Skip to main content

Showing 1–5 of 5 results for author: Grüger, J

.
  1. arXiv:2406.11883  [pdf, other

    cs.PL cs.AI

    Data Petri Nets meet Probabilistic Programming (Extended version)

    Authors: Martin Kuhn, Joscha Grüger, Christoph Matheja, Andrey Rivkin

    Abstract: Probabilistic programming (PP) is a programming paradigm that allows for writing statistical models like ordinary programs, performing simulations by running those programs, and analyzing and refining their statistical behavior using powerful inference engines. This paper takes a step towards leveraging PP for reasoning about data-aware processes. To this end, we present a systematic translation o… ▽ More

    Submitted 12 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

  2. arXiv:2405.08528  [pdf, other

    cs.SE cs.AI

    From Internet of Things Data to Business Processes: Challenges and a Framework

    Authors: Juergen Mangler, Ronny Seiger, Janik-Vasily Benzin, Joscha Grüger, Yusuf Kirikkayis, Florian Gallik, Lukas Malburg, Matthias Ehrendorfer, Yannis Bertrand, Marco Franceschetti, Barbara Weber, Stefanie Rinderle-Ma, Ralph Bergmann, Estefanía Serral Asensio, Manfred Reichert

    Abstract: The IoT and Business Process Management (BPM) communities co-exist in many shared application domains, such as manufacturing and healthcare. The IoT community has a strong focus on hardware, connectivity and data; the BPM community focuses mainly on finding, controlling, and enhancing the structured interactions among the IoT devices in processes. While the field of Process Mining deals with the e… ▽ More

    Submitted 22 May, 2024; v1 submitted 14 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

    ACM Class: H.3.3; I.2.1

  3. arXiv:2209.09535  [pdf, other

    cs.AI

    Declarative Guideline Conformance Checking of Clinical Treatments: A Case Study

    Authors: Joscha Grüger, Tobias Geyer, Martin Kuhn, Stefan Braun, Ralph Bergmann

    Abstract: Conformance checking is a process mining technique that allows verifying the conformance of process instances to a given model. Thus, this technique is predestined to be used in the medical context for the comparison of treatment cases with clinical guidelines. However, medical processes are highly variable, highly dynamic, and complex. This makes the use of imperative conformance checking approac… ▽ More

    Submitted 20 September, 2022; originally announced September 2022.

  4. arXiv:2209.02702  [pdf, other

    cs.DB

    An IoT-Enriched Event Log for Process Mining in Smart Factories

    Authors: Lukas Malburg, Joscha Grüger, Ralph Bergmann

    Abstract: Modern technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT) are becoming increasingly important in various domains, including Business Process Management (BPM) research. One main research area in BPM is process mining, which can be used to analyze event logs, e.g., for checking the conformance of running processes. However, there are only a few IoT-based event logs available for research purposes. So… ▽ More

    Submitted 6 September, 2022; originally announced September 2022.

    Comments: The corresponding dataset of the IoT-enriched event log is available at: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.20130794

  5. arXiv:2206.11392  [pdf, other

    cs.SE

    SensorStream: An XES Extension for Enriching Event Logs with IoT-Sensor Data

    Authors: Joscha Grüger, Lukas Malburg, Juergen Mangler, Yannis Bertrand, Stefanie Rinderle-Ma, Ralph Bergmann, Estefanía Serral Asensio

    Abstract: Process management and process orchestration/execution are currently hot topics; prevalent trends such as automation and Industry 4.0 require solutions which allow domain-experts to easily model and execute processes in various domains, including manufacturing and health-care. These domains, in turn, rely on a tight integration between hardware and software, i.e. via the Internet of Things (IoT).… ▽ More

    Submitted 22 June, 2022; originally announced June 2022.

    Comments: 21 papges, 6 figures, 10 listings, not submitted to anywhere yet

    ACM Class: D.2.12; H.3.2