-
Comparing Classical and Quantum Ground State Preparation Heuristics
Authors:
Katerina Gratsea,
Jakob S. Kottmann,
Peter D. Johnson,
Alexander A. Kunitsa
Abstract:
One promising field of quantum computation is the simulation of quantum systems, and specifically, the task of ground state energy estimation (GSEE). Ground state preparation (GSP) is a crucial component in GSEE algorithms, and classical methods like Hartree-Fock state preparation are commonly used. However, the efficiency of such classical methods diminishes exponentially with increasing system s…
▽ More
One promising field of quantum computation is the simulation of quantum systems, and specifically, the task of ground state energy estimation (GSEE). Ground state preparation (GSP) is a crucial component in GSEE algorithms, and classical methods like Hartree-Fock state preparation are commonly used. However, the efficiency of such classical methods diminishes exponentially with increasing system size in certain cases. In this study, we investigated whether in those cases quantum heuristic GSP methods could improve the overlap values compared to Hartree-Fock. Moreover, we carefully studied the performance gain for GSEE algorithms by exploring the trade-off between the overlap improvement and the associated resource cost in terms of T-gates of the GSP algorithm. Our findings indicate that quantum heuristic GSP can accelerate GSEE tasks, already for computationally affordable strongly-correlated systems of intermediate size. These results suggest that quantum heuristic GSP has the potential to significantly reduce the runtime requirements of GSEE algorithms, thereby enhancing their suitability for implementation on quantum hardware.
△ Less
Submitted 10 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
Early Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing
Authors:
Amara Katabarwa,
Katerina Gratsea,
Athena Caesura,
Peter D. Johnson
Abstract:
Over the past decade, research in quantum computing has tended to fall into one of two camps: near-term intermediate scale quantum (NISQ) and fault-tolerant quantum computing (FTQC). Yet, a growing body of work has been investigating how to use quantum computers in transition between these two eras. This envisions operating with tens of thousands to millions of physical qubits, able to support fau…
▽ More
Over the past decade, research in quantum computing has tended to fall into one of two camps: near-term intermediate scale quantum (NISQ) and fault-tolerant quantum computing (FTQC). Yet, a growing body of work has been investigating how to use quantum computers in transition between these two eras. This envisions operating with tens of thousands to millions of physical qubits, able to support fault-tolerant protocols, though operating close to the fault-tolerant threshold. Two challenges emerge from this picture: how to model the performance of devices that are continually improving and how to design algorithms to make the most use of these devices? In this work we develop a model for the performance of early fault-tolerant quantum computing (EFTQC) architectures and use this model to elucidate the regimes in which algorithms suited to such architectures are advantageous. As a concrete example, we show that, for the canonical task of phase estimation, in a regime of moderate scalability and using just over one million physical qubits, the ``reach'' of the quantum computer can be extended (compared to the standard approach) from 90-qubit instances to over 130-qubit instances using a simple early fault-tolerant quantum algorithm, which reduces the number of operations per circuit by a factor of 100 and increases the number of circuit repetitions by a factor of 10,000. This clarifies the role that such algorithms might play in the era of limited-scalability quantum computing.
△ Less
Submitted 24 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
When to Reject a Ground State Preparation Algorithm
Authors:
Katerina Gratsea,
Chong Sun,
Peter D. Johnson
Abstract:
In recent years substantial research effort has been devoted to quantum algorithms for ground state energy estimation (GSEE) in chemistry and materials. Given the many heuristic and non-heuristic methods being developed, it is challenging to assess what combination of these will ultimately be used in practice. One important metric for assessing utility is runtime. For most GSEE algorithms, the run…
▽ More
In recent years substantial research effort has been devoted to quantum algorithms for ground state energy estimation (GSEE) in chemistry and materials. Given the many heuristic and non-heuristic methods being developed, it is challenging to assess what combination of these will ultimately be used in practice. One important metric for assessing utility is runtime. For most GSEE algorithms, the runtime depends on the ground state preparation (GSP) method. Towards assessing the utility of various combinations of GSEE and GSP methods, we asked under which conditions a GSP method should be accepted over a reference method, such as the Hartree-Fock state. We introduce a criteria for accepting or rejecting a GSP method for the purposes of GSEE. We consider different GSP methods ranging from heuristics to algorithms with provable performance guarantees and perform numerical simulations to benchmark their performance on different chemical systems, starting from small molecules like the hydrogen atom to larger systems like the jellium. In the future this approach may be used to abandon certain VQE ansatzes and other heursitics. Yet so far our findings do not provide evidence against the use of VQE and more expensive heuristic methods, like the low-depth booster. This work sets a foundation from which to further explore the requirements to achieve quantum advantage in quantum chemistry.
△ Less
Submitted 22 December, 2022; v1 submitted 19 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
