-
The DESI Survey Validation: Results from Visual Inspection of Bright Galaxies, Luminous Red Galaxies, and Emission Line Galaxies
Authors:
Ting-Wen Lan,
R. Tojeiro,
E. Armengaud,
J. Xavier Prochaska,
T. M. Davis,
David M. Alexander,
A. Raichoor,
Rongpu Zhou,
Christophe Yeche,
C. Balland,
S. BenZvi,
A. Berti,
R. Canning,
A. Carr,
H. Chittenden,
S. Cole,
M. -C. Cousinou,
K. Dawson,
Biprateep Dey,
K. Douglass,
A. Edge,
S. Escoffier,
A. Glanville,
S. Gontcho A Gontcho,
J. Guy
, et al. (57 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) Survey has obtained a set of spectroscopic measurements of galaxies to validate the final survey design and target selections. To assist in these tasks, we visually inspect (VI) DESI spectra of approximately 2,500 bright galaxies, 3,500 luminous red galaxies (LRGs), and 10,000 emission line galaxies (ELGs), to obtain robust redshift identifications.…
▽ More
The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) Survey has obtained a set of spectroscopic measurements of galaxies to validate the final survey design and target selections. To assist in these tasks, we visually inspect (VI) DESI spectra of approximately 2,500 bright galaxies, 3,500 luminous red galaxies (LRGs), and 10,000 emission line galaxies (ELGs), to obtain robust redshift identifications. We then utilize the VI redshift information to characterize the performance of the DESI operation. Based on the VI catalogs, our results show that the final survey design yields samples of bright galaxies, LRGs, and ELGs with purity greater than $99\%$. Moreover, we demonstrate that the precision of the redshift measurements is approximately 10 km/s for bright galaxies and ELGs and approximately 40 km/s for LRGs. The average redshift accuracy is within 10 km/s for the three types of galaxies. The VI process also helps improve the quality of the DESI data by identifying spurious spectral features introduced by the pipeline. Finally, we show examples of unexpected real astronomical objects, such as Ly$α$ emitters and strong lensing candidates, identified by VI. These results demonstrate the importance and utility of visually inspecting data from incoming and upcoming surveys, especially during their early operation phases.
△ Less
Submitted 15 January, 2023; v1 submitted 17 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
-
Full-Shape Galaxy Power Spectra and the Curvature Tension
Authors:
Aaron Glanville,
Cullan Howlett,
Tamara M. Davis
Abstract:
With recent evidence for a possible "curvature tension" among early and late universe cosmological probes, Effective Field Theories of Large Scale Structure (EFTofLSS) have emerged as a promising new framework to generate constraints on $Ω_k$ that are independent of both CMB measurements, and some of the assumptions of flatness that enter into other large-scale structure analyses. In this work we…
▽ More
With recent evidence for a possible "curvature tension" among early and late universe cosmological probes, Effective Field Theories of Large Scale Structure (EFTofLSS) have emerged as a promising new framework to generate constraints on $Ω_k$ that are independent of both CMB measurements, and some of the assumptions of flatness that enter into other large-scale structure analyses. In this work we use EFTofLSS to simultaneously constrain measurements from the 6dFGS, BOSS, and eBOSS catalogues, representing the most expansive full-shape investigation of curvature to date. Fitting the full-shape data with a BBN prior on $Ω_b h^2$ and fixed $n_s$, we measure $Ω_k = -0.089^{+0.049}_{-0.046}$, corresponding to a $\sim 2 σ$ preference for curvature. We argue that this result cannot be biased towards flatness by assumptions in the fitting methodology. Using the Bayesian evidence ratio our full-shape data assigns betting odds of 2:1 in favour of curvature, indicating present measurements remain broadly compatible with both flat and curved cosmological models. When our full-shape sample is combined with Planck 2018 CMB measurements, we break the geometric degeneracy and recover a joint fit on $Ω_k$ of $-0.0041^{+0.0026}_{-0.0021}$. Using the suspiciousness statistic (built on the standard Bayes factor), we find evidence for a moderate tension between Planck 2018 and our suite of full-shape measurements, at a significance of $1.76 ^{+0.14}_{-0.11} σ$ ($p \sim 0.08 \pm 0.02$). These results demonstrate the usefulness of full-shape clustering measurements as a CMB independent probe of curvature in the ongoing curvature tension debate.
△ Less
Submitted 12 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
The Effect of Systematic Redshift Biases in BAO Cosmology
Authors:
Aaron Glanville,
Cullan Howlett,
Tamara M. Davis
Abstract:
With the remarkable increase in scale and precision provided by upcoming galaxy redshift surveys, systematic errors that were previously negligible may become significant. In this paper, we explore the potential impact of low-magnitude systematic redshift offsets on measurements of the Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) feature, and the cosmological constraints recovered from such measurements. Usi…
▽ More
With the remarkable increase in scale and precision provided by upcoming galaxy redshift surveys, systematic errors that were previously negligible may become significant. In this paper, we explore the potential impact of low-magnitude systematic redshift offsets on measurements of the Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) feature, and the cosmological constraints recovered from such measurements. Using 500 mock galaxy redshift surveys as our baseline sample, we inject a series of systematic redshift biases (ranging from +/-0.2% to +/-2%), and measure the resulting shift in the recovered isotropic BAO scale. When BAO measurements are combined with CMB constraints (in both ΛCDM and wCDM cosmologies), plausible systematics introduce a negligible offset on combined fits of H0 and Ωm, and systematics must be an order of magnitude greater than this plausible baseline to introduce a 1-σ shift on such combined fits. We conclude that systematic redshift biases are very unlikely to bias constraints on parameters such as H0 provided by BAO cosmology, either now or in the near future. We also detail a theoretical model that predicts the impact of uniform redshift systematics on α, and show this model is in close alignment with the results of our mock survey analysis.
△ Less
Submitted 2 March, 2021; v1 submitted 9 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
-
Can an Infinitely Long Object Fit in an Expanding Universe?
Authors:
Aaron Glanville,
Tamara Davis
Abstract:
Does space stretch its contents as the universe expands? Usually we say the answer is no - the stretching of space is not like the stretching of a rubber sheet that might drag things with it. In this paper we explore a potential counter example - namely we show that is is impossible to make an arbitrarily long object in an expanding universe, because it is impossible to hold the distant end of the…
▽ More
Does space stretch its contents as the universe expands? Usually we say the answer is no - the stretching of space is not like the stretching of a rubber sheet that might drag things with it. In this paper we explore a potential counter example - namely we show that is is impossible to make an arbitrarily long object in an expanding universe, because it is impossible to hold the distant end of the object "stationary" with respect to us (as defined in the Friedmann-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker metric). We show that this does not mean that expanding space has a force associated with it, rather, some fictitious forces arise due to our choice of reference frame. By choosing our usual time-slice (where all comoving observers agree on the age of the universe), we choose a global frame that does not correspond to the frame of any inertial observer. As a result, simple relativistic velocity transforms generate an apparent acceleration, even where no force exists. This effect is similar to the fictitious forces that arise in describing objects in rotating reference frames, as in the case of the Coriolis effect.
△ Less
Submitted 22 July, 2020; v1 submitted 5 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
