Dynamic Retrieval Augmented Generation of Ontologies using Artificial Intelligence (DRAGON-AI)
Authors:
Sabrina Toro,
Anna V Anagnostopoulos,
Sue Bello,
Kai Blumberg,
Rhiannon Cameron,
Leigh Carmody,
Alexander D Diehl,
Damion Dooley,
William Duncan,
Petra Fey,
Pascale Gaudet,
Nomi L Harris,
Marcin Joachimiak,
Leila Kiani,
Tiago Lubiana,
Monica C Munoz-Torres,
Shawn O'Neil,
David Osumi-Sutherland,
Aleix Puig,
Justin P Reese,
Leonore Reiser,
Sofia Robb,
Troy Ruem**,
James Seager,
Eric Sid
, et al. (5 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Background: Ontologies are fundamental components of informatics infrastructure in domains such as biomedical, environmental, and food sciences, representing consensus knowledge in an accurate and computable form. However, their construction and maintenance demand substantial resources and necessitate substantial collaboration between domain experts, curators, and ontology experts. We present Dyna…
▽ More
Background: Ontologies are fundamental components of informatics infrastructure in domains such as biomedical, environmental, and food sciences, representing consensus knowledge in an accurate and computable form. However, their construction and maintenance demand substantial resources and necessitate substantial collaboration between domain experts, curators, and ontology experts. We present Dynamic Retrieval Augmented Generation of Ontologies using AI (DRAGON-AI), an ontology generation method employing Large Language Models (LLMs) and Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG). DRAGON-AI can generate textual and logical ontology components, drawing from existing knowledge in multiple ontologies and unstructured text sources.
Results: We assessed performance of DRAGON-AI on de novo term construction across ten diverse ontologies, making use of extensive manual evaluation of results. Our method has high precision for relationship generation, but has slightly lower precision than from logic-based reasoning. Our method is also able to generate definitions deemed acceptable by expert evaluators, but these scored worse than human-authored definitions. Notably, evaluators with the highest level of confidence in a domain were better able to discern flaws in AI-generated definitions. We also demonstrated the ability of DRAGON-AI to incorporate natural language instructions in the form of GitHub issues.
Conclusions: These findings suggest DRAGON-AI's potential to substantially aid the manual ontology construction process. However, our results also underscore the importance of having expert curators and ontology editors drive the ontology generation process.
△ Less
Submitted 12 June, 2024; v1 submitted 17 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
Primer on the Gene Ontology
Authors:
Pascale Gaudet,
Nives Škunca,
James C. Hu,
Christophe Dessimoz
Abstract:
The Gene Ontology (GO) project is the largest resource for cataloguing gene function. The combination of solid conceptual underpinnings and a practical set of features have made the GO a widely adopted resource in the research community and an essential resource for data analysis. In this chapter, we provide a concise primer for all users of the GO. We briefly introduce the structure of the ontolo…
▽ More
The Gene Ontology (GO) project is the largest resource for cataloguing gene function. The combination of solid conceptual underpinnings and a practical set of features have made the GO a widely adopted resource in the research community and an essential resource for data analysis. In this chapter, we provide a concise primer for all users of the GO. We briefly introduce the structure of the ontology and explain how to interpret annotations associated with the GO.
△ Less
Submitted 4 February, 2016;
originally announced February 2016.
Gene Ontology: Pitfalls, Biases, Remedies
Authors:
Pascale Gaudet,
Christophe Dessimoz
Abstract:
The Gene Ontology (GO) is a formidable resource but there are several considerations about it that are essential to understand the data and interpret it correctly. The GO is sufficiently simple that it can be used without deep understanding of its structure or how it is developed, which is both a strength and a weakness. In this chapter, we discuss some common misinterpretations of the ontology an…
▽ More
The Gene Ontology (GO) is a formidable resource but there are several considerations about it that are essential to understand the data and interpret it correctly. The GO is sufficiently simple that it can be used without deep understanding of its structure or how it is developed, which is both a strength and a weakness. In this chapter, we discuss some common misinterpretations of the ontology and the annotations. A better understanding of the pitfalls and the biases in the GO should help users make the most of this very rich resource. We also review some of the misconceptions and misleading assumptions commonly made about GO, including the effect of data incompleteness, the importance of annotation qualifiers, and the transitivity or lack thereof associated with different ontology relations. We also discuss several biases that can confound aggregate analyses such as gene enrichment analyses. For each of these pitfalls and biases, we suggest remedies and best practices.
△ Less
Submitted 4 February, 2016;
originally announced February 2016.
