-
Can Go AIs be adversarially robust?
Authors:
Tom Tseng,
Euan McLean,
Kellin Pelrine,
Tony T. Wang,
Adam Gleave
Abstract:
Prior work found that superhuman Go AIs like KataGo can be defeated by simple adversarial strategies. In this paper, we study if simple defenses can improve KataGo's worst-case performance. We test three natural defenses: adversarial training on hand-constructed positions, iterated adversarial training, and changing the network architecture. We find that some of these defenses are able to protect…
▽ More
Prior work found that superhuman Go AIs like KataGo can be defeated by simple adversarial strategies. In this paper, we study if simple defenses can improve KataGo's worst-case performance. We test three natural defenses: adversarial training on hand-constructed positions, iterated adversarial training, and changing the network architecture. We find that some of these defenses are able to protect against previously discovered attacks. Unfortunately, we also find that none of these defenses are able to withstand adaptive attacks. In particular, we are able to train new adversaries that reliably defeat our defended agents by causing them to blunder in ways humans would not. Our results suggest that building robust AI systems is challenging even in narrow domains such as Go. For interactive examples of attacks and a link to our codebase, see https://goattack.far.ai.
△ Less
Submitted 18 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Uncovering Latent Human Wellbeing in Language Model Embeddings
Authors:
Pedro Freire,
ChengCheng Tan,
Adam Gleave,
Dan Hendrycks,
Scott Emmons
Abstract:
Do language models implicitly learn a concept of human wellbeing? We explore this through the ETHICS Utilitarianism task, assessing if scaling enhances pretrained models' representations. Our initial finding reveals that, without any prompt engineering or finetuning, the leading principal component from OpenAI's text-embedding-ada-002 achieves 73.9% accuracy. This closely matches the 74.6% of BERT…
▽ More
Do language models implicitly learn a concept of human wellbeing? We explore this through the ETHICS Utilitarianism task, assessing if scaling enhances pretrained models' representations. Our initial finding reveals that, without any prompt engineering or finetuning, the leading principal component from OpenAI's text-embedding-ada-002 achieves 73.9% accuracy. This closely matches the 74.6% of BERT-large finetuned on the entire ETHICS dataset, suggesting pretraining conveys some understanding about human wellbeing. Next, we consider four language model families, observing how Utilitarianism accuracy varies with increased parameters. We find performance is nondecreasing with increased model size when using sufficient numbers of principal components.
△ Less
Submitted 18 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Exploiting Novel GPT-4 APIs
Authors:
Kellin Pelrine,
Mohammad Taufeeque,
Michał Zając,
Euan McLean,
Adam Gleave
Abstract:
Language model attacks typically assume one of two extreme threat models: full white-box access to model weights, or black-box access limited to a text generation API. However, real-world APIs are often more flexible than just text generation: these APIs expose ``gray-box'' access leading to new threat vectors. To explore this, we red-team three new functionalities exposed in the GPT-4 APIs: fine-…
▽ More
Language model attacks typically assume one of two extreme threat models: full white-box access to model weights, or black-box access limited to a text generation API. However, real-world APIs are often more flexible than just text generation: these APIs expose ``gray-box'' access leading to new threat vectors. To explore this, we red-team three new functionalities exposed in the GPT-4 APIs: fine-tuning, function calling and knowledge retrieval. We find that fine-tuning a model on as few as 15 harmful examples or 100 benign examples can remove core safeguards from GPT-4, enabling a range of harmful outputs. Furthermore, we find that GPT-4 Assistants readily divulge the function call schema and can be made to execute arbitrary function calls. Finally, we find that knowledge retrieval can be hijacked by injecting instructions into retrieval documents. These vulnerabilities highlight that any additions to the functionality exposed by an API can create new vulnerabilities.
△ Less
Submitted 21 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
STARC: A General Framework For Quantifying Differences Between Reward Functions
Authors:
Joar Skalse,
Lucy Farnik,
Sumeet Ramesh Motwani,
Erik Jenner,
Adam Gleave,
Alessandro Abate
Abstract:
In order to solve a task using reinforcement learning, it is necessary to first formalise the goal of that task as a reward function. However, for many real-world tasks, it is very difficult to manually specify a reward function that never incentivises undesirable behaviour. As a result, it is increasingly popular to use \emph{reward learning algorithms}, which attempt to \emph{learn} a reward fun…
▽ More
In order to solve a task using reinforcement learning, it is necessary to first formalise the goal of that task as a reward function. However, for many real-world tasks, it is very difficult to manually specify a reward function that never incentivises undesirable behaviour. As a result, it is increasingly popular to use \emph{reward learning algorithms}, which attempt to \emph{learn} a reward function from data. However, the theoretical foundations of reward learning are not yet well-developed. In particular, it is typically not known when a given reward learning algorithm with high probability will learn a reward function that is safe to optimise. This means that reward learning algorithms generally must be evaluated empirically, which is expensive, and that their failure modes are difficult to anticipate in advance. One of the roadblocks to deriving better theoretical guarantees is the lack of good methods for quantifying the difference between reward functions. In this paper we provide a solution to this problem, in the form of a class of pseudometrics on the space of all reward functions that we call STARC (STAndardised Reward Comparison) metrics. We show that STARC metrics induce both an upper and a lower bound on worst-case regret, which implies that our metrics are tight, and that any metric with the same properties must be bilipschitz equivalent to ours. Moreover, we also identify a number of issues with reward metrics proposed by earlier works. Finally, we evaluate our metrics empirically, to demonstrate their practical efficacy. STARC metrics can be used to make both theoretical and empirical analysis of reward learning algorithms both easier and more principled.
△ Less
Submitted 11 March, 2024; v1 submitted 26 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
On The Fragility of Learned Reward Functions
Authors:
Lev McKinney,
Yawen Duan,
David Krueger,
Adam Gleave
Abstract:
Reward functions are notoriously difficult to specify, especially for tasks with complex goals. Reward learning approaches attempt to infer reward functions from human feedback and preferences. Prior works on reward learning have mainly focused on the performance of policies trained alongside the reward function. This practice, however, may fail to detect learned rewards that are not capable of tr…
▽ More
Reward functions are notoriously difficult to specify, especially for tasks with complex goals. Reward learning approaches attempt to infer reward functions from human feedback and preferences. Prior works on reward learning have mainly focused on the performance of policies trained alongside the reward function. This practice, however, may fail to detect learned rewards that are not capable of training new policies from scratch and thus do not capture the intended behavior. Our work focuses on demonstrating and studying the causes of these relearning failures in the domain of preference-based reward learning. We demonstrate with experiments in tabular and continuous control environments that the severity of relearning failures can be sensitive to changes in reward model design and the trajectory dataset composition. Based on our findings, we emphasize the need for more retraining-based evaluations in the literature.
△ Less
Submitted 9 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
imitation: Clean Imitation Learning Implementations
Authors:
Adam Gleave,
Mohammad Taufeeque,
Juan Rocamonde,
Erik Jenner,
Steven H. Wang,
Sam Toyer,
Maximilian Ernestus,
Nora Belrose,
Scott Emmons,
Stuart Russell
Abstract:
imitation provides open-source implementations of imitation and reward learning algorithms in PyTorch. We include three inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) algorithms, three imitation learning algorithms and a preference comparison algorithm. The implementations have been benchmarked against previous results, and automated tests cover 98% of the code. Moreover, the algorithms are implemented in a…
▽ More
imitation provides open-source implementations of imitation and reward learning algorithms in PyTorch. We include three inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) algorithms, three imitation learning algorithms and a preference comparison algorithm. The implementations have been benchmarked against previous results, and automated tests cover 98% of the code. Moreover, the algorithms are implemented in a modular fashion, making it simple to develop novel algorithms in the framework. Our source code, including documentation and examples, is available at https://github.com/HumanCompatibleAI/imitation
△ Less
Submitted 21 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
Adversarial Policies Beat Superhuman Go AIs
Authors:
Tony T. Wang,
Adam Gleave,
Tom Tseng,
Kellin Pelrine,
Nora Belrose,
Joseph Miller,
Michael D. Dennis,
Yawen Duan,
Viktor Pogrebniak,
Sergey Levine,
Stuart Russell
Abstract:
We attack the state-of-the-art Go-playing AI system KataGo by training adversarial policies against it, achieving a >97% win rate against KataGo running at superhuman settings. Our adversaries do not win by playing Go well. Instead, they trick KataGo into making serious blunders. Our attack transfers zero-shot to other superhuman Go-playing AIs, and is comprehensible to the extent that human exper…
▽ More
We attack the state-of-the-art Go-playing AI system KataGo by training adversarial policies against it, achieving a >97% win rate against KataGo running at superhuman settings. Our adversaries do not win by playing Go well. Instead, they trick KataGo into making serious blunders. Our attack transfers zero-shot to other superhuman Go-playing AIs, and is comprehensible to the extent that human experts can implement it without algorithmic assistance to consistently beat superhuman AIs. The core vulnerability uncovered by our attack persists even in KataGo agents adversarially trained to defend against our attack. Our results demonstrate that even superhuman AI systems may harbor surprising failure modes. Example games are available https://goattack.far.ai/.
△ Less
Submitted 13 July, 2023; v1 submitted 31 October, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
Calculus on MDPs: Potential Sha** as a Gradient
Authors:
Erik Jenner,
Herke van Hoof,
Adam Gleave
Abstract:
In reinforcement learning, different reward functions can be equivalent in terms of the optimal policies they induce. A particularly well-known and important example is potential sha**, a class of functions that can be added to any reward function without changing the optimal policy set under arbitrary transition dynamics. Potential sha** is conceptually similar to potentials, conservative vec…
▽ More
In reinforcement learning, different reward functions can be equivalent in terms of the optimal policies they induce. A particularly well-known and important example is potential sha**, a class of functions that can be added to any reward function without changing the optimal policy set under arbitrary transition dynamics. Potential sha** is conceptually similar to potentials, conservative vector fields and gauge transformations in math and physics, but this connection has not previously been formally explored. We develop a formalism for discrete calculus on graphs that abstract a Markov Decision Process, and show how potential sha** can be formally interpreted as a gradient within this framework. This allows us to strengthen results from Ng et al. (1999) describing conditions under which potential sha** is the only additive reward transformation to always preserve optimal policies. As an additional application of our formalism, we define a rule for picking a single unique reward function from each potential sha** equivalence class.
△ Less
Submitted 2 December, 2022; v1 submitted 19 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
-
Reducing Exploitability with Population Based Training
Authors:
Pavel Czempin,
Adam Gleave
Abstract:
Self-play reinforcement learning has achieved state-of-the-art, and often superhuman, performance in a variety of zero-sum games. Yet prior work has found that policies that are highly capable against regular opponents can fail catastrophically against adversarial policies: an opponent trained explicitly against the victim. Prior defenses using adversarial training were able to make the victim rob…
▽ More
Self-play reinforcement learning has achieved state-of-the-art, and often superhuman, performance in a variety of zero-sum games. Yet prior work has found that policies that are highly capable against regular opponents can fail catastrophically against adversarial policies: an opponent trained explicitly against the victim. Prior defenses using adversarial training were able to make the victim robust to a specific adversary, but the victim remained vulnerable to new ones. We conjecture this limitation was due to insufficient diversity of adversaries seen during training. We analyze a defense using population based training to pit the victim against a diverse set of opponents. We evaluate this defense's robustness against new adversaries in two low-dimensional environments. This defense increases robustness against adversaries, as measured by the number of attacker training timesteps to exploit the victim. Furthermore, we show that robustness is correlated with the size of the opponent population.
△ Less
Submitted 11 January, 2023; v1 submitted 9 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
-
Preprocessing Reward Functions for Interpretability
Authors:
Erik Jenner,
Adam Gleave
Abstract:
In many real-world applications, the reward function is too complex to be manually specified. In such cases, reward functions must instead be learned from human feedback. Since the learned reward may fail to represent user preferences, it is important to be able to validate the learned reward function prior to deployment. One promising approach is to apply interpretability tools to the reward func…
▽ More
In many real-world applications, the reward function is too complex to be manually specified. In such cases, reward functions must instead be learned from human feedback. Since the learned reward may fail to represent user preferences, it is important to be able to validate the learned reward function prior to deployment. One promising approach is to apply interpretability tools to the reward function to spot potential deviations from the user's intention. Existing work has applied general-purpose interpretability tools to understand learned reward functions. We propose exploiting the intrinsic structure of reward functions by first preprocessing them into simpler but equivalent reward functions, which are then visualized. We introduce a general framework for such reward preprocessing and propose concrete preprocessing algorithms. Our empirical evaluation shows that preprocessed rewards are often significantly easier to understand than the original reward.
△ Less
Submitted 25 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
A Primer on Maximum Causal Entropy Inverse Reinforcement Learning
Authors:
Adam Gleave,
Sam Toyer
Abstract:
Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) algorithms infer a reward function that explains demonstrations provided by an expert acting in the environment. Maximum Causal Entropy (MCE) IRL is currently the most popular formulation of IRL, with numerous extensions. In this tutorial, we present a compressed derivation of MCE IRL and the key results from contemporary implementations of MCE IRL algorithms.…
▽ More
Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) algorithms infer a reward function that explains demonstrations provided by an expert acting in the environment. Maximum Causal Entropy (MCE) IRL is currently the most popular formulation of IRL, with numerous extensions. In this tutorial, we present a compressed derivation of MCE IRL and the key results from contemporary implementations of MCE IRL algorithms. We hope this will serve both as an introductory resource for those new to the field, and as a concise reference for those already familiar with these topics.
△ Less
Submitted 21 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Invariance in Policy Optimisation and Partial Identifiability in Reward Learning
Authors:
Joar Skalse,
Matthew Farrugia-Roberts,
Stuart Russell,
Alessandro Abate,
Adam Gleave
Abstract:
It is often very challenging to manually design reward functions for complex, real-world tasks. To solve this, one can instead use reward learning to infer a reward function from data. However, there are often multiple reward functions that fit the data equally well, even in the infinite-data limit. This means that the reward function is only partially identifiable. In this work, we formally chara…
▽ More
It is often very challenging to manually design reward functions for complex, real-world tasks. To solve this, one can instead use reward learning to infer a reward function from data. However, there are often multiple reward functions that fit the data equally well, even in the infinite-data limit. This means that the reward function is only partially identifiable. In this work, we formally characterise the partial identifiability of the reward function given several popular reward learning data sources, including expert demonstrations and trajectory comparisons. We also analyse the impact of this partial identifiability for several downstream tasks, such as policy optimisation. We unify our results in a framework for comparing data sources and downstream tasks by their invariances, with implications for the design and selection of data sources for reward learning.
△ Less
Submitted 7 June, 2023; v1 submitted 14 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Uncertainty Estimation for Language Reward Models
Authors:
Adam Gleave,
Geoffrey Irving
Abstract:
Language models can learn a range of capabilities from unsupervised training on text corpora. However, to solve a particular problem (such as text summarization) it is typically necessary to fine-tune them on a task-specific dataset. It is often easier for humans to choose between options than to provide labeled data, and prior work has achieved state-of-the-art performance by training a reward mo…
▽ More
Language models can learn a range of capabilities from unsupervised training on text corpora. However, to solve a particular problem (such as text summarization) it is typically necessary to fine-tune them on a task-specific dataset. It is often easier for humans to choose between options than to provide labeled data, and prior work has achieved state-of-the-art performance by training a reward model from such preference comparisons. However, collecting a large preference comparison dataset is still expensive -- and the learned reward models are unreliable out-of-distribution. We seek to address these problems via uncertainty estimation, which can improve sample efficiency and robustness using active learning and risk-averse reinforcement learning (RL). Specifically, we use bootstrap aggregating (bagging) to train an ensemble of reward models differing in the initialization of their final layer. Ensembles have proved successful in prior applications of active learning, but we find that in our setting ensemble active learning does not outperform random sampling. Further experiments show that while the aggregate predictions are well-calibrated, the ensemble's estimated epistemic uncertainty is only weakly correlated with model error. We suspect this is because the ensemble members are fine-tuned from a single model and so are similar to one another. This suggests current pre-training methods will need to be modified to support uncertainty estimation, e.g. by training multiple language models.
△ Less
Submitted 14 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Understanding Learned Reward Functions
Authors:
Eric J. Michaud,
Adam Gleave,
Stuart Russell
Abstract:
In many real-world tasks, it is not possible to procedurally specify an RL agent's reward function. In such cases, a reward function must instead be learned from interacting with and observing humans. However, current techniques for reward learning may fail to produce reward functions which accurately reflect user preferences. Absent significant advances in reward learning, it is thus important to…
▽ More
In many real-world tasks, it is not possible to procedurally specify an RL agent's reward function. In such cases, a reward function must instead be learned from interacting with and observing humans. However, current techniques for reward learning may fail to produce reward functions which accurately reflect user preferences. Absent significant advances in reward learning, it is thus important to be able to audit learned reward functions to verify whether they truly capture user preferences. In this paper, we investigate techniques for interpreting learned reward functions. In particular, we apply saliency methods to identify failure modes and predict the robustness of reward functions. We find that learned reward functions often implement surprising algorithms that rely on contingent aspects of the environment. We also discover that existing interpretability techniques often attend to irrelevant changes in reward output, suggesting that reward interpretability may need significantly different methods from policy interpretability.
△ Less
Submitted 10 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
DERAIL: Diagnostic Environments for Reward And Imitation Learning
Authors:
Pedro Freire,
Adam Gleave,
Sam Toyer,
Stuart Russell
Abstract:
The objective of many real-world tasks is complex and difficult to procedurally specify. This makes it necessary to use reward or imitation learning algorithms to infer a reward or policy directly from human data. Existing benchmarks for these algorithms focus on realism, testing in complex environments. Unfortunately, these benchmarks are slow, unreliable and cannot isolate failures. As a complem…
▽ More
The objective of many real-world tasks is complex and difficult to procedurally specify. This makes it necessary to use reward or imitation learning algorithms to infer a reward or policy directly from human data. Existing benchmarks for these algorithms focus on realism, testing in complex environments. Unfortunately, these benchmarks are slow, unreliable and cannot isolate failures. As a complementary approach, we develop a suite of simple diagnostic tasks that test individual facets of algorithm performance in isolation. We evaluate a range of common reward and imitation learning algorithms on our tasks. Our results confirm that algorithm performance is highly sensitive to implementation details. Moreover, in a case-study into a popular preference-based reward learning implementation, we illustrate how the suite can pinpoint design flaws and rapidly evaluate candidate solutions. The environments are available at https://github.com/HumanCompatibleAI/seals .
△ Less
Submitted 2 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
Quantifying Differences in Reward Functions
Authors:
Adam Gleave,
Michael Dennis,
Shane Legg,
Stuart Russell,
Jan Leike
Abstract:
For many tasks, the reward function is inaccessible to introspection or too complex to be specified procedurally, and must instead be learned from user data. Prior work has evaluated learned reward functions by evaluating policies optimized for the learned reward. However, this method cannot distinguish between the learned reward function failing to reflect user preferences and the policy optimiza…
▽ More
For many tasks, the reward function is inaccessible to introspection or too complex to be specified procedurally, and must instead be learned from user data. Prior work has evaluated learned reward functions by evaluating policies optimized for the learned reward. However, this method cannot distinguish between the learned reward function failing to reflect user preferences and the policy optimization process failing to optimize the learned reward. Moreover, this method can only tell us about behavior in the evaluation environment, but the reward may incentivize very different behavior in even a slightly different deployment environment. To address these problems, we introduce the Equivalent-Policy Invariant Comparison (EPIC) distance to quantify the difference between two reward functions directly, without a policy optimization step. We prove EPIC is invariant on an equivalence class of reward functions that always induce the same optimal policy. Furthermore, we find EPIC can be efficiently approximated and is more robust than baselines to the choice of coverage distribution. Finally, we show that EPIC distance bounds the regret of optimal policies even under different transition dynamics, and we confirm empirically that it predicts policy training success. Our source code is available at https://github.com/HumanCompatibleAI/evaluating-rewards.
△ Less
Submitted 17 March, 2021; v1 submitted 24 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Adversarial Policies: Attacking Deep Reinforcement Learning
Authors:
Adam Gleave,
Michael Dennis,
Cody Wild,
Neel Kant,
Sergey Levine,
Stuart Russell
Abstract:
Deep reinforcement learning (RL) policies are known to be vulnerable to adversarial perturbations to their observations, similar to adversarial examples for classifiers. However, an attacker is not usually able to directly modify another agent's observations. This might lead one to wonder: is it possible to attack an RL agent simply by choosing an adversarial policy acting in a multi-agent environ…
▽ More
Deep reinforcement learning (RL) policies are known to be vulnerable to adversarial perturbations to their observations, similar to adversarial examples for classifiers. However, an attacker is not usually able to directly modify another agent's observations. This might lead one to wonder: is it possible to attack an RL agent simply by choosing an adversarial policy acting in a multi-agent environment so as to create natural observations that are adversarial? We demonstrate the existence of adversarial policies in zero-sum games between simulated humanoid robots with proprioceptive observations, against state-of-the-art victims trained via self-play to be robust to opponents. The adversarial policies reliably win against the victims but generate seemingly random and uncoordinated behavior. We find that these policies are more successful in high-dimensional environments, and induce substantially different activations in the victim policy network than when the victim plays against a normal opponent. Videos are available at https://adversarialpolicies.github.io/.
△ Less
Submitted 17 January, 2021; v1 submitted 25 May, 2019;
originally announced May 2019.
-
Inverse reinforcement learning for video games
Authors:
Aaron Tucker,
Adam Gleave,
Stuart Russell
Abstract:
Deep reinforcement learning achieves superhuman performance in a range of video game environments, but requires that a designer manually specify a reward function. It is often easier to provide demonstrations of a target behavior than to design a reward function describing that behavior. Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) algorithms can infer a reward from demonstrations in low-dimensional conti…
▽ More
Deep reinforcement learning achieves superhuman performance in a range of video game environments, but requires that a designer manually specify a reward function. It is often easier to provide demonstrations of a target behavior than to design a reward function describing that behavior. Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) algorithms can infer a reward from demonstrations in low-dimensional continuous control environments, but there has been little work on applying IRL to high-dimensional video games. In our CNN-AIRL baseline, we modify the state-of-the-art adversarial IRL (AIRL) algorithm to use CNNs for the generator and discriminator. To stabilize training, we normalize the reward and increase the size of the discriminator training dataset. We additionally learn a low-dimensional state representation using a novel autoencoder architecture tuned for video game environments. This embedding is used as input to the reward network, improving the sample efficiency of expert demonstrations. Our method achieves high-level performance on the simple Catcher video game, substantially outperforming the CNN-AIRL baseline. We also score points on the Enduro Atari racing game, but do not match expert performance, highlighting the need for further work.
△ Less
Submitted 24 October, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
-
Active Inverse Reward Design
Authors:
Sören Mindermann,
Rohin Shah,
Adam Gleave,
Dylan Hadfield-Menell
Abstract:
Designers of AI agents often iterate on the reward function in a trial-and-error process until they get the desired behavior, but this only guarantees good behavior in the training environment. We propose structuring this process as a series of queries asking the user to compare between different reward functions. Thus we can actively select queries for maximum informativeness about the true rewar…
▽ More
Designers of AI agents often iterate on the reward function in a trial-and-error process until they get the desired behavior, but this only guarantees good behavior in the training environment. We propose structuring this process as a series of queries asking the user to compare between different reward functions. Thus we can actively select queries for maximum informativeness about the true reward. In contrast to approaches asking the designer for optimal behavior, this allows us to gather additional information by eliciting preferences between suboptimal behaviors. After each query, we need to update the posterior over the true reward function from observing the proxy reward function chosen by the designer. The recently proposed Inverse Reward Design (IRD) enables this. Our approach substantially outperforms IRD in test environments. In particular, it can query the designer about interpretable, linear reward functions and still infer non-linear ones.
△ Less
Submitted 6 November, 2019; v1 submitted 9 September, 2018;
originally announced September 2018.
-
Multi-task Maximum Entropy Inverse Reinforcement Learning
Authors:
Adam Gleave,
Oliver Habryka
Abstract:
Multi-task Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) is the problem of inferring multiple reward functions from expert demonstrations. Prior work, built on Bayesian IRL, is unable to scale to complex environments due to computational constraints. This paper contributes a formulation of multi-task IRL in the more computationally efficient Maximum Causal Entropy (MCE) IRL framework. Experiments show our…
▽ More
Multi-task Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) is the problem of inferring multiple reward functions from expert demonstrations. Prior work, built on Bayesian IRL, is unable to scale to complex environments due to computational constraints. This paper contributes a formulation of multi-task IRL in the more computationally efficient Maximum Causal Entropy (MCE) IRL framework. Experiments show our approach can perform one-shot imitation learning in a gridworld environment that single-task IRL algorithms need hundreds of demonstrations to solve. We outline preliminary work using meta-learning to extend our method to the function approximator setting of modern MCE IRL algorithms. Evaluating on multi-task variants of common simulated robotics benchmarks, we discover serious limitations of these IRL algorithms, and conclude with suggestions for further work.
△ Less
Submitted 15 July, 2018; v1 submitted 22 May, 2018;
originally announced May 2018.
-
Making compression algorithms for Unicode text
Authors:
Adam Gleave,
Christian Steinruecken
Abstract:
The majority of online content is written in languages other than English, and is most commonly encoded in UTF-8, the world's dominant Unicode character encoding. Traditional compression algorithms typically operate on individual bytes. While this approach works well for the single-byte ASCII encoding, it works poorly for UTF-8, where characters often span multiple bytes. Previous research has foc…
▽ More
The majority of online content is written in languages other than English, and is most commonly encoded in UTF-8, the world's dominant Unicode character encoding. Traditional compression algorithms typically operate on individual bytes. While this approach works well for the single-byte ASCII encoding, it works poorly for UTF-8, where characters often span multiple bytes. Previous research has focused on develo** Unicode compressors from scratch, which often failed to outperform established algorithms such as bzip2. We develop a technique to modify byte-based compressors to operate directly on Unicode characters, and implement variants of LZW and PPM that apply this technique. We find that our method substantially improves compression effectiveness on a UTF-8 corpus, with our PPM variant outperforming the state-of-the-art PPMII compressor. On ASCII and binary files, our variants perform similarly to the original unmodified compressors.
△ Less
Submitted 15 January, 2017;
originally announced January 2017.
