-
The SRG/eROSITA all-sky survey: First X-ray catalogues and data release of the western Galactic hemisphere
Authors:
A. Merloni,
G. Lamer,
T. Liu,
M. E. Ramos-Ceja,
H. Brunner,
E. Bulbul,
K. Dennerl,
V. Doroshenko,
M. J. Freyberg,
S. Friedrich,
E. Gatuzz,
A. Georgakakis,
F. Haberl,
Z. Igo,
I. Kreykenbohm,
A. Liu,
C. Maitra,
A. Malyali,
M. G. F. Mayer,
K. Nandra,
P. Predehl,
J. Robrade,
M. Salvato,
J. S. Sanders,
I. Stewart
, et al. (120 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The eROSITA telescope array aboard the Spektrum Roentgen Gamma (SRG) satellite began surveying the sky in December 2019, with the aim of producing all-sky X-ray source lists and sky maps of an unprecedented depth. Here we present catalogues of both point-like and extended sources using the data acquired in the first six months of survey operations (eRASS1; completed June 2020) over the half sky wh…
▽ More
The eROSITA telescope array aboard the Spektrum Roentgen Gamma (SRG) satellite began surveying the sky in December 2019, with the aim of producing all-sky X-ray source lists and sky maps of an unprecedented depth. Here we present catalogues of both point-like and extended sources using the data acquired in the first six months of survey operations (eRASS1; completed June 2020) over the half sky whose proprietary data rights lie with the German eROSITA Consortium. We describe the observation process, the data analysis pipelines, and the characteristics of the X-ray sources. With nearly 930000 entries detected in the most sensitive 0.2-2.3 keV energy range, the eRASS1 main catalogue presented here increases the number of known X-ray sources in the published literature by more than 60%, and provides a comprehensive inventory of all classes of X-ray celestial objects, covering a wide range of physical processes. A smaller catalogue of 5466 sources detected in the less sensitive but harder 2.3-5 keV band is the result of the first true imaging survey of the entire sky above 2 keV. We show that the number counts of X-ray sources in eRASS1 are consistent with those derived over narrower fields by past X-ray surveys of a similar depth, and we explore the number counts variation as a function of the location in the sky. Adopting a uniform all-sky flux limit (at 50% completeness) of F_{0.5-2 keV} > 5 \times 10^{-14}$ erg\,s$^{-1}$\,cm$^{-2}$, we estimate that the eROSITA all-sky survey resolves into individual sources about 20% of the cosmic X-ray background in the 1-2 keV range. The catalogues presented here form part of the first data release (DR1) of the SRG/eROSITA all-sky survey. Beyond the X-ray catalogues, DR1 contains all detected and calibrated event files, source products (light curves and spectra), and all-sky maps. Illustrative examples of these are provided.
△ Less
Submitted 30 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
The first look at Narrow-Line Seyfert 1 Galaxies with eROSITA
Authors:
G. Grünwald,
Th. Boller,
S. Rakshit,
J. Buchner,
T. Dauser,
M. Freyberg,
T. Liu,
M. Salvato,
A. Schichtel
Abstract:
We present the first look at the spectral and timing analysis of Narrow-Line Seyfert 1 Galaxies (NLS1s) with the extended ROentgen Survey with an Imaging Telescope Array (eROSITA) on board the Spectrum-Roentgen-Gamma (SRG) mission. The sample of about 1,200 NLS1s was obtained via cross-match of the first eROSITA All-Sky Survey (eRASS1) catalogue with the catalogue of spectroscopically selected NLS…
▽ More
We present the first look at the spectral and timing analysis of Narrow-Line Seyfert 1 Galaxies (NLS1s) with the extended ROentgen Survey with an Imaging Telescope Array (eROSITA) on board the Spectrum-Roentgen-Gamma (SRG) mission. The sample of about 1,200 NLS1s was obtained via cross-match of the first eROSITA All-Sky Survey (eRASS1) catalogue with the catalogue of spectroscopically selected NLS1s from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) DR12 by Rakshit et al. [ApJS, 229, 39 (2017)]. The X-ray spectral analysis is based on a simple power-law fit. The photon index distribution has a mean value of about 2.81+-0.03, as expected from previous X-ray studies of NLS1s. Interestingly, it is positively skewed, and about 10 percent of the sources are located in the super-soft tail of photon indices larger than 4. These sources are of further interest as their source counts run into the X-ray background at values at around 1 keV. We argue that ionised outflows have been detected by eROSITA and may account for some of the extreme spectral steepness, which is supported by correlations found between the photon index and optical outflows parameters. We analysed the intrinsic X-ray variability of the eRASS1 to eRASS3 light curves of the sample but do not find significant variability neither during the individual survey scans nor between them.
△ Less
Submitted 11 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
Adapting the Interrelated Two-way Clustering method for Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) Modeling of a Diverse Set of Chemical Compounds
Authors:
Subhabrata Majumdar,
Subhash C. Basak,
Gregory D. Grunwald
Abstract:
Interrelated Two-way Clustering (ITC) is an unsupervised clustering method developed to divide samples into two groups in gene expression data obtained through microarrays, selecting important genes simultaneously in the process. This has been found to be a better approach than conventional clustering methods like K-means or self-organizing map for the scenarios when number of samples much smaller…
▽ More
Interrelated Two-way Clustering (ITC) is an unsupervised clustering method developed to divide samples into two groups in gene expression data obtained through microarrays, selecting important genes simultaneously in the process. This has been found to be a better approach than conventional clustering methods like K-means or self-organizing map for the scenarios when number of samples much smaller than number of variables (n<<p). In this paper we used the ITC approach for classification of a diverse set of 508 chemicals regarding mutagenicity. A large number of topological indices (TIs), 3-dimensional, and quantum chemical descriptors, as well as atom pairs (APs) have been used as explanatory variables. In this paper, ITC has been used only for predictor selection, after which ridge regression is employed to build the final predictive model. The proper leave-one-out (LOO) method of cross-validation in this scenario is to take as holdout each of the 508 compounds before predictor thinning and compare the predicted values with the experimental data. ITC based results obtained here are comparable to those developed earlier.
△ Less
Submitted 30 May, 2013;
originally announced May 2013.
-
A simulation study comparing likelihood and non-likelihood approaches in analyzing overdispersed count data
Authors:
Stanley Xu,
Gary Grunwald,
Richard Jones
Abstract:
Overdispersed count data are modelled with likelihood and non-likelihood approaches. Likelihood approaches include the Poisson mixtures with three distributions, the gamma, the lognormal, and the inverse Gaussian distributions. Non-likelihood approaches include the robust sandwich estimator and quasilikelihood. In this simulation study, overdispersed count data were simulated under the Poisson m…
▽ More
Overdispersed count data are modelled with likelihood and non-likelihood approaches. Likelihood approaches include the Poisson mixtures with three distributions, the gamma, the lognormal, and the inverse Gaussian distributions. Non-likelihood approaches include the robust sandwich estimator and quasilikelihood. In this simulation study, overdispersed count data were simulated under the Poisson mixtures with the gamma, the lognormal and the inverse Gaussian distributions, then analyzed with the five likelihood and non-likelihood approaches. Our results indicated that 1) when the count data are mildly overdispersed, there are virtually no differences in type I error rate, standard error of the main effect, and empirical power among the five methods; 2) when the count data are very overdispersed, none of these five approaches is robust to model misspecification as evaluated by type I error rate, standard error of the main effect, and empirical power. This simulation study raises caution on using non-likelihood method for analyzing very overdispered count data because of likely higher type I error and inappropriate power levels. Unlike non-likelihood approaches, likelihood approaches allow for statistical tests based on likelihood ratios and for checking model fit and provide basis for power and sample size calculations. When likelihood approaches are used, we suggest comparing likelihood values to select the appropriate parametric method for analyzing very overdispersed count data.
△ Less
Submitted 5 September, 2008;
originally announced September 2008.
