Showing 1–5 of 5 results for author: Gautam, R K

Heuristics for Influence Maximization with Tiered Influence and Activation thresholds

Authors: Rahul Kumar Gautam, Anjeneya Swami Kare, Durga Bhavani S

Abstract: The information flows among the people while they communicate through social media websites. Due to the dependency on digital media, a person shares important information or regular updates with friends and family. The set of persons on social media forms a social network. Influence Maximization (IM) is a known problem in social networks. In social networks, information flows from one person to an… ▽ More The information flows among the people while they communicate through social media websites. Due to the dependency on digital media, a person shares important information or regular updates with friends and family. The set of persons on social media forms a social network. Influence Maximization (IM) is a known problem in social networks. In social networks, information flows from one person to another using an underlying diffusion model. There are two fundamental diffusion models: the Independent Cascade Model (ICM) and the Linear Threshold Model (LTM). In this paper, we study a variant of the IM problem called Minimum Influential Seeds (MINFS) problem proposed by Qiang et al.[16]. It generalizes the classical IM problem with LTM as the diffusion model. Compared to IM, this variant has additional parameters: the influence threshold for each node and the propagation range. The propagation range is a positive integer that specifies how far the information can propagate from a node. A node on the network is not immediately influenced until it receives the same information from enough number of neighbors (influence threshold). Similarly, any node does not forward information until it receives the same information from a sufficient number of neighbors (activation threshold). Once a node becomes activated, it tries to activate or influence its neighbors. The MINFS problem aims to select the minimum number of initial spreader nodes such that all nodes of the graph are influenced. In this paper, we extend the study of the MINFS problem. We propose heuristics that construct seed sets based on the average degree of non-activated nodes, closest first, and backbone-based heaviest path. △ Less

Submitted 13 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

Interest Maximization in Social Networks

Authors: Rahul Kumar Gautam, Anjeneya Swami Kare, S. Durga Bhavani

Abstract: Nowadays, organizations use viral marketing strategies to promote their products through social networks. It is expensive to directly send the product promotional information to all the users in the network. In this context, Kempe et al. \cite{kempe2003maximizing} introduced the Influence Maximization (IM) problem, which identifies $k$ most influential nodes (spreader nodes), such that the maximum… ▽ More Nowadays, organizations use viral marketing strategies to promote their products through social networks. It is expensive to directly send the product promotional information to all the users in the network. In this context, Kempe et al. \cite{kempe2003maximizing} introduced the Influence Maximization (IM) problem, which identifies $k$ most influential nodes (spreader nodes), such that the maximum number of people in the network adopts the promotional message. Many variants of the IM problem have been studied in the literature, namely, Perfect Evangelising Set (PES), Perfect Awareness Problem (PAP), etc. In this work, we propose a maximization version of PAP called the \IM{} problem. Different people have different levels of interest in a particular product. This is modeled by assigning an interest value to each node in the network. Then, the problem is to select $k$ initial spreaders such that the sum of the interest values of the people (nodes) who become aware of the message is maximized. We study the \IM{} problem under two popular diffusion models: the Linear Threshold Model (LTM) and the Independent Cascade Model (ICM). We show that the \IM{} problem is NP-Hard under LTM. We give linear programming formulation for the problem under LTM. We propose four heuristic algorithms for the \IM{} problem: \LBE{} (\LB{}), Maximum Degree First Heuristic (\MD{}), \PBE{} (\PB{}), and Maximum Profit Based Greedy Heuristic (\MP{}). Extensive experimentation has been carried out on many real-world benchmark data sets for both diffusion models. The results show that among the proposed heuristics, \MP{} performs better in maximizing the interest value. △ Less

Submitted 12 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Approximation Algorithms for the Graph Burning on Cactus and Directed Trees

Authors: Rahul Kumar Gautam, Anjeneya Swami Kare, S. Durga Bhavani

Abstract: Given a graph $G=(V, E)$, the problem of Graph Burning is to find a sequence of nodes from $V$, called a burning sequence, to burn the whole graph. This is a discrete-step process, and at each step, an unburned vertex is selected as an agent to spread fire to its neighbors by marking it as a burnt node. A burnt node spreads the fire to its neighbors at the next consecutive step. The goal is to fin… ▽ More Given a graph $G=(V, E)$, the problem of Graph Burning is to find a sequence of nodes from $V$, called a burning sequence, to burn the whole graph. This is a discrete-step process, and at each step, an unburned vertex is selected as an agent to spread fire to its neighbors by marking it as a burnt node. A burnt node spreads the fire to its neighbors at the next consecutive step. The goal is to find the burning sequence of minimum length. The Graph Burning problem is NP-Hard for general graphs and even for binary trees. A few approximation results are known, including a $ 3$-approximation algorithm for general graphs and a $ 2$-approximation algorithm for trees. The Graph Burning on directed graphs is more challenging than on undirected graphs. In this paper, we propose 1) A $2.75$-approximation algorithm for a cactus graph (undirected), 2) A $3$-approximation algorithm for multi-rooted directed trees (polytree) and 3) A $1.905$-approximation algorithm for single-rooted directed tree (arborescence). We implement all the three approximation algorithms and the results are shown for randomly generated cactus graphs and directed trees. △ Less

Submitted 17 July, 2023; originally announced July 2023.

Comments: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2204.00772

Improved Approximation Algorithm for Graph Burning on Trees

Authors: Rahul Kumar Gautam, Anjeneya Swami Kare, Durga Bhavani S

Abstract: Given a graph $G=(V,E)$, the problem of \gb{} is to find a sequence of nodes from $V$, called burning sequence, in order to burn the whole graph. This is a discrete-step process, in each step an unburned vertex is selected as an agent to spread fire to its neighbors by marking it as a burnt node. A node that is burnt spreads the fire to its neighbors at the next consecutive step. The goal is to fi… ▽ More Given a graph $G=(V,E)$, the problem of \gb{} is to find a sequence of nodes from $V$, called burning sequence, in order to burn the whole graph. This is a discrete-step process, in each step an unburned vertex is selected as an agent to spread fire to its neighbors by marking it as a burnt node. A node that is burnt spreads the fire to its neighbors at the next consecutive step. The goal is to find the burning sequence of minimum length. The \gb{} problem is NP-Hard for general graphs and even for binary trees. A few approximation results are known, including a $3$-approximation algorithm for general graphs and a $2$- approximation algorithm for trees. In this paper, we propose an approximation algorithm for trees that produces a burning sequence of length at most $\lfloor 1.75b(T) \rfloor + 1$, where $b(T)$ is length of the optimal burning sequence, also called the burning number of the tree $T$. In other words, we achieve an approximation factor of $(\lfloor 1.75b(T) \rfloor + 1)/b(T)$. △ Less

Submitted 15 September, 2022; v1 submitted 2 April, 2022; originally announced April 2022.

Comments: We found an issue in the proof. We will submit after rectifying the proof

Faster Heuristics for Graph Burning

Authors: Rahul Kumar Gautam, Anjeneya Swami Kare, S. Durga Bhavani

Abstract: Graph burning is a process of information spreading through the network by an agent in discrete steps. The problem is to find an optimal sequence of nodes which have to be given information so that the network is covered in least number of steps. Graph burning problem is NP-Hard for which two approximation algorithms and a few heuristics have been proposed in the literature. In this work, we propo… ▽ More Graph burning is a process of information spreading through the network by an agent in discrete steps. The problem is to find an optimal sequence of nodes which have to be given information so that the network is covered in least number of steps. Graph burning problem is NP-Hard for which two approximation algorithms and a few heuristics have been proposed in the literature. In this work, we propose three heuristics, namely, Backbone Based Greedy Heuristic (BBGH), Improved Cutting Corners Heuristic (ICCH) and Component Based Recursive Heuristic (CBRH). These are mainly based on Eigenvector centrality measure. BBGH finds a backbone of the network and picks vertex to be burned greedily from the vertices of the backbone. ICCH is a shortest path based heuristic and picks vertex to burn greedily from best central nodes. The burning number problem on disconnected graphs is harder than on the connected graphs. For example, burning number problem is easy on a path where as it is NP-Hard on disjoint paths. In practice, large networks are generally disconnected and moreover even if the input graph is connected, during the burning process the graph among the unburned vertices may be disconnected. For disconnected graphs, ordering of the components is crucial. Our CBRH works well on disconnected graphs as it prioritizes the components. All the heuristics have been implemented and tested on several bench-mark networks including large networks of size more than $50$K nodes. The experimentation also includes comparison to the approximation algorithms. The advantages of our algorithms are that they are much simpler to implement and also several orders faster than the heuristics proposed in the literature. △ Less

Submitted 20 August, 2020; originally announced August 2020.

Comments: 16 pages