-
A Generalized Acquisition Function for Preference-based Reward Learning
Authors:
Evan Ellis,
Gaurav R. Ghosal,
Stuart J. Russell,
Anca Dragan,
Erdem Bıyık
Abstract:
Preference-based reward learning is a popular technique for teaching robots and autonomous systems how a human user wants them to perform a task. Previous works have shown that actively synthesizing preference queries to maximize information gain about the reward function parameters improves data efficiency. The information gain criterion focuses on precisely identifying all parameters of the rewa…
▽ More
Preference-based reward learning is a popular technique for teaching robots and autonomous systems how a human user wants them to perform a task. Previous works have shown that actively synthesizing preference queries to maximize information gain about the reward function parameters improves data efficiency. The information gain criterion focuses on precisely identifying all parameters of the reward function. This can potentially be wasteful as many parameters may result in the same reward, and many rewards may result in the same behavior in the downstream tasks. Instead, we show that it is possible to optimize for learning the reward function up to a behavioral equivalence class, such as inducing the same ranking over behaviors, distribution over choices, or other related definitions of what makes two rewards similar. We introduce a tractable framework that can capture such definitions of similarity. Our experiments in a synthetic environment, an assistive robotics environment with domain transfer, and a natural language processing problem with real datasets demonstrate the superior performance of our querying method over the state-of-the-art information gain method.
△ Less
Submitted 9 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
The Effect of Modeling Human Rationality Level on Learning Rewards from Multiple Feedback Types
Authors:
Gaurav R. Ghosal,
Matthew Zurek,
Daniel S. Brown,
Anca D. Dragan
Abstract:
When inferring reward functions from human behavior (be it demonstrations, comparisons, physical corrections, or e-stops), it has proven useful to model the human as making noisy-rational choices, with a "rationality coefficient" capturing how much noise or entropy we expect to see in the human behavior. Prior work typically sets the rationality level to a constant value, regardless of the type, o…
▽ More
When inferring reward functions from human behavior (be it demonstrations, comparisons, physical corrections, or e-stops), it has proven useful to model the human as making noisy-rational choices, with a "rationality coefficient" capturing how much noise or entropy we expect to see in the human behavior. Prior work typically sets the rationality level to a constant value, regardless of the type, or quality, of human feedback. However, in many settings, giving one type of feedback (e.g. a demonstration) may be much more difficult than a different type of feedback (e.g. answering a comparison query). Thus, we expect to see more or less noise depending on the type of human feedback. In this work, we advocate that grounding the rationality coefficient in real data for each feedback type, rather than assuming a default value, has a significant positive effect on reward learning. We test this in both simulated experiments and in a user study with real human feedback. We find that overestimating human rationality can have dire effects on reward learning accuracy and regret. We also find that fitting the rationality coefficient to human data enables better reward learning, even when the human deviates significantly from the noisy-rational choice model due to systematic biases. Further, we find that the rationality level affects the informativeness of each feedback type: surprisingly, demonstrations are not always the most informative -- when the human acts very suboptimally, comparisons actually become more informative, even when the rationality level is the same for both. Ultimately, our results emphasize the importance and advantage of paying attention to the assumed human-rationality level, especially when agents actively learn from multiple types of human feedback.
△ Less
Submitted 9 March, 2023; v1 submitted 22 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
-
Multi-Modal Prototype Learning for Interpretable Multivariable Time Series Classification
Authors:
Gaurav R. Ghosal,
Reza Abbasi-Asl
Abstract:
Multivariable time series classification problems are increasing in prevalence and complexity in a variety of domains, such as biology and finance. While deep learning methods are an effective tool for these problems, they often lack interpretability. In this work, we propose a novel modular prototype learning framework for multivariable time series classification. In the first stage of our framew…
▽ More
Multivariable time series classification problems are increasing in prevalence and complexity in a variety of domains, such as biology and finance. While deep learning methods are an effective tool for these problems, they often lack interpretability. In this work, we propose a novel modular prototype learning framework for multivariable time series classification. In the first stage of our framework, encoders extract features from each variable independently. Prototype layers identify single-variable prototypes in the resulting feature spaces. The next stage of our framework represents the multivariable time series sample points in terms of their similarity to these single-variable prototypes. This results in an inherently interpretable representation of multivariable patterns, on which prototype learning is applied to extract representative examples i.e. multivariable prototypes. Our framework is thus able to explicitly identify both informative patterns in the individual variables, as well as the relationships between the variables. We validate our framework on a simulated dataset with embedded patterns, as well as a real human activity recognition problem. Our framework attains comparable or superior classification performance to existing time series classification methods on these tasks. On the simulated dataset, we find that our model returns interpretations consistent with the embedded patterns. Moreover, the interpretations learned on the activity recognition dataset align with domain knowledge.
△ Less
Submitted 17 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
