secretary problems hold not only against ordinal algorithms, but also against any online algorithm. However, the value range of the input elements in our construction is huge: $N=O\left(\frac{n^3\cdot n!\cdot n!}{\varepsilon}\right)\uparrow\uparrow(n-1)$ (tower of exponents) for an input sequence of length $n$. As a second result, we identify a class of natural ordinal problems and find cardinal algorithm with a matching advantage of $1+ Ω\left(\frac{1}{\log^{(c)}N}\right),$ where $\log^{(c)}N=\log\ldots\log N$ with $c$ iterative logs and $c$ is an arbitrary constant. Further, we introduce the cardinal complexity for any given ordinal online task: the minimum size $N(\varepsilon)$ of different numerical values in the input such the advantage of cardinal over ordinal algorithms is at most $1+\varepsilon$. As a third result, we show that the game of googol has much lower cardinal complexity of $N=O\left(\left(\frac{n}{\varepsilon}\right)^n\right)$. △ Less

Submitted 11 October, 2023; v1 submitted 4 April, 2022; originally announced April 2022.

Comments: To appear at FOCS 2023. Abstract shortened to meet arXiv requirements

Bayesian and Randomized Clock Auctions

Authors: Michal Feldman, Vasilis Gkatzelis, Nick Gravin, Daniel Schoepflin

Abstract: In a single-parameter mechanism design problem, a provider is looking to sell a service to a group of potential buyers. Each buyer $i$ has a private value $v_i$ for receiving the service and a feasibility constraint restricts which sets of buyers can be served simultaneously. Recent work in economics introduced clock auctions as a superior class of auctions for this problem, due to their transpare… ▽ More In a single-parameter mechanism design problem, a provider is looking to sell a service to a group of potential buyers. Each buyer $i$ has a private value $v_i$ for receiving the service and a feasibility constraint restricts which sets of buyers can be served simultaneously. Recent work in economics introduced clock auctions as a superior class of auctions for this problem, due to their transparency, simplicity, and strong incentive guarantees. Subsequent work focused on evaluating the social welfare approximation guarantees of these auctions, leading to strong impossibility results: in the absence of prior information regarding the buyers' values, no deterministic clock auction can achieve a bounded approximation, even for simple feasibility constraints with only two maximal feasible sets. We show that these negative results can be circumvented by using prior information or by leveraging randomization. We provide clock auctions that give a $O(\log\log k)$ approximation for general downward-closed feasibility constraints with $k$ maximal feasible sets for three different information models, ranging from full access to the value distributions to complete absence of information. The more information the seller has, the simpler these auctions are. Under full access, we use a particularly simple deterministic clock auction, called a single-price clock auction, which is only slightly more complex than posted price mechanisms. In this auction, each buyer is offered a single price and a feasible set is selected among those who accept their offers. In the other extreme, where no prior information is available, this approximation guarantee is obtained using a complex randomized clock auction. In addition to our main results, we propose a parameterization that interpolates between single-price clock auctions and general clock auctions, paving the way for an exciting line of future research. △ Less

Submitted 18 February, 2022; originally announced February 2022.

"Who Is Next in Line?'' On the Significance of Knowing the Arrival Order in Bayesian Online Settings

Authors: Tomer Ezra, Michal Feldman, Nick Gravin, Zhihao Gavin Tang

Abstract: We introduce a new measure for the performance of online algorithms in Bayesian settings, where the input is drawn from a known prior, but the realizations are revealed one-by-one in an online fashion. Our new measure is called order-competitive ratio. It is defined as the worst case (over all distribution sequences) ratio between the performance of the best order-unaware and order-aware algorithm… ▽ More We introduce a new measure for the performance of online algorithms in Bayesian settings, where the input is drawn from a known prior, but the realizations are revealed one-by-one in an online fashion. Our new measure is called order-competitive ratio. It is defined as the worst case (over all distribution sequences) ratio between the performance of the best order-unaware and order-aware algorithms, and quantifies the loss that is incurred due to lack of knowledge of the arrival order. Despite the growing interest in the role of the arrival order on the performance of online algorithms, this loss has been overlooked thus far. We study the order-competitive ratio in the paradigmatic prophet inequality problem, for the two common objective functions of (i) maximizing the expected value, and (ii) maximizing the probability of obtaining the largest value; and with respect to two families of algorithms, namely (i) adaptive algorithms, and (ii) single-threshold algorithms. We provide tight bounds for all four combinations, with respect to deterministic algorithms. Our analysis requires new ideas and departs from standard techniques. In particular, our adaptive algorithms inevitably go beyond single-threshold algorithms. The results with respect to the order-competitive ratio measure capture the intuition that adaptive algorithms are stronger than single-threshold ones, and may lead to a better algorithmic advice than the classical competitive ratio measure. △ Less

Submitted 4 November, 2022; v1 submitted 18 February, 2022; originally announced February 2022.

Secretary Matching with General Arrivals

Authors: Tomer Ezra, Michal Feldman, Nick Gravin, Zhihao Gavin Tang

Abstract: We provide online algorithms for secretary matching in general weighted graphs, under the well-studied models of vertex and edge arrivals. In both models, edges are associated with arbitrary weights that are unknown from the outset, and are revealed online. Under vertex arrival, vertices arrive online in a uniformly random order; upon the arrival of a vertex $v$, the weights of edges from $v$ to a… ▽ More We provide online algorithms for secretary matching in general weighted graphs, under the well-studied models of vertex and edge arrivals. In both models, edges are associated with arbitrary weights that are unknown from the outset, and are revealed online. Under vertex arrival, vertices arrive online in a uniformly random order; upon the arrival of a vertex $v$, the weights of edges from $v$ to all previously arriving vertices are revealed, and the algorithm decides which of these edges, if any, to include in the matching. Under edge arrival, edges arrive online in a uniformly random order; upon the arrival of an edge $e$, its weight is revealed, and the algorithm decides whether to include it in the matching or not. We provide a $5/12$-competitive algorithm for vertex arrival, and show it is tight. For edge arrival, we provide a $1/4$-competitive algorithm. Both results improve upon state of the art bounds for the corresponding settings. Interestingly, for vertex arrival, secretary matching in general graphs outperforms secretary matching in bipartite graphs with 1-sided arrival, where $1/e$ is the best possible guarantee. △ Less

Submitted 3 November, 2020; originally announced November 2020.

Online Stochastic Max-Weight Matching: prophet inequality for vertex and edge arrival models

Authors: Tomer Ezra, Michal Feldman, Nick Gravin, Zhihao Gavin Tang

Abstract: We provide prophet inequality algorithms for online weighted matching in general (non-bipartite) graphs, under two well-studied arrival models, namely edge arrival and vertex arrival. The weight of each edge is drawn independently from an a-priori known probability distribution. Under edge arrival, the weight of each edge is revealed upon arrival, and the algorithm decides whether to include it in… ▽ More We provide prophet inequality algorithms for online weighted matching in general (non-bipartite) graphs, under two well-studied arrival models, namely edge arrival and vertex arrival. The weight of each edge is drawn independently from an a-priori known probability distribution. Under edge arrival, the weight of each edge is revealed upon arrival, and the algorithm decides whether to include it in the matching or not. Under vertex arrival, the weights of all edges from the newly arriving vertex to all previously arrived vertices are revealed, and the algorithm decides which of these edges, if any, to include in the matching. To study these settings, we introduce a novel unified framework of batched prophet inequalities that captures online settings where elements arrive in batches; in particular it captures matching under the two aforementioned arrival models. Our algorithms rely on the construction of suitable online contention resolution scheme (OCRS). We first extend the framework of OCRS to batched-OCRS, we then establish a reduction from batched prophet inequality to batched OCRS, and finally we construct batched OCRSs with selectable ratios of 0.337 and 0.5 for edge and vertex arrival models, respectively. Both results improve the state of the art for the corresponding settings. For the vertex arrival, our result is tight. Interestingly, a pricing-based prophet inequality with comparable competitive ratios is unknown. △ Less

Submitted 25 February, 2020; v1 submitted 22 February, 2020; originally announced February 2020.

Comments: 29 pages, 2 figures

Online Stochastic Matching with Edge Arrivals

Authors: Nick Gravin, Zhihao Gavin Tang, Kangning Wang

Abstract: Online bipartite matching with edge arrivals remained a major open question for a long time until a recent negative result by [Gamlath et al. FOCS 2019], who showed that no online policy is better than the straightforward greedy algorithm, i.e., no online algorithm has a worst-case competitive ratio better than $0.5$. In this work, we consider the bipartite matching problem with edge arrivals in a… ▽ More Online bipartite matching with edge arrivals remained a major open question for a long time until a recent negative result by [Gamlath et al. FOCS 2019], who showed that no online policy is better than the straightforward greedy algorithm, i.e., no online algorithm has a worst-case competitive ratio better than $0.5$. In this work, we consider the bipartite matching problem with edge arrivals in a natural stochastic framework, i.e., Bayesian setting where each edge of the graph is independently realized according to a known probability distribution. We focus on a natural class of prune & greedy online policies motivated by practical considerations from a multitude of online matching platforms. Any prune & greedy algorithm consists of two stages: first, it decreases the probabilities of some edges in the stochastic instance and then runs greedy algorithm on the pruned graph. We propose prune & greedy algorithms that are $0.552$-competitive on the instances that can be pruned to a $2$-regular stochastic bipartite graph, and $0.503$-competitive on arbitrary bipartite graphs. The algorithms and our analysis significantly deviate from the prior work. We first obtain analytically manageable lower bound on the size of the matching, which leads to a non linear optimization problem. We further reduce this problem to a continuous optimization with a constant number of parameters that can be solved using standard software tools. △ Less

Submitted 15 July, 2020; v1 submitted 12 November, 2019; originally announced November 2019.

Prophet inequality for bipartite matching: merits of being simple and non adaptive

Authors: Nick Gravin, Hongao Wang

Abstract: We consider Bayesian online selection problem of a matching in bipartite graphs, i.e., online weighted matching problem with edge arrivals where online algorithm knows distributions of weights, that corresponds to the intersection of two matroids in [Kleinberg and Wienberg STOC 12] model. We consider a simple class of non adaptive vertex-additive policies that assign static prices to all vertices… ▽ More We consider Bayesian online selection problem of a matching in bipartite graphs, i.e., online weighted matching problem with edge arrivals where online algorithm knows distributions of weights, that corresponds to the intersection of two matroids in [Kleinberg and Wienberg STOC 12] model. We consider a simple class of non adaptive vertex-additive policies that assign static prices to all vertices in the graph and accept each edge only if its weight exceeds the sum of the prices of the edge's endpoints. We show existence of a vertex-additive policy with the expected payoff of at least one third of the prophet's payoff and present gradient decent type algorithm that quickly converges to the desired vector of vertex prices. This improves the adaptive online policy of [Kleinberg and Wienberg STOC 12] for the intersection of two matroids in two ways: our policy is non adaptive and has better approximation guarantee of $3$ instead of previous guarantee of $5.82$ against the prophet. We give a complementary lower bound of $2.25$ for any online algorithm in the bipartite matching setting. △ Less

Submitted 17 February, 2019; originally announced February 2019.

Optimal Budget-Feasible Mechanisms for Additive Valuations

Authors: Nick Gravin, Yaonan **, Pinyan Lu, Chenhao Zhang

Abstract: In this paper, we show a tight approximation guarantee for budget-feasible mechanisms with an additive buyer. We propose a new simple randomized mechanism with approximation ratio of $2$, improving the previous best known result of $3$. Our bound is tight with respect to either the optimal offline benchmark, or its fractional relaxation. We also present a simple deterministic mechanism with the ti… ▽ More In this paper, we show a tight approximation guarantee for budget-feasible mechanisms with an additive buyer. We propose a new simple randomized mechanism with approximation ratio of $2$, improving the previous best known result of $3$. Our bound is tight with respect to either the optimal offline benchmark, or its fractional relaxation. We also present a simple deterministic mechanism with the tight approximation guarantee of $3$ against the fractional optimum, improving the best known result of $(2+ \sqrt{2})$ for the weaker integral benchmark. △ Less

Submitted 20 July, 2020; v1 submitted 12 February, 2019; originally announced February 2019.

Envy-freeness up to any item with high Nash welfare: The virtue of donating items

Authors: Ioannis Caragiannis, Nick Gravin, Xin Huang

Abstract: Several fairness concepts have been proposed recently in attempts to approximate envy-freeness in settings with indivisible goods. Among them, the concept of envy-freeness up to any item (EFX) is arguably the closest to envy-freeness. Unfortunately, EFX allocations are not known to exist except in a few special cases. We make significant progress in this direction. We show that for every instance… ▽ More Several fairness concepts have been proposed recently in attempts to approximate envy-freeness in settings with indivisible goods. Among them, the concept of envy-freeness up to any item (EFX) is arguably the closest to envy-freeness. Unfortunately, EFX allocations are not known to exist except in a few special cases. We make significant progress in this direction. We show that for every instance with additive valuations, there is an EFX allocation of a subset of items with a Nash welfare that is at least half of the maximum possible Nash welfare for the original set of items. That is, after donating some items to a charity, one can distribute the remaining items in a fair way with high efficiency. This bound is proved to be best possible. Our proof is constructive and highlights the importance of maximum Nash welfare allocation. Starting with such an allocation, our algorithm decides which items to donate and redistributes the initial bundles to the agents, eventually obtaining an allocation with the claimed efficiency guarantee. The application of our algorithm to large markets, where the valuations of an agent for every item is relatively small, yields EFX with almost optimal Nash welfare. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first use of large market assumptions in the fair division literature. We also show that our algorithm can be modified to compute, in polynomial-time, EFX allocations that approximate optimal Nash welfare within a factor of at most $2ρ$, using a $ρ$-approximate allocation on input instead of the maximum Nash welfare one. △ Less

Submitted 12 February, 2019; originally announced February 2019.

Comments: 19 pages, 1 figure

A Simple Mechanism for a Budget-Constrained Buyer

Authors: Yu Cheng, Nick Gravin, Kamesh Munagala, Kangning Wang

Abstract: We study a classic Bayesian mechanism design setting of monopoly problem for an additive buyer in the presence of budgets. In this setting a monopolist seller with $m$ heterogeneous items faces a single buyer and seeks to maximize her revenue. The buyer has a budget and additive valuations drawn independently for each item from (non-identical) distributions. We show that when the buyer's budget is… ▽ More We study a classic Bayesian mechanism design setting of monopoly problem for an additive buyer in the presence of budgets. In this setting a monopolist seller with $m$ heterogeneous items faces a single buyer and seeks to maximize her revenue. The buyer has a budget and additive valuations drawn independently for each item from (non-identical) distributions. We show that when the buyer's budget is publicly known, the better of selling each item separately and selling the grand bundle extracts a constant fraction of the optimal revenue. When the budget is private, we consider a standard Bayesian setting where buyer's budget $b$ is drawn from a known distribution $B$. We show that if $b$ is independent of the valuations and distribution $B$ satisfies monotone hazard rate condition, then selling items separately or in a grand bundle is still approximately optimal. We give a complementary example showing that no constant approximation simple mechanism is possible if budget $b$ can be interdependent with valuations. △ Less

Submitted 8 October, 2018; v1 submitted 13 September, 2018; originally announced September 2018.

Monopoly pricing with buyer search

Authors: Nick Gravin, Zhihao Gavin Tang

Abstract: In many shop** scenarios, e.g., in online shop**, customers have a large menu of options to choose from. However, most of the buyers do not browse all the options and make decision after considering only a small part of the menu. To study such buyer's behavior we consider the standard Bayesian monopoly problem for a unit-demand buyer, where the monopolist displays the menu dynamically page aft… ▽ More In many shop** scenarios, e.g., in online shop**, customers have a large menu of options to choose from. However, most of the buyers do not browse all the options and make decision after considering only a small part of the menu. To study such buyer's behavior we consider the standard Bayesian monopoly problem for a unit-demand buyer, where the monopolist displays the menu dynamically page after a page to the buyer. The seller aims to maximize the expected revenue over the distribution of buyer's values which we assume are i.i.d. The buyer incurs a fixed cost for browsing through one menu page and would stop if that cost exceeds the increase in her utility. We observe that the optimal posted price mechanism in our dynamic setting may have quite different structure than in the classic static scenario. We find a (relatively) simple and approximately optimal mechanism, that uses part of the items as a "bait" to keep the buyer interested for multiple rounds with low prices, while at the same time showing many other expensive items. △ Less

Submitted 13 February, 2018; v1 submitted 8 February, 2018; originally announced February 2018.

Testing Symmetric Markov Chains from a Single Trajectory

Authors: Constantinos Daskalakis, Nishanth Dikkala, Nick Gravin

Abstract: Classical distribution testing assumes access to i.i.d. samples from the distribution that is being tested. We initiate the study of Markov chain testing, assuming access to a single trajectory of a Markov Chain. In particular, we observe a single trajectory X0,...,Xt,... of an unknown, symmetric, and finite state Markov Chain M. We do not control the starting state X0, and we cannot restart the c… ▽ More Classical distribution testing assumes access to i.i.d. samples from the distribution that is being tested. We initiate the study of Markov chain testing, assuming access to a single trajectory of a Markov Chain. In particular, we observe a single trajectory X0,...,Xt,... of an unknown, symmetric, and finite state Markov Chain M. We do not control the starting state X0, and we cannot restart the chain. Given our single trajectory, the goal is to test whether M is identical to a model Markov Chain M0 , or far from it under an appropriate notion of difference. We propose a measure of difference between two Markov chains, motivated by the early work of Kazakos [Kaz78], which captures the scaling behavior of the total variation distance between trajectories sampled from the Markov chains as the length of these trajectories grows. We provide efficient testers and information-theoretic lower bounds for testing identity of symmetric Markov chains under our proposed measure of difference, which are tight up to logarithmic factors if the hitting times of the model chain M0 is O(n) in the size of the state space n. △ Less

Submitted 3 December, 2017; v1 submitted 22 April, 2017; originally announced April 2017.

Comments: 23 pages, 5 figures

Tight Lower Bounds for Multiplicative Weights Algorithmic Families

Authors: Nick Gravin, Yuval Peres, Balasubramanian Sivan

Abstract: We study the fundamental problem of prediction with expert advice and develop regret lower bounds for a large family of algorithms for this problem. We develop simple adversarial primitives, that lend themselves to various combinations leading to sharp lower bounds for many algorithmic families. We use these primitives to show that the classic Multiplicative Weights Algorithm (MWA) has a regret of… ▽ More We study the fundamental problem of prediction with expert advice and develop regret lower bounds for a large family of algorithms for this problem. We develop simple adversarial primitives, that lend themselves to various combinations leading to sharp lower bounds for many algorithmic families. We use these primitives to show that the classic Multiplicative Weights Algorithm (MWA) has a regret of $\sqrt{\frac{T \ln k}{2}}$, there by completely closing the gap between upper and lower bounds. We further show a regret lower bound of $\frac{2}{3}\sqrt{\frac{T\ln k}{2}}$ for a much more general family of algorithms than MWA, where the learning rate can be arbitrarily varied over time, or even picked from arbitrary distributions over time. We also use our primitives to construct adversaries in the geometric horizon setting for MWA to precisely characterize the regret at $\frac{0.391}{\sqrtδ}$ for the case of $2$ experts and a lower bound of $\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{\ln k}{2δ}}$ for the case of arbitrary number of experts $k$. △ Less

Submitted 13 July, 2016; v1 submitted 11 July, 2016; originally announced July 2016.

Procrastination with variable present bias

Authors: Nick Gravin, Nicole Immorlica, Brendan Lucier, Emmanouil Pountourakis

Abstract: Individuals working towards a goal often exhibit time inconsistent behavior, making plans and then failing to follow through. One well-known model of such behavioral anomalies is present-bias discounting: individuals over-weight present costs by a bias factor. This model explains many time-inconsistent behaviors, but can make stark predictions in many settings: individuals either follow the most e… ▽ More Individuals working towards a goal often exhibit time inconsistent behavior, making plans and then failing to follow through. One well-known model of such behavioral anomalies is present-bias discounting: individuals over-weight present costs by a bias factor. This model explains many time-inconsistent behaviors, but can make stark predictions in many settings: individuals either follow the most efficient plan for reaching their goal or procrastinate indefinitely. We propose a modification in which the present-bias parameter can vary over time, drawn independently each step from a fixed distribution. Following Kleinberg and Oren (2014), we use a weighted task graph to model task planning, and measure the cost of procrastination as the relative expected cost of the chosen path versus the optimal path. We use a novel connection to optimal pricing theory to describe the structure of the worst-case task graph for any present-bias distribution. We then leverage this structure to derive conditions on the bias distribution under which the worst-case ratio is exponential (in time) or constant. We also examine conditions on the task graph that lead to improved procrastination ratios: graphs with a uniformly bounded distance to the goal, and graphs in which the distance to the goal monotonically decreases on any path. △ Less

Submitted 9 June, 2016; originally announced June 2016.

Comments: 19 pages, 2 figures. To appear in the 17th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation (EC 2016)

On Welfare Approximation and Stable Pricing

Authors: Michal Feldman, Nick Gravin, Brendan Lucier

Abstract: We study the power of item-pricing as a tool for approximately optimizing social welfare in a combinatorial market. We consider markets with $m$ indivisible items and $n$ buyers. The goal is to set prices to the items so that, when agents purchase their most demanded sets simultaneously, no conflicts arise and the obtained allocation has nearly optimal welfare. For gross substitutes valuations, it… ▽ More We study the power of item-pricing as a tool for approximately optimizing social welfare in a combinatorial market. We consider markets with $m$ indivisible items and $n$ buyers. The goal is to set prices to the items so that, when agents purchase their most demanded sets simultaneously, no conflicts arise and the obtained allocation has nearly optimal welfare. For gross substitutes valuations, it is well known that it is possible to achieve optimal welfare in this manner. We ask: can one achieve approximately efficient outcomes for valuations beyond gross substitutes? We show that even for submodular valuations, and even with only two buyers, one cannot guarantee an approximation better than $Ω(\sqrt{m})$. The same lower bound holds for the class of single-minded buyers as well. Beyond the negative results on welfare approximation, our results have daunting implications on revenue approximation for these valuation classes: in order to obtain good approximation to the collected revenue, one would necessarily need to abandon the common approach of comparing the revenue to the optimal welfare; a fundamentally new approach would be required. △ Less

Submitted 7 November, 2015; originally announced November 2015.

Liquid Price of Anarchy

Authors: Yossi Azar, Michal Feldman, Nick Gravin, Alan Roytman

Abstract: Incorporating budget constraints into the analysis of auctions has become increasingly important, as they model practical settings more accurately. The social welfare function, which is the standard measure of efficiency in auctions, is inadequate for settings with budgets, since there may be a large disconnect between the value a bidder derives from obtaining an item and what can be liquidated fr… ▽ More Incorporating budget constraints into the analysis of auctions has become increasingly important, as they model practical settings more accurately. The social welfare function, which is the standard measure of efficiency in auctions, is inadequate for settings with budgets, since there may be a large disconnect between the value a bidder derives from obtaining an item and what can be liquidated from her. The Liquid Welfare objective function has been suggested as a natural alternative for settings with budgets. Simple auctions, like simultaneous item auctions, are evaluated by their performance at equilibrium using the Price of Anarchy (PoA) measure -- the ratio of the objective function value of the optimal outcome to the worst equilibrium. Accordingly, we evaluate the performance of simultaneous item auctions in budgeted settings by the Liquid Price of Anarchy (LPoA) measure -- the ratio of the optimal Liquid Welfare to the Liquid Welfare obtained in the worst equilibrium. Our main result is that the LPoA for mixed Nash equilibria is bounded by a constant when bidders are additive and items can be divided into sufficiently many discrete parts. Our proofs are robust, and can be extended to achieve similar bounds for simultaneous second price auctions as well as Bayesian Nash equilibria. For pure Nash equilibria, we establish tight bounds on the LPoA for the larger class of fractionally-subadditive valuations. To derive our results, we develop a new technique in which some bidders deviate (surprisingly) toward a non-optimal solution. In particular, this technique does not fit into the smoothness framework. △ Less

Submitted 3 November, 2015; originally announced November 2015.

Combinatorial Auctions via Posted Prices

Authors: Michal Feldman, Nick Gravin, Brendan Lucier

Abstract: We study anonymous posted price mechanisms for combinatorial auctions in a Bayesian framework. In a posted price mechanism, item prices are posted, then the consumers approach the seller sequentially in an arbitrary order, each purchasing her favorite bundle from among the unsold items at the posted prices. These mechanisms are simple, transparent and trivially dominant strategy incentive compatib… ▽ More We study anonymous posted price mechanisms for combinatorial auctions in a Bayesian framework. In a posted price mechanism, item prices are posted, then the consumers approach the seller sequentially in an arbitrary order, each purchasing her favorite bundle from among the unsold items at the posted prices. These mechanisms are simple, transparent and trivially dominant strategy incentive compatible (DSIC). We show that when agent preferences are fractionally subadditive (which includes all submodular functions), there always exist prices that, in expectation, obtain at least half of the optimal welfare. Our result is constructive: given black-box access to a combinatorial auction algorithm A, sample access to the prior distribution, and appropriate query access to the sampled valuations, one can compute, in polytime, prices that guarantee at least half of the expected welfare of A. As a corollary, we obtain the first polytime (in n and m) constant-factor DSIC mechanism for Bayesian submodular combinatorial auctions, given access to demand query oracles. Our results also extend to valuations with complements, where the approximation factor degrades linearly with the level of complementarity. △ Less

Submitted 18 November, 2014; originally announced November 2014.

Competitive analysis via benchmark decomposition

Authors: Ning Chen, Nick Gravin, Pinyan Lu

Abstract: We propose a uniform approach for the design and analysis of prior-free competitive auctions and online auctions. Our philosophy is to view the benchmark function as a variable parameter of the model and study a broad class of functions instead of a individual target benchmark. We consider a multitude of well-studied auction settings, and improve upon a few previous results. (1) Multi-unit aucti… ▽ More We propose a uniform approach for the design and analysis of prior-free competitive auctions and online auctions. Our philosophy is to view the benchmark function as a variable parameter of the model and study a broad class of functions instead of a individual target benchmark. We consider a multitude of well-studied auction settings, and improve upon a few previous results. (1) Multi-unit auctions. Given a $β$-competitive unlimited supply auction, the best previously known multi-unit auction is $2β$-competitive. We design a $(1+β)$-competitive auction reducing the ratio from $4.84$ to $3.24$. These results carry over to matroid and position auctions. (2) General downward-closed environments. We design a $6.5$-competitive auction improving upon the ratio of $7.5$. Our auction is noticeably simpler than the previous best one. (3) Unlimited supply online auctions. Our analysis yields an auction with a competitive ratio of $4.12$, which significantly narrows the margin of $[4,4.84]$ previously known for this problem. A particularly important tool in our analysis is a simple decomposition lemma, which allows us to bound the competitive ratio against a sum of benchmark functions. We use this lemma in a "divide and conquer" fashion by dividing the target benchmark into the sum of simpler functions. △ Less

Submitted 7 November, 2014; originally announced November 2014.

The inverse moment problem for convex polytopes: implementation aspects

Authors: Nick Gravin, Danny Nguyen, Dmitrii Pasechnik, Sinai Robins

Abstract: We give a detailed technical report on the implementation of the algorithm presented in Gravin et al. (Discrete & Computational Geometry'12) for reconstructing an $N$-vertex convex polytope $P$ in $\mathbb{R}^d$ from the knowledge of $O(Nd)$ of its moments. We give a detailed technical report on the implementation of the algorithm presented in Gravin et al. (Discrete & Computational Geometry'12) for reconstructing an $N$-vertex convex polytope $P$ in $\mathbb{R}^d$ from the knowledge of $O(Nd)$ of its moments. △ Less

Submitted 11 September, 2014; v1 submitted 10 September, 2014; originally announced September 2014.

Towards Optimal Algorithms for Prediction with Expert Advice

Authors: Nick Gravin, Yuval Peres, Balasubramanian Sivan

Abstract: We study the classical problem of prediction with expert advice in the adversarial setting with a geometric stop** time. In 1965, Cover gave the optimal algorithm for the case of 2 experts. In this paper, we design the optimal algorithm, adversary and regret for the case of 3 experts. Further, we show that the optimal algorithm for $2$ and $3$ experts is a probability matching algorithm (analogo… ▽ More We study the classical problem of prediction with expert advice in the adversarial setting with a geometric stop** time. In 1965, Cover gave the optimal algorithm for the case of 2 experts. In this paper, we design the optimal algorithm, adversary and regret for the case of 3 experts. Further, we show that the optimal algorithm for $2$ and $3$ experts is a probability matching algorithm (analogous to Thompson sampling) against a particular randomized adversary. Remarkably, our proof shows that the probability matching algorithm is not only optimal against this particular randomized adversary, but also minimax optimal. Our analysis develops upper and lower bounds simultaneously, analogous to the primal-dual method. Our analysis of the optimal adversary goes through delicate asymptotics of the random walk of a particle between multiple walls. We use the connection we develop to random walks to derive an improved algorithm and regret bound for the case of $4$ experts, and, provide a general framework for designing the optimal algorithm and adversary for an arbitrary number of experts. △ Less

Submitted 11 July, 2016; v1 submitted 10 September, 2014; originally announced September 2014.

Comments: The latest version (accepted to SODA 2016)

Short sequences of improvement moves lead to approximate equilibria in constraint satisfaction games

Authors: Ioannis Caragiannis, Angelo Fanelli, Nick Gravin

Abstract: We present an algorithm that computes approximate pure Nash equilibria in a broad class of constraint satisfaction games that generalize the well-known cut and party affiliation games. Our results improve previous ones by Bhalgat et al.~(EC 10) in terms of the obtained approximation guarantee. More importantly, our algorithm identifies a polynomially-long sequence of improvement moves from any ini… ▽ More We present an algorithm that computes approximate pure Nash equilibria in a broad class of constraint satisfaction games that generalize the well-known cut and party affiliation games. Our results improve previous ones by Bhalgat et al.~(EC 10) in terms of the obtained approximation guarantee. More importantly, our algorithm identifies a polynomially-long sequence of improvement moves from any initial state to an approximate equilibrium in these games. The existence of such short sequences is an interesting structural property which, to the best of our knowledge, was not known before. Our techniques adapt and extend our previous work for congestion games (FOCS 11) but the current analysis is considerably simpler. △ Less

Submitted 14 February, 2014; originally announced February 2014.

Comments: 12 pages

Optimal Competitive Auctions

Authors: Ning Chen, Nick Gravin, Pinyan Lu

Abstract: We study the design of truthful auctions for selling identical items in unlimited supply (e.g., digital goods) to n unit demand buyers. This classic problem stands out from profit-maximizing auction design literature as it requires no probabilistic assumptions on buyers' valuations and employs the framework of competitive analysis. Our objective is to optimize the worst-case performance of an auct… ▽ More We study the design of truthful auctions for selling identical items in unlimited supply (e.g., digital goods) to n unit demand buyers. This classic problem stands out from profit-maximizing auction design literature as it requires no probabilistic assumptions on buyers' valuations and employs the framework of competitive analysis. Our objective is to optimize the worst-case performance of an auction, measured by the ratio between a given benchmark and revenue generated by the auction. We establish a sufficient and necessary condition that characterizes competitive ratios for all monotone benchmarks. The characterization identifies the worst-case distribution of instances and reveals intrinsic relations between competitive ratios and benchmarks in the competitive analysis. With the characterization at hand, we show optimal competitive auctions for two natural benchmarks. The most well-studied benchmark $\mathcal{F}^{(2)}(\cdot)$ measures the envy-free optimal revenue where at least two buyers win. Goldberg et al. [13] showed a sequence of lower bounds on the competitive ratio for each number of buyers n. They conjectured that all these bounds are tight. We show that optimal competitive auctions match these bounds. Thus, we confirm the conjecture and settle a central open problem in the design of digital goods auctions. As one more application we examine another economically meaningful benchmark, which measures the optimal revenue across all limited-supply Vickrey auctions. We identify the optimal competitive ratios to be $(\frac{n}{n-1})^{n-1}-1$ for each number of buyers n, that is $e-1$ as $n$ approaches infinity. △ Less

Submitted 5 January, 2014; originally announced January 2014.

Combinatorial Walrasian Equilibrium

Authors: Michal Feldman, Nick Gravin, Brendan Lucier

Abstract: We study a combinatorial market design problem, where a collection of indivisible objects is to be priced and sold to potential buyers subject to equilibrium constraints.The classic solution concept for such problems is Walrasian Equilibrium (WE), which provides a simple and transparent pricing structure that achieves optimal social welfare. The main weakness of the WE notion is that it exists onl… ▽ More We study a combinatorial market design problem, where a collection of indivisible objects is to be priced and sold to potential buyers subject to equilibrium constraints.The classic solution concept for such problems is Walrasian Equilibrium (WE), which provides a simple and transparent pricing structure that achieves optimal social welfare. The main weakness of the WE notion is that it exists only in very restrictive cases. To overcome this limitation, we introduce the notion of a Combinatorial Walrasian equilibium (CWE), a natural relaxation of WE. The difference between a CWE and a (non-combinatorial) WE is that the seller can package the items into indivisible bundles prior to sale, and the market does not necessarily clear. We show that every valuation profile admits a CWE that obtains at least half of the optimal (unconstrained) social welfare. Moreover, we devise a poly-time algorithm that, given an arbitrary allocation X, computes a CWE that achieves at least half of the welfare of X. Thus, the economic problem of finding a CWE with high social welfare reduces to the algorithmic problem of social-welfare approximation. In addition, we show that every valuation profile admits a CWE that extracts a logarithmic fraction of the optimal welfare as revenue. Finally, these results are complemented by strong lower bounds when the seller is restricted to using item prices only, which motivates the use of bundles. The strength of our results derives partly from their generality - our results hold for arbitrary valuations that may exhibit complex combinations of substitutes and complements. △ Less

Submitted 8 April, 2013; originally announced April 2013.

Comments: Accepted to STOC'2013

Convex curves and a Poisson imitation of lattices

Authors: Nick Gravin, Fedor Petrov, Sinai Robins, Dmitry Shiryaev

Abstract: We solve a randomized version of the following open question: is there a strictly convex, bounded curve γin the plane such that the number of rational points on γ, with denominator $n$, approaches infinity with $n$? Although this natural problem appears to be out of reach using current methods, we consider a probabilistic analogue using a spatial Poisson-process that simulates the refined rational… ▽ More We solve a randomized version of the following open question: is there a strictly convex, bounded curve γin the plane such that the number of rational points on γ, with denominator $n$, approaches infinity with $n$? Although this natural problem appears to be out of reach using current methods, we consider a probabilistic analogue using a spatial Poisson-process that simulates the refined rational lattice $\frac{1}{d} Z^2$, which we call $M_d$, for each natural number $d$. The main result here is that with probability 1 there exists a strictly convex, bounded curve γsuch that the number of spatial Poisson points on γ, with intensity $d$, approaches infinity with $d$. The methods include the notion of a generalized affine length of a convex curve, defined by Petrov (2007). △ Less

Submitted 26 November, 2012; originally announced November 2012.

Comments: 3 figures, 12 pages

MSC Class: 52A10; 52A22; 52A23

Journal ref: Mathematika 60 (2014) 139-152

On moments of a polytope

Authors: Nick Gravin, Dmitrii V. Pasechnik, Boris Shapiro, Michael Shapiro

Abstract: We show that the multivariate generating function of appropriately normalized moments of a measure with homogeneous polynomial density supported on a compact polytope P in R^d is a rational function. Its denominator is the product of linear forms dual to the vertices of P raised to the power equal to the degree of the density function. Using this, we solve the inverse moment problem for the set of… ▽ More We show that the multivariate generating function of appropriately normalized moments of a measure with homogeneous polynomial density supported on a compact polytope P in R^d is a rational function. Its denominator is the product of linear forms dual to the vertices of P raised to the power equal to the degree of the density function. Using this, we solve the inverse moment problem for the set of, not necessarily convex, polytopes having a given set S of vertices. Under a weak non-degeneracy assumption we also show that the uniform measure supported on any such polytope is a linear combination of uniform measures supported on simplices with vertices in S. △ Less

Submitted 29 November, 2017; v1 submitted 11 October, 2012; originally announced October 2012.

Comments: 28 pages, 3 figures

MSC Class: 52B45; 52B70; 44A60; 44A15

Journal ref: Analysis and Mathematical Physics, 2018

Simultaneous Auctions are (almost) Efficient

Authors: Michal Feldman, Hu Fu, Nick Gravin, Brendan Lucier

Abstract: Simultaneous item auctions are simple procedures for allocating items to bidders with potentially complex preferences over different item sets. In a simultaneous auction, every bidder submits bids on all items simultaneously. The allocation and prices are then resolved for each item separately, based solely on the bids submitted on that item. Such procedures occur in practice (e.g. eBay) but are n… ▽ More Simultaneous item auctions are simple procedures for allocating items to bidders with potentially complex preferences over different item sets. In a simultaneous auction, every bidder submits bids on all items simultaneously. The allocation and prices are then resolved for each item separately, based solely on the bids submitted on that item. Such procedures occur in practice (e.g. eBay) but are not truthful. We study the efficiency of Bayesian Nash equilibrium (BNE) outcomes of simultaneous first- and second-price auctions when bidders have complement-free (a.k.a. subadditive) valuations. We show that the expected social welfare of any BNE is at least 1/2 of the optimal social welfare in the case of first-price auctions, and at least 1/4 in the case of second-price auctions. These results improve upon the previously-known logarithmic bounds, which were established by [Hassidim, Kaplan, Mansour and Nisan '11] for first-price auctions and by [Bhawalkar and Roughgarden '11] for second-price auctions. △ Less

Submitted 21 September, 2012; originally announced September 2012.

Structure results for multiple tilings in 3D

Authors: Nick Gravin, Mihail Kolountzakis, Sinai Robins, Dmitry Shiryaev

Abstract: We study multiple tilings of 3-dimensional Euclidean space by a convex body. In a multiple tiling, a convex body $P$ is translated with a discrete multiset $Λ$ in such a way that each point of the space gets covered exactly $k$ times, except perhaps the translated copies of the boundary of $P$. It is known that all possible multiple tilers in 3D are zonotopes. In 2D it was known by the work of M.… ▽ More We study multiple tilings of 3-dimensional Euclidean space by a convex body. In a multiple tiling, a convex body $P$ is translated with a discrete multiset $Λ$ in such a way that each point of the space gets covered exactly $k$ times, except perhaps the translated copies of the boundary of $P$. It is known that all possible multiple tilers in 3D are zonotopes. In 2D it was known by the work of M. Kolountzakis that, unless $P$ is a parallelogram, the multiset of translation vectors $Λ$ must be a finite union of translated lattices (also known as quasi periodic sets). In that work [Kolountzakis, 2002], the author asked whether the same quasi-periodic structure on the translation vectors would be true in 3D. Here we prove that this conclusion is indeed true for 3D. Namely, we show that if $P$ is a convex multiple tiler in 3D, with a discrete multiset $Λ$ of translation vectors, then $Λ$ has to be a finite union of translated lattices, unless $P$ belongs to a special class of zonotopes. This exceptional class consists of two-flat zonotopes $P$, defined by the Minkowski sum of $n+m$ line segments that lie in the union of two different two-dimensional subspaces $H_1$ and $H_2$. Equivalently, a two-flat zonotope $P$ may be thought of as the Minkowski sum of two 2-dimensional symmetric polygons one of which may degenerate into a single line segment. It turns out that rational two-flat zonotopes admit a multiple tiling with an aperiodic (non-quasi-periodic) set of translation vectors $Λ$. We note that it may be quite difficult to offer a visualization of these 3-dimensional non-quasi-periodic tilings, and that we discovered them by using Fourier methods. △ Less

Submitted 7 August, 2012; originally announced August 2012.

Comments: 13 page, 5 figures

MSC Class: 52C07; 52C22; 52C23

Budget Feasible Mechanism Design: From Prior-Free to Bayesian

Authors: Xiaohui Bei, Ning Chen, Nick Gravin, Pinyan Lu

Abstract: Budget feasible mechanism design studies procurement combinatorial auctions where the sellers have private costs to produce items, and the buyer(auctioneer) aims to maximize a social valuation function on subsets of items, under the budget constraint on the total payment. One of the most important questions in the field is "which valuation domains admit truthful budget feasible mechanisms with `sm… ▽ More Budget feasible mechanism design studies procurement combinatorial auctions where the sellers have private costs to produce items, and the buyer(auctioneer) aims to maximize a social valuation function on subsets of items, under the budget constraint on the total payment. One of the most important questions in the field is "which valuation domains admit truthful budget feasible mechanisms with `small' approximations (compared to the social optimum)?" Singer showed that additive and submodular functions have such constant approximations. Recently, Dobzinski, Papadimitriou, and Singer gave an O(log^2 n)-approximation mechanism for subadditive functions; they also remarked that: "A fundamental question is whether, regardless of computational constraints, a constant-factor budget feasible mechanism exists for subadditive functions." We address this question from two viewpoints: prior-free worst case analysis and Bayesian analysis. For the prior-free framework, we use an LP that describes the fractional cover of the valuation function; it is also connected to the concept of approximate core in cooperative game theory. We provide an O(I)-approximation mechanism for subadditive functions, via the worst case integrality gap I of LP. This implies an O(log n)-approximation for subadditive valuations, O(1)-approximation for XOS valuations, and for valuations with a constant I. XOS valuations are an important class of functions that lie between submodular and subadditive classes. We give another polynomial time O(log n/loglog n) sub-logarithmic approximation mechanism for subadditive valuations. For the Bayesian framework, we provide a constant approximation mechanism for all subadditive functions, using the above prior-free mechanism for XOS valuations as a subroutine. Our mechanism allows correlations in the distribution of private information and is universally truthful. △ Less

Submitted 20 March, 2012; originally announced March 2012.

Comments: to appear in STOC 2012

Journal ref: Proceedings of STOC 2012

In Defense of Bureaucracy in the Metric Facility Location Problem

Authors: Nick Gravin, Dominik Scheder

Abstract: Our work is devoted to the metric facility location problem and addresses the selfish behavior of the players. It contributes to the line of work initiated by Procaccia and Tennenholtz [EC09] on approximate mechanism design without money. We explore and argue for an intuitive and simple rule of complexity O(nk),a so-called proportionality mechanism. The mechanism works in k consecutive rounds,each… ▽ More Our work is devoted to the metric facility location problem and addresses the selfish behavior of the players. It contributes to the line of work initiated by Procaccia and Tennenholtz [EC09] on approximate mechanism design without money. We explore and argue for an intuitive and simple rule of complexity O(nk),a so-called proportionality mechanism. The mechanism works in k consecutive rounds,each time choosing a random player at whose position to place the next facility; each time the probabilities of players to be picked are distributed proportionally to their distances to the current set of the facilities. Lu et al. [EC10] showed that the proportionality rule is incentive compatible for k=1,2, but fails to be so for k>2. We tweak the model slightly such that for any k, the proportionality mechanism becomes incentive compatible. In the new model we allow the government to be bureaucratic, i.e., to have the power of to force each player to choose from only a specific set of available facilities. In the proportionality mechanism, we force every player that receives a facility at his reported location to connect to exactly that facility. We extend the proportionality mechanism to a more general setting with a private network of facilities already present in the metric space and show that it is truthful as well. We further show that for any fixed k, the proportionality rule achieves in expectation a constant approximation guarantee to the optimal solution; namely at most a ratio of 4k. On the other hand, we show a lower bound of ln k(1+o(1)), and we suspect the truth to be closer to this lower bound. Thus, our work is the first among those on incentive compatible facility location that treats effectively (with a constant factor of approximation) the general case of an arbitrary number of facilities. △ Less

Submitted 9 February, 2012; v1 submitted 6 February, 2012; originally announced February 2012.

Comments: This paper has been withdrawn by the authors. Very similar results were obtained earlier in http://www.softlab.ntua.gr/~fotakis/data/wine10.pdf

On proper colorings of hypergraphs

Authors: Nick Gravin, Dmitrii Karpov

Abstract: Let $\mathcal{H}$ be a hypergraph of maximal vertex degree $Δ$, such that each its hyperedge contains at least $δ$ vertices. Let $k=\lceil\frac{2Δ}δ\rceil$. We prove that (i) The hypergraph $\mathcal{H}$ admits proper vertex coloring in $k+1$ colors. (ii) The hypergraph $\mathcal{H}$ admits proper vertex coloring in $k$ colors, if $δ\ge 3$ and $k\ge 3$. As a consequence of these results we derive… ▽ More Let $\mathcal{H}$ be a hypergraph of maximal vertex degree $Δ$, such that each its hyperedge contains at least $δ$ vertices. Let $k=\lceil\frac{2Δ}δ\rceil$. We prove that (i) The hypergraph $\mathcal{H}$ admits proper vertex coloring in $k+1$ colors. (ii) The hypergraph $\mathcal{H}$ admits proper vertex coloring in $k$ colors, if $δ\ge 3$ and $k\ge 3$. As a consequence of these results we derive upper bounds on the number of colors in dynamic colorings. △ Less

Submitted 7 November, 2011; originally announced November 2011.

Comments: 10 pages, 3 figure

Report number: MR2870244

Journal ref: Journal of Mathematical Sciences, Volume 184, Issue 5 (2012), pp. 595-600

Competitive Auctions for Markets with Positive Externalities

Authors: Nick Gravin, Pinyan Lu

Abstract: In digital goods auctions, there is an auctioneer who sells an item with unlimited supply to a set of potential buyers, and the objective is to design truthful auction to maximize the total profit of the auctioneer. Motivated from an observation that the values of buyers for the item could be interconnected through social networks, we study digital goods auctions with positive externalities among… ▽ More In digital goods auctions, there is an auctioneer who sells an item with unlimited supply to a set of potential buyers, and the objective is to design truthful auction to maximize the total profit of the auctioneer. Motivated from an observation that the values of buyers for the item could be interconnected through social networks, we study digital goods auctions with positive externalities among the buyers. This defines a multi-parameter auction design problem where the private valuation of every buyer is a function of other winning buyers. The main contribution of this paper is a truthful competitive mechanism for subadditive valuations. Our competitive result is with respect to a new solution benchmark $\mathcal{F}^{(3)}$; on the other hand, we show a surprising impossibility result if comparing to the benchmark $\mathcal{F}^{(2)}$, where the latter has been used quite successfully in digital goods auctions without extenalities \cite{Goldberg2006}. Our results from $\mathcal{F}^{(2)}$ to $\mathcal{F}^{(3)}$ could be considered as the loss of optimal profit at the cost of externalities. △ Less

Submitted 26 July, 2011; originally announced July 2011.

Budget Feasible Mechanism Design via Random Sampling

Authors: Xiaohui Bei, Ning Chen, Nick Gravin, Pinyan Lu

Abstract: Budget feasible mechanism considers algorithmic mechanism design questions where there is a budget constraint on the total payment of the mechanism. An important question in the field is that under which valuation domains there exist budget feasible mechanisms that admit `small' approximations (compared to a socially optimal solution). Singer \cite{PS10} showed that additive and submodular functio… ▽ More Budget feasible mechanism considers algorithmic mechanism design questions where there is a budget constraint on the total payment of the mechanism. An important question in the field is that under which valuation domains there exist budget feasible mechanisms that admit `small' approximations (compared to a socially optimal solution). Singer \cite{PS10} showed that additive and submodular functions admit a constant approximation mechanism. Recently, Dobzinski, Papadimitriou, and Singer \cite{DPS11} gave an $O(\log^2n)$ approximation mechanism for subadditive functions and remarked that: "A fundamental question is whether, regardless of computational constraints, a constant-factor budget feasible mechanism exists for subadditive function." In this paper, we give the first attempt to this question. We give a polynomial time $O(\frac{\log n}{\log\log n})$ sub-logarithmic approximation ratio mechanism for subadditive functions, improving the best known ratio $O(\log^2 n)$. Further, we connect budget feasible mechanism design to the concept of approximate core in cooperative game theory, and show that there is a mechanism for subadditive functions whose approximation is, via a characterization of the integrality gap of a linear program, linear to the largest value to which an approximate core exists. Our result implies in particular that the class of XOS functions, which is a superclass of submodular functions, admits a constant approximation mechanism. We believe that our work could be a solid step towards solving the above fundamental problem eventually, and possibly, with an affirmative answer. △ Less

Submitted 22 March, 2012; v1 submitted 15 July, 2011; originally announced July 2011.

Comments: Updated version please refer to http://arxiv.longhoe.net/abs/1203.4455

Approximate Pure Nash Equilibria in Weighted Congestion Games: Existence, Efficient Computation, and Structure

Authors: Ioannis Caragiannis, Angelo Fanelli, Nick Gravin, Alexander Skopalik

Abstract: We consider structural and algorithmic questions related to the Nash dynamics of weighted congestion games. In weighted congestion games with linear latency functions, the existence of (pure Nash) equilibria is guaranteed by potential function arguments. Unfortunately, this proof of existence is inefficient and computing equilibria is such games is a {\sf PLS}-hard problem. The situation gets wors… ▽ More We consider structural and algorithmic questions related to the Nash dynamics of weighted congestion games. In weighted congestion games with linear latency functions, the existence of (pure Nash) equilibria is guaranteed by potential function arguments. Unfortunately, this proof of existence is inefficient and computing equilibria is such games is a {\sf PLS}-hard problem. The situation gets worse when superlinear latency functions come into play; in this case, the Nash dynamics of the game may contain cycles and equilibria may not even exist. Given these obstacles, we consider approximate equilibria as alternative solution concepts. Do such equilibria exist? And if so, can we compute them efficiently? We provide positive answers to both questions for weighted congestion games with polynomial latency functions by exploiting an "approximation" of such games by a new class of potential games that we call $Ψ$-games. This allows us to show that these games have $d!$-approximate equilibria, where $d$ is the maximum degree of the latency functions. Our main technical contribution is an efficient algorithm for computing O(1)-approximate equilibria when $d$ is a constant. For games with linear latency functions, the approximation guarantee is $\frac{3+\sqrt{5}}{2}+O(γ)$ for arbitrarily small $γ>0$; for latency functions with maximum degree $d\geq 2$, it is $d^{2d+o(d)}$. The running time is polynomial in the number of bits in the representation of the game and $1/γ$. As a byproduct of our techniques, we also show the following structural statement for weighted congestion games with polynomial latency functions of maximum degree $d\geq 2$: polynomially-long sequences of best-response moves from any initial state to a $d^{O(d^2)}$-approximate equilibrium exist and can be efficiently identified in such games as long as $d$ is constant. △ Less

Submitted 11 November, 2011; v1 submitted 12 July, 2011; originally announced July 2011.

Comments: 31 pages

The inverse moment problem for convex polytopes

Authors: Nick Gravin, Jean Lasserre, Dmitrii Pasechnik, Sinai Robins

Abstract: The goal of this paper is to present a general and novel approach for the reconstruction of any convex d-dimensional polytope P, from knowledge of its moments. In particular, we show that the vertices of an N-vertex polytope in R^d can be reconstructed from the knowledge of O(DN) axial moments (w.r.t. to an unknown polynomial measure od degree D) in d+1 distinct generic directions. Our approach is… ▽ More The goal of this paper is to present a general and novel approach for the reconstruction of any convex d-dimensional polytope P, from knowledge of its moments. In particular, we show that the vertices of an N-vertex polytope in R^d can be reconstructed from the knowledge of O(DN) axial moments (w.r.t. to an unknown polynomial measure od degree D) in d+1 distinct generic directions. Our approach is based on the collection of moment formulas due to Brion, Lawrence, Khovanskii-Pukhikov, and Barvinok that arise in the discrete geometry of polytopes, and what variously known as Prony's method, or Vandermonde factorization of finite rank Hankel matrices. △ Less

Submitted 22 April, 2012; v1 submitted 28 June, 2011; originally announced June 2011.

Comments: LaTeX2e, 24 pages including 1 appendix

MSC Class: 52B11; 42B10; 47B35 ACM Class: F.2.1; F.2.2

Journal ref: Discrete and Computational Geometry, 48(2012), pp. 596--621

Mechanism Design without Money via Stable Matching

Authors: Ning Chen, Nick Gravin, Pinyan Lu

Abstract: Mechanism design without money has a rich history in social choice literature. Due to the strong impossibility theorem by Gibbard and Satterthwaite, exploring domains in which there exist dominant strategy mechanisms is one of the central questions in the field. We propose a general framework, called the generalized packing problem (\gpp), to study the mechanism design questions without payment. T… ▽ More Mechanism design without money has a rich history in social choice literature. Due to the strong impossibility theorem by Gibbard and Satterthwaite, exploring domains in which there exist dominant strategy mechanisms is one of the central questions in the field. We propose a general framework, called the generalized packing problem (\gpp), to study the mechanism design questions without payment. The \gpp\ possesses a rich structure and comprises a number of well-studied models as special cases, including, e.g., matroid, matching, knapsack, independent set, and the generalized assignment problem. We adopt the agenda of approximate mechanism design where the objective is to design a truthful (or strategyproof) mechanism without money that can be implemented in polynomial time and yields a good approximation to the socially optimal solution. We study several special cases of \gpp, and give constant approximation mechanisms for matroid, matching, knapsack, and the generalized assignment problem. Our result for generalized assignment problem solves an open problem proposed in \cite{DG10}. Our main technical contribution is in exploitation of the approaches from stable matching, which is a fundamental solution concept in the context of matching marketplaces, in application to mechanism design. Stable matching, while conceptually simple, provides a set of powerful tools to manage and analyze self-interested behaviors of participating agents. Our mechanism uses a stable matching algorithm as a critical component and adopts other approaches like random sampling and online mechanisms. Our work also enriches the stable matching theory with a new knapsack constrained matching model. △ Less

Submitted 14 April, 2011; originally announced April 2011.

Efficient computation of approximate pure Nash equilibria in congestion games

Authors: Ioannis Caragiannis, Angelo Fanelli, Nick Gravin, Alexander Skopalik

Abstract: Congestion games constitute an important class of games in which computing an exact or even approximate pure Nash equilibrium is in general {\sf PLS}-complete. We present a surprisingly simple polynomial-time algorithm that computes O(1)-approximate Nash equilibria in these games. In particular, for congestion games with linear latency functions, our algorithm computes $(2+ε)$-approximate pure Nas… ▽ More Congestion games constitute an important class of games in which computing an exact or even approximate pure Nash equilibrium is in general {\sf PLS}-complete. We present a surprisingly simple polynomial-time algorithm that computes O(1)-approximate Nash equilibria in these games. In particular, for congestion games with linear latency functions, our algorithm computes $(2+ε)$-approximate pure Nash equilibria in time polynomial in the number of players, the number of resources and $1/ε$. It also applies to games with polynomial latency functions with constant maximum degree $d$; there, the approximation guarantee is $d^{O(d)}$. The algorithm essentially identifies a polynomially long sequence of best-response moves that lead to an approximate equilibrium; the existence of such short sequences is interesting in itself. These are the first positive algorithmic results for approximate equilibria in non-symmetric congestion games. We strengthen them further by proving that, for congestion games that deviate from our mild assumptions, computing $ρ$-approximate equilibria is {\sf PLS}-complete for any polynomial-time computable $ρ$. △ Less

Submitted 13 July, 2011; v1 submitted 14 April, 2011; originally announced April 2011.

Translational tilings by a polytope, with multiplicity

Authors: Nick Gravin, Sinai Robins, Dmitry Shiryaev

Abstract: We study the problem of covering R^d by overlap** translates of a convex body P, such that almost every point of R^d is covered exactly k times. Such a covering of Euclidean space by translations is called a k-tiling. The investigation of tilings (i.e. 1-tilings in this context) by translations began with the work of Fedorov and Minkowski. Here we extend the investigations of Minkowski to k-tili… ▽ More We study the problem of covering R^d by overlap** translates of a convex body P, such that almost every point of R^d is covered exactly k times. Such a covering of Euclidean space by translations is called a k-tiling. The investigation of tilings (i.e. 1-tilings in this context) by translations began with the work of Fedorov and Minkowski. Here we extend the investigations of Minkowski to k-tilings by proving that if a convex body k-tiles R^d by translations, then it is centrally symmetric, and its facets are also centrally symmetric. These are the analogues of Minkowski's conditions for 1-tiling polytopes. Conversely, in the case that P is a rational polytope, we also prove that if P is centrally symmetric and has centrally symmetric facets, then P must k-tile R^d for some positive integer k. △ Less

Submitted 16 March, 2011; originally announced March 2011.

Dynamics of Profit-Sharing Games

Authors: John Augustine, Ning Chen, Edith Elkind, Angelo Fanelli, Nick Gravin, Dmitry Shiryaev

Abstract: An important task in the analysis of multiagent systems is to understand how groups of selfish players can form coalitions, i.e., work together in teams. In this paper, we study the dynamics of coalition formation under bounded rationality. We consider settings where each team's profit is given by a convex function, and propose three profit-sharing schemes, each of which is based on the concept of… ▽ More An important task in the analysis of multiagent systems is to understand how groups of selfish players can form coalitions, i.e., work together in teams. In this paper, we study the dynamics of coalition formation under bounded rationality. We consider settings where each team's profit is given by a convex function, and propose three profit-sharing schemes, each of which is based on the concept of marginal utility. The agents are assumed to be myopic, i.e., they keep changing teams as long as they can increase their payoff by doing so. We study the properties (such as closeness to Nash equilibrium or total profit) of the states that result after a polynomial number of such moves, and prove bounds on the price of anarchy and the price of stability of the corresponding games. △ Less

Submitted 1 March, 2011; v1 submitted 25 October, 2010; originally announced October 2010.

On the Approximability of Budget Feasible Mechanisms

Authors: Ning Chen, Nick Gravin, Pinyan Lu

Abstract: Budget feasible mechanisms, recently initiated by Singer (FOCS 2010), extend algorithmic mechanism design problems to a realistic setting with a budget constraint. We consider the problem of designing truthful budget feasible mechanisms for general submodular functions: we give a randomized mechanism with approximation ratio $7.91$ (improving the previous best-known result 112), and a deterministi… ▽ More Budget feasible mechanisms, recently initiated by Singer (FOCS 2010), extend algorithmic mechanism design problems to a realistic setting with a budget constraint. We consider the problem of designing truthful budget feasible mechanisms for general submodular functions: we give a randomized mechanism with approximation ratio $7.91$ (improving the previous best-known result 112), and a deterministic mechanism with approximation ratio $8.34$. Further we study the knapsack problem, which is special submodular function, give a $2+\sqrt{2}$ approximation deterministic mechanism (improving the previous best-known result 6), and a 3 approximation randomized mechanism. We provide a similar result for an extended knapsack problem with heterogeneous items, where items are divided into groups and one can pick at most one item from each group. Finally we show a lower bound of approximation ratio of $1+\sqrt{2}$ for deterministic mechanisms and 2 for randomized mechanisms for knapsack, as well as the general submodular functions. Our lower bounds are unconditional, which do not rely on any computational or complexity assumptions. △ Less

Submitted 22 July, 2010; originally announced July 2010.

On the Continuous CNN Problem

Authors: John Augustine, Nick Gravin

Abstract: In the (discrete) CNN problem, online requests appear as points in $\mathbb{R}^2$. Each request must be served before the next one is revealed. We have a server that can serve a request simply by aligning either its $x$ or $y$ coordinate with the request. The goal of the online algorithm is to minimize the total $L_1$ distance traveled by the server to serve all the requests. The best known compet… ▽ More In the (discrete) CNN problem, online requests appear as points in $\mathbb{R}^2$. Each request must be served before the next one is revealed. We have a server that can serve a request simply by aligning either its $x$ or $y$ coordinate with the request. The goal of the online algorithm is to minimize the total $L_1$ distance traveled by the server to serve all the requests. The best known competitive ratio for the discrete version is 879 (due to Sitters and Stougie). We study the continuous version, in which, the request can move continuously in $\mathbb{R}^2$ and the server must continuously serve the request. A simple adversarial argument shows that the lower bound on the competitive ratio of any online algorithm for the continuous CNN problem is 3. Our main contribution is an online algorithm with competitive ratio $3+2 \sqrt{3} \approx 6.464$. Our analysis is tight. The continuous version generalizes the discrete orthogonal CNN problem, in which every request must be $x$ or $y$ aligned with the previous request. Therefore, Our result improves upon the previous best competitive ratio of 9 (due to Iwama and Yonezawa). △ Less

Submitted 16 September, 2010; v1 submitted 14 April, 2010; originally announced April 2010.

Report number: MR2781393

Journal ref: Algorithms and computation. Part II. 2010 LNCS 6507, pp. 254-265

Frugal Mechanism Design via Spectral Techniques

Authors: Ning Chen, Edith Elkind, Nick Gravin, Fedor Petrov

Abstract: We study the design of truthful mechanisms for set systems, i.e., scenarios where a customer needs to hire a team of agents to perform a complex task. In this setting, frugality [Archer&Tardos'02] provides a measure to evaluate the "cost of truthfulness", that is, the overpayment of a truthful mechanism relative to the "fair" payment. We propose a uniform scheme for designing frugal truthful mech… ▽ More We study the design of truthful mechanisms for set systems, i.e., scenarios where a customer needs to hire a team of agents to perform a complex task. In this setting, frugality [Archer&Tardos'02] provides a measure to evaluate the "cost of truthfulness", that is, the overpayment of a truthful mechanism relative to the "fair" payment. We propose a uniform scheme for designing frugal truthful mechanisms for general set systems. Our scheme is based on scaling the agents' bids using the eigenvector of a matrix that encodes the interdependencies between the agents. We demonstrate that the r-out-of-k-system mechanism and the \sqrt-mechanism for buying a path in a graph [Karlin et. al'05] can be viewed as instantiations of our scheme. We then apply our scheme to two other classes of set systems, namely, vertex cover systems and k-path systems, in which a customer needs to purchase k edge-disjoint source-sink paths. For both settings, we bound the frugality of our mechanism in terms of the largest eigenvalue of the respective interdependency matrix. We show that our mechanism is optimal for a large subclass of vertex cover systems satisfying a simple local sparsity condition. For k-path systems, while our mechanism is within a factor of k + 1 from optimal, we show that it is, in fact, optimal, when one uses a modified definition of frugality proposed in [Elkind et al.'07]. Our lower bound argument combines spectral techniques and Young's inequality, and is applicable to all set systems. As both r-out-of-k systems and single path systems can be viewed as special cases of k-path systems, our result improves the lower bounds of [Karlin et al.'05] and answers several open questions proposed in that paper. △ Less

Submitted 11 April, 2010; v1 submitted 17 December, 2009; originally announced December 2009.

Journal ref: Proceedings of FOCS 2010

Non-degenerate colorings in the Brook's Theorem

Authors: Nikolay Gravin

Abstract: Let $c\geq 2$ and $p\geq c$ be two integers. We will call a proper coloring of the graph $G$ a \textit{$(c,p)$-nondegenerate}, if for any vertex of $G$ with degree at least $p$ there are at least $c$ vertices of different colors adjacent to it. In our work we prove the following result, which generalizes Brook's Theorem. Let $D\geq 3$ and $G$ be a graph without cliques on $D+1$ vertices and the… ▽ More Let $c\geq 2$ and $p\geq c$ be two integers. We will call a proper coloring of the graph $G$ a \textit{$(c,p)$-nondegenerate}, if for any vertex of $G$ with degree at least $p$ there are at least $c$ vertices of different colors adjacent to it. In our work we prove the following result, which generalizes Brook's Theorem. Let $D\geq 3$ and $G$ be a graph without cliques on $D+1$ vertices and the degree of any vertex in this graph is not greater than $D$. Then for every integer $c\geq 2$ there is a proper $(c,p)$-nondegenerate vertex $D$-coloring of $G$, where $p=(c^3+8c^2+19c+6)(c+1).$ During the primary proof, some interesting corollaries are derived. △ Less

Submitted 1 December, 2008; originally announced December 2008.

Comments: 18 pages, 10 figures

Report number: MR2641023

Journal ref: Diskretnaya Matematika, 2009 N4 pp. 105-128