-
Learning to Maximize (Expected) Utility
Authors:
Thomas Dohmen,
Georgios Gerasimou
Abstract:
We study if participants in a choice experiment learn to behave in ways that are closer to the predictions of ordinal and expected utility theory as they make decisions from the same menus repeatedly and without receiving feedback of any kind. We designed and implemented a non-forced-choice lab experiment with money lotteries and five repetitions per menu that aimed to test this hypothesis from ma…
▽ More
We study if participants in a choice experiment learn to behave in ways that are closer to the predictions of ordinal and expected utility theory as they make decisions from the same menus repeatedly and without receiving feedback of any kind. We designed and implemented a non-forced-choice lab experiment with money lotteries and five repetitions per menu that aimed to test this hypothesis from many behavioural angles. In our data from 308 subjects in the UK and Germany, significantly more individuals were ordinal- and expected-utility maximizers in their last 15 than in their first 15 identical decision problems. Furthermore, around a quarter and a fifth of all subjects, respectively, decided in those modes throughout the experiment, with nearly half revealing non-trivial indifferences. A considerable overlap was found between those consistently rational individuals and the ones who satisfied core principles of random utility theory. Finally, in addition to finding that choice consistency is positively correlated with cognitive ability, we document that subjects who learned to maximize utility were more cognitively able than those who did not. We discuss potential implications of our analysis.
△ Less
Submitted 26 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Non-diversified portfolios with subjective expected utility
Authors:
Christopher P. Chambers,
Georgios Gerasimou
Abstract:
Although diversification is the typical strategy followed by risk-averse investors, non-diversified positions that allocate all resources to a single asset, state of the world or revenue stream are common too. Focusing on demand under uncertainty, we first clarify how this kind of behavior is compatible with risk-averse subjective expected utility maximization under beliefs that assign a strictly…
▽ More
Although diversification is the typical strategy followed by risk-averse investors, non-diversified positions that allocate all resources to a single asset, state of the world or revenue stream are common too. Focusing on demand under uncertainty, we first clarify how this kind of behavior is compatible with risk-averse subjective expected utility maximization under beliefs that assign a strictly positive probability to every state. We then show that whenever finitely many non-diversified choices are rationalizable in this way under some such beliefs and risk-averse preferences, they are simultaneously rationalizable under the *same* beliefs by many qualitatively distinct risk-averse as well as risk-seeking and risk-neutral preferences.
△ Less
Submitted 15 January, 2024; v1 submitted 17 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
Towards Eliciting Weak or Incomplete Preferences in the Lab: A Model-Rich Approach
Authors:
Georgios Gerasimou
Abstract:
Recovering and distinguishing between the potentially meaningful indifference and/or indecisiveness parts of a decision maker's preferences from their observable choice behaviour is important for testing theory and conducting welfare analysis. This paper contributes a way forward in two ways. First, it reports on a new experimental design with a forced and a non-forced general choice treatment whe…
▽ More
Recovering and distinguishing between the potentially meaningful indifference and/or indecisiveness parts of a decision maker's preferences from their observable choice behaviour is important for testing theory and conducting welfare analysis. This paper contributes a way forward in two ways. First, it reports on a new experimental design with a forced and a non-forced general choice treatment where the 282 subjects in the sample were allowed to choose *multiple* gift-card bundles from each menu they saw. Second, it analyses the collected data with a new non-parametric combinatorial-optimization method that allows to compare the goodness-of-fit of utility maximization to that of models of undominated or dominant choice with incomplete preferences, in each case with or without indifferences. Most subjects in the sample are well-approximated by some indifference-permitting instance of those three models. Furthermore, the model-specific preference recovery typically elicits a unique preference relation with a non-trivial indifference part and, where relevant, a distinct indecisiveness part. The two kinds of distinctions between indifference and indecisiveness uncovered herein are theory-guided and documented empirically for the first time. Our findings suggest that accounting for the decision makers' possible indifference or inability to compare some alternatives can increase the descriptive accuracy of theoretical models and their empirical tests thereof, while it can also aid attempts to recover people's stable but possibly weak or incomplete preferences.
△ Less
Submitted 3 December, 2023; v1 submitted 29 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
Ordinal Intensity-Efficient Allocations
Authors:
Georgios Gerasimou
Abstract:
We study the assignment problem in situations where, in addition to having ordinal preferences, agents also have *ordinal intensities*: they can make simple and internally consistent comparisons such as "I prefer $a$ to $b$ more than I prefer $c$ to $d$" without necessarily being able to quantify them. In this new informational social-choice environment we first introduce a rank-based criterion th…
▽ More
We study the assignment problem in situations where, in addition to having ordinal preferences, agents also have *ordinal intensities*: they can make simple and internally consistent comparisons such as "I prefer $a$ to $b$ more than I prefer $c$ to $d$" without necessarily being able to quantify them. In this new informational social-choice environment we first introduce a rank-based criterion that enables interpersonal comparability of such ordinal intensities. Building on this criterion, we define an allocation to be *"intensity-efficient"* if it is Pareto efficient with respect to the preferences induced by the agents' intensities and also such that, when another allocation assigns the same pairs of items to the same pairs of agents but in a "flipped" way, the former allocation assigns the commonly preferred item in every such pair to the agent who prefers it more. We present some first results on the (non-)existence of such allocations without imposing restrictions on preferences or intensities other than strictness.
△ Less
Submitted 31 January, 2024; v1 submitted 9 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
-
The Decision-Conflict Logit
Authors:
Georgios Gerasimou
Abstract:
We introduce the *decision-conflict logit*, a simple and disciplined extension of the logit with an outside option that assigns a menu-dependent utility to that option. The relative value of this utility at a menu could be interpreted as proxying decision difficulty and determines the probability of avoiding/delaying choice at that menu. We focus on two intuitively structured special cases of the…
▽ More
We introduce the *decision-conflict logit*, a simple and disciplined extension of the logit with an outside option that assigns a menu-dependent utility to that option. The relative value of this utility at a menu could be interpreted as proxying decision difficulty and determines the probability of avoiding/delaying choice at that menu. We focus on two intuitively structured special cases of the model that offer complementary insights, and argue that they explain a variety of observed choice-deferral effects that are caused by hard decisions. We conclude by illustrating the usability of the proposed modelling framework in applications.
△ Less
Submitted 10 August, 2023; v1 submitted 10 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
Status Quo Bias and the Decoy Effect: A Comparative Analysis in Choice under Risk
Authors:
Miguel Costa-Gomes,
Georgios Gerasimou
Abstract:
Inertia and context-dependent choice effects are well-studied classes of behavioural phenomena. While much is known about these effects in isolation, little is known about whether one of them "dominates" the other when both can potentially be present. Knowledge of any such dominance is relevant for effective choice architecture and descriptive modelling. We initiate this empirical investigation wi…
▽ More
Inertia and context-dependent choice effects are well-studied classes of behavioural phenomena. While much is known about these effects in isolation, little is known about whether one of them "dominates" the other when both can potentially be present. Knowledge of any such dominance is relevant for effective choice architecture and descriptive modelling. We initiate this empirical investigation with a between-subjects lab experiment in which each subject made a single decision over two or three money lotteries. Our experiment was designed to test for dominance between *status quo bias* and the *decoy effect*. We find strong evidence for status quo bias and no evidence for the decoy effect. We also find that status quo bias can be powerful enough so that, at the aggregate level, a fraction of subjects switch from being risk-averse to being risk-seeking. Survey evidence suggests that this is due to subjects focusing on the maximum possible amount when the risky lottery is the default and on the highest probability of winning the biggest possible reward when there is no default. The observed reversal in risk attitudes is explainable by a large class of Koszegi-Rabin (2006) reference-dependent preferences.
△ Less
Submitted 26 November, 2021; v1 submitted 26 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
