Showing 1–5 of 5 results for author: Goller, D

Tournaments, Contestant Heterogeneity and Performance

Authors: Enzo Brox, Daniel Goller

Abstract: Tournaments are frequently used incentive mechanisms to enhance performance. In this paper, we use field data and show that skill disparities among contestants asymmetrically affect the performance of contestants. Skill disparities have detrimental effects on the performance of the lower-ability contestant but positive effects on the performance of the higher-ability contestant. We discuss the pot… ▽ More Tournaments are frequently used incentive mechanisms to enhance performance. In this paper, we use field data and show that skill disparities among contestants asymmetrically affect the performance of contestants. Skill disparities have detrimental effects on the performance of the lower-ability contestant but positive effects on the performance of the higher-ability contestant. We discuss the potential of different behavioral approaches to explain our findings and discuss the implications of our results for the optimal design of contests. Beyond that, our study reveals two important empirical results: (a) affirmative action-type policies may help to mitigate the adverse effects on lower-ability contestants, and (b) the skill level of potential future contestants in subsequent tournament stages can detrimentally influence the performance of higher-ability contestants but does not affect the lower-ability contestant. △ Less

Submitted 10 January, 2024; originally announced January 2024.

'Good job!' The impact of positive and negative feedback on performance

Authors: Daniel Goller, Maximilian Späth

Abstract: We analyze the causal impact of positive and negative feedback on professional performance. We exploit a unique data source in which quasi-random, naturally occurring variations within subjective ratings serve as positive and negative feedback. The analysis shows that receiving positive feedback has a favorable impact on subsequent performance, while negative feedback does not have an effect. Thes… ▽ More We analyze the causal impact of positive and negative feedback on professional performance. We exploit a unique data source in which quasi-random, naturally occurring variations within subjective ratings serve as positive and negative feedback. The analysis shows that receiving positive feedback has a favorable impact on subsequent performance, while negative feedback does not have an effect. These main results are found in two different environments and for distinct cultural backgrounds, experiences, and gender of the feedback recipients. The findings imply that managers should focus on giving positive motivational feedback. △ Less

Submitted 27 January, 2023; originally announced January 2023.

A general framework to quantify the event importance in multi-event contests

Authors: Daniel Goller, Sandro Heiniger

Abstract: We propose a statistical framework for quantifying the importance of single events that do not provide intermediate rewards but offer implicit incentives through the reward structure at the end of a multi-event contest. Applying the framework to primary elections in the US, where earlier elections have greater importance and influence, we show that schedule variations can mitigate the problem of f… ▽ More We propose a statistical framework for quantifying the importance of single events that do not provide intermediate rewards but offer implicit incentives through the reward structure at the end of a multi-event contest. Applying the framework to primary elections in the US, where earlier elections have greater importance and influence, we show that schedule variations can mitigate the problem of front-loading elections. When applied to European football, we demonstrate the utility and meaningfulness of quantified event importance in relation to the in-match performance of contestants, to improve outcome prediction and to provide an early indication of public interest. △ Less

Submitted 5 July, 2022; originally announced July 2022.

Active labour market policies for the long-term unemployed: New evidence from causal machine learning

Authors: Daniel Goller, Tamara Harrer, Michael Lechner, Joachim Wolff

Abstract: Active labor market programs are important instruments used by European employment agencies to help the unemployed find work. Investigating large administrative data on German long-term unemployed persons, we analyze the effectiveness of three job search assistance and training programs using Causal Machine Learning. Participants benefit from quickly realizing and long-lasting positive effects acr… ▽ More Active labor market programs are important instruments used by European employment agencies to help the unemployed find work. Investigating large administrative data on German long-term unemployed persons, we analyze the effectiveness of three job search assistance and training programs using Causal Machine Learning. Participants benefit from quickly realizing and long-lasting positive effects across all programs, with placement services being the most effective. For women, we find differential effects in various characteristics. Especially, women benefit from better local labor market conditions. We propose more effective data-driven rules for allocating the unemployed to the respective labor market programs that could be employed by decision-makers. △ Less

Submitted 29 May, 2023; v1 submitted 18 June, 2021; originally announced June 2021.

Analysing a built-in advantage in asymmetric darts contests using causal machine learning

Authors: Daniel Goller

Abstract: We analyse a sequential contest with two players in darts where one of the contestants enjoys a technical advantage. Using methods from the causal machine learning literature, we analyse the built-in advantage, which is the first-mover having potentially more but never less moves. Our empirical findings suggest that the first-mover has an 8.6 percentage points higher probability to win the match i… ▽ More We analyse a sequential contest with two players in darts where one of the contestants enjoys a technical advantage. Using methods from the causal machine learning literature, we analyse the built-in advantage, which is the first-mover having potentially more but never less moves. Our empirical findings suggest that the first-mover has an 8.6 percentage points higher probability to win the match induced by the technical advantage. Contestants with low performance measures and little experience have the highest built-in advantage. With regard to the fairness principle that contestants with equal abilities should have equal winning probabilities, this contest is ex-ante fair in the case of equal built-in advantages for both competitors and a randomized starting right. Nevertheless, the contest design produces unequal probabilities of winning for equally skilled contestants because of asymmetries in the built-in advantage associated with social pressure for contestants competing at home and away. △ Less

Submitted 17 August, 2020; originally announced August 2020.

Journal ref: Annals of Operations Research, 2022