-
Anonymizing Test Data in Android: Does It Hurt?
Authors:
Elena Masserini,
Davide Ginelli,
Daniela Micucci,
Daniela Briola,
Leonardo Mariani
Abstract:
Failure data collected from the field (e.g., failure traces, bug reports, and memory dumps) represent an invaluable source of information for developers who need to reproduce and analyze failures. Unfortunately, field data may include sensitive information and thus cannot be collected indiscriminately. Privacy-preserving techniques can address this problem anonymizing data and reducing the risk of…
▽ More
Failure data collected from the field (e.g., failure traces, bug reports, and memory dumps) represent an invaluable source of information for developers who need to reproduce and analyze failures. Unfortunately, field data may include sensitive information and thus cannot be collected indiscriminately. Privacy-preserving techniques can address this problem anonymizing data and reducing the risk of disclosing personal information. However, collecting anonymized information may harm reproducibility, that is, the anonymized data may not allow the reproduction of a failure observed in the field. In this paper, we present an empirical investigation about the impact of privacy-preserving techniques on the reproducibility of failures. In particular, we study how five privacy-preserving techniques may impact reproducibilty for 19 bugs in 17 Android applications. Results provide insights on how to select and configure privacy-preserving techniques.
△ Less
Submitted 12 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Exception-Driven Fault Localization for Automated Program Repair
Authors:
Davide Ginelli,
Oliviero Riganelli,
Daniela Micucci,
Leonardo Mariani
Abstract:
Automated Program Repair (APR) techniques typically exploit spectrum-based fault localization (SBFL) to identify the program locations that should be patched, making the effectiveness of APR techniques dependent on the effectiveness of fault localization. Indeed, results show that SBFL often does not localize faults accurately, hindering the effectiveness of APR. In this paper, we propose EXCEPT,…
▽ More
Automated Program Repair (APR) techniques typically exploit spectrum-based fault localization (SBFL) to identify the program locations that should be patched, making the effectiveness of APR techniques dependent on the effectiveness of fault localization. Indeed, results show that SBFL often does not localize faults accurately, hindering the effectiveness of APR. In this paper, we propose EXCEPT, a technique that addresses the localization problem by focusing on the semantics of failures rather than on the correlation between the executed statements and the failed tests, as SBFL does. We focus on failures due to exceptions and we exploit their type and source to localize and guess the faults. Experiments with 43 exception-raising faults from the Defects4J benchmark show that EXCEPT can perform better than Ochiai and ssFix.
△ Less
Submitted 3 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
-
FLACOCO: Fault Localization for Java based on Industry-grade Coverage
Authors:
André Silva,
Matias Martinez,
Benjamin Danglot,
Davide Ginelli,
Martin Monperrus
Abstract:
Fault localization is an essential step in the debugging process. Spectrum-Based Fault Localization (SBFL) is a popular fault localization family of techniques, utilizing code-coverage to predict suspicious lines of code. In this paper, we present FLACOCO, a new fault localization tool for Java. The key novelty of FLACOCO is that it is built on top of one of the most used and most reliable coverag…
▽ More
Fault localization is an essential step in the debugging process. Spectrum-Based Fault Localization (SBFL) is a popular fault localization family of techniques, utilizing code-coverage to predict suspicious lines of code. In this paper, we present FLACOCO, a new fault localization tool for Java. The key novelty of FLACOCO is that it is built on top of one of the most used and most reliable coverage libraries for Java, JaCoCo. FLACOCO is made available through a well-designed command-line interface and Java API and supports all Java versions. We validate FLACOCO on two use-cases from the automatic program repair domain by reproducing previous scientific experiments. We find it is capable of effectively replacing the state-of-the-art FL library. Overall, we hope that FLACOCO will help research in fault localization as well as industry adoption thanks to being founded on industry-grade code coverage. An introductory video is available at https://youtu.be/RFRyvQuwRYA
△ Less
Submitted 16 March, 2023; v1 submitted 24 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
A Software-Repair Robot based on Continual Learning
Authors:
Benoit Baudry,
Zimin Chen,
Khashayar Etemadi,
Han Fu,
Davide Ginelli,
Steve Kommrusch,
Matias Martinez,
Martin Monperrus,
Javier Ron,
He Ye,
Zhongxing Yu
Abstract:
Software bugs are common and correcting them accounts for a significant part of costs in the software development and maintenance process. This calls for automatic techniques to deal with them. One promising direction towards this goal is gaining repair knowledge from historical bug fixing examples. Retrieving insights from software development history is particularly appealing with the constant p…
▽ More
Software bugs are common and correcting them accounts for a significant part of costs in the software development and maintenance process. This calls for automatic techniques to deal with them. One promising direction towards this goal is gaining repair knowledge from historical bug fixing examples. Retrieving insights from software development history is particularly appealing with the constant progress of machine learning paradigms and skyrocketing `big' bug fixing data generated through Continuous Integration (CI). In this paper, we present R-Hero, a novel software repair bot that applies continual learning to acquire bug fixing strategies from continuous streams of source code changes, implemented for the single development platform Github/Travis CI. We describe R-Hero, our novel system for learning how to fix bugs based on continual training, and we uncover initial successes as well as novel research challenges for the community.
△ Less
Submitted 6 December, 2021; v1 submitted 12 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
A Comprehensive Study of Code-removal Patches in Automated Program Repair
Authors:
Davide Ginelli,
Matias Martinez,
Leonardo Mariani,
Martin Monperrus
Abstract:
Automatic Program Repair (APR) techniques can promisingly help reducing the cost of debugging. Many relevant APR techniques follow the generate-and-validate approach, that is, the faulty program is iteratively modified with different change operators and then validated with a test suite until a plausible patch is generated. In particular, Kali is a generate-and-validate technique developed to inve…
▽ More
Automatic Program Repair (APR) techniques can promisingly help reducing the cost of debugging. Many relevant APR techniques follow the generate-and-validate approach, that is, the faulty program is iteratively modified with different change operators and then validated with a test suite until a plausible patch is generated. In particular, Kali is a generate-and-validate technique developed to investigate the possibility of generating plausible patches by only removing code. Former studies show that indeed Kali successfully addressed several faults. This paper addresses the case of code-removal patches in automated program repair investigating the reasons and the scenarios that make their creation possible, and the relationship with patches implemented by developers. Our study reveals that code-removal patches are often insufficient to fix bugs, and proposes a comprehensive taxonomy of code-removal patches that provides evidence of the problems that may affect test suites, opening new opportunities for researchers in the field of automatic program repair.
△ Less
Submitted 15 December, 2021; v1 submitted 11 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
