-
Comparing fast imaging techniques for individual pulse imaging by Cherenkov in vivo from electron FLASH irradiation
Authors:
Mahbubur Rahman,
M. Ramish Ashraf,
Rongxiao Zhang,
Xu Cao,
David J. Gladstone,
Lesley A. Jarvis,
P. Jack Hoopes,
Brian W. Pogue,
Petr Bruza
Abstract:
Objective: In this study, a fast imaging technique was developed for the first in vivo Cherenkov emission imaging from an ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) electron beam source at single pulse (360 Hz) submillimeter resolution.
Approach: A CMOS camera, gated to the UHDR LINAC, imaged the Cherenkov emission profiles pulse by pulse passively during the irradiation of mice on their limbs and intestinal r…
▽ More
Objective: In this study, a fast imaging technique was developed for the first in vivo Cherenkov emission imaging from an ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) electron beam source at single pulse (360 Hz) submillimeter resolution.
Approach: A CMOS camera, gated to the UHDR LINAC, imaged the Cherenkov emission profiles pulse by pulse passively during the irradiation of mice on their limbs and intestinal region. The utility of an intensifier was investigated for its effect on image quality including signal to noise and spatial resolution. Pulse by pulse variability in Cherenkov emission profile were quantified spatially and temporally.
Main results: An intensifier improved the emission profile signal to noise ratio from 15 to 280, with reduced spatial resolution. The profile extended beyond of the treatment field due to the lateral scattering of the electrons in tissue and its optical properties. The CMOS camera with an intensifier detected the changes in Cherenkov emission profile during expiration and inspiration of the respiration cycle for the mice to be about 3 mm.
Significance: This fast imaging technique can be utilized for in vivo intrafraction monitoring of FLASH patient treatments at single pulse resolution. It can display delivery differences during respiration, and variability in the delivered treatment's surface profile, which may perturb from the intended UHDR treatment more for pencil beam scanning systems. The technique may leverage Cherenkov emission surface profile to gate the treatment delivery via respiratory gating systems under FLASH conditions.
△ Less
Submitted 29 December, 2022; v1 submitted 12 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
Characterization of a Diode Dosimeter for UHDR FLASH Radiotherapy
Authors:
Mahbubur Rahman,
Jakub Kozelka,
Jeff Hildreth,
Andreas Schonfeld,
Austin M. Sloop,
M. Ramish Ashraf,
Petr Bruza,
David J. Gladstone,
Brian W. Pogue,
William E. Simon,
Rongxiao Zhang
Abstract:
Purpose: A diode EDGE Detector with a newly designed electrometer has been characterized for use in an UHDR electron beam and demonstrated appropriateness for UHDR FLASH radiotherapy dosimetry.
Methods: Dose linearity, mean dose rate, and dose per pulse dependencies of the EDGE Detector were quantified and compared with dosimeters including a W1 scintillator detector, radiochromic film, and ioni…
▽ More
Purpose: A diode EDGE Detector with a newly designed electrometer has been characterized for use in an UHDR electron beam and demonstrated appropriateness for UHDR FLASH radiotherapy dosimetry.
Methods: Dose linearity, mean dose rate, and dose per pulse dependencies of the EDGE Detector were quantified and compared with dosimeters including a W1 scintillator detector, radiochromic film, and ionization chamber that were irradiated with a 10 MeV UHDR beam. The dose, dose rate and dose per pulse were controlled via an in-house developed scintillation-based feedback mechanism, repetition rate of the linear accelerator, and source-to-surface distance, respectively. Depth-dose profiles and temporal profiles at individual pulse resolution were compared to the film and scintillation measurements, respectively. The radiation-induced change in response sensitivity was quantified via irradiation of ~5kGy.
Results: The EDGE Detector agreed with film measurements in the measured range with varying dose (up to 70 Gy), dose rate (nearly 200 Gy/s), and dose per pulse (up to 0.63 Gy/pulse) on average to within 2%, 5%, and 1%, respectively. The detector also agreed with W1 scintillation detector on average to within 2% for dose per pulse (up to 0.78 Gy/pulse). The EDGE Detector signal was proportional to ion chamber (IC) measured dose, and mean dose rate in the bremsstrahlung tail to within 0.4% and 0.2% respectively. The EDGE Detector measured percent depth dose agreed with film to within 3% and per pulse output agreed with W1 scintillator to within -6% to +5%.
Conclusions: The EDGE Detector demonstrated dose linearity, mean dose rate independence, and dose per pulse independence for UHDR electron beams. It can quantify the beam spatially, and temporally at sub millisecond resolution.
△ Less
Submitted 8 May, 2023; v1 submitted 12 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
-
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) for Experimental Use of FLASH on a Clinical Accelerator
Authors:
Mahbubur Rahman,
Rongxiao Zhang,
David J. Gladstone,
Benjamin B. Williams,
Erli Chen,
Chad A. Dexter,
Lawrence Thompson,
Petr Bruza,
Brian W. Pogue
Abstract:
Background: Use of a linear accelerator in ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) mode can provide a conduit for wider access to UHDR FLASH effects, sparing normal tissue, but care needs to be taken in the use of such systems to ensure errors are minimized.
Purpose: Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) was carried out in a team that has been involved in converting a LINAC between clinical use and UHDR…
▽ More
Background: Use of a linear accelerator in ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) mode can provide a conduit for wider access to UHDR FLASH effects, sparing normal tissue, but care needs to be taken in the use of such systems to ensure errors are minimized.
Purpose: Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) was carried out in a team that has been involved in converting a LINAC between clinical use and UHDR experimental mode for more than one year, following the proposed methods of TG100.
Methods: A team of 9 professionals with extensive experience were polled to outline the process map and workflow for analysis, and developed fault trees for potential errors, as well as failure modes that would results. The team scored the categories of severity magnitude (S), occurrence likelihood (O), and detectability potential (D) in a scale of 1 to 10, so that a risk priority number (RPN=S*O*D) could be assessed for each.
Results: A total of 46 potential failure modes were identified, including 5 with RPN>100. These failure modes involved 1) patient set up, 2) gating mechanisms in delivery, and 3) detector in the beam stop mechanism. Identified methods to mitigate errors included 1) use of a checklist post conversion, 2) use of robust radiation detectors, 3) automation of QA and beam consistency checks, and 4) implementation of surface guidance during beam delivery.
Conclusions: The FMEA process was considered critically important in this setting of a new use of a LINAC, and the expert team developed a higher level of confidence in the ability to safely move UHDR LINAC use towards expanded research access.
△ Less
Submitted 20 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
Individual Pulse Monitoring and Dose Control System for Pre-Clinical Implementation of FLASH-RT
Authors:
M. Ramish Ashraf,
Mahbubur Rahman,
Xu Cao,
Kayla Duval,
Benjamin B. Williams,
P. Jack Hoopes,
David J. Gladstone,
Brian W. Pogue,
Rongxiao Zhang,
Petr Bruza
Abstract:
Ultra-high dose rate electron sources require dose rate independent dosimeters and a calibrated dose control system for accurate delivery. In this study, we developed a single-pulse dose monitoring and a real-time dose-based control system for a converted clinical linear accelerator (LINAC). A point scintillator detector was coupled to a gated amplifier and a real-time controller for dose monitori…
▽ More
Ultra-high dose rate electron sources require dose rate independent dosimeters and a calibrated dose control system for accurate delivery. In this study, we developed a single-pulse dose monitoring and a real-time dose-based control system for a converted clinical linear accelerator (LINAC). A point scintillator detector was coupled to a gated amplifier and a real-time controller for dose monitoring and feedback control loop. The controller was programmed to integrate dose and measure pulse width of each radiation pulse and gate the LINAC beam when the prescribed dose was delivered. The scintillator was mounted in solid water phantom and placed underneath mice skin for in vivo dose monitoring. Additionally, the scintillator was characterized in terms of its radiation stability, mean dose-rate, and dose per pulse dependence. Dose integration was performed for each radiation pulse and displayed in real-time. The scintillator was shown to be linear with mean dose-rate (40-380 Gy/s) and dose per pulse (0.3-1.3 Gy/Pulse) to within +/- 3%. However, the plastic scintillator was subject to significant radiation damage (16%/kGy) and would need to be calibrated frequently. Pulse-counting control was accurately implemented with direct correspondence between the intended and the actual delivered pulses. The dose-based control was sufficient to gate on any pulse of the LINAC. In-vivo dosimetry monitoring with a 1 cm circular cut-out revealed that a ramp-up of 4-5 pulses was present during which the average dose per pulse was ~0.045 +/- 0.004 Gy/Pulse, whereas after the ramp-up it stabilized at 0.65 +/- 0.01 Gy/Pulse. The tools presented in this study can be used to determine the beam parameter space pertinent to the FLASH effect. Additionally, this study is the first instance of real-time dose-based control for a modified LINAC at ultra-high dose rates.
△ Less
Submitted 16 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
Retrospective Evaluation of an Always-on Cherenkov Imaging System for Radiotherapy Quality Improvement
Authors:
Daniel A. Alexander,
Michael Jermyn,
Petr Bruza,
Rongxiao Zhang,
Erli Chen,
Savannah M. Decker,
Tatum L. McGlynn,
Rory A. Rosselot,
Jae Lee,
Melanie L. Rose,
Benjamin B. Williams,
Brian W. Pogue,
David J. Gladstone,
Lesley A. Jarvis
Abstract:
Purpose: Cherenkov imaging is now clinically available to track the course of radiation therapy as a treatment verification tool. The aim of this work was to discover the benefits of always-on Cherenkov images as a novel incident detection and quality improvement system through retrospective review of imaging in our center.
Methods: Continuous imaging of all patients was attempted during a 12-mo…
▽ More
Purpose: Cherenkov imaging is now clinically available to track the course of radiation therapy as a treatment verification tool. The aim of this work was to discover the benefits of always-on Cherenkov images as a novel incident detection and quality improvement system through retrospective review of imaging in our center.
Methods: Continuous imaging of all patients was attempted during a 12-month period by automating the acquisition of Cherenkov imaging using an always-on commercial system. Multi-camera systems were installed in two treatment bunkers in the radiation oncology clinic at our center and one bunker in an affiliated satellite clinic. Images were acquired as part of normal treatment procedure and reviewed retrospectively with potential incidents flagged for evaluation by the physician and medical physics teams.
Results: In total, 622 patients were imaged as part of this study. In this summary, 9 patients were identified with incidents occurring during their course of treatment that were detected only with Cherenkov imaging. Incidents were found relating to issues during simulation, planning, pre-treatment review, and treatment delivery, however none of the incidents were detected prior to treatment delivery. Primary areas of improvement identified in this study are dose to unintended areas in planning, dose to unintended areas due to positioning, and non-ideal bolus placement during setup. Case studies are presented highlighting the detection of these issues using Cherenkov imaging.
Conclusions: All detected events were deemed below the threshold for reporting, but their observation could lead to quality improvement in practice. Perhaps most importantly, the imaging was seamless with no effort required by the radiotherapy team and provided both real-time and permanent records of what was delivered in each fraction.
△ Less
Submitted 14 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
Treatment Planning System for Electron FLASH Radiotherapy: Open-source for Clinical Implementation
Authors:
Mahbubur Rahman,
M. Ramish Ashraf,
David J. Gladstone,
Petr Bruza,
Lesley A. Jarvis,
Philip E. Schaner,
Xu Cao,
Brian W. Pogue,
P. Jack Hoopes,
Rongxiao Zhang
Abstract:
Purpose: A Monte Carlo (MC) beam model and its implementation in a clinical treatment planning system (TPS, Varian Eclipse) are presented for a modified ultra-high dose-rate electron FLASH radiotherapy (eFLASH-RT) LINAC.
Methods: The gantry head without scattering foils or targets, representative of the LINAC modifications, was modelled in Geant4. The energy spectrum (σE) and beam source emittan…
▽ More
Purpose: A Monte Carlo (MC) beam model and its implementation in a clinical treatment planning system (TPS, Varian Eclipse) are presented for a modified ultra-high dose-rate electron FLASH radiotherapy (eFLASH-RT) LINAC.
Methods: The gantry head without scattering foils or targets, representative of the LINAC modifications, was modelled in Geant4. The energy spectrum (σE) and beam source emittance cone angle (θcone) were varied to match the calculated and Gafchromic film measured central-axis percent depth dose (PDD) and lateral profiles. Its Eclipse configuration was validated with measured profiles of the open field and nominal fields for clinical applicators. eFLASH-RT plans were MC forward calculated in Geant4 for a mouse brain treatment and compared to a conventional (Conv-RT) plan in Eclipse for a human patient with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Results: The beam model and its Eclipse configuration agreed best with measurements at σE=0.5 MeV and θcone=3.9+/-0.2 degrees to clinically acceptable accuracy (the absolute average error was within 1.5% for in-water lateral, 3% for in-air lateral, and 2% for PDD). The forward dose calculation showed dose was delivered to the entire mouse brain with adequate conformality. The human patient case demonstrated the planning capability with routine accessories in relatively complex geometry to achieve an acceptable plan (90% of the tumor volume receiving 95% and 90% of the prescribed dose for eFLASH and Conv-RT, respectively).
Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first functional beam model commissioned in a clinical TPS for eFLASH-RT, enabling planning and evaluation with minimal deviation from Conv-RT workflow. It facilitates the clinical translation as eFLASH-RT and Conv-RT plan quality were comparable for a human patient. The methods can be expanded to model other eFLASH irradiators.
△ Less
Submitted 31 August, 2021; v1 submitted 9 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
Electron FLASH Delivery at Treatment Room Isocenter for Efficient Reversible Conversion of a Clinical LINAC
Authors:
Mahbubur Rahman,
M. Ramish Ashraf,
Rongxiao Zhang,
Petr Bruza,
Chad A. Dexter,
Lawrence Thompson,
Xu Cao,
Benjamin B. Williams,
P. Jack Hoopes,
Brian W. Pogue,
David J. Gladstone
Abstract:
Purpose: In this study, procedures were developed to achieve efficient reversible conversion of a clinical linear accelerator (LINAC) and deliver electron FLASH (eFLASH) or conventional beams to the treatment room isocenter. Material & Methods: The LINAC was converted to deliver eFLASH beam within 20 minutes by retracting the x-ray target from the beam's path, positioning the carousel on an empty…
▽ More
Purpose: In this study, procedures were developed to achieve efficient reversible conversion of a clinical linear accelerator (LINAC) and deliver electron FLASH (eFLASH) or conventional beams to the treatment room isocenter. Material & Methods: The LINAC was converted to deliver eFLASH beam within 20 minutes by retracting the x-ray target from the beam's path, positioning the carousel on an empty port, and selecting 10 MV photon beam energy in the treatment console. Dose per pulse and average dose rate were measured in a solid water phantom at different depths with Gafchromic film and OSLD. A pulse controller counted the pulses via scattered radiation signal and gated the delivery for preset pulse count. A fast photomultiplier tube-based Cherenkov detector measured per pulse beam output at 2 ns sampling rate. After conversion back to clinical mode, conventional beam output, flatness, symmetry, field size and energy were measured for all clinically commissioned energies. Results: Dose per pulse of 0.86 +/- 0.01 Gy (310 +/- 7 Gy/s average dose rate) were achieved at isocenter. The dose from simultaneous irradiation of film and OSLD were within 1%. The PMT showed the LINAC required about 5 pulses before the output stabilized and its long-term stability was within 3% for measurements performed at 3 minutes intervals. The dose, flatness, symmetry, and photon energy were unchanged from baseline and within tolerance (1%, 3%, 2%, and 0.1% respectively) after reverting to conventional beams. Conclusion: 10 MeV FLASH beams were achieved at the isocenter of the treatment room. The beam output was reproducible but requires further investigation of the ramp up time in the first 5 pulses, equivalent to <100 cGy. The eFLASH beam can irradiate both small and large subjects in minimally modified clinical settings and dose rates can be further increased by reducing the source to surface distance.
△ Less
Submitted 1 February, 2021; v1 submitted 16 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
Dosimetry for FLASH Radiotherapy: A Review of Tools and the Role of Radioluminescence and Cherenkov Emission
Authors:
Muhammad Ramish Ashraf,
Mahbubur Rahman,
Rongxiao Zhang,
Benjamin B. Williams,
David J. Gladstone,
Brian W. Pogue,
Petr Bruza
Abstract:
While spatial dose conformity delivered to a target volume has been pushed to its practical limits with advanced treatment planning and delivery, investigations in novel temporal dose delivery are unfolding new mechanisms. Recent advances in ultra-high dose radiotherapy, abbreviated as FLASH, indicate the potential for reduction in healthy tissue damage while preserving tumor control. FLASH therap…
▽ More
While spatial dose conformity delivered to a target volume has been pushed to its practical limits with advanced treatment planning and delivery, investigations in novel temporal dose delivery are unfolding new mechanisms. Recent advances in ultra-high dose radiotherapy, abbreviated as FLASH, indicate the potential for reduction in healthy tissue damage while preserving tumor control. FLASH therapy relies on very high dose rate of > 40Gy/sec with sub-second temporal beam modulation, taking a seemingly opposite direction from the conventional paradigm of fractionated therapy. FLASH brings unique challenges to dosimetry, beam control, and verification, as well as complexity of radiobiological effective dose through altered tissue response. In this review, we compare the dosimetric methods capable of operating under high dose rate environments. Due to excellent dose-rate independence, superior spatial (~<1 mm) and temporal (~ns) resolution achievable with Cherenkov and scintillation-based detectors, we show that luminescent detectors have a key role to play in the development of FLASH-RT, as the field rapidly progresses towards clinical adaptation. Additionally, we show that the unique ability of certain luminescence-based methods to provide tumor oxygenation maps in real-time with submillimeter resolution can elucidate the radiobiological mechanisms behind the FLASH effect. In particular, such techniques will be crucial for understanding the role of oxygen in mediating the FLASH effect.
△ Less
Submitted 17 June, 2020; v1 submitted 5 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
