-
Automatic pulse-level calibration by tracking observables using iterative learning
Authors:
Andy J. Goldschmidt,
Frederic T. Chong
Abstract:
Model-based quantum optimal control promises to solve a wide range of critical quantum technology problems within a single, flexible framework. The catch is that highly-accurate models are needed if the optimized controls are to meet the exacting demands set by quantum engineers. A practical alternative is to directly calibrate control parameters by taking device data and tuning until success is a…
▽ More
Model-based quantum optimal control promises to solve a wide range of critical quantum technology problems within a single, flexible framework. The catch is that highly-accurate models are needed if the optimized controls are to meet the exacting demands set by quantum engineers. A practical alternative is to directly calibrate control parameters by taking device data and tuning until success is achieved. In quantum computing, gate errors due to inaccurate models can be efficiently polished if the control is limited to a few (usually hand-designed) parameters; however, an alternative tool set is required to enable efficient calibration of the complicated waveforms potentially returned by optimal control. We propose an automated model-based framework for calibrating quantum optimal controls called Learning Iteratively for Feasible Tracking (LIFT). LIFT achieves high-fidelity controls despite parasitic model discrepancies by precisely tracking feasible trajectories of quantum observables. Feasible trajectories are set by combining black-box optimal control and the bilinear dynamic mode decomposition, a physics-informed regression framework for discovering effective Hamiltonian models directly from rollout data. Any remaining tracking errors are eliminated in a non-causal way by applying model-based, norm-optimal iterative learning control to subsequent rollout data. We use numerical experiments of qubit gate synthesis to demonstrate how LIFT enables calibration of high-fidelity optimal control waveforms in spite of model discrepancies.
△ Less
Submitted 24 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
Model predictive control for robust quantum state preparation
Authors:
Andy J. Goldschmidt,
Jonathan L. DuBois,
Steven L. Brunton,
J. Nathan Kutz
Abstract:
A critical engineering challenge in quantum technology is the accurate control of quantum dynamics. Model-based methods for optimal control have been shown to be highly effective when theory and experiment closely match. Consequently, realizing high-fidelity quantum processes with model-based control requires careful device characterization. In quantum processors based on cold atoms, the Hamiltoni…
▽ More
A critical engineering challenge in quantum technology is the accurate control of quantum dynamics. Model-based methods for optimal control have been shown to be highly effective when theory and experiment closely match. Consequently, realizing high-fidelity quantum processes with model-based control requires careful device characterization. In quantum processors based on cold atoms, the Hamiltonian can be well-characterized. For superconducting qubits operating at milli-Kelvin temperatures, the Hamiltonian is not as well-characterized. Unaccounted for physics (i.e., mode discrepancy), coherent disturbances, and increased noise compromise traditional model-based control. This work introduces model predictive control (MPC) for quantum control applications. MPC is a closed-loop optimization framework that (i) inherits a natural degree of disturbance rejection by incorporating measurement feedback, (ii) utilizes finite-horizon model-based optimizations to control complex multi-input, multi-output dynamical systems under state and input constraints, and (iii) is flexible enough to develop synergistically alongside other modern control strategies. We show how MPC can be used to generate practical optimized control sequences in representative examples of quantum state preparation. Specifically, we demonstrate for a qubit, a weakly-anharmonic qubit, and a system undergoing crosstalk, that MPC can realize successful model-based control even when the model is inadequate. These examples showcase why MPC is an important addition to the quantum engineering control suite.
△ Less
Submitted 11 October, 2022; v1 submitted 13 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
-
PySINDy: A comprehensive Python package for robust sparse system identification
Authors:
Alan A. Kaptanoglu,
Brian M. de Silva,
Urban Fasel,
Kadierdan Kaheman,
Andy J. Goldschmidt,
Jared L. Callaham,
Charles B. Delahunt,
Zachary G. Nicolaou,
Kathleen Champion,
Jean-Christophe Loiseau,
J. Nathan Kutz,
Steven L. Brunton
Abstract:
Automated data-driven modeling, the process of directly discovering the governing equations of a system from data, is increasingly being used across the scientific community. PySINDy is a Python package that provides tools for applying the sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics (SINDy) approach to data-driven model discovery. In this major update to PySINDy, we implement several advanced feat…
▽ More
Automated data-driven modeling, the process of directly discovering the governing equations of a system from data, is increasingly being used across the scientific community. PySINDy is a Python package that provides tools for applying the sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics (SINDy) approach to data-driven model discovery. In this major update to PySINDy, we implement several advanced features that enable the discovery of more general differential equations from noisy and limited data. The library of candidate terms is extended for the identification of actuated systems, partial differential equations (PDEs), and implicit differential equations. Robust formulations, including the integral form of SINDy and ensembling techniques, are also implemented to improve performance for real-world data. Finally, we provide a range of new optimization algorithms, including several sparse regression techniques and algorithms to enforce and promote inequality constraints and stability. Together, these updates enable entirely new SINDy model discovery capabilities that have not been reported in the literature, such as constrained PDE identification and ensembling with different sparse regression optimizers.
△ Less
Submitted 25 January, 2022; v1 submitted 12 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
